成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	王怡方 Wang, Yi-Fang
論文名稱：	步行、騎乘腳踏車與推廣健康策略之相關性研究—以台南市學童為例 Analyzing the relationship among walking, cycling and Healthy Policies—a case study of Children in Tainan City
指導教授：	黃國平 Hwang, Kevin P.
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 交通管理科學系 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science
論文出版年：	2005
畢業學年度：	93
語文別：	中文
論文頁數：	88
中文關鍵詞：	交通與規律運動、身體質量指數、騎乘腳踏車、步行
外文關鍵詞：	Body mass index, Walking, Cycling, Transportation and regular exercise
相關次數：	點閱：85 下載：3
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

　　依賴機動車輛作為運輸工具帶給社會龐大的外部成本，而運輸是生活中的必要活動，因此有無可能在健康與運輸間建立連結？藉步行、騎乘腳踏車為運輸工具，同時達到運動的目的？其方法、效果如何？為本研究的重點。

　　本研究藉台南市國小五、六年級與國中學生利用步行、腳踏車為運具的現況，建立系統動態模型，分析步行、騎乘腳踏車與運動及健康之互動回饋關係。針對步行、騎乘腳踏車效益模型，政策支持度模型，與減重模型進行數值模擬分析。最後利用問卷分析不同政策認同度下推動步行、騎乘腳踏車，對台南市學童身體質量指數分佈的影響。

　　研究結果顯示，在步行就學方面，推動「街道植樹」政策最能獲得學童的支持；而在騎乘腳踏車方面，推動「增設腳踏車專用道」政策，會吸引最多的學生支持。在系統動態效益模型方面，不論是利用步行或騎乘腳踏車就學，都可視為一種良好的身體活動方式，而在每天騎乘30分鐘，或是步行40分鐘的假設下，一年下來消耗可觀的身體活動量已多到足以讓學童的體重降低。政策敏感度分析亦顯示利用步行或是騎乘腳踏車就學，皆有「政策支持度愈高，身體質量指數分佈愈往健康偏移」的特性。

　Using motor vehicle as the moving way could cause huge external cost on society. Like environmental pollution and the security, could affect populace’s healthy in mind and body. Moreover, most people do not have the habits of being engaged in regularly physical activity, and the situation of lacking physical activity is tied up with many diseases. If people did suitable exercises, they can be prevented from obesity and promote the bodily function. Although there are lots of advantages of regularly physical activity, people always have excuse for not exercising. Then physical activity would hardly become their habits. However, transportation is people’s necessary activity everyday, and this research will discuss how to exercise by walking and cycling.

　The questionnaire is designed for discussing whether the promoting walking/cycling policy of government would improve the using willingness of particular objects. The research framework is built on the walking/cycling condition of junior high school and elementary school students in Tainan. The walking/cycling benefits model could be divided into three parts, including calories expense, calories surplus and weight decreasing.

　The most attractive policy of students cycling to school is the policy of “Adding the pathways and bicycle lanes,” and the most attractive policy of walking is the policy of “Tree planting on the wayside.” According the result of research, walking or cycling to school everyday would expense calories, increase students’ activities and decrease their weight. The research result shows a characteristic that for walking or cycling students the higher policy supportability causes the more left shaped distance of BMI after promoting policy.

