本研究旨在探討Gogoro與PBGN聯盟成員宏佳騰之間的企業間關係，並解決存在的權力不平衡和相互依賴的二元並存問題。Gogoro在台灣電動機車市場表現卓越，以出色的電動機車性能和創新運營模式(如電池交換站)成為領導者。然而，Gogoro與PBGN成員之間的關係存在著不平衡和相互依賴的挑戰。
首先，研究探討了宏佳騰與Gogoro之間權力不平衡的來源。這種不平衡主要來自於Gogoro所擁有的資源優勢，包括技術、品牌知名度和市場份額。這使得Gogoro在聯盟中擁有較大的影響力，而其他成員則處於較弱的地位。
其次，研究分析了宏佳騰如何改變權力不平衡並實現相互依賴的目標。宏佳騰可以通過提升自身技術能力和創新能力，增強在聯盟中的地位和影響力。此外，宏佳騰還可以進行戰略合作，共同開展研發項目、市場推廣和產品創新，以實現與Gogoro的互惠互利關係。
本文還介紹了雙向依存的概念以及其在組織間關係中的重要性。傳統的權力關係理論著重於單向的二元關係，而雙向依存觀點則更注重雙方在不同方向上的相互依存程度和關係。雙向依存不僅有助於解決組織中的權力問題，還能建立信任、聲譽等社會性資產，促進組織間長期合作關係的形成。
然而，在高度的權力不平衡狀態下，雙向依存關係較難形成。權力不平衡可能造成壓力和緊張感，使得雙方溝通和協調變得困難，破壞雙向依存的平衡。若企業之間資源具有互補性，即使在權力不平衡的情況下，弱勢組織仍有可能與強勢組織建立雙向依存的關係。基於互補性，企業雙方可以相互支持、協作和成長，加強彼此之間的關係，實現共同成功。
研究的結果將有助於PBGN聯盟內的企業思考如何在Gogoro佔據資源優勢的情況下實現平衡的企業間關係，這將促進創新活動和產品開發，為聯盟成員帶來更大的價值和競爭優勢。

This study delves deep into the inter-organizational dynamics between Gogoro and Aeon Motors, both integral members of the PBGN. The central focus is on the intricate interplay of power imbalances and mutual dependence. Gogoro's commanding stance within the alliance is driven by its technological prowess, robust brand recognition, and substantial market presence, contributing to an uneven distribution of influence. To counterbalance this, Aeon Motors can fortify its technological capabilities and innovation potential while embarking on strategic collaborations with Gogoro. These collaborations encompass joint research initiatives, targeted market promotions, and pioneering product innovations. The study introduces the pivotal concept of mutual dependence, underscoring its pivotal role in shaping inter-organizational relationships. Unlike conventional power-centric models, mutual dependence highlights the reciprocal interdependence that fosters trust and cultivates a commendable reputation, thereby laying the groundwork for sustained collaboration. The study aptly recognizes the challenges presented by imbalanced power dynamics, including obstacles to effective communication and potential disruptions to mutual dependence. Nevertheless, the study posits that even in a scenario marked by imbalance, companies possessing complementary resources have the potential to establish a relationship of mutual dependence. Such a symbiotic partnership nurtures cooperative growth, reinforces relational bonds, and ultimately culminates in the realization of shared success. The research's implications hold significance for PBGN members, offering valuable insights into attaining equilibrium within inter-organizational interactions, nurturing innovation, and enhancing competitive advantages within the alliance's purview.

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual review of Sociology, 2(1), 79-105.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Boudreau, K. J. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management science, 56(10), 1849-1872.
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative science quarterly, 50(2), 167-199.
Drees, J. M., & Heugens, P. P. (2013). Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of management, 39(6), 1666-1698.
Dyer, J. H. (1996). Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(4), 271-291.
Dyer, J. H. (1997). Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 535-556.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679.
Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., & Hesterly, W. S. (2018). The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3140-3162.
