簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許再文
Hsu, Tsai-Wen
論文名稱: 柳葉菜科水丁香屬小果組的親緣關係
Phylogenetics of the Genus Ludwigia Section Microcarpium (Onagraceae)
指導教授: 蔣鎮宇
Chiang, Tzen-Yuh
共同指導教授: 彭鏡毅
Peng, Ching-I
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 生物科學與科技學院 - 生命科學系
Department of Life Sciences
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 水丁香屬柳葉菜科親緣關係小果組
外文關鍵詞: Ludwigia, Onagraceae, Phylogenetics, Section Microcarpium
相關次數: 點閱:66下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 柳葉菜科(Onagraceae)植物泛分布於世界各地,約含有7族17屬652種,其中水丁香屬(Ludwigia)植物泛分布於全球熱帶至溫帶地區的溼地,含有23組81種,其中小果組(section Microcarpium)含有14種,除 L. stricta特產於古巴外,其餘種類主要分佈於美國東南部,所有種類皆生長於積水地、淺水池、湖、河、溪、瀉湖、沼澤、潮濕的牧場或草原、排水或灌溉溝渠與森林內的沼澤。本研究取全部14種小果組水丁香以葉綠體DNA atpB-rbcL 基因間的非轉譯區間序列與細胞核的核糖體DNA (nrDNA)內轉錄區間(Internal Transcribed Spacer, ITS)的序列,進行小果組植物親緣關係之分析。由ITS分析結果除L. stricta因所得結果無法分析外,針對其餘13個種類以ITS序列進行親緣關係,分析結果可分成兩個主要類群,第一個主要類群由方果類群(L. alata, L. sufruticosa, L. lanceolata)及一新種L. pseudoalata,與毛果水丁香複合群(L. pilosa complex, L. pilosa 與 L. ravenii)組成;毛果水丁香(L. pilosa)與雷氏水丁香(L. ravenii)由分析資料顯示確為已分化分類群,但彼此親緣關係接近。第二個主要類群則由其他種類組成,可得到以下幾個結果,(1)是L. polycarpa、L. glandulosa類群與有瓣類群(L. linearis, L. linifolia)為分化明顯的類群,其中L. glandulosa類群包含有L. glandulosa及其亞種 L. glandulosa ssp. brachycarpa,分析顯示這兩個分類群應已分化;(2)為圓果水丁香(L. sphaerocarpa)與該種類與其他種類的複雜情形,顯示該物種應為雜交起源,並與其他物種尚有複雜的基因交流;(3)為小葉類群(L. curtissii, L. simpsonii, L. microcarpa),結果顯示小果水丁香(L. microcarpa)與另兩種分化明顯,柯氏水丁香Ludwigia curtissii與辛氏水丁香(L. simpsonii)可能為同一種類。

    Onagraceae are widely distributed in the world, which include about 7 tribes, 17 genera, and 652 species. Genus Ludwigia are widely distributed in wetlands of tropical and temperate regions in the world, which include 23 sections and 81 species. The section Microcarpium has 14 species, all are mainly in ES of U.S.A. excepting that L. stricta is endemic to Cuba. All species of Ludwigia section Microcarpium grow at wetlands, including habitats of shallow ponds, lakes, creeks, lagoons, marshes, humid ranches grasslands, drains, agricultural ditches, and wetlands in forest.
