| 研究生: |
陳智偉 CHEN, CHI-WEI |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
價值共創商業模式之研究:以臺南宿務所與 Local 樂客背包旅棧為例 A Study on the Value Co-Creation Business Model: The Cases of Tainan Dormitory and Local Backpacker Hostel |
| 指導教授: |
周信輝
Chou, Hsin-Hui |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 經營管理碩士學位學程(AMBA) Advanced Master of Business Administration (AMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 109 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 價值共創 、DART 模型 、商業模式 、個案研究 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Value Co-Creation, DART Model, Business Model Canvas, Case Study |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:59 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討旅宿業者如何透過價值共創機制,將顧客互動、地方資源與數位平台轉化為可持續運作的商業模式。相較於既有研究多聚焦於旅宿業服務品質、顧客滿意度、品牌形象或重遊意願,本研究進一步整合服務主導邏輯、DART 價值共創模型與 Business Model Canvas,分析價值共創如何由互動機制形成共創價值,並進一步被組織化為商業模式構面。本研究採質性多個案研究法,以臺南宿務所與 Local 樂客背包旅棧為研究個案。兩者同處臺南地方旅宿場域,皆重視地方文化、顧客互動與數位平台運用,但其價值共創方式具有明顯差異。臺南宿務所主要扮演民宿整合與品牌推廣平台角色,透過會員民宿、地方商家、社群媒體與文創商品等資源串聯,形成以平台、網絡與資源整合為核心的價值共創模式。Local 樂客背包旅棧則以老宅空間、主客交流、公共空間互動、地方體驗與旅客口碑為核心,形成以人、空間與住宿體驗為基礎的價值共創模式。
研究發現,DART 模型與 Business Model Canvas 並非一對一對應關係,而是具有前後連結與互補功能。DART 模型說明價值共創如何透過對話、取得、風險評估與透明等互動機制發生;Business Model Canvas 則說明這些互動所形成的共創價值,如何進一步反映於價值主張、顧客關係、通路、關鍵資源、關鍵活動與關鍵夥伴等商業模式構面。臺南宿務所的價值共創較偏向「平台互動型」,其主要價值在於品牌曝光、共同形象建立、地方資源串聯與合作網絡形成;Local 樂客背包旅棧則較偏向「體驗互動型」,其價值創造來自旅客住宿過程中的情感交流、場域體驗、回訪與口碑推薦。本研究之理論貢獻在於補充 DART 價值共創模型與 Business Model Canvas 之間的整合邏輯,說明價值共創不僅是企業與顧客之間的互動,更可延伸為旅宿業者、旅客、地方商家、社群平台與地方文化共同參與的地方價值網絡。實務上,本研究建議旅宿業者應建立完整的線上與線下顧客旅程,善用數位平台作為互動與回饋工具,並將地方文化與合作夥伴視為商業模式的重要資源,以發展具差異化與永續性的旅宿價值共創模式。
This study explores how hospitality businesses transform customer interactions, local resources, and digital platforms into sustainable business models through value co-creation. While previous hospitality studies have primarily focused on service quality, customer satisfaction, brand image, and revisit intention, relatively limited attention has been paid to how value co-creation mechanisms are embedded in and organized through business models. To address this gap, this study integrates Service-Dominant Logic, the DART model of value co-creation, and the Business Model Canvas (BMC) to examine how interactive mechanisms generate co-created value and how such value is subsequently incorporated into business model components.
A qualitative comparative case study was conducted using Tainan Dormitory and Local Backpacker Hostel as two contrasting cases located within the cultural and tourism context of Tainan, Taiwan. Although both cases emphasize local culture, customer interaction, and the use of digital platforms, they exhibit distinct approaches to value co-creation. Tainan Dormitory functions primarily as a platform for integrating and promoting local accommodations, connecting member homestays, local businesses, social media, and cultural products. Its value co-creation model is therefore characterized as a platform-interactive model, in which value is mainly created through brand exposure, collective image building, local resource integration, and collaborative networks. In contrast, Local Backpacker Hostel emphasizes interpersonal interaction, shared spaces, local experiences, and guest-generated word of mouth. Its value co-creation model is characterized as an experience-interactive model, in which value emerges directly from interactions among hosts, guests, physical spaces, and local culture.
