簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林筠庭
Lin, Yun-Ting
論文名稱: 運用臨床實證評估藥品療效相等性之法規-以Fluoxetine為例
Assessing the Regulations on Therapeutic Equivalence of Pharmaceutical Products by Real World Evidence - Using Fluoxetine as an Example
指導教授: 高雅慧
Kao, Yea-Huei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 臨床藥學與藥物科技研究所
Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical sciences
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 134
中文關鍵詞: fluoxetine學名藥原廠藥療效相等性用藥持續性學名藥事法規各國學名藥法規比較
外文關鍵詞: therapeutic equivalence, medication persistence, generic drug regulations
相關次數: 點閱:268下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 研究背景
    現今各國醫療成本不斷攀升,學名藥因省下龐大研發經費,且能提供與原廠藥等效的臨床品質,故成為公私部門節省醫療成本的治療選擇。禮來股份有限公司生產之「百憂解」fluoxetine自108年4月1日起宣布停止供貨。即使原廠藥退出台灣市場,尚有同成分之藥品可供醫師處方。然而在臨床現況上,部分醫療人員和民眾仍對學名藥的療效和安全性是否與原廠藥相等存有疑慮。
    有鑑於此,本研究將從台灣和其他國家的學名藥管理切入。一方面了解各國對於學名藥的態度和科學基礎上的相關法規規範,另一方面欲利用實際臨床資料,評估上市後原廠藥與學名藥之療效相等性,以回應各方對於原廠藥與學名藥療效相等性的疑慮,進一步提升對於學名藥的認識與信心。
    研究方法
    本研究搜集美國、英國、日本、台灣等國家的學名藥相關法規,彙整各國原廠藥與學名藥之定義、學名藥使用現況和預估市場,再探究各國學名藥上市前審查規範,到上市後監控機制。接著回顧學名藥相關法規演進,隨著各國規範越趨嚴謹,對於相繼推出的學名藥法規進行介紹。
    接著,本研究搜尋Pubmed、Embaase和華藝線上圖書館,尋找抗精神病藥物的原廠藥和學名藥療效相等性的研究,並分析研究結果和研究指標之特性。然後,本研究運用2002~2015年健保資料庫兩百萬人抽樣檔,進行回溯性世代研究 (retrospective cohort study)。研究對象為2002年1月1日到2015年12月31日間,曾有憂鬱症診斷且開立fluoxetine之患者,並排除有癌症或曾使用任何抗憂鬱劑者後,依藥品廠牌分為使用原廠藥和學名藥者。主要分析指標為「用藥持續性」(medication persistence),即病患從開始使用fluoxetine到發生治療改變事件 (停藥、換藥、加藥)的治療天數,以及分析兩組發生治療改變事件的風險比 (hazard ratio, HR); 療效指標設為自殺傾向+死亡+精神科住院或急診的風險比; 安全性指標為兩組併用benzodiazepine (BZD)、Z drug (包含zopiclone, zolpidem, zaleplon, eszopiclone)的比率。
    研究結果
    總共針對世界上八個國家進行學名藥相關法規文獻回顧,從1790年代專利制度逐漸純熟,到預估2025年學名藥市場發展;從上市前生體相等性藥物動力學參數和試驗設計比較,到學名藥上市後主動稽查、被動通報、源頭管理及製造廠規範進行了詳實探討與比較。最後學名藥法規回顧部分,除敘述相關法規演進,亦針對上述八國豁免生體相等性試驗指引進行公告時間之比較,與美國食品藥物管理局 (US The Food and Drug Administration, US FDA)、歐洲藥品管理局 (European Medicines Agency, EMA)、世界衛生組織 (World Health Organization, WHO)規範異同之整理。
    本研究共納入fluoxetine新使用者14392人。進行傾向分數配對後,原廠藥組和學名藥組各有4251人。用藥持續性方面,原廠藥使用者有3802 (89.44%)人停藥、2912 (68.50%)人換藥、116 (2.73%)人加藥。學名藥使用者有3873 (91.11%)人停藥、2740 (64.46%)人換藥、99 (2.33%)人加藥。不論原廠藥組或學名藥組,在觀察的一年中全部都發生了治療改變事件。相較於原廠使用者,學名藥發生治療改變事件的風險比,在以指標年份和醫療層級校正情況下,兩組之間無顯著差異HR 0.97 (95%信賴區間0.92-1.02)。療效指標結果經傾向分數配對後,再經指標年份和醫療層級校正後的風險比1.09 (95%信賴區間0.87-1.04),無統計學上顯著差異。安全性指標方面,兩組之間併用比率沒有顯著差異。
    研究結論
    本篇回顧的國家中,學名藥市場都穩健成長,主要原因為學名藥使用率上升、人口老化、慢性疾病負擔加重、原廠藥專利過期等,加上大眾對於學名藥逐漸了解與接受,學名藥市場的發展性值得關注。各國上市前規範方面,在嚴謹的法規與科學基礎上,可以確保生產之原廠藥與學名藥療效與安全性相等。各國上市後監控方面,隨著監控機制漸趨完整成熟,期望能有效提升部分醫療人員和民眾對學名藥的信心。各國推出的豁免生體相等性試驗相關指引,目的為增進民眾醫療可近性,在藥物有效與安全的前提下,盡可能縮減不必要的試驗,加速學名藥的核准與上市。
