本研究之主要目的係為探討企業組織中策略領導能力、管理控制能力與知識發展能力之相互影響關係，以及這三項能力對於資源產出的影響關係。
研究的進行，係選定國立成功大學管理學院高階管理在職專班(EMBA)之在校學員來作為問卷調查對象，針對問卷資料所進行的研究分析，可獲致結論如下：
1. 策略領導、管理控制與知識發展等三項能力構念間的存在顯著互動關係。
2. 三項能力構念將會影響組織資源產出。其中，管理控制之財務面控制能力、策略領導之願景與策略能力以及知識發展之創新的實踐能力為三項最顯著影響因素。
3. 選擇三項個別能力構念中之重要影響因素，並將這些重要影響因素相乘，依此原則，可形成新變數，稱之為整體性能力衡量因素。與個別的能力構念之因素比較，整體性能力衡量因素對於組織資源產出具有更強的解釋能力。
4. 組織資源產出將會顯著影響對財務資源產出。
依據上述構念間互動關係之分析結果，本研究提出一項理論架構，稱之為「整合性的資源與能力發展架構--內燃機動力系統模型」，來解釋組織中資源與能力之相互影響關係，並描述有關組織資源之輸入、創造、轉換與累積，如同內燃機動力系統模型，將是一個持續循環之歷程。

The purpose of this study is to investigate the mutual influence relationships of strategic leadership capability, managerial control capability and knowledge development capability and also the influences of these capabilities on the resource outcome.
The study is performed though the questionnaire survey on the graduate student of EMBA of National Cheng-Kung University. According to the analysis of collected data, the conclusions could be drawn as following:
1. The capabilities of strategic leadership, managerial control and knowledge development are mutually influenced significantly.
2. The capabilities of strategic leadership, managerial control and knowledge development significantly influence the outcome of organizational resources. It is also found that, among these three capability constructs, the factors of financial control, vision and strategy, and innovation implementation are the significant ones to influence the outcome of organizational resource.
3. As selecting the significantly influencing factor from each of the capability constructs and being according to the principal of multiplying these factors, a new variable could be formed and identified as the factor of total capability evaluation. It is found that this new factor of total capability evaluation will be stronger in the explanation of organizational resource outcome as compared to the factors of single capability construct.
4. The outcomes of organizational resource significantly influence the outcome of financial resource.
According to the research findings as stated above, a theory scheme is proposed, which is called “An integrated development structure of resources and capabilities- model of internal-combustion power system”. This model could be used to explain the interaction relationships between resources and capabilities, and describe the process of input, creation, transfer and accumulation of resources is a continuous cycle similar to the operation of an internal-combustion power system.

1. Amit, R. & Paul Schoemaker, “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”, Strategic Management Journal, 1993
2. Barney, J. B., “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage”, Journal of Management 1991, Vol. 17, 99-120.
3. Badaracco, J., “The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances”, Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
4. Bird, A. and S. Beechler “Links Between Business Strategy and Human Resource Management Strategy in U.S.-based Japanese Subsidiaries: An Empirical Investigation”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.2 (3), pp. 60-79, 1995
5. Connor, P. E. “Dimensions in Modern Management” Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1974, pp.22-27.
6. Davenport, T.H., and Prusak, L., “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know”, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1998
7. Dierickx, I., K. and Cool, “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive and Advantage”, Management Science, Vol.35, No.12, 1,989
8. Drucker, P. F., “Management: Task, Responsibilities and Practice.” London: Heinemann. (20). 1974, pp.3-4.
9. Drucker, P. F, “The Coming of the New Organization”, Harvard Business Review , 64, no. 1, 1988
10. Drucker, P. F, “The New Productivity Challenge”, Harvard Business Review , 67, no. 6, 1991.
11. Drucker P. F, “The New Society of Organization”, Harvard Business Review , 68, no. 5, 1992.
12. Durbin, A. J., “Leadership: Research Finding, Practice, and Skill”, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998
13. Fiedler, F. F., “A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness”, New York: Mcgrraw-Hill, 1,967
14. Goldratt, E. M., “Theory of Contraint”, New York: North River Press, 1990
15. Hafeez, K., Y. Zhang and N. Malark, “Determining Key Capabilities of a Firm Using Analytic Hierarchy process,” Int. J. Production Economics, 2002
16. Harrison, J. S., “Strategic Management of Resources & Relationships”, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003
17. Hitt, M. A., R. D. Ireland and R. E. Hoskisson, “Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization (Concept) ”, South-Western College Publishing, 2001
18. Holtshouse, D., “Knowledge Research Issues,” California Management Review, Berkeley, Vol.40 No.3, pp.277-280, 1998.
19. Holsapple, C.W. and M. Singh, “The Knowledge Chain Model: Activities for Competitiveness,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.20 No.1, pp.77-98, 2001
20. House, R. J. and R. N. Adita, “The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? ” Journal of Management, Vol. 23, no. 3, 1997, p. 445
21. House, R. J., “A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Sep. 1971, and R. J. House, “Path-Goal Theory of Theory: Lessons, Legacy, and a Reformulated Theory’, Leadership Quarterly, Fall 1996, pp. 323-52
22. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action”, Harvard Business School, 1996
23. Koontz H., “Toward a Unified Theory of Management”, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964
24. Koontz H. & Cysil O’Donnell, “Management： A System and Contingency Analysis of Managerial Functions”, N.Y. McGraw-Hill, 1976
25. Kotter, J. P., “What Leaders Really Do,” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1990, pp. 103-11, and Kotter, J. P. , “A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management” New York: Free Press, 1990
26. Nonaka, I., “The Knowledge-Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, pp.96-104, 1991.
27. Nonoka, I. and H. Takeuchi, “The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation”, Oxford University Press, New York, 1995
28. Porter, M.E., “Competitive Advantage”, New York: Free Press, 1985
29. Robbins, S. P., David A. De Cenzo, “Fundamentals of Management”, Prentice-Hall. Inc., 1998
30. Robbins, S. P., “Organization Behavior,” Prentice Hall International Inc., 2000 ,
31. Senge, “Leader’s New Work”; C. C. Manz and H. P. Sims, “Super Leadership”, Organization Dynamics 17, No. 4, pp. 8-36, 1991
32. Shin, M., T. Holden and A. Schmidt, “From Knowledge theory to management practice: towards an integrated approach,” Information Processing and Management, Vol.37, pp.335-355, 2000
33. Stogdill, R. M. & A. E. Coons, “Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Research Monograph No. 88. (Columbus: Ohio State University, Bureau of Business Research), 1957
34. Wernerfelt, B., “A Resource-based View of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.5, 171-180, 1984
35. Wiig, K., Knowledge Management Foundations, Arlington: Schema Press, 1993

1. 李淑敏，“證據醫學之應用研究”，國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文，2002。
2. 許士軍，“管理學”，東華書局，2001
3. John K. Kotter, “領導與變革,” 中國生產力中心出版, 2001, pp. 79-90
4. 吳萬益、林清河（2000），「企業研究方法」，華泰書局，初版。
5. 彼得杜拉克(Drucker, Peter F.)，“經理人的專業與挑戰”，天下遠見出版社，1999。
6. 陳建宇，“台灣中小企業創業導向、組織資源與能力對企業績效之影響”，國立成功大學管理學院高階管理在職專班碩士論文，2003
7. 黃仁祈，“企業文化、組織學習、組織創新與企業核心能力間之關係研究”，國立成功大學管理學院高階管理在職專班碩士論文，2003
8. 吳思華，“策略九說”，臉譜出版社，2000