簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭泰佑
Tai-Yu, Kuo
論文名稱: 車用化學物質之綜合評估指標
Assessment Indicator for Vehicles Chemical Substances
指導教授: 陳家豪
Lewis, Chen,Jahau
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 機械工程學系
Department of Mechanical Engineering
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 生命週期成本毒性潛能指標
外文關鍵詞: TPI, LCA
相關次數: 點閱:48下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著世界環保意識的抬頭,人們開始瞭解產品從製造到使用最後廢棄的過程中,必須盡量的減少對於環境及人體的衝擊。近年來世界各國環保法規的設立,企業也紛紛訂定環保策略因應世界的趨勢,在產品設計階段就導入環境維護的概念,以減少對於環境及人體的衝擊。隨著RoHS(Restriction of Hazardous Substance )及ELV(End of life Vehicles Directives)等各項法規的發佈,顯示出人們對於環境保護的決心,也由於各項法規的執行,使得做為我國重要產業之一的汽車業,也必須面對這些環保議題的挑戰,故藉由提升我國汽車業綠色設計的能力,可以增加我國的汽車業在世界上的競爭力。
    本文利用毒性潛能指標(Toxic Potential Indicator, TPI) 、生命週期成本與產品價值,針對車用化學物質建置綜合評估指標,考量化學物質之毒性、生命週期成本與產品價值,整合生命週期成本與產品價值提出成本價值比, 可避免在追求降低成本的同時忽略價值的重要性, 再與TPI以二維的方式依照不同產品特性將綜合評估指標分為六個區塊,配合產品的特性對照表,可以快速判斷落於不同區塊的產品屬於何種特性。更進一步發展綜合評估指標輔助程式,將綜合評估指標流程與計算程式化,方便使用者進行產品的綜合評估指標流程,減少不必要的時間浪費。綜合評估指標於產品設計階段提供設計者對其所設計之產品成本價值比與對環境衝擊間的關係,可作為設計者在產品設計階段材料選擇或改善的依據, 藉此減少產品對環境及人體的負荷, 提昇我國汽車業綠色設計能力。

    With a new environmental consciousness in the world, people begin to understand that we must try our best to reduce the products impact to environment and the human body. With the issue in several regulations, such as RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substance ) and ELV (End of Life Vehicles Directives ) ,etc., it demonstrates people's resolution to environmental protection. Automobile industry, one of the important industries of our
    country, must face the challenge of the environmental protection topic.Therefore by improving the green design ability of automobile industry, we can increase the competitiveness in the world for automobile industry of our country.
    This study utilizes Toxic Potential Indicator (TPI), life cycle cost and product value to built up an assessment indicator for vehicles chemical
    substances. This study proposes the ratio of cost to value (C/V) by combing life cycle cost and value of products. Dividing the assessment indicator into
    six blocks according to different characteristics of the products can help designer can to choose the suitable product easily. Furthermore, the auxiliary
    software for assessment indicator is developed to simplify the procedure of assessing. The result of assessing can be used as designer's material choosing or improving evaluation criteria for product design.

    摘要....................................................................................................... i 英文摘要.............................................................................................. ii 誌謝..................................................................................................... iii 目錄..................................................................................................... iv 表目錄................................................................................................. vi 圖目錄............................................................................................... viii 第一章 緒論.........................................................................................1 1.1 前言..................................................................................................1 1.2 文獻回顧..........................................................................................2 1.2.1 生命週期成本...............................................................................2 1.2.2 環境會計.......................................................................................3 1.2.3 毒性潛能指標...............................................................................4 1.3 研究目的..........................................................................................6 1.4 本文架構..........................................................................................7 第二章 生命週期成本...........................................................................9 2.1 生命週期成本範疇界定.................................................................9 2.2 生命週期成本分類.......................................................................10 2.3 環境成本會計...............................................................................13 2.4 環境成本分類...............................................................................15 第三章 毒性潛能指標.........................................................................21 3.1 材料TPI 值之評估架構與項目...................................................21 3.2 材料TPI 值之計算架構...............................................................24 3.3 產品之毒性潛能指標...................................................................25 第四章 車用化學物質之綜合評估指標架構.....................................27 4.1 成本價值比...................................................................................27 4.2 車用化學物質之綜合評估指標...................................................28 4.3 車用化學物質之綜合評估指標評估流程...................................29 4.4 綜合評估指標輔助程式...............................................................31 第五章 車用化學物質實例應用........................................................37 5.1 評估用輪胎基本資料...................................................................37 5.2 輪胎毒性潛能指標計算...............................................................38 5.2.1 矽膠60/40 之材料TPI 值計算...............................................39 5.2.2 碳黑之材料TPI 值計算............................................................40 5.3 輪胎成本價值比計算...................................................................43 5.4 汽車用輪胎綜合評估...................................................................44 5.5 利用輔助程式進行汽車用輪胎綜合評估...................................46 5.6 不同生命週期成本考量的汽車用輪胎綜合評估.......................47 第六章 結論與建議............................................................................53 6.1 結論...............................................................................................53 6.2 建議...............................................................................................64 附錄A 汽車用輪胎基本物質毒性潛能評估-NO.A ........................58 附錄B 汽車用輪胎基本物質毒性潛能評估-NO.B..........................62 附錄C 汽車用輪胎基本物質毒性潛能評估-NO.C..........................66

    Blanchard, B. S. and Fabrycky, W. J., “Systems Engineering and Analysis
    3rd Edition,” Prentice Hall International Series in Industrial and Systems
    Engineering, 1998 .

