簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝馨慧
Hsieh, Hsin-hui
論文名稱: 科技性醫療服務接觸滿意度之研究:以科技準備度為干擾變數
Clinical Staffs’ Satisfaction with Technology-based Service Encounters in the Healthcare Industry -Technology Readiness as a Moderator
指導教授: 張心馨
Chang, Hsin-Hsin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞: 知覺價值服務品質科技準備度科技基礎服務接觸滿意度
外文關鍵詞: Technology-based Service Encounter, Perceived Value, Satisfaction, Technology Readiness Service Quality
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本篇研究主要探討當醫院導入一套新科技產品後,醫院員工對此科技產品滿意度的衡量。當醫院導入此一科技產品後,員工會藉由產品服務品質及自身知覺價值,來衡量對其產品的滿意度。此外,本研究又探討當員工具備不同的科技準備度時,是否會影響醫院導入系統的滿意度;亦即檢測科技準備度在員工使用科技性服務接觸後對服務品質與知覺價值,是否產生干擾作用。資料分析以結構方程模型作為檢驗員工服務品質、知覺價值與滿意度形成之基本模型,接著再以階層迴歸來進一步檢驗科技準備度所產生的干擾效果。資料分析結果發現,當醫院導入新的科技產品,員工對此商品具有正面的服務品質的肯定,亦能有效提升自身知覺價值,再進一步形成高度的滿意度。不過,員工本身所具備的科技準備度,亦會影響以科技產品與服務品質之間的連結,但對科技產品與知覺價值間的連結不具影響力。因此,本研究建議醫院高層需慎選能提供最適產品的供應商,以及提供充分教育訓練來提升醫院員工的科技準備度,增益新產品導入時員工的滿意度。

    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the level of satisfaction for hospital clinical staffs after they have encountered a technology-based service adopted by the hospital in which they work. Clinical staff members use technology-based services, which can affect service quality and perceived value for both the staffs and the patients. This study uses technology-based service encounters in hospital as a context in which to investigate the moderating effect of technology readiness on service quality and perceived value. The framework of the satisfaction formation
    process was tested by structural equation analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis was then used to examine the moderating effects of technology readiness. The results of this study indicate that technology-based service encounters will positively increase service quality and perceived value toward the technology, and in turn, both of them will positively increase the satisfaction level of the clinical staffs involved. However, technology readiness weakens the relationship between
    technology-based service encounters and service quality, and it has an insignificant impact on the relationship between technology-based service encounters and perceived value. Therefore, this study suggests that hospital management should choose reputable manufacturers who can provide useful products and should also provide enough educational training to increase the the level of preparedness necessary for clinical staffs to make use of the technology they purchase and want their staffs to use.

    中文摘要………………………………...………I ABSTRACT…………………...II 誌謝…………………...…………..………III TABLE OF CONTENT……………………………...……...………IV LIST OF TABLE……………..………V LIST OF FIGURE…………………..…...…...…VI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background and Motivation……….………………..1 1.2 Research Objective……….…...……………...….....3 1.3 Research Process…...……...……....…...……………..3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Technology-based Service Encounter…...………….…...………….…...………………..………...……...…5 2.2 Service Quality…...………….…...………….…...………….…...………….…...…………..…...…………..7 2.3 Perceived Value…...………….…...………….…...………….…...………….…...……………..…….…….10 2.4 Satisfaction…...………….…...………….…...………….…...………….…...…………….............…….….13 2.5 Technology Readiness…...………….…...………….…...………….…...……………….………...………..16 2.6 The Hypotheses Development………………….…...…………………………………….…...………………..…...….……………...18 2.6.1 Relationship Between Technology-based Service Encounter and Service Quality………….…….18 2.6.2 Relationship Between Technology-based Service Encounter and Perceived Value………….……20 2.6.3 Relationship Between Service Quality and Satisfaction……........…….................……...…………21 2.6.4 Relationship Between Perceived Value and Satisfaction…….………...............………..…………22 2.6.5 Moderating Effects of Technology Readiness………...………...……...……………..…...………23 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN 3.1 Conceptual Framework…...……….…...………….…..………….…...