簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃婷婷
Huang, Ting-Ting
論文名稱: 公司對有害產品報導之回應策略與消費者反應關係探討 -一有害食品實驗設計例
Corporate Response to Product Harm Publicity and Consumer Reaction: An Experimental Study of Food Products
指導教授: 葉桂珍
Yeh, Quey-Jen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 79
中文關鍵詞: 有害性產品危機歸咎理論不信任購買意願
外文關鍵詞: product-harm crisis, blame attribution, consumer distrust, purchase intention
相關次數: 點閱:158下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 由於產品設計趨於複雜,政府單位與公司嚴格把關產品品質,加上媒體的監督下,使得有害性產品的企業危機(Product-harm crises)層出不窮。根據2010年美國消費品安全委員會(Consumer Product Safety Commission)網站公告表示,其有害性消費產品申訴已多達400起案件。對於此議題的探討,國外學術研究投入較多資源。
    近年來,透過經濟部標準檢驗局商品安全資訊網的揭露,可得知台灣亦有知名品牌的除濕機、洗碗機、電暖器等自願召回與強制召回的資訊。然而,台灣的學術界卻鮮少投入該議題之研究。
    本研究目以奶茶為例,實驗設計為方法,探究一般消費者對有害食品報導之反應,包括對事件責任之歸咎、對公司之不信任感、以及後續消費行為之影響。所探討的因子則包括事件對身體傷害之輕微/嚴重度、高/低公司商譽、以及公司主動/被動式的回應策略,因此是一2×2×2 三因子的實驗設計。
    實證結果顯示,三項因子對於消費者的反應皆有顯著影響:其中,輕微事件、高商譽、與主動式回應策略,對被報導公司之傷害--包括責任歸咎、對該公司之不信任感、與對該公司後續消費意願與形象的傷害--顯著較低。另外,商譽與公司的回應策略具有顯著交互作用:在降低公司的不信任感與後續購買意願及形象傷害的效果比較上,低知名度採取主動策略者所獲得的效果,比高知名度採取主動策略者所獲得的效果,顯著較佳。最後,雖然公司商譽可消弭一些消費者對事件的責任歸屬,但有害食品事件仍會顯著影響公司形象與消費者後續購買意願。因此,對於有害食品報導,公司應採取積極、主動的回應策略,並需嚴格管控品質管理計畫,避免有害產品事件的發生。

    Product-harm crises occur ever more frequently and visibly due to the increasing complexity of products, stringent scrutiny by manufacturers and policy makers, and demanding customers, as well as vigilant media. According to information revealed by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, over 400 products were recalled in 2010 due to safety concerns. As a result, researchers and practitioners have explored the theory and practices for product-harm crisis preparation and response.
    There are many product-harm crises in Taiwan, but existing academic journals relating to them are lacking in contrast to foreign countries. Using milk tea as the experimental example, this study investigates three factors: low and high firm reputation, passive and proactive firm’s response strategies, and mild and severe level of event severity, which impact consumers’ blame attribution, distrust and reaction due to food product-harm publicity. The research procedure therefore constitutes a 2×2×2 three way experimental design.
    The results demonstrate that the main effects of firm reputation, response strategies, and the severity of event are significant. Most importantly, the interaction of firm reputation and response strategies indicates that negative impact on distrust and purchase intention for a company with a low reputation could be mitigated when the company takes a proactive strategy. When a company encounters a product-harm crisis, market penalties would decrease if a responsible response is initiated.
