簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪嘉壕
Jia-hao, Hong
論文名稱: 影響降低輕型機車考照年齡態度之因素:一般民眾與學生之比較
The factors to influence the attitude toward lowering the minimum test age of getting a light motorcycle driving license- Compare the public with the students
指導教授: 陳正忠
Chan, Victor
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 交通管理科學系
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 機車駕照機車
外文關鍵詞: motorcycle, motorcycle driving license, unlicensed driving
相關次數: 點閱:107下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • High mobility, easy parking and low cost of the motorcycles turn out to be very
    important factors in Taiwan’s traffic of nowadays. It is so convenient for most teenagers to
    obtain such a transportation tool whether it is borrowed from a friend or come-at-able from
    his or her own family. The result, however, is that such a convenience might cause relatively
    high crash involvements, driving without licenses in particular, due to their immature skill in
    mastering the machine. So that we have conducted a survey of public opinion aimed at those
    people whose age over 20 years old and the students whose age from 16 to 18 years old so as
    to get the idea of their attitude toward lowering the minimum test age of getting a light
    motorcycle driving license. Also, we want to know from this survey: what sort of the
    students’ social or economic background seems more likely to drive them to have the
    unlicensed driving experience and how many traffic accidents caused thereby over the past
    year.
    From this survey, we can clearly find that general attitude of the public tend to oppose
    lowering the minimum test age of getting such driving license, but, on the other hand, the
    students are inclined to agree. The main reasons from the public are that the young novice
    drivers have immature mind, and don’t have enough skills and experience to deal with the
    situation on the road. The main reason from the students is that it is convenient for them to
    attend school or to do the shopping.
    We can also discover that the more motorcycles one’s family have, the more positive
    attitude one voices ‘yes’, the public’s opinion shows so and the students alike. The younger
    the interview- recipients are, the more positive attitude they adopt. Moreover, the males take
    more positive attitude than females do.
    In addition, the public with second-class job take the most positive attitude toward
    lowering the minimum test age. And the parents’ attitude and the temptation from friends
    around definitely relate to the students’ attitude and are apt to gain unlicensed driving
    experience.

    Chapter 1 Introduction ..............7 1.1 Background ......................7 1.2 Research scope and purpose.......8 1.3 Research problems and procedure..9 Chapter 2 Literature review .........10 2.1 Motorcycle accidents: Taiwan VS other main nations in the world............................10 2.2 The serious level of unlicensed driving..............................15 2.3 The factors to relate to the drivers to be injured or injure ............................. 17 2.4 Licensing system: Classification of motorcycle license..............................21 Chapter 3 Research Hypotheses & models ..............................22 3.1 The attitude of the public ..............................22 3.2 The attitude of the students ........................... 25 3.3 The unlicensed driving experience of the students.............................28 3.4 The number of the students’ traffic accidents in the last year ...........................29 Chapter 4 Method ....................31 4.1 Questionnaire survey.............31 4.2 Sampling & distribution .........33 4.3 Methods to survey ...............37 Chapter 5 Results ...................38 5.1 Survey aimed at those who are over 20 years old .................................38 5.2 The survey of the students whose age is ranged from 16 to 18 years old .....................58 5.3 For unlicensed driving...........74 5.4 Number of accidents in the last one year in point of students driving without licenses....80 Chapter 6 Discussion and suggestions .........................90 6.1 Discussion ......................90 6.2 Suggestions......................98

    1.張新立,楊淑娟,「青少年學生旅運活動需求特性與違規使用機器腳踏車行為之地域性比較研究」,中華民國第一屆機器腳踏車交通與安全研討會學術論文集,民國85年11月。
    2.Åberg, L., & RimmÖ, P. (1998). Dimensions of aberrant driver behaviour. Ergonomics, 41(1), 39–56.
    3.Dobson, A., Brown, W., Ball, J., Powers, J., & McFadden, M. (1999). Women drivers’ behaviour, socio-demographic characteristics and Accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev.31 525–535
    4.Murray Å. (1998). The home and school background of young drivers involved in traffic accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev., 30, 169-182.
    5.Attewell, R (1998). Women Behind the Wheel: A Statistical Overview of Road Crash Involvement. Federal Office of Road Safety, Canberra, Australia.
    6.Blockley, P., & Hartley, L. (1995). Aberrant driving behaviour: errors and violations. Ergonomics, 38(9), 1759–1771.
    7.Brown, I.D., & Groeger, J.A.(1998). Risk perception and decision taking during the transition between novice and experienced driver status. Ergonomics, 31, 585-897.
    8.Bjørskau, T. (2000). Road Traffic Risk in Norway, 1997/98. Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics, 483.
    9.California DMV(California Department of Motor Vehicles)
    http://www.dmv.ca.gov/dmv.htm
    10.Cooper, P. J., Pinili, M., & Chen W. (1995). An examination of the crash involvement rates of novice drivers aged 16 to 55. Accid. Anal. Prev., 27, 89-104,.
