目前台灣大眾運輸場站周邊地區之規劃，通常係根據場站所在位置之都市計畫，較少針對運輸系統與都市活動因素考量，易造成土地使用與運輸系統整合之缺乏效率。就世界各國都市的發展經驗觀察之，都市的活動有朝向主要的大眾運輸場站（如捷運車站）集中發展的趨勢。近年來，透過大眾運輸系統整合運輸場站附近地區之土地使用，朝向多樣化土地使用，以提昇公共運輸使用的T.O.D概念因為都市規劃學者的反思，已蔚然成為晚近都市發展及都市設計的主要思潮。本研究從公、私部門的角度，企圖構建捷運場站周邊土地使用多目標規劃模式，目標包含：捷運系統運量最大、土地使用差異最小、家戶可支配所得最大、零售商與土地開商利潤最大，以捷運站位置為決策變數，加入適當的限制條件，分析運輸系統與土地使用型態之互動關係，俾供規劃者明瞭大眾運輸系統影響土地使用配置之重要因素之參考。並可利用此模型尋找出提高土地使用與捷運系統整合整體效益之發展方向，以便未來將興建捷運場站之都市地區，可以此模擬出走向T.O.D.土地使用模式之策略。由本研究單一車站理論模型之模擬分析可發現：（一）模型模擬結果發現各目標間具有衝突性質，單一車站最適場站位置大約為整個都市半徑的四分之一；（二）都市活動聚集於場站周邊之原因大致上是由於捷運場站能吸引人潮聚集與商業投資，由模式模擬結果可知捷運班距、捷運票價、房租、人口密度之改變，皆對都市活動造成吸引或外擴的趨勢；（三）調控計畫人口密度與住宅房租兩項因素可使都市規劃達成T.O.D.之目標；（四）容積管制方法確實可以達成縮小都市差異的目標。

The development plans around the Mass Transit Station area usually follow the urban planning in Taiwan now.Usually, these general plans fail to consider the factors of transit system and private land use sector. According to the developing experience of worldwide cities, urban activities tend to be concentrated around Mass Transit Stations (e.g. MRT stations).In recent years, the concept of T.O.D., which focuses on maximizing and diversifying the land use of the vicinity of mass transit stations, has become the leading principle in urban design. Based on the principles of Transit Oriented Development, this study constructs a multi-goal optimization model of land use pattern around the MRT station areas from government-private sectors point of view. Five objectives have been considered namely, maximizing the number of MRT passengers, minimizing the difference of urban land use, maximizing the net income of each household, maximizing the profit of retailers, and maximizing the profit of land developers. This multi-goal optimization model, with the decision variable as the site of MRT station, and other constraints, aims to analyze the interrelationship between transportation and land use patterns, which can be used to help planners to make the land use plan more efficiently. This model can help planners to understand the important factors influencing the land use patterns. The major findings are summarized as below:（1）The objectives indeed have trade-off relation among themselves, and the optimal site of MRT station is within the one-fourth radius of the city center;（2）Because MRT station can attract people and business investments, urban activities tend to concentrate around Mass Transit Stations, the simulation outcomes of this model showed that changes in the MRT ticket price, MRT headway, land rent and population density can influence urban activities a lot;（3）Adjust the planning population density and the resident rent can achieve T.O.D. objectives; （4）The floor-ratio control can achieve the goal of minimizing the difference of urban land use.