    Since food products strongly relate to consumers’ health, consumers blame the company for product-harm crises no matter what the reputation or response is. As a result, the best approach for a company is to have an aggressive plan of product quality and safety prevention in place.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II 誌謝 III TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII LIST OF APPENDICES VIII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation 3 1.3 Research Purpose 4 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 5 2.1 Product-Harm Crisis 5 2.2 Major Factors Affecting Firms in Crises 6 2.2.1 Firm Reputation 7 2.2.2 Firm’s Response Strategies 8 2.2.3 Severity of Injury 10 2.3 Consumer Reaction 11 2.3.1 Blame Attribution of Consumers 11 2.3.2 Consumer Trust 13 2.3.3 Consumer Retaining 14 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 15 3.1 Hypotheses Development 15 3.1.1 Main Effect of Firm Reputation 15 3.1.2 Main Effect of Firm’s Response Strategies 16 3.1.3 Main Effect of Severity of Event 17 3.1.4 Interactive Effect of Firm Reputation and Response Strategies 17 3.1.5 Interactive Effect of Firm Reputation and Severity of Event 18 3.1.6 Interactive Effect of Firm’s Response Strategies and Severity of Event 19 3.2 Operational Definition 20 3.2.1 Independent Variables 20 3.2.2 Dependent Variables 22 3.3 Experimental Procedure 26 3.3.1 Scenarios 26 3.3.2 Sampling Plan 27 3.3.3 Pretest 28 3.3.4 Scenario and Manipulation Check 28 3.3.5 Reliability of Pretest Questionnaires 29 3.4 Data Analysis Procedures 31 3.4.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis 31 3.4.2 Factor Analysis 31 3.4.3 Reliability Analysis 31 3.4.4 Correlation Analysis 32 3.4.5 Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) 32 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULT 33 4.1 Descriptive Analysis 33 4.1.1 Characteristics of Respondents 33 4.1.2 Sample Size in Each Scenario 34 4.1.3 Manipulation Check 34 4.2 Factor Analysis and Reliability 35 4.2.1 Independent Variables 35 4.2.2 Blame Attribution of Consumers 37 4.2.3 Consumer Distrust 38 4.2.4 Consumer Retaining 39 4.3 Correlation Analysis 40 4.4 MANCOVA Test 41 4.4.1 Firm Reputation and Response Strategy 41 4.4.2 Firm Reputation and Severity of Event 48 4.4.3 Firm’s Response Strategy and Severity of Event 55 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 60 5.1 Discussion 60 5.2 Managerial Implications 63 5.3 Limitation and Direction for Future Research 64 5.4 Concluding Remark 66 REFERENCES 67 APPENDIX 73

    Adams, J. E., Highhouse, S., & Zickar, M. J. (2010). Understanding general distrust of corporations. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(1), 38-51.
    Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (2000). Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 203-214.
    Ahmed, P., Gardella, J., & Nanda, S. (2002). Wealth effect of drug withdrawals on firms and their competitors. Financial Management (Blackwell Publishing Limited), 31(3), 21.
    Anonymous. (2008, December 3). Sharp to recall over 16,000 projectors. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Anonymous. (2010, October 10). Health authorities recall weight-loss drug meridia. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Benedicktus, R. L., Brady, M. K., Darke, P. R., & Voorhees, C. M. (2010). Conveying trustworthiness to online consumers: Reactions to consensus, physical store presence, brand familiarity, and generalized suspicion. Journal of Retailing, 86(4), 322-335.
    Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177-186.
    Blanchard, B. (2008, October 2). China milk scandal firm asked for cover-up help. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Bunniran, S., McCaffrey III, D. J., Bentley, J. P., & Bouldin, A. S. (2009). Pharmaceutical product withdrawal: Attributions of blame and its impact on trust. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 5(3), 262-273.
    Burgoon, J. K., & Le Poire, B. A. (1993). Effects of communication expectancies, actual communication, and expectancy disconfirmation on evaluations of communicators and their communication behavior. Human Communication Research, 20(1), 67-96.
    Caruana, A. (1997). Corporate reputation: Concept and measurement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 6(2), 109-118.
    Chaikin, A. L., & Darley, J. M. (1973). Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 268-275.
    Cheah, E. T., Chan, W. L., & Chieng, C. L. L. (2007). The corporate social responsibility of pharmaceutical product recalls: An empirical examination of u.S. And u.K. Markets. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 427-449.