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31–41.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human relations, 18(1), 21-32.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization science, 7(4), 375-387.
Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32–69.
Hallen, B. L., Katila, R., & Rosenberger, J. D. (2014). How do social defenses work? A resource-dependence lens on technology ventures, venture capital investors, and corporate relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1078-1101.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964.
Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of management, 27(6), 679-690.
Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 265-291.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, 2(1), 88-115.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255-2276.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89-108.
Lin, E., Mak, B., & Wong, K. (2013). The business relationships between LCCs and airports in Southeast Asia: Influences of power imbalance and mutual dependence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 50, 33-46.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Oliver, A. L., & Ebers, M. (1998). Networking network studies: an analysis of conceptual configurations in the study of inter-organizational relationships. Organization Studies, 19(4), 549-583.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
Pfeffer, J. (1987). A resource dependence perspective on intercorporate relations. Intercorporate relations: The structural analysis of business, 1(1), 25-55.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003a). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003b). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective: Stanford University Press.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
Rindfleisch, A., & Heide, J. B. (1997). Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. Journal of marketing, 61(4), 30-54.
Roundy, P. T., & Bayer, M. A. (2019). To bridge or buffer? A resource dependence theory of nascent entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies.
Rudie Harrigan, K. (1986). J oint ventures: Linking for a leap forward. Planning Review, 14(4), 10-14.
Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Scheer, L. K., Miao, C. F., & Garrett, J. (2010). The effects of supplier capabilities on industrial customers’ loyalty: the role of dependence. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 38, 90-104.
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. Routledge.
Sobrero, M., & Schrader, S. (1998). Structuring inter-firm relationships: A metaanalytic approach. Organization Studies, 19(4), 585-615.
Stanko, M. A., Bonner, J. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2007). Building commitment in buyer–seller relationships: A tie strength perspective. Industrial marketing management, 36(8), 1094-1103.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Williamson, O. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative science quarterly, 269-296.
方世榮. (2004). 關係認知, 關係態度及關係行為之關聯性的探討. 管理與系統, 11(4), 509-539.
王品雯. (2021). 台灣電動機車商業生態系統建構與演化之研究─ 以 GOGORO 為例.
江诗松, & 刘双. (2021). 平台生态系统中的参与者战略: 互补与依赖关系的解耦. 管理世界, 37(2), 126-147+ 110.
巫立宇. (2011 ). 專屬資產投資對企業自發性表現行為之研究：關係利益、關係品質之延伸探討. http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52892
周信輝. (2022). 商業生態系統發展基礎之服務設計思考. 科技管理學刊, 27(2), 1-25.
林茂文. (2022). 臺灣 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略之綜析. 石油季刊, 58(2), 1-39.
徐靖雯. (2017). 發展平台商業模式探索性研究: 以 GOGORO 為例
張乃瑄, & 蓓章. (2019). 我國電動機車產業現況與迎戰國際競爭策略. 經濟前瞻(183), 84-88.
張綜桁. (2022). 邁向公路淨零排放: 臺灣機車車隊模型發展與應用.
陳厚銘, 柯雅菁, & 張幼齡. (2010). 什麼是台灣廠商從代工到自有品牌經營之最有效組織結構? 行銷科學學報, 6(2), 81-105.
游博丞. (2018). 台灣電動機車產業研究-以 GOGORO 為例 長庚大學].
黃延聰. (2006). 代工聯盟中產品開發能力之提昇: 知識管理過程觀點. 中山管理評論, 第十四卷第四期, 881-914.
楊英賢, 林柏年, & 陳昱安. (2020). 生態系統創新能力建構之研究-以電動機車領導廠商 GOGORO 個案為例. 管理科學研究, 14(2), 17-34.
鄒孟霏. (2019). 電動機車消費購買因素之研究—以 GOGORO 為例.
蔡惠雯. (2015). 電動機車推廣之關鍵因子分析.