    本研究利用用藥持續性作為同時反應療效與安全性之綜合指標,採用自殺傾向+自殺死亡+精神科住院和急診作為療效指標,另以併用鎮靜安眠藥比率作為安全性指標。整體而言,在三項指標中使用原廠藥與學名藥皆無達到統計學上顯著差異。因此,本研究所得結論不論使用原廠藥和學名藥fluoxetine,藥品本身對療效和安全性造成之影響不大,在臨床應用上應不會有顯著之差異。因此,現行的法規與科學證據下,本研究足以支持學名藥可以做為醫師處方同療效與安全的治療選擇。

    The Eli Lilly Co. Ltd. announced that it would withdraw “Prozac” fluoxetine from Taiwan market after April 1, 2019. However, in the current clinical situation, some medical members and general public had doubts about whether the effectiveness and safety of the generic drugs were equal to the brand-name drugs. In view of this, this study reviewed the regulation of generic drugs in Taiwan and other countries. Based on evolving regulations and scientific evidence, various national authorities were accountable for the effectiveness and safety between generic and brand drugs are equal. Meanwhile, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the therapeutic equivalence of fluoxetine between the brand-name and the generic drugs. There were both 4251 patients in the brand-name and generic drugs group. Compared with the brand-name users, the results of medication persistence (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.02), efficacy index (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87-1.04) and safety index (combination rates of BZD and Z drugs) were no significant difference between two groups. It was hoped that by promoting communication with the real world evidence, the medical members and general public would have better understanding about the generic drugs, and increase prescribing experience with confidence.

    中文摘要 i Extended Abstract iv 誌謝 viii 目錄 x 表目錄 xii 圖目錄 xiv 第一篇、 學名藥相關法規文獻回顧 第一章、 研究背景與動機1 第二章、 研究方法3 第三章、 研究結果4 第一節、 原廠藥與學名藥之定義4 第二節、 各國學名藥使用現況5 第三節、 各國學名藥上市規範11 第四節、 各國藥品上市後監控23 第五節、 從學名藥的簡易上市申請到豁免生體相等性試驗之學名藥相關法規演進32 第四章、 結論43 第二篇、 原廠藥與學名藥fluoxetine療效相等性分析 第一章、 研究背景與研究藥品44 第二章、 抗精神病藥物與研究指標文獻回顧45 第一節、 抗精神病藥物原廠藥與學名藥療效相等性之探討45 第二節、 抗精神病藥物療效相等性研究指標之探討47 第三章、 研究目的與重要性52 第四章、 研究方法53 第五章、 研究結果69 第六章、 討論90 第七章、 研究限制100 第八章、 結論與建議101 第三篇、臨床藥事服務-分析原廠藥換廠為學名藥對成大醫院處方型態之影響 第一章、 緣起102 第二章、 目的103 第三章、 方法103 第四章、 結果108 第五章、 討論與建議120 References127

    [1] S. Handoo, V. Arora, D. Khera, P. K. Nandi, and S. K. Sahu, "A comprehensive study on regulatory requirements for development and filing of generic drugs globally," (in eng), Int J Pharm Investig, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99-105, Jul 2012, doi: 10.4103/2230-973x.104392.
