公路車禍發生原因多為煞車不及，或因輪胎鎖死，造成滑動摩擦，使得輪胎與鋪面間無法產生良好的煞車力，而鋪面抗滑能力(摩擦係數)的程度為影響之關鍵。本研究將改變不同摩擦係數以及排列寬度比例，以兩種煞車方式測試在輪胎煞車過程中，煞車距離及煞車效益的影響。研究利用有限元素軟體ABAQUS進行模擬，測試不同車速下探究煞車距離。研究結果發現，ABS煞車能夠減少10~15%之煞車距離，隨車速增加而其煞車距離縮短比例會逐漸提升，另外以高摩擦係數在一般鋪面上交錯排列，可以減短煞車距離，主要根據其兩不同路面摩擦係數之平均值而定。最後交錯排列比例及煞車過程碰觸方式會些微影響煞車距離。整體來說，鋪面摩擦係數對煞車影響甚大。

The car accidents were due to the tire locked on braking or the insufficient friction of the pavement. It is necessary to realize the effect of the friction coefficient of pavement by design different friction coefficient on pavement and using different type of braking system. Also the different speeds will be tested. This study will set a model in ABAQUS and simulate the braking distance in different situations. By the result, the ABS can reduce about 10~15% braking distance. On the other hand, using the friction coefficient of 1.0 and 1.5 paved one by one with strip can reduce braking distance. Due to the average of the coefficient of 1.0 and 1.5 is higher than origin one. Finally, the braking distance will slightly affected by the width of the strip, the way to arrangement and the coefficient of the contact point when the brakes started operation. Overall, the effect of the friction
coefficient is significant.

1. Popov, V.L., Contact Mechanics and Friction. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
2. Gllespie, T.D., Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc, 1992.
3. Stolarski, T.A. and S. Tobe, Rolling contacts. London : Professional Engineering Pub. Ltd., 2000.
4. Flintsch, G.W., et al., Effect of HMA Properties on Pavement Surface Characteristics. 2002.
5. Fwa, T.F., Y.S. Choo, and Y. Liu, Effect of Aggregate Spacing on Skid Resistance of Asphalt Pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2003. 129(4): p. 420-426.
6. Shim, T. and D. Margolis, Model-Based Road Friction Estimation. Vehicle System Dynamics: International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility, 2004. 41(4): p. 249-276.
7. Ong, G.P. and T.F. Fwa, Wet-Pavement Hydroplaning Risk and Skid Resistance: Modeling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2007. 133(10): p. 590-598.
8. Ong, G.P. and T.F. Fwa, Wet-Pavement Hydroplaning Risk and Skid Resistance: Analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008. 134(5): p. 182-190.
9. Hall, J.W., et al., Guide for Pavement Friction. Transportation Research Board, 2009.
10. Ong, G.P. and T.F. Fwa, Modeling Skid Resistance of Commercial Trucks on Highways. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2010. 136(6): p. 510-517.
11. Roque, R. and G. Wang, Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling of Static Tire-Pavement Interaction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2155(-1): p. 158-169.
12. Xia, K. and Y. Yang, Three-dimensional finite element modeling of tire/ground interaction. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2012. 36(4): p. 498-516.
13. 林大煜、廖慶秋，我國汽車煞車距離與行車速度關係之測試與研究，交通部運輸研究所，民國84年。
14. 林大煜、廖慶秋，影響汽車煞車距離相關因素之探討與分析，交通部運輸研究所，民國85年。
15. 林大煜、黃品誠，車輛安全配備-ABS防鎖煞車系統之效用評估，交通部運輸研究所，民國85年。
16. 林豐福、廖慶秋，煞車距離與行車速度影響關係之試驗與研究，交通部運輸研究所，民國86年。
17. 王信發，由煞車距離推估行車速度之研究，國立中央大學機械工程研究所碩士論文，民國91年。
18. 趙志勇、楊成宗，汽車煞車系統ABS理論與實際，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，民國80年。
19. 吳金華，汽車防鎖定煞車系統，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，民國86年。
20. George, M., The Difference Between Coefficient of Friction and Drag Factor. 2005.
21. 士盟科技股份有限公司, http://www.simutech.com.tw.