1.何東波，“容積率訂定方式之比較”，研考雙月刊，第十八卷第二期，pp.33-40，1994
2.吳綱立，“大眾捷運系統對都會區發展之影響：加州舊金山灣區捷運與台北捷運經驗的啟示”，第三屆海峽兩岸都市（新市鎮）公共工程學術暨實務研討會論文集，pp.287-309，1998
3.吳綱立、李子璋、蔡佳蓉，“大眾運輸導向發展理念整合於都市土地開發管理之願景與現實：從美國經驗到本土省思”，第七屆國土規劃論壇，2003
4.林祖嘉，“台灣地區房價與房租關係之研究”，台灣銀行季刊，第四十三卷第一期，pp.279-312，1992
5.林森田，土地經濟理論與分析，台北：三民書局，2001
6.林楨家、高誌謙，“用於捷運車站周邊地區容積管制檢討之T.O.D.規劃模式”，第七屆國土規劃論壇，2003
7.財團法人成大研究發展基金會，高雄市都發局委託，捷運系統沿線都市發展規劃期中報告書，2003
8.許志義，多目標決策，台北：五南，1994
9.陳金木，考慮成本結構下高鐵車站區位最適性研究，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文，1998
10.陳勝智，以大眾運輸導向發展理念進行車站地區都市再發展之探討，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文，2000
11.陳惠國等合著，運輸網路分析，台北：五南，2001
12.馮正民，林楨家，都市及區域分析方法，新竹：建都文化，2000
13.馮正民、魏國強、洪嘉宏，“交通運輸與資源利用多目標規劃整合模式之研究”，管理科學學報，第六卷第一期，pp.27-40，1989
14.張有恆，運輸學，台北：華泰書局，1993
15.張昭芸，配合捷運走廊營運之土地使用規劃模式，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文，1993
16.張學孔、錢學陶、杜雲龍， “大眾運輸導向之都市發展策略”，捷運技術半年刊，第二十一期，pp.1-15，2000
17.楊靜音，捷運系統北淡線沿線附近地區都市發展之研究，國立中興大學法商學院都市計劃研究所碩士論文，1988
18.Alonso , W., Location and Land Use, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965
19.Anas　Alex , Richard Arnott, and Kenneth A. Small, “Urban Spatial Structure” , Journal of Economic Literature, 36:pp. 1426-1464 , 1998
20.Anas, Alex and Kim, Ikki. "General Equilibrium Models of Polycentric Urban Land Use with Endogenous Congestion and Job Agglomeration," Journal of Urban Economics, 40(2), pp.232-256. ,September 1996
21.Arnott, R., “Optimal City Size in a Spatial Economy” Journal of Urban Economics 6:65-89,1977
22.Campbell, J. C., Radke, J., Gless, J.T., and Wirtshafter, R.M., “An Application of Linear Programming and Geographic Information System: Cropland Allocation in Antigue”, Environment and Planning A 24:535-549, 1992
23.Cervero R., “Light Rail Transit and Urban Development ”, Journal of the American Planning Association 50:133-147, 1997
24.Cervero, R., and Landis, J. “Why the Transportation-land Use Connection is Still Important ” TR News 187:9-11, 1996
25.Diamond, J.T., and Wright, J.R., “Efficient Land Allocation”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development 115:81-96, 1989
26.Epstein, L. R., “Integrating the Environment and Land Use into Transportation Decision Making.” TR News 187:16-17, 1996
27.Fujita, M., Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK,1989
28.Gilbert, K. C., Holmes, D. D., and Rosenthal, R.E., “A Multiobjective Discrete Optimization Model for Land Allocation”, Management Science 31:1509-1522, 1985
29.Giuliano, G., “Transportation, Land Use, and Public Policy.” TR News 187:12-13, 1996
30.Hanson, S., The Geography of Urban Transportation, The Guilford Press, New York,1986
31.Leinberger, C. B., “Standardizing the American Dream. ” TR News 187:14-15, 1996
32.Loo Lee Sim, Lai Choo Malone-Lee, Kein Hoong Lawrence Chin, “Integrating Land Use and Transport Planning to Reduce Work-Related Travel: A Case Study of Tampines Regional Centre in Singapore”, Habitat International 25:399-414,2001
33.Mills, E. S.; De Ferranti, D. M., “Market Choices and Optimum City Size” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings pp.340-345, 1971
34.Moore, T., “Premises and Promises.” TR News 187:7, 1996
35.Oron, Y.; Pines, D.; Sheshinski, E., “Optimum vs. Equilibrium Land Use Pattern and Congestion Toll” Bell Journal of Economics pp.619-636,1973
36.Ogawa, H.; Fujita, M., “Equilibrium Land Use Patterns in a Nonmonocentric City” Journal of Regional Science 20:455-475, 1980
37.Polzin, S. E., “Transportation/Land Use Relationship: Public Transit's Impact on Land Use.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 125:135-181, 1999
38.Richardson, H. W, The New Urban Economics: and Alternatives, Pion, London, 1977
39.Skinner, R. E., Jr., “The Transportation–Land Use Interaction.” TR News, 187:6 , 1996
40.Transportation Research Board., “Transit, Urban Form and The Built Environment: A Summary of Knowledge.” TCRP Rep. 16, Transportation Cooperative Research Program. , 1996
41.William C. Wheaton, “Land Use and Density in Cities with Congestion”, Journal of Urban Economics 43:258-272,1998