本研究旨在瞭解學生於物流管理課程中，使用物流軟體的認知與態度，對學生於課程中學習動機的影響。本研究運用科技接受模型，並加入學習動機的討論，以成功大學與高雄第一科技大學之物流相關課程的修課學生為問卷調查與訪談對象，蒐集學生對上課使用之物流軟體易用性、有用性、使用態度與學習動機的知覺感受，以變異數分析、結構方程模式分析，並以訪談分析結果深入瞭解學生在物流課程中，物流軟體使用的真實感受。。本研究發現學生對物流軟體使用的「認知有用性」和「認知易用性」會正向影響學生對物流軟體之「使用態度」 ; 學生對物流軟體的「認知易用性」正向影響學生對物流軟體使用的「認知有用性」 ; 學生對物流軟體的「使用態度」正向影響學生對物流管理課程學習之「學習動機」 ; 而本研究中影響物流軟體使用認知的外生變數-過去學習經驗，對學生之物流軟體使用認知並無顯著的影響。而本研究亦發現使用物流軟體輔助物流課程的教學，確能有助於學習者在課程中的學習動機，而課程導入物流軟體使用時，可先應用具單一功能的物流軟體，再以由淺入深的方式，利用功能較複雜的物流軟體搭配學習，讓學生得以模擬物流系統在不同配置下中長期的作業營運狀況。

This study aims to discuss how the perspective and attitude toward using logistics software of students influences their learning motivation in the logistics curriculum. By applying the theory of Technology Acceptance Model and the education theory as learning motivation, the study involved students taking logistic related course at National Cheng-Kung University and National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology in Taiwan as investigation subjects. Students completed the questionnaire we designed to capture their perceptions on logistics software’s usefulness, perceptions on its ease of use, subjects’ attitudes toward using the logistics software, and their learning motivation in the logistics course. One-way ANOVA and structural equation modeling were used to analyze the data.And an interview was also conducted after the survey.
In the analysis, structural equation modeling which was used to verify the hypotheses regarding the relationships among perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude toward using logistics software, and learning motivation. According to the analyzed result, we find that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of using logistics software has positively significant influence on attitude toward using logistics software, and perceived ease of use has positively significant influence on perceived usefulness. Besides attitude toward using logistics software has a positively significant influence on learning motivation in logistics course. However, the hypothesis that external variables named learning experience positively affects on perceived ease of use and usefulness of using logistics software didn’t be supported. This research also finds that using logistics software can really contribute to students’ learning motivation in the logistics course. When using logistics software in the logistics course, educators can arrange the logistics software with single function for students first, and then go from the easy to the difficult by utilizing logistics software with more complicated function to enable students to simulate the logistics network in the medium and long-term operation conditions.

中文文獻
余清華譯民(民83); Esther R, Steinberg 原著，電腦輔助教學：理論與實踐，台北市：松崗。

邵瑞珍譯(民84); 布魯納 Jerome S. Bruner 原著，教育的歷程，台北市：五南。

吳靜吉、程炳林(民81)，「激勵的學習策略量表之修訂」，中國測驗學會測驗年刊，頁59-78。

吳萬益(民94)，企業研究方法，二版，臺北市：華泰。

林怡秀（民89）。國中小教師教育態度之訪查、評量與調查研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。

洪榮昭(民81)，電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用，台北市：師大書苑出版。

洪新原、梁定澎、張嘉銘(民93)，「科技接受模式之彙總研究」。資訊管理學報，第十二卷第四期，頁211-234。

侯君溥、吳文雄、王宗立(民89)，「物流電腦輔助教學軟體與商業自動化教學」，資訊與教育雜誌，頁65-77。

張春興(民81)，現代心理學，台北市：五南。

張春興(民83)，教育心理學--三化取向，台北市：東華。

張春興、林清山(民78)，教育心理學，台北市：東華。

陳順宇(民93)，多變量分析，三版，臺北市：華泰。

蘇雄義(民91)，企業物流導論，二版，台北市：華泰。

蘇雄義(民89)，物流與運籌管理 :觀念、機能與整合，初版，台北市：華泰。

物流經營管理與實務(民89)，最新修訂版，經濟部商業司。

廈門宇博網路資訊技術有限公司http://www.chinabgao.com/。

美商製造運籌系統 http://www.manugistics.com/。

鼎新電腦 http://www.dsc.com.tw/。

i2 technology. Inc http://www.i2.com/。

英文文獻
Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. 1998. Computer-Based Instruction：Methods and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen, I. 1998. Attitude , Personality , and Behavior. Chicago : The Dorsey Press.

