台灣地殼的運動頻繁，造就了許多的地形變化與斷層活動，容易影響公共建設的安全性，因此需要定期來進行監測與維修。結構的健康定期監測與檢驗是必須的，並且需要依狀態異動來更新其性能預測的模型。然而因經費與時間的關係，每次均進行全面性的自動連續監測是不符合實際的需求，為達到最有效的成本效益下之監測策略，首先是對結構的性能進行評估與預測，從地質環境至危害原因及機制進行詳細的討論。
　　本研究區域選定於國道三號中寮隧道一帶及屏東士文水庫預定壩址區域，利用地震災害、地滑及斷層活動性等災害因子，進行災害結構變形之評估，並以災害微分區進行討論以分析對應的監測週期。
　　在斷層滑移部分，利用研究區域附近內政部GPS基準站資料，進行小區域的位移方向及水平位移量內插，並針對跨斷層GPS測站進行週平均位移之振幅統計，其振幅範圍在±5mm之間，加上考慮監測結構物之強度容許誤差值，推定本研究區域最小觀測期必須為六到八個月。
　　地震災害潛勢部分以過去地震資料與隧道維修紀錄或設計耐震度為基礎，並考慮地形放大效應，利用台灣V30剪力波速度將規模距離關係式修正來適合本研究區域使用，計算出地震再現機率與對應影響範圍，其五年及十年地震發生對隧道之損壞機率為0.47及0.53。
　　本研究最後根據中央地調所提供之區域崩塌潛勢圖討論其地滑趨勢，並將上述兩項結果綜合，依狀況分為三部分並針對各區域監測特性分別考量來討論監測規劃。
　　研究結果顯示各工址之災害因子各不相同，應該根據其災害因子對工址之影響區域做微分區劃分，並依照各致災因子對建築物的損害機制與觀測週期來做為各微區域監測方法選擇與警戒值設立的依據。

Intensely crustal movement in Taiwan that creating frequently terrain change and also fault scarps. The public construction of the region thus become vulnerable by the threat of such crustal movement. Thus the reason, routine maintenance to those public constructions are required. As the result, structural health monitoring should be performed, and the coresponding prediction model should be renew periodically. Although the complete continuous monitoring is not practical because of the time consuming and limited financial resources. Therefore, planning a cost-effective methodology to cover enough turfs of public structures monitoring is necessary. For fulfill this purpose, it is necessary to assess and also predict the anti-hazardous performance of structures by the terms of geology and also risk factors.
Area of Zhongliao tunnel at Southern Taiwan is the main testing site, and earthquake damage, landslide and fault rupture are the major risk factors for assessing the deformation of structures. Analysis of potential threats is performed by the method of hazardous micro-zonation for the purpose in analyzing the corresponding monitoring period.
Regarding to the fault slip part, this work interpolated the GPS data of MDI nearby the study area for estimating both the direction and horizontal displacement. Using the GPS data which located across the fault for counting the amplitude of displacement on the weekly basis, and the found amplitude range is about ±5mm.Considering the error tolerance of structure in the study area, we thus determine the minimum observation time period with is method should be six to eight months at least.
Earthquake hazard potential analysis is based upon historical seismic data and also the maintains records of local tunnels with extra consideration of the topographic amplification effect. The scaling relationship of study area is amendments by using V30 shear wave velocity in Taiwan area, then calculating the probabilities and also the threaten zone of further earthquake damage. It shows that the probabilities of earthquake damage at the local tunnel is 0.47 in 5 years and 0.53 in 10 years, respectively.
According to the landslide potential map of CGS plus the above two referred results, this testing site have been divided into to three different parts and discuss the individual monitoring plan, case by case.
This study show that the various sites have its own hazard potential and should compartmentalize the site to a small areas according to various threats. According to the different destroying mechanism and observing period, it can be served as the fundamental figures in deciding the monitoring plan and also set up the alarm threshold in each hazard micro-zonation.

1.朱聖心，「應用地理資訊系統至做地震及降雨所制之山崩危險圖」，國立台灣大2學土木工程所碩士論文，2001。
2.李錫堤，馬國鳳，秦葆珩，「 88年度美濃水庫設計地震評估研究」，台灣省南區水資源局建教合作計畫成果報告，共320頁，1999。
3.李馨慈，「重大地震地表擾動衰減特性於震後高強度降與之山崩潛勢分析」，國立成功大學資源工程所博士論文，2010。
4.林岑彧，「結合遙測影像與GIS資料以資料挖掘技術進行崩塌地辨識-以石門水庫集水區為例」，國立中央大學土木工程所碩士論文，2010。
5.林啟文、陳文山、饒瑞鈞，「台灣活動斷層調查的近期發展，經濟部中央地質調查所特刊」，第十八號，第85-110頁，2007。
6.林鴻成，「旗山斷層中南段GPS監測分析」，國立成功大學地球科學研究所博士論文，2007。
7.侯進雄，「台灣活動斷層構造相關地殼變形監測研究」，國立台灣大學地質科學研究所博士論文，2007。
8.耿文溥，「台南以東丘陵區之地質」。經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊，第1號，1-32頁，1981。
9.徐慶雲，「台南縣坑內、龍船及高雄縣小滾水構造地質查核報告」，中油內部報告，1975。
10.許京穎，「台灣潛勢地震之發生機率評估」，國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文，2008。
11.陳文山，「潮州斷層附近地質背景」，台灣地震科學論壇，編號2-1-401-S4-3，2005。
12.陳春盛、林思源、曾子青、蔡豐吉，「整合GPS、精密水準及三角三邊測量於大型儲槽沈陷變形監測之研究」，行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告，2001。
13.陳春盛、粘惎非、鍾易達、鄭印淞，「整合3D Laser Scanner、物理量測儀器及GPS 等測量儀器進行變形網監測分析之研究」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告，2004。
14.彭文飛，「地震引起山崩之潛勢圖製作—考慮地形放大效應與土體滑動堆積行為」，國立成功大學資源工程所博士論文，2008。
15.溫振宇，「結合地震與颱風因子之山崩模式分析」，國立成功大學地球科學系碩士論文，2004。
16.詹皓凱，「加速度地動潛勢預估」，國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文，2008。
17.葉宏融，「台灣區域震源潛勢地震發生機率之評估與分析」，國立中央大學地球物理研究所碩士論文，2010。
18.蔡璧嬬，「台灣自由場強震站場址分類之進一步研究」，國立中央大學應用地質所碩士論文，2007。
19.廖啟雯，「機率式地震誘發山崩危害度分析–以國姓地區為例」，國立中央大學地球物理研究所博士論文，2004。
20.饒瑞鈞、余致義、洪日豪、胡植慶、李建成、詹瑜璋、許麗文，「地震地質調查及活動斷層資料庫建置－ 活動斷層監測系統計畫（5/5）」，經濟部中央地質調查所研究報告95-10號，共241頁，2006。
21.Anagnos, T., and Kiureghian, A.S., "A review of earthquake occurrence models for seismic hazard analysis", Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 3, 1, 3-11, 1988.