    [2] B. Davit, A. C. Braddy, D. P. Conner, and L. X. Yu, "International guidelines for bioequivalence of systemically available orally administered generic drug products: a survey of similarities and differences," (in eng), Aaps j, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 974-90, Oct 2013, doi: 10.1208/s12248-013-9499-x.
    [3] M. A. Fischer and J. Avorn, "Potential savings from increased use of generic drugs in the elderly: what the experience of Medicaid and other insurance programs means for a Medicare drug benefit," (in eng), Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 207-14, Apr 2004, doi: 10.1002/pds.872.
    [4] "健保「加價」、「加值」服務時代來臨," in 新新聞文化事業股份有限公司, ed, 2012.
    [5]"Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia.pdf."
    [6]"Generic medicine," EUROPEAN MEDICINED AGENCY, 2007.
    [7]"健保醫療資訊雲端查詢系統再加值運用! 疑似藥品療效不等通報管道正式啟用," 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署, 107-05-17. [Online]. Available: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-41234-1.html.
    [8]G. Boehm, L. Yao, L. Han, and Q. Zheng, "Development of the generic drug industry in the US after the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984," Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 297-311, 2013/09/01/ 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2013.07.004.
    [9] U. F. Drug, "FDA Drug Competition Action Plan," 04/08/2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/fda-drug-competition-action-plan.
    [10] "學名藥問答集," 中華民國學名藥學會. [Online]. Available: http://www.tgpa.org.tw/page/about/index.aspx?kind=32.
    [11]"US Generic Drug Market: Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2020-2025." IMARC group market research. https://www.imarcgroup.com/us-generics-market (accessed JUL 25, 2020).
    [12] g. o. canada, "Generics360 – Generic Drugs in Canada, 2018," 2018. [Online]. Available: http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/view.asp?ccid=1468&lang=en#a3.
    [13] C. Healthcare, "Global Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Review," 2016/02.
    [14] "Generics market in Germany set to reach $9.5 billion by end 2021." https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/generics-market-in-germany-set-to-reach-9-5-billion-by-end-2021 (accessed JUN, 25, 2020).
    [15] "The supply of generic medicines in the UK Prepared for The British Generic Manufacturers Association," 26 June 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxera.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Oxera-study-on-the-supply-of-generic-medicines-in-the-UK-26-June-2019.pdf.
    [16] T. A. I. o. H. a. W. (AIHW). "International health data comparisons, 2018." https://reurl.cc/Wd56qx (accessed JUL, 25, 2020).
    [17] D. d. a. delivery, "Australian Pharmaceutical Market to Surpass $25 Billion." [Online]. Available: https://drug-dev.com/australian-pharmaceutical-market-to-surpass-25-billion/.
    [18] M. B. Jakovljevic, S. Nakazono, and S. Ogura, "Contemporary generic market in Japan - key conditions to successful evolution," (in eng), Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 181-94, Apr 2014, doi: 10.1586/14737167.2014.881254.
    [19] T. Iizuka, "Experts' agency problems: evidence from the prescription drug market in Japan," The Rand journal of economics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 844-862, 2007.
    [20] "South Korean pharma market to reach US$20 billion by 2020." http://gabi-journal.net/news/south-korean-pharma-market-to-reach-us20-billion-by-2020 (accessed JUN, 10, 2020).
