簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 艾杉榷
Sanchez, Allan
論文名稱： 特古西加爾巴市之鋪面管理系統發展架構
Developing the framework of a Pavement Management System for Tegucigalpa city
指導教授： 郭振銘
Kuo, Chen-Ming
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年： 2019
畢業學年度： 107
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 132
外文關鍵詞： Pavement Management Systems (PMS), Pavement Condition Index (PCI), PAVER, Geographical Information Systems (GIS), ArcMap
相關次數： 點閱：133  下載：3 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • Pavement Management Systems (PMS) gather and analyze road network information to help decision makers find optimal strategies for maintaining pavements. They are widely used by transportation agencies because of the benefits and monetary savings that can be achieved with their implementation. This thesis is driven by the need for a pavement management system for Tegucigalpa, the capital city of Honduras. The current pavement management programs of the city are inefficient and lack a systematic nature. Moreover, information regarding the road network is scarce and limited. Therefore, it is fundamental to develop a system that serves as a guidance tool to integrate road network information and enable the systematical selection of maintenance and rehabilitation activities.
    The framework of a PMS for the city was developed using the knowledge acquired through a literature review and an assessment of the current pavement management practices of the city. The framework uses the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) to determine the condition of the roads and it is aided by PMS and GIS software programs. PAVER 7 is used to store the road network information, determine the current and future condition of the roads, and evaluate the impact on pavement performance of different treatment and budget scenarios. Finally, ArcMap 10 is used to make maps that highlight the results of the PMS.
    The developed framework was evaluated in selected sections of the city using road network inventory and condition data from a previous road network assessment. Results of the evaluation showed that the developed PMS framework has many advantages over the current pavement management practices. The implementation of the developed framework is envisioned to integrate road network information in a centralized database. The framework can be used to calculate the cost-efficiency of different treatment scenarios, which would enable the systematic selection of optimal maintenance and rehabilitation strategies and give a better understanding of the current and future road condition and needs. The framework can also be used to identify which maintenance and rehabilitation strategies deliver the best return on investment over the course of time. The implementation of the developed framework would result in more cost-efficient and consistent pavement management programs.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I ABSTRACT II TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS I CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research motivation 2 1.3 Research objectives 3 1.4 Research procedure 3 1.5 Thesis structure 5 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 Overview of Pavement Management Systems (PMS) 6 2.2 Pavement management process 9 2.3 Pavement condition indices 13 2.4 PMS software programs 17 2.5 PMS-GIS integration 20 2.6 Benefits of PMS implementation 21 CHAPTER 3: CURRENT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF TEGUCIGALPA 23 3.1 Overview of Tegucigalpa and its road network 23 3.2 Current pavement management practices 24 3.3 Analysis of a major network assessment 25 3.3.1 Structure of the assessment 25 3.3.2 Areas for improvement and recommendations 33 3.4 The need for a pavement management system 36 CHAPTER 4: DEVELOPING THE FRAMEWORK OF A PMS FOR TEGUCIGALPA 38 4.1 Selection of a pavement management tool 38 4.2 Network definition 41 4.3 Road inventory and data collection 41 4.4 Condition data collection 44 4.5 Pavement condition prediction 44 4.6 Definition of treatment parameters and scenarios 45 4.7 Reports and data update 48 4.8 Framework of the PMS for Tegucigalpa 49 CHAPTER 5: EVALUATING THE FRAMEWORK OF THE PMS FOR TEGUCIGALPA IN SELECTED SECTIONS 50 5.1 Selection of a pavement management tool and network definition 50 5.2 Road inventory and data collection 53 5.3 Condition data collection 56 5.4 Pavement condition prediction 62 5.5 Definition of treatment parameters and scenarios 73 5.6 Reports and data update 81 5.7 Advantages of the developed framework over the current pavement management practices 84 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 6.1 Conclusions 89 6.2 Recommendations for further studies 92 REFERENCES 94 APPENDICES 96 Appendix 1 Survey forms used in the 2011 road network assessment (ASP Consultants, 2011) 96 Appendix 2 Road inventory data collection forms 98 Appendix 3 Pavement distress data collection forms (ASTM International, 2008) 101 Appendix 4 Treatment parameters and costs of PAVER’s default M&R families 103 Appendix 5 Road inventory data 107 Appendix 6 Pavement condition data 109 Appendix 7 PMS reports – GIS maps 111 Appendix 8 PMS Reports – Tables and charts 121

    1. AASHTO. (1993). Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. Washington, D.C.
    2. AASHTO. (2012). Pavement Management Guide 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C.
    3. ASP Consultants. (2011). Road Network Assessment for Tegucigalpa. Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
    4. ASTM International. (2008) Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys. Designation: D 6433 – 07. Pennsylvania, United States.
