在現有的利害關係人地圖的繪製範例中，專案執行時往往以聚焦議題為導向去分析利害關係人。常以單一視角分析利害關係人會造成對議題以及對利害關係人的認知模糊，分析不完善的現象出現。然而，一般社會型議題所涉及的問題會是多元且複雜的。且現有利害關係人地圖的繪製方法在實用性和客觀性上也經常受到質疑。故本研究的目的是：嘗試以問題為導向，開發繪製利害關係人地圖的新方法。
本研究將以設計思考理論為基礎，通過議題一:「設計思考工作坊：發現洞察青少年菸害防治問題」，捕捉洞察青少年菸害防治過程中的問題。後通過質性分析對問題進行歸類與合併，歸納出青少年菸害防治的18個核心問題與6個關鍵利害關係人。進一步，以青少年菸害防治的核心問題為導向，運用數量化Ⅲ類分析，對核心問題與關鍵利害關係人進行分析分類與定位。根據量化分析結果，可繪製出問題與利害關係人之相對關係，即「青少年菸害防治問題之利害關係人地圖」。其結果，本研究整合出7個構面，對18個核心問題與6個關鍵利害關係人進行綜合討論與評價。最終提出 一套以問題為導向的利害關係人地圖創新繪製系統(Problem-based—Stakeholders-map Innovative Mapping System.簡稱P-SIMS)。此系統可幫助專案管理者多元且動態地解析議題，洞察創新解決方案，制定更全面更有針對性的溝通計畫與策略。
為了檢驗P-SIMS方法的可行性及優勢，本研究將通過議題二:「設計思考工作坊：社區遊樂設施創意設計前期洞察課程」來進行驗證。後透過與現有利害關係人繪製技巧的比對發現，P-SIMS可有效解決現有利害關係人地圖視角單一、主觀評測的問題，並且提升了利害關係人地圖的集成性與應用的可擴展性。

In the existing examples of stakeholder mapping, the project implementation is often subject-based to analyze stakeholders. Analyzing stakeholders from a single perspective will lead to the vague understanding of the subject and stakeholders, and imperfect analysis. However, the issues involved in general social issues will be diverse and complex. And the existing stakeholder mapping approaches are often questioned in terms of practicability and objectivity. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to try to develop a new approach for mapping stakeholders based on problems.
Based on the design thinking theory, this study will explore the problems in the process of adolescent tobacco hazards prevention through subject 1: “Design Thinking Workshop: Discover Insight for Adolescent Tobacco Hazards Prevention Issue”. After that, the problems were classified and merged through qualitative analysis, and 18 core issues and 6 key stakeholders of ATHP were summarized. Further, based on the core issues of ATHP, quantification theory type III analysis is used to analyze, classify and locate the core issues and key stakeholders. According to the results of quantitative analysis, the relative relationship between the problem and stakeholders can be drawn, that is, the “stakeholder map of adolescent tobacco hazards prevention”. As a result, this study integrates 7 aspects to comprehensively discuss and evaluate 18 core issues and 6 key stakeholders. Finally, “Problem-based—Stakeholders-map Innovative Mapping System (P-SIMS)” is proposed, which can help project managers to analyze issues diversely and dynamically, gain insight into innovative solutions, and formulate more comprehensive and targeted communication plans and strategies.
In order to test the feasibility and advantages of the P-SIMS approach, this study will be verified by subject 2: “Design Thinking Workshop: Preliminary Insight Course of Creative Design of Community Recreational Facilities”. Later, through the comparison with the existing stakeholder mapping skills, it is found that P-SIMS can effectively solve the problems of single perspective and subjective evaluation of the existing stakeholder map, and improve the integration and application scalability of the stakeholder map.

王可越， 稅琳琳 ，薑浩 (2017). 設計思考創新引導. 北京：清華大學出版社。[Wang, K. Y., Shui, L. L., & Jiang,H. (2017). Design thinking innovation guidance. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.]