    This research uses all of the 14 species in Ludwigia section Microcarpium, doing the phylogenetic relationship analysis by using the chloroplast DNA atpB-rbcL, the sequence of noncoding spacer, and the sequence of Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) of the ribose DNA (nrDNA) of cell nucleus. The result of ITS analysis shows that, excepting that L. stricta cannot be analyzed, the phylogenetic relationship of the rest of the 13 species can be divided into two main groups. The first one consists of tetracarpa taxon (L. alata, L. sufruticosa, and L. lanceolata), a new species L. pseudoalata, and L. pilosa complex (L. pilosa, and L. ravenii). Analysis data shows that L. pilosa and L. ravenii are two differentiated taxa, but with close parental relationship. The second one consists of the rest of species, and the following results concluded: (1) L. polycarpa, L. glandulosa taxon, and petalous group (L. linearis, L. linifolia) are significantly differentiated. Analysis also shows that L. glandulosa, and its subspecies L. glandulosa ssp. brachycarpa should have already differentiated. (2) The complicate relationship between L. sphaerocarpa and other species shows that this species should be the origin of hybridization, and has complicate gene flow with other species. (3) The L. microcarpa in microphyllum group is significantly differentiated from the other two species of the same group -- Ludwigia curtissii and L. simpsoni, which might be the same species。

    中文摘要....................i 英文摘要....................ii 誌謝....................iii 目錄....................iv 表目錄....................v 圖目錄....................vi 附錄目錄....................vii 圖版目錄....................viii 一、前言........................ 1 二、材料及方法...................... 5 三、結果與討論...................... 18 四、Ludwigia pseudoalata sp. nov. (Onagraceae Section Microcarpium), a New Species of the Southeastern United States..........................26 五、物種野外現況..................... 33 六、引用文獻...................... 34 附錄.......................... 40 圖版.......................... 45 自述.......................... 59

    Baum D. A., K. J. Sytsma, and P. C. Hoch 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 19: 363-388.
    Byrne M., and G. f. Moran 1994. Population divergence in chloroplast genome of Eucalyptus nitens. Heredity 73: 18-28.
    Catalan M.P., E.A. Kellogg and R.G. Olmstead 1997. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8: 150-166.
    Chiang T. Y., B. A. Schaal and C. I Peng 1998. Universal primers for amplification and sequencing a noncoding spacer between atpB and rbcL genes of chloroplast DNA. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 39: 245-250.
    Conti E., A. Fischbach and K. J. Sytsma 1993. Tribal relationships in Onagraceae: implications from rbcL sequence. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 672-685.
    Cruzan M. B., M. L. Arnold, S. E. Carney and K. R. Wollenberg 1993. CpDNA inheritance in interspecific crosses and its effect on evolutionary inference in Louisiana irises. Amer. J. Bot. 80: 344.
    Downie S.R., S. Ramanath, D.S. Katz-Downie and E. Llanas 1998. Molecular systematics of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer and plastic rpoC1 intron sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 563-591.
    Doyle J. L. and K. L. Doyle 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
    Dvorak, J. and H. B. Zhang, 1992. Application of molecular tools for study of the phylogeny of diploid and polyploid taxa in Triticeae. Heredity 166: 37-42.
    Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
    Forcioli D., P. Saumitou-Laprade, M. Valero, P. Vernet and J. Cuguen 1998. Distribution of chloroplast DNA diversity within and among populations in gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima (Chenopodiaceae). Mol. Ecol. 7: 1183-1204.
    Graham S. A. and T. B. Cavalcanti 2001. New Chromosome Counts in the Lythraceae and a Review of Chromosome Numbers in the Family. Syst. Bot. 26: 445-458.
    Guindon S. and O. Gascuel 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-704.
    Hao G., M. L. Chye and R. M. K. Saunders 2001. A phylogenetic ana lysis of the Schisandraceae based on morphology and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 135: 401–411.
    Hillis D. M., C. Moritz and B. K. Mable 1996. Molecular systematics. 2nd Edn. Sinauer, Sunderland.
    Hoch P. C. 1993. A cladistic analysis of the plant family Onagraceae. Syst. Bot. 18: 31-47.
    King R. A. and C. Ferris 1998. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1151-1161.
    Le Corre, V., S. Dumolin-Lapègue and A. Kremer 1997. Genetic variation at allozyme and RAPD loci in sessile oak Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.: the role of history and geography. Mol. Ecol. 6: 519-529.
    Leadlay, E. A. and P. S. Wyse 1989. Rare and threatened plants of cuba: ex situ conservation in botanic gardens. IUCN botanic gardens conservation secretariat.
    Levin R. A., W. L. Wagner, P. C. Hoch, M. Nepokroeff, J. C. Pires, E. A. Zimmer, and K. .J Sytsma 2003. Family-level relationships of Onagraceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF data. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 107-115.
    Mummenhoff K. and H. Hurka 1995. Allopolyploid origin of Arabidopsis suecica (Fries) norrlin: evidence from chloroplast and nuclear genome markers. Bot. Acta. 108: 449-456.