    11.Hanna, C.L., Taylor D. M. , Sheppard M. A. , & Laflamme L. (2006). Fatal crashes involving young unlicensed drivers in the U.S. Journal of Safety Research, 37, 385–393
    12.Clark D.D., Ward P., Bartle C., & Truman W. (2006). Young drivers accidents in the UK: The influence of age, experience, and time of day. Accid. Anal. Prev., 38, 871-878.
    13.Deery, H.A. (1999). Harzard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30, 225-236.
    14.DeJoy, D. M. (1989). The optimism bias and traffic accident risk perception. Acc. Ana. Prev., 21(4), 333–340.
    15.DeJoy, D. M. (1992). An examination of gender differences in traffic accident risk perception. Acc. Ana. Prev., 24, 237-246.
    16.Department of Population of the Ministry of the Interior of R.O.C. http://www.ris.gov.tw/ch4/static/st1-7-9411.xls
    17.Department of Statistics of the Ministry of the Communications of R.O.C. http://www.motc.gov.tw/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=stat.asp
    18.Department of Statistics of Department of Health http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/衛生統計重要指標/93/8.xls
    http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/data/死因摘要/93年/表45.xls
    http://www.doh.gov.tw/statistic/生命統計/93.htm
    19.Department of Traffic of National Police Agency of the Ministry of the Interior of R.O.C. http://www.npa.gov.tw/index.php
    20.DSA(Driving Standards Agency)http://www.dsa.gov.uk/index.asp
    21.Evans, L. (1991). Traffic Safety and the Driver. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
    22.Federal Office of Road Safety. (1997). Profile of unlicensed motorists in fatal crashes. Monograph 20. Canberra: Federal Office of Road Safety (FORS). Available at: http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/1997/pdf/Surv_Unlic_2.pdf
    23.Frisch, L., Johnston, S., Melhorn, K., Hill, C., & Boyce, M. (2003). In the hands of children: Fatal car, van, and truck crashes involving drivers aged 7 through 14 years. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 157, 1032.
    24.Gregersen, N.P., & Bjurulf, P. (1996). Young novice drivers: toward a model of their accident involvement. Acc. Ana.Pre., 28, 229-241.
    25.Gregersen, N.P., Nyberg, A., Berg, H-Y. (2000). Sixteen years age limit for learners in Sweden: an evaluation of safety effects. Acc. Ana.Pre. 35, 25–35.
    26.Gregersen, N.P., Nyberg, A. Privat övningskörning – En undersökning om hur den utnyttjas och om dess för och nackdelar för trafiksäkerheten. VTI rapport 481. Linköping, Swedish Road and Traffic Research Institute (VTI) 2002 (in Swedish)
    27.Hasselberg, M., Laflamme, L., RingbackWeitoft, G., & Epidemiol J.(2001). Socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries during childhood and youth: a closer look at different kinds of road user. Community Health, 55, 858–862.
    28.Hasselberg, M., Laflamme, L. (2003). Socioeconomic background and road traffic injuries: a study of young car drivers in Sweden. Traffic Injury Prev., 4, 249–254.
    29.Haworth, N., & Mulvihill C. ( 2005 ), Review of motorcycle licensing and training. MONASH University Accident Research Centre.
    30.HHTSA(National Highway Traffic Safety Administration)http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/
    31.Hotz, G.A., Cohn, S.M., Mishkin, D., Castelblanco, A., Li, P., & Popkin, C., Duncan, R.(2004). Outcome of motorcycle riders at one year post-injury. Traffic Inj. Prev., 5, 87–89.
    32.Jonah, B.A.(1986). Accidents risk and risk-taking behaviour among young drivers. Acc. Ana.Pre., 18, 255-271.
    33.Joksch, H. C. (1993). Velocity change and fatality risk in a crash––a rule of thumb. Acc. Ana.Pre., 25(1), 103–104.
    34.Laflamme, L., Engstr¨om, K. (2002). Socioeconomic differences in Swedish children and adolescents injured in road traffic incidents: cross sectional study. BMJ, 324, 396–397.
    35.Lajunen, T., Parker, D., & Stradling, S. G. (1998).Dimensions of driver anger, aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation. Transportation Research Part F, 1, 107–121.
    36.Lam, L. T. (2003). A neglected risky behavior among children and adolescents: Underage driving and injury in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Safety Research, 34, 315−320.
    37.Land Transpor New Zealand http://www.landtransport.govt.nz/index.html
    38.Liu, J. Y., Mooney, D. P., Meyer, M. M., & Shorter, N. A. (1998). Teenage driving fatalities. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 33, 1084−1088.
    39.Hasselberg, M., & Laflamme, L. (2005). The social patterning of injury repetitions among young car drivers in Sweden. Acc. Ana.Pre., 37, 163–168.
    40.Sullman, J.M., Michelle, L.M., & Karl, B. P. (2002). Aberrant driving behaviours amongst New Zealand truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 5, 217–232
    41.Mayou, R., & Bryant, B. (2003) Consequences of road traffic accidents for different types of road user. Injury, 34, 197–202.
    42.McKenna, F. P. (1993). It won’t happen to me: Unrealistic optimism or illusion of control. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 39–50.
    43.Millstein, S. G.(1993).Perceptual, attributional, and affective processes in perceptions of vulnerability through the life span. London: Sage Publications, 55-65.