第一章 緒論.....................................................................................................1 
1 研究動機...................................................................................................1 
2 研究目的...................................................................................................2 
3 研究架構...................................................................................................3 
4 研究方法...................................................................................................4 
5 研究流程...................................................................................................4 
6 研究對象及範圍..........................................................................................6 
第二章 文獻回顧...............................................................................................8 
1 適合非機動車輛運具之都市條件....................................................................8 
2 影響非機動車輛運具選擇之硬體因素............................................................10 
3 步行、騎乘腳踏車與健康之關係..................................................................11 
4 步行、騎乘腳踏車之政策............................................................................12 
5 台南市腳踏車使用狀況問卷調查...................................................................15 
第三章 研究方法..............................................................................................22 
1 問卷設計...................................................................................................22 
2 問項說明...................................................................................................22 
3 問卷調查...................................................................................................25 
4 統計分析方法.............................................................................................25 
5 系統動態心智模型-Mental model................................................................25 
6 系統動態操作模型-Operational model........................................................27 
6.1 模型建構................................................................................................27 
6.2 步行、騎乘腳踏車效益模型.......................................................................28 
6.3 減重模型................................................................................................31 
6.4 政策支持度模型.......................................................................................32 
6.5 整體模型.................................................................................................32 
第四章 資料分析...............................................................................................34 
1 基本統計....................................................................................................34 
2 外在因素同意度分析....................................................................................37 
2.1 家長對於外在因素之同意程度....................................................................37 
2.2 學生對於外在因素之同意程度....................................................................38 
3 不同政策下使用意願分析..............................................................................39 
4 小結..........................................................................................................40 
第五章 變異數分析.............................................................................................42 
1 單因子變異數分析........................................................................................42 
1.1 家戶收入特性檢定.....................................................................................43 
1.2 教育程度特性檢定.....................................................................................47 
1.3 汽車持有特性檢定......................................................................................49 
2 二因子變異數分析.........................................................................................49 
2.1 二因子統計分析.........................................................................................50 
2.2 二因子對政策5支持程度之檢定....................................................................50 
2.3 二因子對政策6支持程度之檢定....................................................................52 
2.4 二因子對步行時間之檢定............................................................................53 
2.5 二因子對騎乘腳踏車時間之檢定...................................................................54 
3 小結............................................................................................................56 
第六章 系統動態模型分析.....................................................................................57 
1 步行、騎乘腳踏車效益模型.............................................................................57 
1.1 步行效益模型分析.......................................................................................57 
1.2 步行效益模型時間敏感度分析.......................................................................60 
1.3 騎乘腳踏車效益模型分析.............................................................................65 
1.4 騎乘腳踏車效益模型時間敏感度分析.............................................................67 
2 政策支持度模型.............................................................................................71 
2.1 政策支持度模型分析....................................................................................71 
2.2 政策支持度模型敏感度分析...........................................................................72 
3 減重模型分析.................................................................................................80 
第七章  結論與建議...............................................................................................81 
1 結論..............................................................................................................81 
2 建議..............................................................................................................84 
參考文獻..............................................................................................................86 
附錄一 國際無車日調查問卷....................................................................................I 
附錄二 國中小學生調查問卷....................................................................................II 
附錄三 各年齡層肥胖定義.......................................................................................VIII 

                                    

中文部份
1. 交通部運研所，腳踏車道系統可行性研究暨規劃，林豐福、陳東亮等計畫主持，民國86年。
2. 交通部運研所，腳踏車專用道之規劃研究，林豐福、凌瑞賢計畫主持，民國88年。
3. 陶在樸，系統動態學，五南圖書出版有限公司，民國88年。
4. 台北國際無車日網站：http://www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/ch/web/carfree92/P0.htm
5. 台北市政府交通政策白皮書網站：http://www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/ch/web/annual/whitepage91/index.htm
6. 國民健康局網站: http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/
7. 世界衛生組織歐洲區域步行與腳踏車主題網站：
http://www.euro.who.int/transport/modes/20021009_1
8. 台閩地區中小學校學生身體發育測量結果，教育部體育司。http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/PHYSICAL/EDU7663001/importance/910728-1.htm?FILEID=85976&open