    Chung, J., Lee, H., Middendorf, A. and Zuber, K. H., “A Study on the Trace
    of Appropriate Ecodesign Strategies Applying "Instep-DfE" and "IZM-EE
    toolbox" on a PDA,” Proceedings of EcoDesign2003: Third International
    Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse
    Manufacturing, pp. 291-296, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 8-11, 2003.

    Clarke, J. D., “Life Cycle Cost: An examination of its application in the
    united states, and potential for use in the Australian defense forces,” Thesis
    of M.S, Naval Postgraduate School, 1990.

    Dangel, R., “Integrated Lgistic Support (ILS) Implementation in the Naval
    Ship System Command,” ASE 6th annual technical symposium, pp. 1-25,
    1969.

    Dougan, K. W. and Reilly, M. C., ”Quantitative reliability methods improve
    plant uptime,” Hydrocarbon processing, Aug. ‘93, pp. 131-141, 1993.

    Environment Agent, Japan, “Study Group for Developing a System for
    Environmental Accounting”, 2000, Developing an Environmental
    Accounting System(2000 Report), pp.33.

    Epstein, M. J. “Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance,”
    pp154-156, 1996.

    Mitchell L. Kennedy, “Total Cost Assessment for Environmental Engineers
    and Managers,” pp.6-7. , 1998

    Müller, J., Hagelüken, M., Griese, H. and Reichl, H., “Technological
    Innovation Started by Environmental Concerns,” Proceedings of Electronics
    Goes Green 2004+, pp. 315-319, Berlin, Germany, Sep. 6-8, 2004.

    Nissen, N. F., Griese, H., Middendorf, A., Müller, J., Pötter, H. and Reichl,
    56
    H., “Environmental Assessment of Electronics: A New Model to Bridge
    the Gap Between Full Life Cycle Evaluations and Product Design,”
    Proceedings of 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the
    Environment, pp. 182-187, May 5-7, 1997.

    Nissen, N. F., Griese, H., Middendorf, A., Müller, J., Pötter, H. and Reichl,
    H., “An Environmental Comparison of Packaging and Interconnection
    Technologies,” Proceedings of 1998 IEEE International Symposium on
    Electronics and the Environment, pp. 106-111, May 4-6, 1998.
    Nissen, N. F., Naunin D., Reichl H. and Wagemann, “Entwicklung eines
    ökologischen Bewertungsmodells zur Beurteilung elektronischer
    Systeme”,2001

    Ram, B., Stevels, A., Griese, H., Middendorf, A., Muller, J., Nissen, N. F.,
    and Reichl, H., “Environmental performance of mobile products,”
    Proceedings of 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the
    Environment, pp. 140-145, May 11-13, 1999.

    Schischke, K., Deubzer, O., Griese, H. and Stobbe, I., “LCA for
    Environmental Management and Eco-Design in the Electronics Industry-State
    of the Art and Screening Approaches–,” InLCA/LCM 2002- Life Cycle
    Assessment and Life Cycle Management E-Conference
    (www.lcacenter.org/lca-lcm), May 20-25, 2002.

    Sekhar, S. C., and Toon, K. L. C., ”On the study of energy performance and
    life cycle cost of smart window, ”Energy and Buildings, VOL 28,
    pp.307-316 ,1998.

    United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund,
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development and World
    Bank, ”Handbook of National Accounting-Integrated Environmental and
    Economic Accounting 2003,” 2003.

    U.S. EPA, “An Introduction to Environmental Accounting As a Management
    Tool-Key Concept and Terms, ” 1995.

    Vogtlander, J. G., Bijma, A., and Brezet, H. C.,” Communicating the
    eco-efficiency of products and services by means of the eco-costs/value
    model ,”Journal Cleaner Production, Vol. 10, pp.57-67, 2002.

    Yen, S. B. and Chen, J. L., "The Development of Taiwan’s Toxic Potential
    Indicator (TPI)," Proceedings of EcoDesign 2003: Third International
    Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse
    Manufacturing, pp.632-635, Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 8-11, 2003.

    王 立彥,環境成本核算與環境會計體系,經濟科學,pp. 53-63,1998 第6期。

    李 涵茵 與 林 幸嫻,創造企業的綠色盈餘您需要改變算帳方法-淺談環境成本
    會計,永續發展雙月刊,2006年6月15日。

    張 健梅,環境會計中兩種有效可行的方法―作業成本法和生命週期成本法,四川
    會計,1999第6期。

    黃 璿彬,整合生命週期評估與成本模式的綠色設計方法之研究,國立成功大學
    機械工程學系碩士論文,2000。

    陳 家豪 與 嚴 聖博,建立光電相關產業毒性潛能指標計畫,台灣電子檢驗中心
    委託學術機構研究計畫成果報告,2002年11月。

    陳 正銘,毒性潛能指標於車用化學物質之評估技術研究,國立成功大學機械工程
    學系碩士論文,2005。

    嚴 聖博,陳 家豪,陳 潤明,卓 訓全 與 王 瀅琇,毒性潛能指標(TPI)在台灣
    之初步應用, 2003永續性產品與產業管理研討會,成功大學,台南,
    2003年3月15日。

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2006-07-26公開
    QR CODE