摘要
績效指標與機制為一套評分系統，用來衡量執行專案的目標達成度或績效，管理者能透過指標情況標準與數值，判斷計算績效的優劣。國內多數營造廠商，習以主觀經驗，單方觀點看待施工績效，結果不易為人接受。

本研究由定義施工績效著手，建立架構與尋找指標，然後整合建立施工專案績效指標與架構。建立架構併入施工流程中輸入、過程與輸出三階段，與成本、品質、時間三大專案目標。尋找指標則由專案管理、文獻、契約與規範中之執行要求、理論、條款、標準，導出之指標具體又完整。並設計出一套施工績效評估工具，明確定義各指標內容以供衡量，說明使用方法，建立評估機制。

所建立的指標經檢驗後，配合不同工程時期使用不同的指標組合，可找出每個時期之管理重點。另外定出各時期的指標權重，透過指標值與權重的比例，可分析專案細部績效。將此架構測試6個實際施工專案，並分析其整體與細部績效，能找出問題所在，初步驗證此機制的實用性。

Abstract
Performance measures and evaluation mechanisms are a set of scoring system. It is used to evaluate performance or the achievement of a construction project. A construction manager can judge the condition from the standards and numbers of the measures. However, most contactors in Taiwan measure construction project performance based on their own experiences and personal views. The result is hard to be accepted.

This research builds the construction project performance measures and framework. It starts from defining the construction performance, establishes framework and searches for the measures, then, combines them together. The framework includes the three stages of a construction process such as input, process, output and three goals of a project such as cost, quality and time. The sources of measures searching are from requirements of project management, theories, contract articles and standards of specifications. The measures derived from the above are specific and complete. This research also designs a tool for construction performance evaluation. The instrument clearly defines the content of every measure, explains to evaluator how to use, and builds the evaluation mechanism.

The measures and mechanisms are tested valid on 6 construction projects. The measures can be combined for different construction stages and display management focus in every stage. Setting the weights of measures in every stage, it can score performance to further detail.

一、英文部份

1.Ammons, D. N. (1996). Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

2.Ashley, D. B., Lurie, C. S., and Jaselskis, E. J. (1987). ”Determinants of Construction Project Success.” Project Management Journal, Vol.18, No.2, pp69-79.

3.Badiru, A. B., Pulat, P. S. (1995). Comprehensive Project Management: Integrating Optimization Models, Management Principles, and Computers. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

4.Chang, A. S. (1998). “Development of Consultant Performance Measures for Design Projects.” Project Management Journal, Vol.29, No.2, pp39-54.

5.Chang, A. S. (2001). “Work-Time Model for Engineers.” J. of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.127, No.2, pp193-172.

6.Comfort, L. K. and Pitts, K. (1996). “Improving Emergecy Management: A Total Quality Management Approach,” International J. of Public Administration, Vol.19, No.11&12, pp2113-2139.

7.Daft, R. L. (2001). Organization Theory and Design. 7th Edition, South-Western College Publishing, USA.

8.De Neufville, J. I. (1978-1979). “Validating Policy Indicators” Policy Sciences, Vol.10, p173.

9.Drucker, P. (1973). Management Tasks, Responsibilities Practices. Harper & Row, New York.

10.De La Garza, J. M., Hancher, D. E. and Decker, L. (1998). “Analysis of Safety Indicator in Construction” J. of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.124, No.4, pp312-314.

11.Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000). KPI Report for The Minister for Construction, Eland House Bressenden Place London UK.

12.Eccles, R. G. (1991). “The Performance Measurement Manifesto.” Harvard Business Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp131-137.

13.Felix, G. H. and Riggs, J. L. (1983). “Productivity Measurement by Objectives”, National Productivity Review, Vol.2, No.4, pp386-393.

14.Fisher, J. (1992). “Use of Nonfinancial Performance Measures.” Cost Management, Spring, pp31-38.

15.Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R. and Aouad, G. (2001). “Performance Management in Construction: A Conceptual Framework”, Construction Management and Economics, 19, pp85-95.

16.Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P. (1992). “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures that Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.70, No.1, pp71-79.

17.Kast, F. E., et al. (1979) Organization and Management, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

18.Katzell, M. E. (1975) Productivity : The Measure and the Myth, Amaeom, New York.

19.McKim, R., Hegazy, T. and Attalla, M. (2000). “Project Performance Control in Reconstruction Project”, J. of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.127, No.2, pp137-141.

20.Meyer, C. (1994). “How the Right Measures Help Teams Excel.” Harvard Business Review, Vol.72, No.3, pp95-103.

21.Ouchi, W. G. (1979). “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms.” Management Science, Vol.25, No.9, pp833-848.