…………..….….……….………..26 3.2 Variable Measurement………...…………...……..…………...…………...………………...…..….…..…26 3.3 Research Hypothesis to be tested………...…………...…………………….…...….…....………...........…31 3.4 Questionnaire Design………...……….…………...…...…...................….....................................……...…32 3.5 Pilot Test of the Questionnaire………...……..………...…………...………..…………………………….33 3.6. Sampling Design and Data Collection………...………...…………...………...……………………………36 V 3.7. Data Analysis………...…………...…...………………...…………...……………….……...……...…36 3.7.1 Descriptive Statistics Analysis………...…………...…...…………........………….………………..36 3.7.2 Structural Equation Model………...…………...…………...………...……….……...........………..36 3.7.3 ANOVA Analysis………...…………...…………...………..…………...……………….………….37 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS OF DATA ANALYSIS 4.1 Sample Characteristics…...………….…...………….…...………….…...…….………………….…….…..39 4.2 Measurement Model Analysis………...….……...…………...…………...................................………41 4.2.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis......………….…...………….…...…………………………...………41 4.2.2 Convergent Validity and Reliability Analysis………...…………...……………………………...…47 4.2.3 Discriminant Validity Analysis………...……….………...…………...………………...…..………48 4.3 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis………...…………..…...………………………..….………...…48 4.3.1 Path Analysis of SEM Full Model......………….…...………….…………..……….………………51 4.4 Moderated Regression Analysis………...…………....…………...………………...…..…...…...…….…52 4.5 Additional Analysis……...…………...………………..………………………...…...……..……...……..54 4.5.1 Path Analysis of Additional Model......………….…...………………………..……………………57 4.6 Results of Hypothesis Testing...…………...…………...……………...………..……..……...…...………59 4.7 ANOVA Analysis………...…………...…………….….…………...……………….….............……..…60 CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS 5.1 Discussion………...………….…………...………………………………………………….………….… 67 5.2 Conclusion and Suggestion………...…………...………...…………...………………………..…….....…69 5.3 Theoretical Implication……...…………...…………...…………...……………………...……..………....70 5.4 Managerial Implication………...…………...…………...…………...……………………………..………71 5.5 Limitations and Future Research…………………...…………...……………………………………..…...74 5.6 Additional Discussion………...………......……………………………………………...……..……….… 75 REFERENCES…...…………......………….…...………….…...………….…...………….……...…………..…….… 78 APPENDIX…...………….…...………….…...………….…...………….…...………….…...……………………..…..84

    Abdolrasulnia, M., Menachemi, N., Shewchuk, R. M., Giner, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Brook, R. G.,
    2008). Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians. Health Care
    Management Review , 33 (3), 243-252
    Aga, M., & Safakli, O. V. (2007). An empirical investigation of service quality and customer
    satisfaction in professional accounting firms: Evidence from North Cyprus. Problems and
    Perceptive in Management, 5(13), 84-98
    Akter, M. S., Upal, M., & Hani, U. (2008). Service quality perception and satisfaction: A study over
    sub-urban public hospitalist in Banglandesh. Journal of Services Research, special issue
    Aladwani, A. (2002). Organizational actions, computer attitudes, and end-user satisfaction in public
    organizations: An empirical study. Journal of End User Computing, 14 (1), 42-50.
    Aydin, S., & Ozer, G. (2005). The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish mobile
    telecommunication market. European Journal of Marketing, 39 (7), 910-925
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of St Ructural equation models. Journal of the
    Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94
    Bailey, J., & Pearson, S. (1983). Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer users
    satisfaction. Management Science, 29 (5), 530-545
    Barger, P. B., & Grandey, A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional
    contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1229–1238.
