| 研究生: |
陳禹芳 Chen, Yu-Fang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
產業群聚現象之研究—以製藥產業與生物技術產業為例 A Study On Industrial Clusters Of Pharmaceutical Industry/ Biotechnology Industry |
| 指導教授: |
何東波
Ho, Tong-Po, |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 95 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 產業群聚 、網絡概念 、產業群聚圖 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | cluster map, network concept, industrial cluster |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:89 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Porter在1990年提出產業群聚與產業競爭力息息相關的觀念後,各界學者紛紛研究群聚現象,很多巳開發國家逐漸利用群聚策略作為產業發展政策。目前,國外歐美日發展成熟的生技相關產業,其發展成功的關鍵因素就是在於善用產業群聚效應。因此,面對全球化威脅與國外廠商的優勢,如何加強台灣廠商競爭力與提升整體產業環境是當前重要課題。本研究主要以產業群聚為理論基礎,一方面蒐集國內相關產業政策與產業園區的展概況;另一方面利用專家訪談與問卷分析,採網絡概念與空間分佈特性來觀察台灣製藥產業與生物技術產業廠商與上下游產業的關係,以繪製出產業群聚圖。最後,則是從實證研究中檢討並研議國內相關產業政策,並提出未來製藥產業與生技產業空間發展的建議。
In 1990 Porter brought up the conception that industrial cluster is closely linked with industrial competition, it has arouse highly attention of academe, also a lot of developed countries took this appearance of assemblage policy as the development policy for their industries. Presently, through the experience from foreign countries which try to develop the ripe biotech industries and related enterprises, we can realize that the key element of succeeded development is perfectly utilizing the effects of industrial cluster. For this reason, facing the advantageous position from globalization and foreign firms/enterprises, how to consolidate domestic firm’s competition and to promote the whole industrial environment are the current major issues.
Mainly, this study tries to use the related views of industrial cluster to be my theory foundation. On the one hand, I try to collect the related domestic industrial policy and the profile of Taiwan’s Science Park; On the other hand, I also use expert interview and questionnaire survey which adopt the network concept and the characteristic of spatial distribution to observe the relationship between pharmaceutical industry/biotechnology industry and supplier/customer industry. Hence, I can draw the map which describes the character of biotech industrial cluster, and from my empirical case I also review the related industrial policies in order to bring up my suggestions which related to the spatial development of pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology industry.
(一)中文書目
1. 王佳煌、潘中道等譯,當代社會研究法,學富文化事業有限公司,台北,2002
2. 方世杰、邱志芳,知識創新環境改善之研究-社會資本觀點,科技發展政策報導,SR9110,746-755,2002
3. 田蔚城、徐源泰、蘇遠志,國外成功的生物技術產業園區之分析,生物產業,第6卷,第3期,第193-207頁,1995
4. 朱南玉,朝向群聚基礎的產業分析模式-台灣地區產業群聚之再界定,ITIS產業論壇,第6卷,第2期
5. 行政院生物技術產業指導小組,2003生技產業白皮書,經濟部工業局,2003
6. 行政院生物技術與醫藥工業發展推動小組,2004台灣生技產業新興生技公司名錄,2004
7. 伍忠賢,知識經濟,全華科技圖書,台北,2004
8. 李羽,美東地區生技發展近況,生技時代,第25期,第94-96頁,2003
9. 李明軒、邱美如譯,國家競爭優勢(上)(下),天下文化出版股份有限公司,台北,1996
10. 李洋寧,知識可及性對創新的影響-以台灣北部區域電子產業為例,交通大學運輸研究所碩士論文,2003
11. 林明定,生技育成中心-預約下一個明星產業,生技時代,第25期,第33-49頁,2003
12. 邱浩政,社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析-spss中文視窗版資料分析範例解析,五南圖書出版股份有限公司,2000
13. 邸東輝、范建軍譯,知識對經濟的影響力,知書房出版社,台北,2001
14. 財團法人生物技術開發中心,生物技術產業年鑑2003,財團法人生物技術開發中心,2003
15. 財團法人生物技術開發中心,製藥產業年鑑2001,財團法人生物技術開發中心,2001
16. 廖美智,生物技術產業結構及經營模式分析,財團法人生物技術開發中心,2002
17. 蕭若杏,學習區域觀點下之創新學習現象差異分析-以工具機產業為例,成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文,2004
(二)英日文書目
1. Austrian Z. (2000) “Cluster Case Studies: The Marriage of Quantitative and Qualitative Information of Action”, Economic Development Quarterly,14(1), 97-100
2. Becattini G. (2002) ” Industrial Sectors and Industrial Districts: Tools for Industrial Analysis”, European Planning Studies, 10(4), 483-493
3. Benneworth P. and Henry N. (2004) “ Where Is the Value Added in the Cluster Approach? Hermeneutic Theorising, Economic Geography and Clusters as a Multiperspectival Approach”, Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 1011-1023
4. Cumbers A. and MacKinnon D. (2004) ”Introduction: Clusters in Urban and Regional Development”, Urban Studies, 41(5/6), 956-969
5. Guerrieri P. and Pietrobelli C. (2003) “Industrial districts’ evolution and technological regimes: Italy and Taiwan” , Technovation
6. Hill E.W. and Brennan J.F. (2000) ” A Methodology for Identifying the Drivers of Industrial Clusters: The Foundation of Regional Competitive Advantage”, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 65-96
7. Morosini P. (2004) “Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance”, World Development, 32(2), 305–326
8. Phelps N.A. and Ozawa T. (2003) “Contrasts in agglomeration: proto-industrial, industrial and post-industrial forms compared”, Progress in Human Geography, 24(5), 583-604
9. Porter E. (2000) “Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy”, Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15-34
10. Steinle C. and Schiele H. (2002) ” When do industries cluster? A proposal on how to assess an industry’s propensity to concentrate at a single region or nation”, Research Policy, 31, 849-858
11. 日本政策投資銀行,2003
12. 日本文部科學省科技術政策研究所,地域イナべーシヨン成功要因及び促進政策の調査研究,2003
13. 現代日本產業論第13回,2004
(三)網路資料
1. 行政院經濟建設委員會http://www.cepd.gov.tw/
2. 中小企業育成中心http://incub.cpc.org.tw/link/link.htm
3. 生醫知識網http://biomedical.itri.org.tw/default.aspx
4. ITIS產業論壇http://www.if.itri.org.tw/index.html
5. 台灣工業用地供給與服務資訊網http://idb.management.org.tw/
6. 經濟部工業局http://www.moeaidb.gov.tw/portal/index.jsp
7. 醫藥工業網http://biomed.itri.org.tw/index.asp?web_id=bmecg0&func_seq=1
8. 神戶醫療產業都市http://www.city.kobe.jp/cityoffice/06/015/iryo/press/2004/20041213.html
9. 南科網站http://www.stsipa.gov.tw