    44.Moe, D.(1986). Young drivers: relation between perceived and real ability. Behavioural studies (Rep. no. STF63 A92002). Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF Samferdselsteknikk.
    45.MSF(Motorcycle Safety Foundation)http://www.msf-usa.org
    46.Mullin, B., Jackson, R., Langley, J., & Norton, R. (2000). Increasing age and experience: are both protective against motorcycle injury? A case–control study. Inj. Prev., 6, 32–35.
    47.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2004). Traffic safety facts: Research note. National Center for Health Statistics and Analysis. Washington DC: Department of Transportation. (Accessed May 17, 2005). Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2004/809911.pdf
    48.Harré, N., Field, J., & Kirkwood, B. (1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Safety Research, 27, 163-173.
    49.Ulleberg, P.(2002). Personality subtypes of young drivers. Relationship to risk-taking preferences, accident involvement, and response to a traffic safety campaign. Transportation research Part F, 4, 279-297.
    50.Parker, D., Reason, J. T., Manstead, A., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Driving errors, driving violations, and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 38, 1036–1048
    51.Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Extending the theory of planed behaviour: the role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 127–137.
    52.Quimby, A. R., Maycock, G., Carter, I. D., Dixon, R., & Wall, J. G. 1986. Perceptual abilities of accident involved drivers. Crowthorne, Transport and Road Research Laboratory, UK, 27..
    53.Reason, J., Manstead, A., Stradling, S., Baxter, J., & Campbell, K. (1990). Errors and violations: a real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10/11), 1315–1332.
    54.Reason, J. T. (1990) Human Error, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
    55.Reeder, A.I., Chalmers, D.J., & Langley, J.D.(1996). Rider training, reasons for riding, and the social context of riding among young on road motorcyclists in New Zealand. Public Health, 20, 369– 374.
    56.Reeder, A.I., Chalmers, D.J., Marshall, S.W., & Langley, J.D. (1997). Psychological and social predictors of motorcycle use by young adult males in New Zealand. Soc. Sci. Med., 45, 1357–1376.
    57.Rothe, J. P. (1987a). Eriebnis of young drivers involved in injury producing crashes. In J. P. Rothe (Ed.), Rethinking young drivers. New Brunswick: Transaction, 49-130.
    58.Rutter, D.R., & Quine, L.(1996). Age and experience in motorcycling safety. Acc. Anal. Pre,. 28, 15–21.
    59.Schoon, C. ( 2004 ), Traffic legislation and safety in Europe concerning the moped and the A1 category (125 cc ) motorcycle, SWOV, Leidschendam.
    60.Scopatz, R. A., Hatch, C. E., Hilger DeLucia, B., & Tays, K. A. (2003). Unlicensed to kill: The sequel. Washington DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. Available at: http://www.aaafoundation.org/pdf/UnlicensedToKill2.pdf
    61.Stoddart, K.(1987). Erfahrung of young drivers. New Brunswick: Transaction. In J. P. Rothe (Ed.), Rethinking young drivers, 131-198.
    62.Svenson, O. (1981). Are we all less risky and more skillful than our fellow drivers. Acta Psychologica, 47, 143–148.
    63.Tabitha, B. H., Mark, S. H. (2002). The influence of desire for control on drivers’ risk-taking behaviour. Transportation Research Part F ,4, 271–277.
    64.Wasielewski, P. (1984). Speed as a measure of driver risk: observed speeds versus driver and vehicle characteristics. Acc. Ana. & Pre., 16(2), 89–103.
    65.Wells, S., Mullin, B., Norton, R., Langley, J., Connor, J., Lay-Yee, R., & Jackson, R. (2004). Motorcycle rider conspicuity and crash related injury: case-control study. BMJ,328, 857.
    66.West, R., French, D., Kemp, R., & Elander, J. (1993). Direct observation of driving, self reports of driving behaviour, and accident involvement. Ergonomics, 36(5), 557–567.
    67.Wick, M., Muller, E.J., Ekkernkamp, A., Muhr, G. (1998). The motorcyclist: easy rider or easy victim? An analysis of motorcycle accidents in Germany, 16, 320–323.
    68.Williams, A. F., Preusser, D. F., Ferguson, S. A., & Ulmer, R. G. (1997). Analysis of the fatal crash involvements of 15-year-old drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 28, 49−54.
    69.Wilson, T., & Greensmith, J. (1983). Multivariate analysis of the relationship between drivers’ accident, sex, and exposure status. Human Factors, 25(3), 303–312.
    70.Wladis, A., Bostrom, L., Nilsson, B. (2002). Injuries in 8927 patients admitted after motor-cycle crashes in Sweden 1987–1994 inclusive. Eur. J. Surg., 168, 187–192.
    71.Zuckerman, M.(1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 45-52.
    72.Zuckerman, M.(1979). Sensation seeking and risk taking. In C. E. Izard(Ed.), Emotions in personality and psychopathology. New York: Plenum Press.
    73.Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S., & Eysenck, H. T. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross cultural, age and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 139-149.

    下載圖示 校內:2010-04-24公開
    校外:2012-04-24公開
    QR CODE