    Baroudi, J. J., Olson, M. H., & Ives, P. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user
    involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of the ACM, 29(3),
    232-238.
    Bell, S. J., Seigyoung, A., & Karen, S. (2005). Customer relationship dynamics: Service quality and
    customer loyalty in the context of varying levels of customer expertise and switching costs.
    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33 (2), 169-83.
    Bergeron, F., Rivard, S., & DeSerre, L. (1990). Investigating the support role of the information
    center. MIS Quarterly, 247-260.
    Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., & Meuter, M. L (2000). Technology infusion in service encounters.
    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 139–149
    Brady, M.K., & Cronin, J.J. (2001). Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service
    quality: A hierarchical approach. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 34–49.
    Brown, S.P., & Chin, W.W. (2004). Satisfying and retaining customers through independent service
    representatives. Decision Sciences, 35, 527–550.
    Cengiz, E., & Kirkbir, F. (2007). Customer perceived value. Problem and Perspectives in
    Management, 5 (3), 252-268.
    Chakrabarty, S., Whitten, D., & Green, K. (2008). Understanding service quality and relationship
    quality in is outsourcing: Client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and
    the task-technology-structure fit. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48 (2), 1-15
    Chang, H. H., & Chang, S. C. (2008). An assessment of technology-based service encounter &
    network security on the e-health care systems of medical centre in Taiwnan. BMC Health
    Service Research, 8 (87), 1-13
    Chiu, C. M., Chiu, C. S., & Chang, H. C. (2007). Examining the integrated influence of fairness and
    quality on learners’ satisfaction and Web-based learning continuance intention. Information
    Systems Journal, 17(3), 271-287
    Dabholkar, P.A. (2000). Technology in service delivery: Implications for self-service and service
    support. In T. A. Swartz & D. Iacobucci (eds.), Handbook of Service Marketing & Management,
    London,UK: Sage, 103-104
    DelliFraine, J. L., Dansky, K. H., & Rumberger, J. S. (2006). Can organizational support for
    technology influence job satisfaction? Health Care Management Review, 31(4), 300-307
    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent
    variable. Information System Research, 3(1), 60-95.
    Drennan, J., & Mc-CollKennedy, J. R. (2003). The relationship between internet use and perceived
    performance in retail and professional service firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 295-311.
    Ekrem, C., & Kirbir, F. (2007). Customer perceived value: The development of multiple item scale
    in hospitals, Problems and Perspective in Management, 5(3), 252- 268
    Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable
    variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39-50.
    Froehle, C. M., & Roth, A. V. (2004). New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the
    technology-mediated customer service experience. Journal of Operations Management, 22, 1-
    21.
    Grewal, D., Monroe, K.B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effect of price comparison advertising on
    buyers’ perception of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intention. Journal of
    Marketing, 62 (April), 46-59.
    Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of
    Marketing, 18(4), 36–44.
    Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. M., & Roos, I. (2005). The effects of customer satisfaction,
    relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. Journal of Marketing,
    69, 210-218.
    Hair, J, F., William, C. B., Barry, J. B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data
    Analysis (6th eds.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1988). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th
    eds.). Upper Seddle River, New Jersey, USA. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
    Host, V., & Andersen, M. K. (2004). Modelling customer satisfaction in mortgage credit companies.
    International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22 (1), 26-42
    Ibanez, V. A., Hartmann, P., & Calvo, P. Z. (2006). Antecedents of customer loyalty in residential
    energy markets: Service quality, satisfaction, trust and switching costs. The Service Industries
    Journal, 26 (6), 633-650.
    Igbaria, M., & Nachman, S. A. (1990). Correlates of user satisfaction with end user computing.
    Information and Management, 19(2), 73-82.
    Lehtinen, U., & Lehtinen, J.R. (1991). Two approaches to service quality dimensions. The Services
    Industries Journal, 11, 287–303.