    [21] g. a. b. i. online, "Biologicals patent expiries," 13/11/2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.gabionline.net/Biosimilars/General/Biologicals-patent-expiries.
    [22] W. YY, "Review and market trends II: Taiwan. IGPA 16th Annual Conference, Brussels, Belgium."
    [23] "國民醫療保健支出(NHE)," 109-01-20. [Online]. Available: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-2156-113-xCat-y107-1-20.html.
    [24] 黃文鴻陽明大學退休教授、曾任衛生署藥政處處長, "觀念平台-重新建構製藥業發展政策與資本市場." [Online]. Available: https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160316000071-260202?chdtv.
    [25] "Generics360 – Generic Drugs in Canada, 2018." https://reurl.cc/5l6m0V (accessed JUL, 25, 2020).
    [26] O. J. Wouters, P. G. Kanavos, and K. M. Mc, "Comparing Generic Drug Markets in Europe and the United States: Prices, Volumes, and Spending," (in eng), Milbank Q., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 554-601, Sep 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12279.
    [27] "The supply of generic medicines in the UK Prepared for The British Generic Manufacturers Association," https://www.oxera.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Oxera-study-on-the-supply-of-generic-medicines-in-the-UK-26-June-2019.pdf, 26 June 2019.
    [28] 財團法人醫藥品查驗中心, "學名藥藥品審查." [Online]. Available: https://www3.cde.org.tw/drugs/med_explain?id=12.
    [29] 廖珮汝、林純江. (201906) 上市後藥品安全品質監控之現況. 當代醫藥法規月刊第105期. 12. Available: https://reurl.cc/exeexb
    [30] 張凱琳、徐立峰. (2018-02-09) 日本與我國學名藥法規介紹與比較. 當代醫藥法規月刊. Available: https://reurl.cc/d0EExM
    [31] M. A. C. Andreas J. Dirnagl, "Global Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Review," 2016.
    [32] 信傳媒. "「百憂解」退出台灣》精神科醫師嘆:一顆藥比糖果便宜..背後隱藏的危機." https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/14728 (accessed MAY, 21, 2020).
    [33] "我國學名藥品質之把關機制," 103年衛生福利部新聞, Ed., ed: 食品藥物管理署, 2014/03.
    [34] "通報新制效應!疑換藥影響療效 半年暴增到243件." https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1254503 (accessed MAY, 18, 2020).
    [35] (2019-04-01). 藥品不良品通報案件年報. [Online] Available: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/%E8%97%A5%E5%93%81%E4%B8%8D%E8%89%AF%E5%93%81%E5%B9%B4%E5%A0%B1(107%E5%B9%B41%E6%9C%88_12%E6%9C%88).pdf
    [36] 吳明美, "上市後藥品安全品質監控之現況," 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署, 2019-06-23.
    [37] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署. (103 / 3) 學名藥品質嚴格把關 與國際接軌. 一周全球藥聞. Available: https://reurl.cc/0OO699
    [38] "SUPAC: Manufacturing Equipment Addendum," FDA 2013/12. [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/supac-manufacturing-equipment-addendum.
    [39] "藥品優良安全監視規範," TFDA通報及監視相關法規. [Online]. Available: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/%E8%97%A5%E5%93%81%E5%84%AA%E8%89%AF%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E7%9B%A3%E8%A6%96%E8%A6%8F%E7%AF%84%20(1).pdf.
    [40] U. S. f. drug, "MedWatch Forms for FDA Safety Reporting." [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-product-safety-information/medwatch-forms-fda-safety-reporting.
    [41] "FDA, FAERS Reporting by Healthcare Providers and Consumers by Year ". [Online]. Available: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/ucm070456.htm,%20Last%20visited%20date:2015/4/1.
    [42] "The pharmacist's role in product selection," (in eng), J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 181-99, Apr 1971, doi: 10.1016/s0003-0465(16)31588-9.
    [43] F. J. Ascione, D. M. Kirking, C. A. Gaither, and L. S. Welage, "Historical overview of generic medication policy," (in eng), J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. (Wash.), vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 567-77, Jul-Aug 2001, doi: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)31281-5.