22.Campbell, K. W., "Near-source attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration", Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 71, 2039-2070, 1981.
23.Chang, C.-P., Chang T.-Y., Angelier J., Kao H., Lee J.-C., and Yu S.-B., "Strain and stress field in Taiwan oblique convergent system: constraints from GPS observation and tectonic data.", Earth and Planetary Science Letters 214(1-2): 115-127, 2003.
24.Chrzanowski, A., Chen, Y., Romero, P., and James, M. S., "Integration of geodetic and geotechnical deformation surveys in the geosciences.", Tectonophysics 130(1-4): 369-383,1986.
25.Frangopol, D. M., and Kim, S., “Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: General approach.”, Eng. Struct., 3012, 3644–3653, 2008.
26.Hu, J.C, Hou, C.H., Sheng, L.C., Huang, C., Huang, M.H., Nien, P.F., Lin, C.W., Chan, Y.C, Chen, R.F and Rau, R.J., "Fault activity and lateral extrusion inferred from velocity field revealed by GPS measurement in the Pingtung area of southwestern Taiwan. ", J. Asian Earth Sci. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.07.020, 2006.
27.Iida, K., " Earthquake energy-magnitude relation, strain rate and stress drop in earthquake, seismic efficiency factor, and parameters of faulting", Dept. of Earth Science, Nagoyo University, 1976.
28.Gutenberg, B., and Richter, C.F., "Frequency of earthquake in California", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 34, 185-188, 1944.
29.Guzzetti, F., P. Reichenbach, M. Cardinali, M. Galli, and Ardizzone, F., "Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. ", Geomorphology,72(1-4), pp.272-299, 2005.
30.Joyner, W. B. and Boore, D. M., "Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including record from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 2011-2038, 1981.
31.Kreemer, C., Haines, J., Holt, W. E., Blewitt, G., and Lavallee, D., "On the determination of a global strain rate model", Earth Planets Space, 52, 765–770, 2000.
32.Kim, S. and Frangopol, D. M., "Cost-Effective Lifetime Structural Health Monitoring Based on Availability.", Journal of Structural Engineering 137(1): 22-33, 2011.
33.J. W. Lovse,‧ W. F. Teskey, G. Lachapelle, and M. E. Cannon, "Dynamic Deformation Monitoring of Tall Structure Using GPS Technology.", Journal of Surveying Engineering 121(1): 35-40,1995.
34.Mitasova, H.,Drake, T.,Harmon, R.,Hofierka, J., and McNinch, J., "Spatio-temporal monitoring of evolving topography using LIDAR,Real Time Kinematic GPS and sonar data", GIS - GRASS users conference 2002 - Trento, Italy, 11-13, 2002.
35.Ogawara, M., "Probability of the coming felt earthquake to Tokyo", Quart. J. Seism., 20, 81-92, 1955.
36.Rikitake, T., "Recurrence of great earthquakes at subduction zones”, Tectonophysics, 35, 355-362, 1955.
37.Roberts, G. W., Meng, X., Dodson, A. H., "The Use of Kinematic GPS and Triaxialaccelerometers to Monitor the Deflections of Large Bridges", The 10th FIG International Symposium on Deformation Measurements., 2001.
38.Strauss, A., D. M. Frangopol, Kima, S., "Use of monitoring extreme data for the performance prediction of structures: Bayesian updating.", Engineering Structures 30(12): 3654-3666, 2008.
39.Sella, G. F., Seth, S., Timothy, H. D., Michael, C., James,T. S., Stephane, M., and Dokka, R. K., "Observation of glacial isostatic adjustment in “stable” North America with GPS.", AGU AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION Volume: 34, Issue: 2,Pages: 1-4, 2007.
40.Utus, T., "Estimation of Parameters for Recurrence Models of Earthquakes. ", Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute,University of Tokyo 59(1), 53-66, 1984.
41.Udias, A. and J. Rice, "Statistical analysis of microearthquake activity near the San Andreas Geophysical Observatory.", Hollister, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 65, 809-827, 1975.
42.Ward, T.J., R. Li., and D.B. Simons, " Mapping landslide hazard in forestwatershed", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 108(GT2), pp.319-324, 1982.