Amoroso, D. L. & Cheney, P. H. 1991. Testing a causal model of end-user application effectiveness. Journal of Management Information System , 8, 1, 63-89.

Astone, M. K. & Rainer, R. K. & Laosethakul,K. 2003. Are gender perceptions of computing changing over time? The Journal of Computer Information Systems; Summer, 43, 4, 108-114.

Bajaj, A. & Nidumolu, S. R. 1998. A feedback model to understand information system usage. Information & Management, 33, 4, 213-224.

Bruner, J. S. 1966. The Process of Education. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.

Bowersox, D. J. & Closs, D. J. 1996. Logistical Management : The Integrated Supply Chain Process, McGraw Hill, New York.

Busmann, P. & Ahsen, A. V. & Diaz, L. M. & Wolf, K. 2004. Usage and evaluation of Supply Chain Management Software – results of an empirical study in the European automotive industry. Information System Journal, 14, 295-309.

Chau, P. Y. K. & Tam, K. Y. 1997. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems：An Exploratory Study. MIS Quarterly, 21, 1, 01-24.

Closs, D. J & Goldsby, T. J. & Clinton, S. R. 1997. Information technology influences on world class logistics capability. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 27, 1, 4-17.

Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, September, 319-340.

Ezer, J. G. & Harel, D. 1998. What (Else) Should CS Educators Know? Communications of The Acm, September, 41, 9, 77-84.

G.ahtani, S. A. 2001. The applicability of TAM outside North America: An empiricaltest in the United Kingdom. Information Resources Management Journal ,
Jul-Sep, 14, 3, 37-46.

Golob, T. F. 2003. Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research.Transportation Research Part B, 37, 1–25.

Hycner, R. H. 1985. Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279-303.

Igbaria, M. & Iivari, J. 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega , 23, 6, 587-605.

Jonathan, F. & Kent, N. 1993. Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 360–375.

Kling, J. A. & Grimm, C. M. 1989. Microcomputer use in transportation and logistics: a literature review with implications for educators. Journal of Business Logistics,
9, 1, 1-18..

Morris, M. G.. 1997. How User Perceptions Influence Software Use. IEEE July/Augst,58-65

Morton, R. 1997. Software can ease your transportation troubles. Transportation & Distribution, Mar, 38, 3, 60-66.

Pintrich, P. R. & De Groot, E. V. 1990.Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Special Section: Motivation and efficacy in education: Reserrch and new direction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33-40.

Rao, K. & Stenger, A. J. & Wu Haw-Jan. 1998. Integrating the use of computers in logistics education. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 28, 4, 302-319

Silagyi, J. & Brooks, G & Peterson, E. 1998. Efficacy of an assessment instrument to measure affective and cognitive learning domains of students enrolled in food or nutrition courses. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 11, 519–527.

Spacey, R. & Goulding, A. & Murray, I. 2004. Exploring the attitudes of public library staff to the Internet using the TAM. Journal of Documentation, 60, 5, 550-564.

Stipek, D. 1998. Motivation to learn. Boston，MA : Allyn and Bacan.

Szajna, B. 1996. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model.Management Science, 42, 1, 85-92.

Taylor, S. &Todd, P. 1995. Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models. Information Systems Research, 6, 2, 144-176.

Thelwall, M. 2000. Computer-based assessment: a versatile educational tool. Computers & Education, 34, 37-49.

Thompson, R. L. & Higgins, C. A. & Howell, J. M. 1994. Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems. 11, 137-187.

Tyworth, J.E. & Grenoble, W. L. 1991.Spreadsheet modeling in logistics: advancing today's educational tools. Journal of Business Logistics, 12, 1, 1-26.

Vincent, A. & Ross, D. 1998. Software: What are businesses using? Implications for computer education. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, Summer, 38, 4, 75-77.

Weiner, B. 1972. Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42, 2, 203-215.