    Chen, Y., Ganesan, S., & Liu, Y. (2009). Does a firm's product-recall strategy affect its financial value? An examination of strategic alternatives during product-harm crises. Journal of Marketing, 73(6), 214-226.
    Coombs, W. (2007). Attribution theory as a guide for post-crisis communication research. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 135-139.
    Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(3), 163-176.
    Coombs, W. T. (Ed.). (2007). Ongoing crisis communication :Planning, managing, and responding Los Angeles :SAGE Publications.
    Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experiment study in crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(4), 279-295.
    Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management, 10(2), 123-137.
    Couchen, W., & Chi-Cheng, L. (2007). Exploring crowding effects on collectivists' emotions and purchase intention of durable and non-durable goods in east asian night markets. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 20(1), 5-18.
    Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
    Darke, P., Ashworth, L., & Main, K. (2010). Great expectations and broken promises: Misleading claims, product failure, expectancy disconfirmation and consumer distrust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 347-362.
    Davidson III, W. N., & Worrell, D. L. (1992). The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal, 13(6), 467-473.
    Dawar, N., & Pillutla, M. M. (2000). Impact of product-harm crises on brand equity: The moderating role of consumer expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(2), 215-226.
    Dean, D. H. (2004). Consumer reaction to negative publicity: Effects of corporate reputation, response, and responsibility for a crisis event. Journal of Business Communication, 41(2), 192-211.
    Department of Health, E. Y., R.O.C (Taiwan). (2000). Food recall guidelines.
    Fisk, M. C. (2010, February 6). Toyota faces at least 29 lawsuits over sudden acceleration. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Folkes, V. S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. The Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 398-409.
    Folkes, V. S., Koletsky, S., & Graham, J. L. (1987). A field study of causal inferences and consumer reaction: The view from the airport. The Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), 534-539.
    Gray, E. R., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695-702.
    Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. The Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59.
    Grunwald, G., & Hempelmann, B. (2011). Impacts of reputation for quality on perceptions of company responsibility and product-related dangers in times of product-recall and public complaints crises: Results from an empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(4), 264-283.
    Gupta, P., Yadav, M. S., & Varadarajan, R. (2009). How task-facilitative interactive tools foster buyers' trust in online retailers: A process view of trust development in the electronic marketplace. Journal of Retailing, 85(2), 159-176.
    Hess, R., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. (2003). Service failure and recovery: The impact of relationship factors on customer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 127-145.
    Hess, R. L., Ganesan, S., & Klein, N. M. (2007). Interactional service failures in a pseudorelationship: The role of organizational attributions. Journal of Retailing, 83(1), 79-95.
    Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
    Iglesias, V. (2009). The attribution of service failures: Effects on consumer satisfaction. Service Industries Journal, 29(2), 127-141.
    Jarrell, G., & Peltzman, S. (1985). The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers. Journal of Political Economy, 93(3), 512.
    Jorgensen, B. K. (1994). Consumer reaction to company-related disasters: The effect of multiple versus single explanations. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 348-352.
    Keh, H. T., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(7), 732-742.
    Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 381 - 403.
    Klein, J., & Dawar, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 203-217.
    Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
    Laczniak, R. N., DeCarlo, T. E., & Ramaswami, S. N. (2001). Consumers' responses to negative word-of-mouth communication: An attribution theory perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 57-73.
    Laufer, D., & Coombs, W. T. (2006). How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues. Business Horizons, 49(5), 379-385.
    Laufer, D., & Gillespie, K. (2004). Differences in consumer attributions of blame between men and women: The role of perceived vulnerability and empathic concern. Psychology and Marketing, 21(2), 141-157.
    Laufer, D., Gillespie, K., McBride, B., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). The role of severity in consumer attributions of blame: Defensive attributions in product-harm crises in mexico. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 17(2/3), 33-50.
    Laufer, D., Gillespie, K., & Silvera, D. H. (2009). The role of country of manufacture in consumers' attributions of blame in an ambiguous product-harm crisis Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21(3), 189-201.