22.Perrin, B. (1998). “Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement” American J. of Evaluation, Vol.19, No.3, pp367-379.

23.Russell, J. S., Jaselskis, E. J., Lawrence, S. P., Tserng, H. P., and Prestine, M. T. (1996). “Development of a Predictive Tool for Continuous Assessment of Project Performance.” Research Report 107-12, The Construction Industry Institute, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

24.Sanvido, V., Grobler, F., Parfitt, K., Guvenis, M. and Coyle, M. (1992). “Critical Success Factors for Construction Projects”, J. of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol.118, No.1, pp94-111.

25.Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy Text & Cases. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

26.Soetanto, R., Proverbs, D. G. and Holt, G. D. (2001). “Achieving Quality Construction Projects Based on Harmonious Working Relationship, Clients’ and Architects’ Perceptions of Contractor Performance”, International J. of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol.18, No.5, pp528-548.

27.Stevens, J. D., Kloppenborg, T. J., and Glagola, C. R. (1994). “Quality Performance Measurements of the EPC Process: The Blueprint.” Source Document 103, The Construction Industry Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, Nov.

28.Tesoro, F. and Tootson, J. (2000). Implementing Global Performance Measurement Systems – A Cookbook Approach. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer, San Francisco.

29.Theurer, J. (1998). “Seven Pitfalls to Avoid When Establishing Performance Measures” Public Management (US), Vol.80, No.7, pp21-28.

30.Thorpe, D. J. (1997). “Total Quality Service: Principles, Practice and Implementation,” J. of the Academic of Marketing Science, Vol.25, No.1, pp90-92.

二、中文部份

1.王毓仁，「公部門績效指標的設計與運用」，人力發展月刊，第八十二期，p.35-45，民國八十九年。

2.王明德與莊春發，公共建設執行績效信號機制之建立(期末報告書)，行政院公共工程委員會，民國八十八年五月。

3.中國國家標準(CNS)，品質管理─專案管理品質指導綱要，總號14485，類號Z4075。

4.古秋雄，台灣大型營造業經營策略之研究─以個案公司為例，國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文，民國八十九年。

5.行政院公共工程委員會，工程採購契約範本，民國八十八年九月。

6.行政院公共工程委員會，施工綱要規範第00700章「一般條款」，民國九十年三月，第二版。

7.行政院公共工程委員會，施工綱要規範第01篇「一般要求」，民國九十年三月，第二版。

8.邱文杰與張行道，營造公司之績效與指標建立，第五屆營建工程與管理研究成果聯合發表會論文集，民國九十年。

9.李長貴，績效管理與績效評估，華泰文化事業公司，台北，民國八十六年。

10.林財丁與林瑞發譯，「組織行為」，滄海書局，台中，民國八十九年。

11.林清宏，設計管理之機效-原因-過程模式，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，民國八十九年。

12.柯鎮洋，營建業成本控制，營建管理季刊，第18期，p.70-72，民國八十三年。

13.范光懿，談營造業成本控制，營造天下，第24期，p.27-36，民國八十六年。

14.曾仁杰、黃玉霖、呂守陞等，現行公共工程進度與預算管理制度之檢討，行政院公共工程委員會研究計劃成果報告，計畫編號：pcc87-管-03，民國八十七年五月。

15.孫本初等，行政機關考成指標之研究，行政院研究發展考核委員會，民國八十九年十二月。

16.黃建銘，組織績效指標的運用與管理意涵-英國經驗之探討，人力發展月刊，第66期，p.52-62，民國八十八年七月。

17.黃价成，時程管理體系整合做法，國立成功大學土木研究所碩士論文，民國八十九年。

18.許士軍，績效評估之導讀「走向創新時代的組織績效評估」，天下遠見出版股份有限公司，高翠霜譯，杜拉克等著，台北，民國八十九年。

19.賀長青，公共工程執行績效評估模式之研究，國立台灣技術學院營建工程技術學系碩士論文，民國八十五年。

20.張萬鑫，應用平衡計分理論於營造廠績效衡量制度之研究，國立台灣大學土木研究所碩士論文，民國八十八年。

21.楊建民，行政機關生產力之研究─指標建構與衡量方法的探討，國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，民國七十六年。

22.廖國禎，營建管理：P3軟體對工程實例之演練；營建管理及監造實務，科技圖書股份有限公司，台北，民國八十七年。

23.劉福勳，營建管理之挑戰與策略之探討，2001年海峽兩岸土木工程合作交流活動“台灣論文集”，p.113-122，2001年。

24.劉福勳，如何有效運用營建管理技巧提昇工程單位營運績效，營造天下，第64期，p.6-13，民國九十年。