    [44] E. L. Andrews, "A Scandal Raises Serious Questions at the F.D.A.," N. Y. Times Mag., Aug. 13, 1989. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/1989/08/13/business/a-scandal-raises-serious-questions-at-the-fda.html.
    [45] "全國藥物不良反應通報系統設置宗旨," 財團法人藥害救濟基金會. [Online]. Available: https://www.tdrf.org.tw/safety01/.
    [46] "Biowaiver monographs," International Pharmaceutical Federation, FIP, Last update 25 May 2020.
    [47] "檢送列屬BCS class I且經本屬評估低風險性取代生體相等性試驗品項名單如附表," 行政院衛生署函, 20090615. [Online]. Available: http://www.cpmda.org.tw/file/e_news/017/b/0980360874.pdf.
    [48] "健保署依法調整藥價,願積極與藥界檢討DET之計算公式," 中央健康保險署, 108-03-18. [Online]. Available: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-46830-1.html.
    [49] "專家怎麼看「百憂解」退出台灣市場這個決定?," 關鍵評論新興科技媒體中心, 2019/08/12. [Online]. Available: https://www.thenewslens.com/article/123229.
    [50] E. L. C. Inc, "PROZAC Product Monograph," 2016. [Online]. Available: http://pi.lilly.com/ca/prozac-ca-pm.pdf.
    [51] 衛生福利部食品藥物管理署, "學名藥依藥品溶解度及穿透性分類原則以溶離率曲線比對試驗取代生體相等性試驗申請指引," 部授食字第1051406824號, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://reurl.cc/zzzrDN.
    [52] M. Van Ameringen, C. Mancini, B. Patterson, and M. Bennett, "Symptom relapse following switch from Celexa to generic citalopram: an anxiety disorders case series," (in eng), J Psychopharmacol, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 472-6, Jul 2007, doi: 10.1177/0269881107077373.
    [53] J. Rosenthal, B. Kong, L. Jacobs, and M. Katzman, "Did a switch to a generic antidepressant cause relapse?," (in eng), J. Fam. Pract., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 109-14, Feb 2008.
    [54] G. Cessak et al., "Therapeutic equivalence of antipsychotics and antidepressants - A systematic review," (in eng), Pharmacol. Rep., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 217-23, Apr 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.08.017.
    [55] J. A. Lieberman et al., "Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia," (in eng), N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 353, no. 12, pp. 1209-23, Sep 22 2005, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051688.
    [56] E. C. Lai, C. H. Chang, Y. H. Kao Yang, S. J. Lin, and C. Y. Lin, "Effectiveness of sulpiride in adult patients with schizophrenia," (in eng), Schizophr. Bull., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 673-83, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs002.
    [57] C. W. Hsu, S. Y. Lee, and L. J. Wang, "Comparison of the effectiveness of brand-name and generic antipsychotic drugs for treating patients with schizophrenia in Taiwan," (in eng), Schizophr. Res., vol. 193, pp. 107-113, Mar 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.06.020.
    [58] C. T. Solem, A. Shelbaya, Y. Wan, C. G. Deshpande, J. Alvir, and E. Pappadopulos, "Analysis of treatment patterns and persistence on branded and generic medications in major depressive disorder using retrospective claims data," (in eng), Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., vol. 12, pp. 2755-2764, 2016, doi: 10.2147/ndt.S115094.
    [59] J. F. Gautier et al., "Effectiveness and Persistence with Liraglutide Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Routine Clinical Practice--EVIDENCE: A Prospective, 2-Year Follow-Up, Observational, Post-Marketing Study," (in eng), Adv. Ther., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 838-53, Sep 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0245-x.
    [60] M. Pozzi et al., "Persistence in Therapy With Risperidone and Aripiprazole in Pediatric Outpatients: A 2-Year Naturalistic Comparison," (in eng), J. Clin. Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. e1601-e1609, Dec 2016, doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10247.
