| 研究生: |
林芷筠 Lin, Chin-Yun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
Tw-DRGs支付制度實施前後對於醫療資源與醫院績效
之影響 Impact of the Tw-DRGs payment system on medical resources and hospital performance |
| 指導教授: |
許永明
Shiu, Yung-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 81 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | Tw-DRGs 、醫療資源 、醫院績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Tw-DRGs, medical resources, hospital performance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:71 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
全民健康保險局面臨醫療費用不斷上漲,2010年1月起實施Tw-DRGs支付制度控制費用上漲。本研究透過獨立t檢定、複迴歸、羅吉斯迴歸探討實施後對醫療資源及醫院績效之影響。本研究對象為某醫院泌尿科,採次級資料研究法,共769筆個案,經本研究得到三項結論:1.減少醫療資源浪費2.Tw-DRGs差額減少3.支付制度、病例組合、病患來源、醫師年資、診斷次數及手術次數因素影響醫療資源及醫院績效。醫療資源主要節省在病房費、手術技術費、藥費、醫師診察費。整體而言,病例組合、病患來自急診、醫師年資低、診斷次數少、手術次數高卻是影響醫院績效變差之因素。支付制度的改變的確會影響醫院經營管理模式且造成醫院財務衝擊,故建立臨床路徑、病歷輸寫詳實均有效提升醫院績效及節省醫療資源之方法。
Facing to the problem that the increasing healthcare cost , Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) in order to restrict the increasing cost to better use Tw-DRGs payment system started in January, 2010. The study through independent sample t-test、Multiple Regression Analysis and Logistic Regression Analysis wants to understand the change of the medical resources and the hospital performance after starting the Tw-DRGs payment system. A case study of one regional teaching hospital foundation, which adopting the secondary analysis and 769 data. The results showed:1. the medical resources is efficient 2. Tw-DRGs difference is decrease. 3. 「payment system」、「case mix」、「resources of the patients」、「medical expenditure」 and「the total number of surgery operated」 have influence. The medical resources is efficient on the medical items of Ward Fee, Operation Fee and Medicine Fee. Above all, 「patients from ER」、「the higher amount of DRGs code」、「the total number of surgery operated over」are the factor the hospital performance is morse worse. Overall, the change of the payment system does affect the hospital’s operation management mode and does cause the financial impact to the hospital. Bulid Clinical Pathway and medical records are good waysto provide the hospital perforance.
【中文部分】
1.行政院衛生署全民健康保險局-全球資訊網,擷取於2010年12月 30日,http://www.nhi.gov.tw/webdata/webdata.asp?menu=23&menu_id=819&webdata_id=937&WD_ID=819。
2.王淑美(2002),「全膝關節置換術論病例計酬醫療資源耗用分析--以北部某醫學中心為例」, 國立陽明大學醫務管理研究所碩士論文 。
3.朱正一(2006), 醫務管理-制度組織與實務,頁38~40,華泰文化。
4.呂嵐欽等(2005),「他山之石可以攻錯-DRG制度之國際比較」,健康保險雜誌,2卷,1期,頁40~47。
5.李佳霖等(2009),「模擬實施新制DRG(TW-DRGs)對醫療費用之影響及因應之道-以股骨轉子間骨折(210,211)為例」,醫管期刊,10卷,3期,頁153~164。
6.吳萬益(2000),企業研究方法第三版,華泰文化。
7.林詠蓉、曾家琳、湯澡薰(2008),「疾病分類人員對診斷編碼的建議對於健保支付費用與DRG支付點數之初探性研究」,醫管期刊,9(2),頁83-97。
8.林秀亮(1987),「以DRG分類方法探討「一級教學醫院」勞保病人住院日、醫療費用差異研究」,陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
9.林玲珠、朱正一(2008),「DRGs權重公告對醫院代碼申報之影響-以東部醫院呼吸系統疾病代碼申報變化之分析為例」,醫護科技學刊,10卷,2期,頁133~143。
10.阮子凌、藍忠孚(1999),「診斷關聯群在我國之引進與發展」,全民健康保險,19,頁10-13。
11.陳建立(2006),「組織理論與醫院DRGs因應準備作業」,健康保險雜誌,1卷,2期,頁1~13。
12.陳星助,曾瓊禎(2005) ,「台灣健保前膽性支付制度導入之衝擊-診斷關係群醫院因應策略之探討」,健康保險,1卷,2期,頁58~72。
13.陳婉茗、朱慧凡、錢慶文、蘇喜、吳肖琪 (2006),「醫院對即將全面實施DRGs支付制度之因應表現」,醫務管理期刊,7(2),頁193-205。
14.陳婉茗、吳肖琪 (2005),「模擬DRGs實施對於我國醫院的財務衝擊」,台灣衛誌,24(4),頁306-314。
15.莊逸洲、黃崇哲(2001),醫務管理學系列:醫療機構管理制度,台北,華杏出版 股份有限公司。
16.韓揆(2005),「診斷組合在台推行問題(上)-DRGs 之支付精神、支付邏輯及侷限」,醫務管理,6(1),頁1-17。
17.韓揆(2001),「土、洋DRGs-全民健保論病例計酬如何為繼」,醫務管理期刊 ,2(3),頁27-45。
18.韓揆(2002),「台灣論病例計酬之實施及其變革展望」,醫院 ,35(2),頁15-27。
19.賴慧娟、張煥禎(2007),「DRGs政策實施之預期影響-區域醫院觀點」,醫療品質雜誌,第一卷第五期,頁50-53。
20.賴慧娟、黃俊雄(2007),「DRGs政策實施之預期影響-醫學中心觀點」,醫療品質雜誌,第一卷第五期,頁47-49。
21.蔡依珍、黃偉堯(2004),「醫院對疾病疾病診斷關係群之因應行為-以美國為例」。醫院,37(3),頁23-31。