英文部份
1. Anderson, T., The Greening of Urban Transport: Planning for Walking and Cycling in Western Cities. England: Wiley, 1997.
2. David S., James S., Lloyd J. K., Frederick L. T., Stephen B. T., Richard A. G., Suzanne M. H., “Guidelines for School and Community Programs to Promote Lifelong Physical Activity Among Young People,” Mobility and Mortality Report, Vol.46, No. RR-6, 1997.
3. Dickinson, J.E., Kingham, S., Copsey, S., Pearlman Hougie, D.J., “Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycle to work in UK?” Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 8 pp.53-67, 2003.
4. Frank, L.D., “Land use and transportation interaction: implications on public health and quality of life,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 20, pp.6-22, 2000.
5. Frank, L.D., Engelke, P.O., “The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health,” Journal of Planning Literature, Vol.16, No. 2, pp.201-216, 2001.
6. Forrester, J.W., “Road Map: A Guide to Learning System Dynamics,” MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sloan School of Managemen, 1992. http://sysdyn.mit.edu/
7. Forrester, J.W., “System Dynamics and K-12 Teachers,” MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Sloan School of Management, 1996.
8. Gaffron, P., “The implementation of walking and cycling policies in British local authorities,” Transport policy, Vol.10, pp.235-244, 2003.
9. Harris, J. A. and Francis B., “A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man,” Washington, D.C. The Carnegie Institution, 1919.
10. Hoefer, W.R., McKenzie, T.L., Sallis, J.F., Marshall, S.J., Conway, T.L., “Parental Provision of Transportation for Adolescent Physical Activity,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.48-51, 2001.
11. Hu, G., Pekkarinen, H., Hanninen, O., Tian, H., Guo, Z., “Relation between commuting, leisure time physical activity and serum lipids in a Chinese urban population,” Annals of Human Biology, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp.412–421, 2001.
12. Humpel, N., Owen, N., Leslie, E., “Environmental factors associated with adults_ participation in physical activity: A review,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp.188–199, 2002.
13. James, F.S., Lawrence, D.F., Brian, E.S., M. Katherine, K., “Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research,” Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 38, pp.249-268, 2004.
14. Julie B., “Creating a Walkable Community,” Northwest Public Health, pp.14-15, 2005.
15. Kaplan GA, Strawbridge WJ, Cohen RD, “Natural history of leisure-time physical activity and its correlates: Associations with mortality from all causes and cardiovascular diseases over 28 years,” American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 144, pp.793-797, 1996.
16. Manson, J.E., Hu, F.B., Rich-Edwards, J.W., Colditz, G.A. Stampfer, M.J., Willett, W.C., Speizer, F.E., Hennekens, C.H., “A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women,” New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 341, pp.650–658, 1999.
17. Martens, K., “The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries,” Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 9, pp.281-294, 2004.
18. Ross, C.L., Dunning, A.E., “Land use transportation interaction: An examination of the 1995 NPTS data,” Atlanta, U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration, 1997.
19. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Frank, L.D., “Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 25, pp.80–91, 2003.
20. Sallis, J.F., Kraft, K., Linton, L.S., “How the environment shapes physical activity: A transdisciplinary research agenda,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 22, pp.208, 2002.
21. Sharkey, B.J., Physiology of Fitness. Champaign Ill, Human Kinetics Book.
22. Sherman SE, D’Agostino RB, Cobb J.L., “Physical activity and mortality in women in the Framingham Heart Study,” American Heart Journal, Vol. 128, pp.879-84, 1994.
23. The world health report 2002 - reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization.
24. Timperio, A., Crawford, D., Telford, A., M.Sc., Salmon, J., “Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 38, pp.39-47, 2004.
25. Wagner, A., Simon, C., Ducimetiere, P., Montaye, M., Bongard, V., Yarnell, J., Bingham, A., Hedelin, G., Amouyel, P., Ferrieres, J., Evans, A., Arveiler, D., “Leisure-time physical activity and regular walking or cycling to work are associated with adiposity and 5y weight gain in middle-aged men: The PRIME Study,” International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, Vol. 25, pp.940-948, 2001.
26. Westerterp, K. R., Arnold D.M. K., “Physical activity in confined conditions as an indicator of free-living physical activity,” Obesity Research, Vol. 11, No. 7, pp.865-868, 2003.
27. Whitney, E., Corinne C., Sharon R., Understanding Normal and Clinical Nutrition, 5th edition Belmont, CA: West Wadsworth, 1998.

校內：2006-07-08公開
校外：2006-07-08公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文