    Li, P., Bahensky, J. A., Jaana, M., & Ward, M. M. (2008). Role of multihospital system
    membership in electronic medical record adoption. Health Care Manage Review, 33(2), 169-177
    Lin, W. T., & Shao B. B. M. (2000). The relationship between user participation and system
    success: A simultaneous contingency approach. Information and Management, 37(6), 283- 295.
    McDougall, G. H., & Levesque, T. (2000). Customer satisfaction with services: Putting perceived
    value into the equation. Journal of Services Marketing, 14 (5), 392-410
    Menachemi, N., Chukmaitov, A., Saunders, C., & Brooks, R. B. (2008). Hospital quality of care:
    Does information technology matter? The relationship between information technology adoption
    and quality of care. Health Care Manage Review, 33(1), 51-59.
    Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Roundtree, R. I., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Self-service technolgy:
    Understanding customer satisfaction with technology-based service encounter. Journal of
    Marketing, 64, 50-64
    Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and
    copying strategy. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (5), 123-145
    Monroe, K. (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Moore, R., Jackson, M. J., & Wilkes, R. B. (2007). End-user computing strategy: An examination
    of its impact on end-user satisfaction. Academy of Strategic Management Journal , 6(3), 69-89
    Nunnally, J.C., (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Oliver, R.L. (1980). A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction.
    Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460–469.
    Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI). Journal of Service Research, 2 (4),
    307-320.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the
    SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67 (4), 420-450
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1998). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for
    measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 12-40
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its
    implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.
    Piligrimiene, Z. (2008). Different perspectives on health care quality: Is the consensus possible?
    Economics of Engineering Decisions, 1(56), 104-111.
    Raymond, L. (1987). Validating and applying user satisfaction as a measure of MIS success in
    small organizations. Information and Management, 12 (4) , 173-179.
    Saravanan, R., & Pao, K. S. P. (2007). Measurement of service quality from the customer’s
    perspective -- An empirical study. Total Quality Management , 18 (4), 435-449.
    Schumann, J. H., Keller, N. V., Wangenheim, F. V., & Holzmuller, H. H. (2007). Technology
    mediation in service delivery: A new typology and an agenda for managers and academics. 2007
    American Marketing Association Winter Educators’ Conference.
    Shonk, D. J., (2008). Service quality, satisfaction, and intent to return in event sport tourism.
    Journal of Sport management, 22, 587-602.
    Sohail, M. S., Roy, M. H., Saeed, M., & Ahmed, Z. U. (2007). Determinants of service quality in
    the hospitality industry: The case of Malaysian hotels. Journal of Accounting-Business &
    Management , 14, 64-74.
    Staples, D.S., Wong, I., & Seddon, P. B. (2002). Having expectations of information systems
    benefits that match received benefits: Does it really matter? Information and Management, 40(2),
    115-131.
    Tam, J. L. M. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: An integrative
    model. Journal of Marketing Management, 20, 897 - 917
    Timmer, Y., & Rymon, T. (2007). To do or not to do: The dilemma of technology-based service
    improvement. Journal of Service Quality, 21 (2), 99-111
    Verhoef, P. C., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals
    and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: Dose age of relationship matter?
    Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 202-216.
    Weise, G. (1975). Psychologische Leistungstests, Germany: Hogrefe, Göttingen,
    Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology
    acceptance. Information System Research, 16 (1), 85-102.
    Woodruff, R.B. (1997) Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the
    Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 139–53.
    Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of
    switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21 (10), 799-822
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and
    synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing , 52 (3), 2-22
    Zhu, F.X., Wymer, W., & Chen, I. (2002). IT-based services and quality in consumer banking.
    International Journal of Service Industry Management, 13, 69–90.
    Zviran, M., & Erlich, Z. (2003). Measuring is user satisfaction: Review and implications.
    Communications of Association for Information Systems, 12, 81-103

    無法下載圖示 校內:2108-10-09公開
    校外:2108-10-09公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE