| 研究生: |
高千琇 Kao, Chien-Hsiu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
工業區設置對台灣地區製造業廠商存活之影響--以電力及電子機械器材製造修配業為例 The Industrial Districts Effect on Firm Survival in Taiwan - Example of Electtrical and Electronic Machinery Manufacturing and Repairing Industry. |
| 指導教授: |
孔憲法
Kung, Shiann-Far |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2004 |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 67 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 工業區 、廠商存活 、電力及電子機械器材製造修配業 、乘積限估計 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Firm Survival, Industrial Districts, Electrical and Electronic Machinery Manufacturin |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:61 下載:15 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
摘 要
區位因素對廠商存活情形具有影響,已經在過去少數理論探討與實證研究中被證實,但甚少有研究者能提出實際數據資料來直接探討區位與廠商存活之間的關係。本研究採用一個長期的廠商登記資料,以台灣的電力及電子機械器材製造修配業為例,使用存活分析方法中的Kaplan-Meier估計方法分析電子業廠商,在區域間以及不同區位間之廠商存活的差異。
實證研究發現,廠商存活情形有地理因素與區位因素上的差異,存活分析的結果顯示,地理上位於北部區域的電子業廠商存活時間較短;而區位上位於工業區內的電子業廠商存活時間較短。顯示在工業區的規劃設置以提供廠商附加價值的理論和規劃意念,與實際現象之間產生了矛盾。
Abstract
Location effect on firm survival had been confirmed in some researches, but few researchers discuss firm survival with location directly. This paper uses a longitudinal data taken from registration to investigate location and other characteristics of firm survival. The study is concerned with whether firm survival rate is different from regions. Analysis of this data had been done with survival function, using Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival functions of firms in regions and locations. The results show that, location has an effect on firm survival in regions and locations. Firms in industrial districts seem have shorter survival days.
(一)中文參考文獻
1.王缉慈等著(2001),《創新的空間―企業集群與區域發展》。
2.方世調(1991),《台灣地區廠商存活的隨機程序模型與實證研究》,國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
3.吳明美(1995),〈台灣電子業新進廠商經濟績效分析〉,淡江大學產業經濟學研究所碩士論文。
4.吳聖森(1995),〈台灣中小企業存活期間及失敗危險率影響因子分析―以紡織、電子產業為例〉,淡江大學金融研究所碩士論文。
5.林祖嘉、方世調(1992),〈臺北市紡織業與食品業廠商存活期間分析〉,《經濟論文》20:1,pp. 59-91。
6.林惠玲(1993),〈廠商之退出率與存活時間計量模型-台灣電力及電子機械器材製造業的驗證〉,《經濟論文叢刊》21:4,pp. 411-440。
7.林家裕,〈第三義大利的小規模工業化發展:以Emilia-Romagna為例〉,知識台灣戀戀台灣網站http://home.kimo.com.tw/liutaho/。
8.邱耿中(2003),〈廠商存活、退出與轉業之動態分析―存活方法之應用〉,台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
9.茆詩松、濮曉龍、劉忠譯(1998),《壽命數據中的統計模型與方法》。
10.莊文彬(2002),〈台灣製造業廠商轉業行為〉,中央大學產業經濟研究所博士論文。
11.張育憲(1996),〈台灣地區製造業廠商存活模型之建立與實證研究―食品業與製鞋業之個案分析〉,中國文化大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
12.陳正倉(1994),〈台灣製造業廠商加入與退出之研究〉,《社會科學論叢》,42, pp. 1-36。
13.陳俊佐(1995),〈台灣內外銷廠商存活期間及失敗危險率影響因子分析〉,淡江大學金融研究所碩士論文。
14.陳肇男(1985),〈台灣地區電子業廠商之加入、退出與成長〉,《經濟論文》第十三卷第一期,pp. 47-83。
15.陳家鼎、戴中維譯(1998),《生存數據分析的統計方法》。
16.單驥(1990),〈勞基法中退休制度的改進―並兼論退休、資遣與失業保險制度之整合〉,《當前人力運用問題研討會論文集》,pp. 66-89。
17.經濟部工業局(2002),《工業區開發管理九十一年度年報》。
18.經濟部工業局(2004),台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網, http://idb.management.org.tw/index.asp
19.蔡世彬(1995),〈台灣高低科技產業存活期間及失敗危險率影響因子分析〉,淡江大學金融研究所碩士論文。
20.劉進慶著,谷蒲孝雄編著,雷慧英漢譯(1992),《台灣的工業化:國際加工基地的形成》,pp. 196-208。
(二)西文參考文獻
1.Ailing, Z.(2003)Comparing clinical cohort data: which test to choose? Bioinformatics Institute. http://www.bii-sg.org/research/mig/tutorials.asp
2.Amin, A.(2000) Industrial districts. A Companion to Economic Geography, Sheppard E., and Barnes, T., 149-168.
3.Asheim, B. T.(2000) Industrial districts:The contributions of Marshall and beyond. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Clark G., Feldman M., and Gartner M., 413-431.
4.Becattini, G.(1991) Italian industrial districts:Problems and perspectives. International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 21, No. 1, 83-90.
5.Beesley, M. E. and Hamilton, R. T.(1985)Births and Deaths of Manufacturing Firms in the Scottish Regions. Regional Studies, Vol. 20.4, 281-288.
6.Bruderl, J. and Mahmood, T.(1996) Small business mortality in Germany:A comparison between regions and sectors. Social Science Research Center Berlin, Discussion papers, FS IV 96-20, 1-11.
7.Collett, D.(1994)Modeling Survival Data in Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London. First edition.
8.Costa-Campi, M. T. and Viladecans-Marsal, E.(1999) The district effect and the competitiveness of manufacturing companies in local productive systems. Urban Studies, Vol. 36, 2085-2098.
9.Fotopoulos, G. and Spence, N.(2001) Regional variations of firm births, deaths and growth patterns in the UK, 1980-1991. Growth and Change, Vol. 32, 151-173.
10.Gehan, E. A., and Thomas, D. G.(1969)The performance of some two-sample tests in small samples with and without censoring. Biometrika, 56, 127-132.
11.Gibb, J. M. ed. (1985) Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12.Hands, D.(2002)Business start-ups and closures: VAT registrations and de-registrations in 2001. http://www.sbs.gov.uk
13.Kaplan, E. L. and Meier, P.(1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 53, 457-481.
14.Kleinbaum, D. G.(1996)Survival Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
15.Lawless, J. F.(1982) Statistical models and methods for lifetime data. John Wiley & Sons.
16.Lee, E. T.(1992)Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Second Edition.
17.Marascuilo, L. A., and McSweeney, M.(1977)Nonparametric and Distribution-free Methods for the Social Sciences. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
18.Monck, CSP., Quintas, P. R., Wynarczyk, P., Porter, R. B., and Storey, D. J. (1988) Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
19.Nielsen, P. B.(2002)Statistics on new enterprises, entrepreneurs and survival of start-ups: The Danish experience. STI WORKING PAPER, OECD.
20.Ohno-Machado, L.(2001) Methodology review-Modeling Medical Prognosis:Survival Analysis Techniques. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 34, 428-439.
21.Oinas, P. and Malecki, E. J.(1999) Making connections – technological learning and regional economic change, 7-33; 109-142.
22.Porter, M. E.(2000) Location, clusters, and company strategy. The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, 253-274.
23.Richmond, K.(2002) Measuring three year survival rates of Scottish enterprise assisted start-ups. Scottish Enterprise Network:http://www.scottishenterprise.com/about/what/research/newapproach/
24.Shaw, J.(2002) Survival rates of VAT registered business. Small Business Service Research.
25.Spilling, O. R.(2001)Women entrepreneurship and management in Norway – A statistical overview. Norwegian School of Management BI. Discussion paper.
26.Urban Land Institute(1988) Business and industrial park development handbook, 1-46. Urban Land Institute, Washington.