22.蔡淑鈴(2009),「新版Tw-DRGs第一階段分類及支付通則」頁4-1~4-37,台灣健康保險協會主辦,全民健保最新政策及實務因應專題研討會,高雄醫學大學第一教學大樓B1-演藝廳。
23.嚴玉華、吳重慶、周腎榮、牟聯瑞(2008),「實施DRGs對醫院財務之影響-以南部某區域醫院消化系統主診斷為例」,秀傳醫學雜誌,8卷1&2期,頁1-8。
【英文部分】
1.Bentes, M., do Ceu Mateus, M. and da Luz Gonsalves, M.(1996) “DRGs in Portugal: A Decade of Experience: Casemix and Change-International Perspections”. Paper presented to the Eighth Casemix Conference, Sydney, Australia,19-21 September.
2.Birkmeyer, J.D., Sharp, S. M., Finlayson, S. R. G., Fisher, E. S., & Wennberg , J. E. (1998). Variation profile of common surgical procedures. Surgery, 124(5) : 917-923。
3.Brackstone, G., Managing Data Quality in a Statistical Agency. Survey Methodology,1999. 25: p. 139-149。
4.Closon, M. C., Azoury, E., Herbeuval, A. F. and Lopez, M.(1996) “ New Financial Incentives For Acute Care Hospital In Belgium” Paper presented to the 12th International Working Conference of Patient Classification Systems/Europe, Sydney, Australis,19-21 September.
5.Fischer, W.(2000) “ A Comparison of PCS Construction Principles of The American DRGs , The Austrian LDF System, And The German EP/SE System”, CASEMIX 2(1),pp.12-20.
6.Fetter, R.B, Brand, D.A.,&Gamache, D.(1991).DRGs-their design and development. Michigan:Health Administpredetermined payment.
7.Ikegami N. Campbell J.C.(2004).Japan, s Health Care System: Containing Costs and Attempting Reform. Health Care System: Containing Costs and Attempting Reform. Health Affairs, 23(3),26-36.
8.Langenbrunner, J.C. and Wiley, M.M.(2002) “ Hospital Payment Mechanisms: Theory And Practice In Transition Countries”, shapter 8 in Hospitals In A Changing Europe edited by McKee, M. and Healy, J., European Observatory On Health Care System Series, Open University Press,150-176.
9.Lundgren, S., Kindseth, O. and Magnussen, J.(1998) “New Financial Reform of Hospital Stays Payment In Norwegian Hospitals: Preliminary Experience After Six Months of Use”Paper presented to the 14th International Working Conferentce of Patient Classification Systems, Man-chester, England, UK, 1-3, October.
10.Marjorie, A. R., & Mark, J. B. (2001). The Impact of The Inpatient Prospective Payment System and Diagnosis-Related Groups : A Survery of The Literature. North American Acturial Journal, 5(4), 84-94
11.Maqbool, D., William, D. W. (1999), Evalutating financial risk in the Medicare Prospective Payment System. Management Science, 45(3),316-322.
12.Newhouse, J. P. (1996). Reimbursing health plan and health provider: efficiency in production versus selection. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1236-1263.
13.Rodrigues, J. M., Coca, E., Trombert-Paviot, B. and Abrial, V.(1998) “How To Use Case Mix To Reduce Inequities And Inefficiencies Among French Hospitals” Paper presented to the 14th International Working Conference of Patient Classifi-cation Systems, Manchester, England, UK, 1-3,October.
14.Russel, L. B., & Manning, C.L.(1989). The effect of prospective payment on medicare expenditure . The New England Journal of Medicine, 320(7), 439-444.
15.Statistics Canada Quality Guidelines. 4th ed. 2003 (October): Statistics Canada. 85-92.
16.Valdeck, B. C.(1984). Medicare hospital payment by diagnosis-related groups. Annals of Internal Medicine, 100(4), 576-591.
17.Wiley, M. M.(1995) “Budgeting For Acute Hospital Services In Ireland: The Case-Mix Adjustment Journal of the Irish Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons,24(4)238-290.
18.Yang B. M.(2005). National Health Insurance in South Korea: Opportunities and Challenges. In Taiwan, To celebreate the 10th anniversary of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance, Taipei, Taiwan.
校內:2021-12-31公開