    Laufer, D., Silvera, D. H., & Meyer, T. (2006). The impact of aging on consumer attributions of blame for a product harm crisis. Advances in Consumer Research, 33(1), 704-705.
    Lee, B. K. (2004). Audience-oriented approach to crisis communication:: A study of hong kong consumers' evaluation of an organizational crisis. Communication Research, 31(5), 600-618.
    Lilley, R. (2008, December 24). Sanlu, company in china milk scandal, declared bankrupt. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Luo, Y. D. (2008). A strategic analysis of product recalls: The role of moral degradation and organizational control. Management and Organization Review, 4(2), 183-196.
    Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361-367.
    Marcus, A. A., & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 281-305.
    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
    Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20.
    Mowen, J. C. (1980). Further information on consumer perceptions of product recalls. Advances in Consumer Research, 7(1), 519-523.
    Nguyen, N., & Leblanc, G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers' retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(4), 227-236.
    Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2d ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Poon, P. S., Hui, M. K., & Au, K. (2004). Attributions on dissatisfying service encounters: A cross-cultural comparison between canadian and prc consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 38(11/12), 1527-1540.
    Rhee, M., & Haunschild, P. R. (2006). The liability of good reputation: A study of product recalls in the us automobile industry. Organization Science, 17(1), 101-117.
    Robbennolt, J. (2000). Outcome severity and judgments of responsibility: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Apploed Social Psychology, 30(12), 2575-2609.
    Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
    Salin, V., & Hooker, N. H. (2001). Stock market reaction to food recalls. Review of Agricultural Economics, 23(1).
    Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659-680.
    Sims, R. (2009). Toward a better understanding of organizational efforts to rebuild reputation following an ethical scandal. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 453-472.
    Siomkos, G. (1989). Managing product-harm crises. Organization & Environment, 3(1), 41-60.
    Siomkos, G., Triantafillidou, A., Vassilikopoulou, A., & Tsiamis, I. (2010). Opportunities and threats for competitors in product-harm crises. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28(6), 770-791.
    Siomkos, G. J., & Kurzbard, G. (1994). The hidden crisis in product-harm crisis management. European Journal of Marketing, 28(2), 30 - 41.
    Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 675-682.
    Smart, C., & Vertinsky, I. (1984). Strategy and the environment: A study of corporate responses to crises. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 199-213.
    Smith, N. C., & Cooper-Martin, E. (1997). Ethics and target marketing: The role of product harm and consumer vulnerability. The Journal of Marketing, 61(3), 1-20.
    Souiden, N., & Pons, F. (2009). Product recall crisis management: The impact on manufacturer's image, consumer loyalty and purchase intention. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(2), 106-114.
    Stockmyer, J. (1996). Brands in crisis: Consumer help for deserving victims. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 429-435.
    Taylor, M. (2000). Cultural variance as a challenge to global public relations: A case study of the coca-cola scare in europe. Public Relations Review, 26(3), 277-293.
    Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis : Understanding concepts and applications (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25-29.
    Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85-104.
    Van Heerde, H., Helsen, K., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2007). The impact of a product-harm crisis on marketing effectiveness. Marketing Science, 26(2), 230-245.
    Vartabedian, K. B. R. (2009, December 9). Toyota cars have most consumer complaints about sudden speed up. The China Post, retrieved from http://www.chinapost.com.tw/
    Vassilikopoulou, A., Siomkos, G., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Pantouvakis, A. (2009). Product-harm crisis management: Time heals all wounds? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(3), 174-180.
    Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305-317.
    Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological review, 92(4), 548-573.
    Weiner, B. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. The Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 382-387.
    York, C. C., Gumbus, A., & Lilley, S. (2008). Reading the tea leaves—did citigroup risk their reputation during 2004–2005? Presented at icaa's second international conference globalization – the good corporation june 26–28, 2007 baruch college, new york city. Business and Society Review, 113(2), 199-225.
    Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. The Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

    下載圖示 校內:2016-06-30公開
    校外:2016-06-30公開
    QR CODE