The findings demonstrate that the DART model and the Business Model Canvas do not correspond on a one-to-one basis. Instead, they perform complementary and sequential analytical functions. The DART model explains how value co-creation occurs through Dialogue, Access, Risk Assessment, and Transparency, whereas the BMC explains how co-created value is organized, delivered, and sustained through value propositions, customer relationships, channels, key resources, key activities, key partnerships, and other business model components. The study therefore proposes an integrated logic of interaction mechanisms–co-created value–business model configuration.
Theoretically, this study extends value co-creation research by connecting micro-level interaction mechanisms with meso-level business model configurations and by expanding the unit of analysis from the conventional firm–customer relationship to a broader local value network involving hospitality operators, guests, local businesses, digital platforms, and local cultural resources. Managerially, the findings suggest that hospitality businesses should integrate online and offline customer journeys, employ digital platforms as tools for interaction and feedback rather than merely as promotional or booking channels, and treat local culture and collaborative partners as strategic resources for developing differentiated and sustainable hospitality business models.
方世杰、李慶芳(2016)。公私部門夥伴關係之特質、整合型研究架構與研究方向。《組織與管理》,9(2),1–29。
周信輝、蔡志豪(2016)。價值基礎策略觀點之公私部門夥伴關係的價值共創:以文創產業之駁二藝術特區為例。《組織與管理》,9(2),31–71。
杜鵬、李慶芳、周信輝、方世杰(2017)。「(創)串新」的服務模式:以價值共創觀點探索尚品宅配的服務流程與本質。《管理學報》,34(3),401–430。
交通部觀光署(2025)。《中華民國 113 年觀光統計年報》。交通部觀光署。
吳思華(2000)。《策略九說:策略思考的本質》。臉譜出版。
李政賢(2012)。《質性研究:設計與計畫撰寫》。五南圖書出版。
林建煌(2018)。《行銷管理》。華泰文化。
張紹勳(2014)。《研究方法》。滄海書局。
黃俊英(2010)。《行銷學原理》。華泰文化。
榮泰生(2021)。《策略管理》。五南圖書出版。
蔡敦浩(2019)。《管理研究方法》。雙葉書廊。
經濟部中小及新創企業署(2024)。《2024 年中小企業白皮書》。經濟部中小及新創企業署。
國家發展委員會(2024)。《地方創生相關政策及推動資料》。國家發展委員會。
臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2024)。《臺南市觀光統計及觀光發展相關資料》。臺南市政府觀光旅遊局。
臺南民宿文化發展協會(2024)。《協會簡介與活動資料》。臺南民宿文化發展協會。
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 493–520.
Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., & Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.
Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133–150.
Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.
Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. (2017). A critical assessment of business model research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 73–104.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2013). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97–105.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2014). The co-creation paradigm. Stanford University Press.
Ramaswamy, V., & Ozcan, K. (2018). What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation. Journal of Business Research, 84, 196–205.
Snihur, Y., & Markman, G. (2023). Business model research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Management Studies, 60(4), e1–e14.
Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3–8.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: An extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23.
Wieland, H., Hartmann, N. N., & Vargo, S. L. (2017). Business models as service strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(6), 925–943.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Booking.com(2026)。Local 樂客背包旅棧(Local Backpacker Hostel)住宿資訊與旅客評論。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。
交通部觀光署(2026)。《觀光統計資料庫》。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。
交通部觀光署(2026)。Local 樂客背包旅棧旅宿登記及住宿資訊。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。
Local 樂客背包旅棧(2026)。官方 Facebook 粉絲專頁。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。
臺南市政府觀光旅遊局(2026)。臺南觀光旅遊及觀光統計相關資料。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。
臺南宿務所(2026)。官方 Facebook 粉絲專頁。檢索日期:2026 年 4 月 30 日。