大隅昇. (2005). 対応分析法・数量化法 III 類の考え方. テキスト・マイニング研究会, http://www. wordminer. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/63_18. pdf. [Noboru Osumi. (2005). Correspondence Analysis Method / Quantification Theory Type III Concept.Text Mining Study Group,http://www. wordminer. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/63_18. pdf. ]
菅民郎. (2017). 例題と Excel 演習で学ぶ多変量解析 因子分析・コレスポンデンス分析・クラスター分析 編. 株式会社 オーム社.[Tamio Kan.(2017).Multivariate analysis learned from examples and Excel exercises: Factor analysis, correspondence analysis, cluster analysis,eds., Ohmsha Publisher.]
Andersen, E. S., Grude, K. V., & Haug, T. (2009). Goal directed project management: effective techniques and strategies. Kogan Page Publishers.
Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253-270.
Bennett, C., & Rosner, D. K. (2018). The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the Other. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems.
Bland, D. (2016). Agile coaching tip–What is an empathy map?. Retrieved August, 15, 2016.
Brooks-Harris, J. E., & Stock-Ward, S. R. (1999). Workshops: Designing and facilitating experiential learning. Sage Publications.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6), 84.
Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of product innovation management, 28(3), 381-383.
Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43.
Billestrup, J., Stage, J., Bruun, A., Nielsen, L., & Nielsen, K. S. (2014, September). Creating and using personas in software development: experiences from practice. In International Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering (pp. 251-258). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Capra, M. G. (2005, September). Factor analysis of card sort data: an alternative to hierarchical cluster analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 49, No. 5, pp. 691-695). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Calvert, S. (1995). Managing stakeholders. The commercial project manager, 214-222.
Chen, M. L., Chou, L. N., & Zheng, Y. C. (2017). Providing a Clean Environment for Adolescents: Evaluation of the Tobacco Hazards Prevention Act in Taiwan. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(6), 634.
Chen, J. M., Hwang, B. F., Chen, Y. C., & Lee, Y. L. (2014). Active smoking, environmental tobacco smoke and bronchitic symptoms among adolescents in Taiwan: a prospective cohort study. Preventive medicine, 65, 116-121.
Clarkson, M. B. (2016). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance (pp. 243-274). University of Toronto Press.
Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. In Software-Ergonomie’99 (pp. 17-17). Vieweg+ Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Council, D. (2005). The “double diamond”design process model. Design Council.
Council, B. D. (2016). " Eleven lessons. A study of the design process.
Crosby, B. (1992). Stakeholder analysis: a vital tool for strategic managers. USAID's Implementing Policy Change Project.
Dam, R., & Siang, T. (2018). What is design thinking and why is it so popular. Interaction Design Foundation.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Ferreira, B., Silva, W., Oliveira Jr, E. A., & Conte, T. (2015, July). Designing Personas with Empathy Map. In SEKE (Vol. 152).
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2008). Managing for stakeholders. Yale University Press.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of management studies, 39(1), 1-21.
Giordano, F. B., Morelli, N., De Götzen, A., & Hunziker, J. (2018). The stakeholder map: A conversation tool for designing people-led public services. In Service Design and Innovation Conference: Proof of Concept. Linköping University Electronic Press.
Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002, June). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proc. PDC (Vol. 2, pp. 144-152).
Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Educational measurement: issues and practice, 12(3), 38-47.
Han, J. X., Ma, M. Y., & Hsieh, E. C. F. (2019). A New Approach for Mapping Stakeholders.
Hayashi, C. (1956). Theory and example of quantification (II). Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 4, 19-30.
Hoffman, D. L., & Franke, G. R. (1986). Correspondence analysis: graphical representation of categorical data in marketing research. Journal of marketing Research, 23(3), 213-227.
Ittermann, T., Thamm, M., Schipf, S., John, U., Rettig, R., & Völzke, H. (2013). Relationship of smoking and/or passive exposure to tobacco smoke on the association between serum thyrotropin and body mass index in large groups of adolescents and children. Thyroid, 23(3), 262-268.
IDEO, E. (2015). The field guide to human-centered design: design kit.
Jepsen, A. L., & Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International journal of project management, 27(4), 335-343.
Junginger, S. (2006). Change in the making: Organizational change through human-centered product development. ProQuest.
Kettunen, J. (2014). The stakeholder map in higher education. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 78, 34.
Lee, G. C., Kim, Y. J., Shin, Y. K., Eun, B. L., Park, S. H., & Tockgo, Y. C. (1997). The state of smoking and alcohol usein Korean adolescent. Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society, 40(3), 307-317.
Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L. (2018). The design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. John Wiley & Sons.
Little, M. A., Pokhrel, P., Sussman, S., Derefinko, K. J., Bursac, Z., & Rohrbach, L. A. (2017). Factors Associated with the Adoption of Tobacco Cessation Programmes in Schools. Journal of Smoking Cessation, 12(1), 55-62.
Ma, J., & LeRouge, C. (2007). Introducing user profiles and personas into information systems development.
Marzena.(2019).How the Design Thinking method can help to engage project stakeholders. Retrieved from https://www.m-powered.eu/how-the-design-thinking-method-can-help-to-engage-project-stakeholders/
Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group guidebook (Vol. 1). Sage publications.
Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual review of sociology, 22(1), 129-152.
Nikander, J. B., Liikkanen, L. A., & Laakso, M. (2014). The preference effect in design concept evaluation. Design Studies, 35(5), 473-499.
Norman, D. (2010). Design thinking: A useful myth. Retrieved January, 25, 2015.
Nielsen, L., Nielsen, K. S., Stage, J., & Billestrup, J. (2013, September). Going global with personas. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 350-357). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Ohiwa, H., Kawai, K., & Koyama, M. (1990). Idea processor and the KJ method. Journal of Information Processing, 13(1), 44-48.
Park, H. K. (1967). The social-politic consideration about youngmen's drinking and smoking. J Korean Med Assoc, 10, 545-548.
Poorman, P. B. (2002). Biography and role playing: Fostering empathy in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 32-36.
Poursafa, P., Mansourian, M., Motlagh, M. E., Ardalan, G., & Kelishadi, R. (2014). Is air quality index associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents? The CASPIAN-III study. Environmental research, 134, 105-109.
Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Weinberg, U. (2009). Design-thinking. Landsberg am Lech: Mi-Fachverlag.
Patrick Grégoire. (2019). Stakeholders Analysis: Definitions, Tools and Techniques. Retrieved from https://www.boreal-is.com/blog/what-is-stakeholders-analysis/
Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2010). The persona lifecycle: keeping people in mind throughout product design. Elsevier.
Reich, B. H., & Wee, S. Y. (2006). Searching for Knowledge in the PMBOK® Guide. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 11-26.
Self, J. A. (2019). Communication through design sketches: Implications for stakeholder interpretation during concept design. Design Studies, 63, 1-36.
Schein, E. H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Scupin, R. (1997). The KJ method: A technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese ethnology. Human organization, 233-237.
Spool, J. M. (2004). The KJ-technique: A group process for establishing priorities. User interface engineering.
Steinert, Y., Boillat, M., Meterissian, S., Liben, S., & McLeod, P. J. (2008). Developing successful workshops: a workshop for educators. Medical teacher, 30(3), 328-330.
Stickdorn, M., Hormess, M. E., Lawrence, A., & Schneider, J. (2018). This is service design doing: applying service design thinking in the real world. " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
Ulrich, K. T. (2003). Product design and development. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Utamura, S., Vontin, N., Takeda, K., & Hirabaru, S. (2018). Global Roll-out of Unique Methods and Tools for Co-creation Workshops. FUJITSU Sci. Tech. J, 54(1), 40-45.
Walker, D. H., Bourne, L. M., & Shelley, A. (2008). Influence, stakeholder mapping and visualization. Construction management and economics, 26(6), 645-658.
Wang, Y. S., Lee, W. L., & Hsu, T. H. (2017). Using netnography for the study of role-playing in female online games: Interpretation of situational context model. Internet Research.
Weaver, P. (2006). A Brief History of Scheduling - Back to the Future. Retrieved from http://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/Resources_Papers_042.htm
Weaver.(2019).A Brief History of Stakeholder and Stakeholder Map. Retrieved from https://www.mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF_Papers/P073_Stakeholder_Mapping.pdf
Yan, W., Chen, C. H., Chang, D., & Chong, Y. T. (2009). A stakeholder-oriented innovative product conceptualization strategy based on fuzzy integrals. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(2), 201-209.
Zhang, H., Guerrero, C., Wheatley, D., & Lee, Y. S. (2010, September). Privacy issues and user attitudes towards targeted advertising: A focus group study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 54, No. 19, pp. 1416-1420). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.