    [61] I. Hernandez, Y. Zhang, and S. Saba, "Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban, Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation," (in eng), Am. J. Cardiol., vol. 120, no. 10, pp. 1813-1819, Nov 15 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.092.
    [62] G. L. Colombo, E. Agabiti-Rosei, A. Margonato, C. Mencacci, C. M. Montecucco, and R. Trevisan, "Off-patent generic medicines vs. off-patent brand medicines for six reference drugs: a retrospective claims data study from five local healthcare units in the Lombardy Region of Italy," (in eng), PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 12, p. e82990, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082990.
    [63] G. Corrao et al., "Medication persistence and the use of generic and brand-name blood pressure-lowering agents," (in eng), J. Hypertens., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1146-53; discussion 1153, May 2014, doi: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000000130.
    [64] A. Sicras-Mainar, L. Sanchez-Alvarez, R. Navarro-Artieda, and J. Darba, "Treatment persistence and adherence and their consequences on patient outcomes of generic versus brand-name statins routinely used to treat high cholesterol levels in Spain: a retrospective cost-consequences analysis," (in eng), Lipids Health Dis., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 277, Dec 6 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12944-018-0918-y.
    [65] G. Corrao et al., "Are generic and brand-name statins clinically equivalent? Evidence from a real data-base," (in eng), Eur. J. Intern. Med., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 745-50, Oct 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.08.002.
    [66] A. P. Association and A. P. Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5," ed: Washington, DC: American psychiatric association, 2013.
    [67] N. P. Nair, "Therapeutic equivalence of risperidone given once daily and twice daily in patients with schizophrenia. The Risperidone Study Group," (in eng), J. Clin. Psychopharmacol., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 103-10, Apr 1998, doi: 10.1097/00004714-199804000-00002.
    [68] O. Oluboka, S. Stewart, S. Landry, and S. Adams, "Does therapeutic equivalence follow bioequivalence? A randomized trial to assess clinical effects after switching from Clozaril to generic clozapine (gen-clozapine)," (in eng), J. Clin. Pharmacol., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 531-5, May 2010, doi: 10.1177/0091270009347871.
    [69] S. C. Stoner, J. W. Lea, B. Dubisar, P. A. Marken, L. V. Ramlatchman, and J. Reynolds, "A program to convert patients from trade-name to generic clozapine," (in eng), Pharmacotherapy, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 806-10, Jun 2003, doi: 10.1592/phco.23.6.806.32183.
    [70] C. Paton, "Generic clozapine: outcomes after switching formulations," (in eng), Br. J. Psychiatry, vol. 189, pp. 184-5, Aug 2006, doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.017079.
    [71] D. J. Healy, S. Taylor, M. Goldman, K. Barry, F. Blow, and K. K. Milner, "Clinical equivalence of generic clozapine," (in eng), Community Ment. Health J., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 393-8, Aug 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10597-005-5981-y.
    [72] J. C. Kluznik, N. H. Walbek, M. G. Farnsworth, and K. Melstrom, "Clinical effects of a randomized switch of patients from clozaril to generic clozapine," (in eng), J. Clin. Psychiatry, vol. 62 Suppl 5, pp. 14-7; discussion 23-4, 2001.
    [73] R. E. Gliklich et al., "Harmonized outcome measures for use in asthma patient registries and clinical practice," J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 671-681. e1, 2019.
    [74] C. S. Colin D. Mathers , Doris Ma Fat , Chalapati Rao , Mie Inoue , Niels Tomijima , Christina Bernard , Alan D Lopez , Christopher J. L. Murray, "Global Burden of Disease 2000: Version 2 methods and results," DMCA.
    [75] D. J. Brody, L. A. Pratt, and J. P. Hughes, "Prevalence of Depression Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 2013-2016," (in eng), NCHS Data Brief, no. 303, pp. 1-8, Feb 2018.