    5. Broten, M. (1997). Local Agency Pavement Management Application Guide. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Transportation.
    6. Cundill, M. (1991). MERLIN-A Low-Cost Machine for Measuring Road Roughness in Developing Countries. Transportation Research Record, 1291, 106-112.
    7. European Union Road Federation. (2014). An ERF position paper for maintaining and improving a sustainable and efficient road network. Belgium.
    8. Fountain Valley Office. (2018). Pavement Management System for the Cities of Avenal, Hanford, Lemoore, and County of Kings. Fountain Valley, CA.
    9. Garcia, A. (2006). The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview. 36, 41-59. doi:10.1080/10408340500526766
    10. Haas, R., & Hudson, W. R. (2015). Pavement Asset Management. Beverly, MA: Scrivener Publishing LLC.
    11. Haas, R., Hudson, W. R., & Falls, L. C. (2015). Pavement Asset Management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    12. Herold, M., Roberts, D., Noronha, V., & Smadi, O. (2008). Imaging spectrometry and asphalt road surveys. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 16(2), 153-166. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2007.07.001
    13. Illinois Center for Transportation. (2011). Implementing Pavement Management Systems for Local Agencies.
    14. Lynne Cowe Falls, S. Khalil, W. Ronald Hudson, & Ralph Haas. (1994). Long-Term Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pavement Management System Implementation. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Managing Pavements, San Antonio, Texas.
    15. Municipality of Tegucigalpa, & Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). (2016). Action Plan for Tegucigalpa.
    16. Obaidat, M. T., Ghuzlan, K. A., & Al-Mistarehi, B. W. (2018). Integration of Geographic Information System (GIS) and PAVER System Toward Efficient Pavement Maintenance Management System (PMMS). Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 12(3), 449-460.
    17. Ognjenovic, S., Ishkov, A., Cvetkovic, D., Peric, D., & Romanovich, M. (2016). Analyses of Costs and Benefits in the Pavement Management Systems. Procedia Engineering, 165, 954-959. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.805
    18. Onyango, M., Merabti, S. A., Owino, J., Fomunung, I., & Wu, W. (2018). Analysis of cost effective pavement treatment and budget optimization for arterial roads in the city of Chattanooga. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 12(3), 291-299. doi:10.1007/s11709-017-0419-5
    19. Ribeiro, A. M. G., Capitão, S. D., & Correia, R. G. (2019). Deciding on maintenance of small municipal roads based on GIS simplified procedures. Case Studies on Transport Policy. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2019.03.011
    20. Robinson, R., Danielson, U., & Snaith, M. (1998). Road Maintenance Management. London, : McMillan Press Limited.
    21. She, T. H., Aouad, G., & Sarshar, M. (1999). A Geographic Information System (GIS)–Based Bridge Management System. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 14, 417–427.
    22. Smadi, O. (2004). Quantifying the Benefits of Pavement Management. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Managing Pavements, Brisbane Queensland, Australia.
    23. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. (2003). Status of Pavement Management Systems (PMS) in Southeast Michigan. Detroit, MI.
    24. Stantec Consulting, & Ministry of Transportation of Ontario. (2005). Integration of Preventive Maintenance in the Pavement Preservation Program: Ontario Experience. Paper presented at the First National Conference on Pavement Preservation, Kansas City MO, United States.
    25. U.S. Department of Transportation. (2008). Pavement Management Catalog. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration.
    26. Washington State Department of Transportation. (1994). A Guide for Local Agency Pavement Managers. Olympia, WA: The Northwest Technology Transfer Center.

    下載圖示 校內：立即公開
    校外：立即公開
    QR CODE