    Munz P. A. 1944. Studies in Onagraceae XIII. The American species of Ludwigia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 71: 152-165.
    Munz P. A. 1965. Onagraceae. N. Amer. Fl. II. 5: 1-278.
    Murray M. G., and W. F. Thompson 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleotide Acids Research 8: 4321-4325.
    Ouborg N. J., Y. Piquot and J. M. V. Groenendael 1999. Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J. Ecol. 87: 551-568.
    Peng C. I 1984. Ludwigia ravenii (Onagraceae), a new species from the coastal plan of the southeastern United States. Syst. Bot. 9: 129-132.
    Peng C. I 1986. A new combination in Ludwigia sect. Microcarpium (Onagraceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 490
    Peng C. I 1988. The biosytematics of Ludwigia Sect. Microcarpium (Onagraceae). Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 75: 970-1009.
    Peng C. I 1989. The systematics and evolution of Ludwigia sect. Microcarpium. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 76: 221-302.
    Peng C. I, and H. Tobe 1987. Capsule wall anatomy in relation to capsular dehiscence in Ludwigia sect. Mircrocarpium (Onagraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 74: 1102-1110
    Posada D and K. A. Crandall 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinfromatics 14:817-818.
    Pryer K. M., H. Schneider, A. R. Smith, R. Cranfill, P.l G. Wolf, J. S. Hunt and S. D. Sipes 2001. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants. Nature 409: 618-622.
    Ramamoorthy T. P. and E. M. Zardini 1987. The systematics and evolution of Ludwigia sect. Myrtocarpus s. lat. (Onagraceae). Mongr. Syst. Bot. Missouri Bot. Gard. 19: 1-120.
    Raven P. H. and W. Tai 1979. Observations of chromosomes in Ludwigia (Onagraceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 66: 862-879.
    Raven P. H. 1963. The Old World species of Ludwigia (including Jussiaea), with a synopsis of the genus (Onagraceae). Reinwardtia 6: 327-427.
    Raven P. H. 1979. A survey of reproductive biology in Onagraceae. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 575-593.
    Raven P. H. 1988. Onagraceae as a model of plant evolution. In L. D. Gottlieb and S. K. Jain [eds.], Plant evolutionary biology, 85–107. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
    Rivadavia F., K. Kondo, M. Kato, and M. Hasebe 2003. Phylogeny of the sundews, Drosera (Droseraceae), based on chloroplast rbcL and nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA sequence. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 123–130.
    Swofford D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
    Tamura K., J. Dudley, M. Nei, S. Kumar 2007. MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599.
    Thompson J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin and D.G. Higgins 1997. The Clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acid Res. 24: 4876-4882.
    Tobe H. and P. H. Raven 1986. Evolution of polysporangiate anthers in Onagraceae. Amer. J. Bot. 73: 475-488
    Tobe H., P. H. Raven and C.-I Peng 1988. Seed coat anatomy and relationships of Ludwigia sect. Microcarpium, Dantia and Miquelia (Onagraceae), and notes on fossil seeds of Ludwigia from Europe. Bot. Gaz. 149: 450-457.
    Tsutsumi N., M. Nakazono, T. Wakasugi, M. Sugiura, K. Kadowaki and A. Hirai 1994. Current status of studies of rice organelle genes. Rice Genetics Newsletter 11: 18-22.
    Ward D. B. 2001. New Combinations in the Florida Flora. Novon 11: 360-365.
    Whittemore A. T. and B. A. Schaal 1991. Interspecific gene flow in sympatric osks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88: 2540-2544.
    Wolf P. G., R. A. Murray and S. D. Sipes 1997. Species-independent, geographical structuring of chloroplast DNA haplotypes in a montane herb lpomopsis (Polemoniaceae). Mol. Ecol. 6: 283-291.
    Zardini E. and P. H. Raven 1992. A new section of Ludwigia (Onagraceae) with a key to the sections of the genus. Syst. Bot. 17: 481-485.

    下載圖示 校內:2014-07-29公開
    校外:2014-07-29公開
    QR CODE