    [76] M. Fornaro et al., "The FDA “Black Box” Warning on Antidepressant Suicide Risk in Young Adults: More Harm Than Benefits?," (in English), Frontiers in Psychiatry, Perspective vol. 10, no. 294, 2019-May-03 2019, doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00294.
    [77] 衛生福利部全民健康保險會, "總額支付制度下建立基層與醫院門診分級醫療指標之研究," 106-02-06.
    [78] 吳肖琪、李玉春、康端嚴、郭德貞, "全民健康保險醫療費用協定委員會委託研究計畫 總額支付制度下建立基層與醫院門診分級醫療指標之研究," 92~93.
    [79] K. Fehse, L. Maikowski, F. Simmank, E. Gutyrchik, and K. Meissner, "Placebo Responses to Original vs. Generic ASA Brands During Exposure to Noxious Heat: A Pilot fMRI Study of Neurofunctional Correlates," (in eng), Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1967-1974, 2015/10// 2015, doi: 10.1111/pme.12783.
    [80] C. T. Solem, A. Shelbaya, Y. Wan, C. G. Deshpande, J. Alvir, and E. Pappadopulos, "Analysis of treatment patterns and persistence on branded and generic medications in major depressive disorder using retrospective claims data," (in eng), Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., vol. 12, pp. 2755-2764, 2016, doi: 10.2147/NDT.S115094.
    [81] S. V. Otton, D. Wu, R. T. Joffe, S. W. Cheung, and E. M. Sellers, "Inhibition by fluoxetine of cytochrome P450 2D6 activity," (in eng), Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 401-9, Apr 1993, doi: 10.1038/clpt.1993.43.
    [82] C. M. Beasley, Jr. et al., "Fluoxetine and suicide: a meta-analysis of controlled trials of treatment for depression," (in eng), BMJ, vol. 303, no. 6804, pp. 685-92, Sep 21 1991, doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6804.685.
    [83] A. Serretti and A. Chiesa, "Treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction related to antidepressants: a meta-analysis," (in eng), J. Clin. Psychopharmacol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 259-66, Jun 2009, doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181a5233f.
    [84] D. S. Baldwin and T. Foong, "Antidepressant drugs and sexual dysfunction," (in eng), Br. J. Psychiatry, vol. 202, pp. 396-7, Jun 2013, doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.110650.
    [85] A. H. Clayton et al., "Prevalence of sexual dysfunction among newer antidepressants," (in eng), J. Clin. Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 357-66, Apr 2002, doi: 10.4088/jcp.v63n0414.
    [86] U. Reichenpfader et al., "Sexual dysfunction associated with second-generation antidepressants in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a systematic review with network meta-analysis," (in eng), Drug Saf., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 19-31, Jan 2014, doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0129-4.
    [87] "Fluoxetine: Drug information." [Online]. Available: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/fluoxetine-drug-information?search=fluoxetine&source=panel_search_result&selectedTitle=1~148&usage_type=panel&kp_tab=drug_general&display_rank=1#F172677.
    [88] "全面完成藥廠符合PIC/S GMP,並積極推動藥品「源頭」與「運銷」管理," 104年衛生福利部3月新聞, 104-03-16. [Online]. Available: https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2642-20865-1.html.
    [89] P. Chou. "為什麼「學名藥」藥效不如「原廠藥」?藥師揭露台灣不能說的秘密..." https://health.businessweekly.com.tw/AArticle.aspx?id=ARTL000074067 (accessed MAY, 27, 2020).
    [90] 林以璿. "學名藥?原廠藥?差別到底在哪裡?." https://heho.com.tw/archives/43493 (accessed MAY, 27, 2020).
    [91] "definition of the defined daily dose (DDD) " WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 2018-02-07. [Online]. Available: https://www.whocc.no/ddd/definition_and_general_considera/.
    [92] 陳奕華, "原廠藥、學名藥難區分 換藥時患者困擾," 新北市藥師公會, 2011. [Online]. Available: http://tcpa.taiwan-pharma.org.tw/node/9852.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2026-01-01公開
    校外:2026-01-01公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE