社會網絡對於高齡者晚年搬遷選擇的影響為高齡友善城市在社會基礎設施與服務規劃上的考量重點。而在今日數位通訊對互動習慣日益影響的背景下，高齡者的社交偏好上是否傾向維持實體見面的互動，抑或高齡者由於身體機能的退化而更傾向借助數位互動將有待探討。因此在上述背景下能延伸出幾大思考方向，第一，實體見面和遠距互動是否能有效給予高齡者社會支持使其在晚年不進行搬遷，第二，在地鄰里社團網絡與家庭網絡的影響又是否有差異，以上皆為探尋現今高齡者晚年居住決策上的重要課題。因此本研究將以高齡者互動行為衡量其社會網絡，並研析其社會網絡對於高齡者晚年遷移決策的影響。
方法上，本研究彙整華人家庭動態資料庫為實證樣本，並藉由羅吉特回歸(Logistic regression) 為設立社會網絡對於搬遷選擇之模型，並藉由參數分析、賭倍比分析各變數之影響程度，以及藉由z檢定比較系數是否具顯著差異。在實證發現上，在家庭網絡中本研究發現高齡者頻繁的代間實體見面與遠距通訊維繫的社會支持將增加高齡者選擇在地老化意願的可能。然而比較互動管道可發現代間實體見面對遷移機率之影響現今仍大於代間遠距通訊對於搬遷機率之影響，而獨居長者將需要更多的見面與通訊頻率才能增加在地老化的機率，相關社會服務機構也應持續重視獨居長者互動是否足夠以增加其選擇在地老化的機率。而在地方社團網絡方面，本研究則發現相較於其他地方社團參與，參與地方廟宇活動將有效降低搬遷機率，顯現地方宗教所聯繫的網絡仍是現今高齡者增加地方依附的重要管道。

The impact of social networks on the elderly's aging-in-place choices is an important consideration of neighbourhood social infrastructure and services. However, under the context of increasing digital communication on interaction habits today, whether the interaction preference of the elderly will still focus on physical face-to-face interaction or the elderly are more inclined to rely on digital interaction due to the degradation of physical functions? And what kind of interaction could effectively provide the elderly with plentiful social support so that they wouldn’t relocate in old age are all important issues in understanding the behavioural preferences of today's elderly as well. As a result, this article will measure the social network of the elderly with their interaction frequency, and analyze its influence on the decision of the elderly to conduct residential relocation in their later years.
About the methodology, this article arranged Panel Study of Family Dynamics(PSFD) as an empirical database. And establishing Logistic regression based on how the social network model would affect relocation choice. The degree of influence of each variable was analyzed by parameter analysis, odds ratio, and whether the coefficients were significantly different was compared by the z-test. In terms of the empirical result of the family networks, this study found that the frequent intergenerational face-to-face interaction and the social support maintained by long-distance digital communication will increase the possibility of the elderly's willingness to age in place. However, the impact of intergenerational face-to-face interaction on relocation probability is still greater than the impact of intergenerational telecommunications. Moreover, the elderly who lives alone will need more frequent meetings and communication to decrease the probability of relocation. Relevant social service agencies should also continue to pay attention to whether the interaction among the elderly living alone is sufficient to increase the probability of aging-in-place. In terms of local activity networks, this article found that compared with other local activity participation, participating in local religious activities will effectively reduce the probability of relocation. Revealing the networks that local religions are connected to is an important conduit for increasing place attachment.

（一） 外文文獻
1. Arber, S. (1993). Ageing, independence, and the life course. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
2. Ball, M. M., Perkins, M. M., Hollingsworth, C., Whittington, F. J., & King, S. V.(2009). Pathways to assisted living: The influence of race and class. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(1), 81-108.
3. Barnes, J. A. (1954). Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human relations, 7(1), 39-58.
4. Bäumker, T., Callaghan, L., Darton, R., Holder, J., Netten, A. N. N., & Towers, A. M. (2012). Deciding to move into extra care housing: residents’ views. Ageing & Society, 32(7), 1215-1245.
5. Bekhet, A. K., Zauszniewski, J. A., & Nakhla, W. E. (2009). Reasons for relocation to retirement communities: A qualitative study. Western journal of nursing research, 31(4), 462-479.
6. Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186-204.
7. Bezaitis, A. G. (2008). New technologies for aging-in-place: Aging well. Today’s Geriatric Medicine, 1(2), 26.
8. Bohle, P., Rawlings-Way, O., Finn, J., Ang, J., & Kennedy, D. J. (2014). Housing choice in retirement: Community versus separation. Housing studies, 29(1), 108- 127.
9. Boldy, D., Grenade, L., Lewin, G., Karol, E., & Burton, E. (2011). Older people's decisions regarding ‘ageing in place’: A Western Australian case study. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 30(3), 136-142.
10. Clark, W. A., & Onaka, J. L. (1983). Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban studies, 20(1), 47-57.
11. Caro, F. G., Yee, C., Levien, S., Gottlieb, A. S., Winter, J., McFadden, D. L., & Ho, T. H. (2012). Choosing among residential options: Results of a vignette experiment. Research on Aging, 34(1), 3-33.
12. Castle, N., & Resnick, N. (2016). Service-enriched housing: The staying at home program. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(8), 857-877.
13. Chao, T. Y. S. (2017). Planning for greying cities: Age-friendly city planning and design research and practice. Routledge.
14. Choi, N. G. (2003). Nonmarried aging parents' and their adult children's characteristics associated with transitions into and out of intergenerational coresidence. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 40(3), 7-29.
15. Choi, Y., Kwon, Y. H., & Kim, J. (2018). The effect of the social networks of the elderly on housing choice in Korea. Habitat International, 74, 1-8.
16. Clark, D. E., Knapp, T. A., & White, N. E. (1996). Personal and location‐specific characteristics and elderly interstate migration. Growth and Change, 27(3), 327-351.
17. Clark, W. A., & Onaka, J. L. (1983). Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility. Urban studies, 20(1), 47-57.
18. Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American journal of sociology, 100(5), 1261-1293.
19. Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., & McCullough, B. M. (2013). Impact of internet use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults: cross-sectional analysis. Journal of medical Internet research, 15(2), e2306.
20. Crisp, D. A., Windsor, T. D., Butterworth, P., & Anstey, K. J. (2013). What are older adults seeking? Factors encouraging or discouraging retirement village living. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 32(3), 163-170.
21. Cutchin, M. P. (2001). Deweyan integration: Moving beyond place attachment in elderly migration theory. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52(1), 29-44.
22. Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2018). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467-477.
23. de Jonge, D. M., Jones, A., Phillips, R., & Chung, M. (2011). Understanding the essence of home: Older people's experience of home in Australia. Occupational therapy international, 18(1), 39-47.
24. Després, C., & Lord, S. (2005). The meaning of home for elderly suburbanites. Coming Home: International Perspectives on Place, Time and Identity in Old Age, New York, Springer, 317-340.
25. Dupuis-Blanchard, S. M. (2007). Building a new nest: The experience of women relocating to a seniors-designated apartment building. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research Archive, 136-153.
26. e. Housing Studies, 28(5), 746-763.
27. Edelbrock, D., Buys, L. R., Waite, L. M., Grayson, D. A., Broe, G. A., & Creasey, H. (2001). Characteristics of social support in a community‐living sample of older people: the Sydney Older Persons Study. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 20(4), 173-178.
28. Erickson, M. A., Krout, J., Ewen, H., & Robison, J. (2006). Should I stay or should I go? Moving plans of older adults. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20(3), 5-22.
29. Ewen, H. H., & Chahal, J. (2013). Influence of late life stressors on the decisions of older women to relocate into congregate senior housing. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 27(4), 392-408.
30. Fiori, K. L., Antonucci, T. C., & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), P25-P32.
31. Fonad, E., Wahlin, T. B. R., Heikkila, K., & Emami, A. (2006). Moving to and living in a retirement home: Focusing on elderly people's sense of safety and security. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20(3), 45-60.
32. Golant, S. M. (2003). Conceptualizing time and behavior in environmental gerontology: A pair of old issues deserving new thought. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 638-648.
33. Golant, S. M. (2011). The quest for residential normalcy by older adults: Relocation but one pathway. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 193-205.
34. Granbom, M., Himmelsbach, I., Haak, M., Löfqvist, C., Oswald, F., & Iwarsson, S. (2014). Residential normalcy and environmental experiences of very old people: Changes in residential reasoning over time. Journal of Agi Larsson ng Studies, 29, 9-19.
35. Groger, L., & Kinney, J. M. (2001, October). Reason for moving to a continuing care retirement community (CCRC). In Gerontologist (Vol. 41, pp. 138-139). 1275 K STREET NW SUITE 350, WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4006 USA: GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY AMER.
36. Hallberg, D., & Lagergren, M. (2009). Moving in and out of public old age care among the very old in Sweden. European Journal of Ageing, 6(2), 137-145.
37. Han, J. H., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Variations in ageing in home and ageing in neighbourhood. Australian Geographer, 48(2), 255-272.
38. Hansen, E. B., & Gottschalk, G. (2006). What makes older people consider moving house and what makes them move?. Housing, Theory and Society, 23(01), 34-54.
39. Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S., & Ogg, J. I. M. (2014). Moving beyond ‘ageing in place’: older people's dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing & Society, 34(10), 1771-1796.
40. House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 293-318.
41. Hwang, E. (2008). Exploring aging-in-place among Chinese and Korean seniors in British Columbia, Canada. Ageing international, 32(3), 205-218.
42. Jenkins Morales, M., & Robert, S. A. (2020). The effects of housing cost burden and housing tenure on moves to a nursing home among low-and moderate-income older adults. The Gerontologist, 60(8), 1485-1494.
43. Jörg, F., Borgers, N., Schrijvers, A. J., & Hox, J. J. (2006). Variation in long-term care needs assessors’ willingness to support clients’ requests for admission to a residential home: a vignette study. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(6), 767-790.
44. Jungers, C. M. (2010). Leaving home: An examination of late‐life relocation among older adults. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(4), 416-423.
45. Kendig, H. L. (1984). Housing careers, life cycle and residential mobility: Implications for the housing market. Urban Studies, 21(3), 271-283.
46. Key, W. (2013). 17 Ageing in rural communities. Interpreting Rurality: Multidisciplinary Approaches, 251.
47. Kim, H., Ahn, Y. H., Steinhoff, A., & Lee, K. H. (2014). Home modification by older adults and their informal caregivers. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 59(3), 648-656.
48. Kim, J., Kim, M., Han, A., & Chin, S. (2015). The importance of culturally meaningful activity for health benefits among older Korean immigrant living in the United States. International Journal of Qualitative studies on Health and Well-being, 10(1), 27501.
49. Krout, J. A., Moen, P., Holmes, H. H., Oggins, J., & Bowen, N. (2002). Reasons for relocation to a continuing care retirement community. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21(2), 236-256.
50. Larsson, K., Thorslund, M., & Kåreholt, I. (2006). Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the behavioural model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population. European Journal of Ageing, 3(1), 22-33.
51. Laumann, E. O., Galaskiewicz, J., & Marsden, P. V. (1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual review of sociology, 4(1), 455-484.
52. Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process.
53. Leith, K. H. (2006). “Home is where the heart is… or is it?”: A phenomenological exploration of the meaning of home for older women in congregate housing. Journal of Aging studies, 20(4), 317-333.
54. Litwak, E., & Longino Jr, C. F. (1987). Migration patterns among the elderly: A developmental perspective. The gerontologist, 27(3), 266-272.
55. Löfqvist, C., Granbom, M., Himmelsbach, I., Iwarsson, S., Oswald, F., & Haak, M. (2013). Voices on relocation and aging in place in very old age—a complex and ambivalent matter. The gerontologist, 53(6), 919-927.
56. Lord, S., Després, C., & Ramadier, T. (2011). When mobility makes sense: A qualitative and longitudinal study of the daily mobility of the elderly. Journal of Environmental psychology, 31(1), 52-61.
57. Macdonald, B., Luo, M., & Hülür, G. (2021). Daily social interactions and well being in older adults: The role of interaction modality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3566-3589.
58. Manicaros, M. A., & Stimson, R. J. (1999). Living in a retirement village attitudes, choices and outcomes.
59. Marston, H. R., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(19), 3525.
60. Marston, H. R., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(19), 3525.
61. McCann, M., Grundy, E., & O'Reilly, D. (2012). Why is housing tenure associated with a lower risk of admission to a nursing or residential home? Wealth, health and the incentive to keep ‘my home’. J Epidemiol Community Health, 66(2), 166-169.
62. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.
63. McFadden, D. (1976). The theory and practice of disaggregate demand forecasting for various modes of urban transportation (No. 7623). Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary.
64. Motevasel, I. N. (2006). Senior housing in Sweden—A question of class differences and collective aging: An interview study in rental apartments and housing cooperatives. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 20(3), 77-93.
65. Oh, J. H. (2003). Social bonds and the migration intentions of elderly urban residents: The mediating effect of residential satisfaction. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(2), 127-146.
66. Oswald, F., & Rowles, G. D. (2006). Beyond the Relocation Trauma in Old Age: New Trends in Elders' Residential Decisions. New Dynamics in Old Age: Individual, Environmental and Societal Perspectives; Wahl, H.-W., Tesch-Römer, C., Hoff, A., Eds, 127-152.
67. Oswald, F., Schilling, O., Wahl, H. W., & Gäng, K. (2002). Trouble in paradise? Reasons to relocate and objective environmental changes among well-off older adults. Journal of environmental psychology, 22(3), 273-288.
68. Oswald, F., Wahl, H. W., Schilling, O., Nygren, C., Fänge, A., Sixsmith, A., ... & Iwarsson, S. (2007). Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. The Gerontologist, 47(1), 96-107.
69. Painter, G., & Lee, K. (2009). Housing tenure transitions of older households: Life cycle, demographic, and familial factors. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(6), 749-760.
70. Park, S., Cho, J., & Chen, Y. C. (2019). Subsidized housing and geographic accessibility to neighborhood resources for low-income older people: From later year social exclusion perspective. Geoforum, 106, 297-304.
71. Pettersson, A., & Malmberg, G. (2009). Adult children and elderly parents as mobility attractions in Sweden. Population, space and place, 15(4), 343-357.
72. Powdthavee, N. (2008). Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationships. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(4), 1459-1480.
73. Pynoos, J., Liebig, P., Alley, D., & Nishita, C. M. (2005). Homes of choice: Towards more effective linkages between housing and services. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 18(3-4), 5-49.
74. Rabushka, A., & Jacobs, B. (1980). Old folks at home. New York: Free Press.
75. Reschovsky, J. D. (1990). Residential immobility of the elderly: An empirical investigation. Real Estate Economics, 18(2), 160-183.
76. Rouwendal, J., & Thomese, F. (2013). Homeownership and long-term car Tyvimaa
77. Roy, N., Dubé, R., Després, C., Freitas, A., & Légaré, F. (2018). Choosing between staying at home or moving: A systematic review of factors influencing housing decisions among frail older adults. PloS one, 13(1), e0189266.
78. Sabia, J. J. (2008). There's no place like home: A hazard model analysis of aging in place among older homeowners in the PSID. Research on Aging, 30(1), 3-35.
79. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
80. Sergeant, J. F., & Ekerdt, D. J. (2008). Motives for residential mobility in later life: Post-move perspectives of elders and family members. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 66(2), 131-154.
81. Shelton, J. P. (1968). The cost of renting versus owning a home. Land Economics, 44(1), 59-72.
82. Silverstein, M., & Angelelli, J. J. (1998). Older parents' expectations of moving closer to their children. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 53(3), S153-S163.
83. Shillair, R. J., Rikard, R. V., Cotten, S. R., & Tsai, H. Y. (2015). Not so lonely surfers: Loneliness, social support, internet use and life satisfaction in older adults. Iconference 2015 proceedings.
84. Stoeckel, K. J., & Porell, F. (2010). Do older adults anticipate relocating? The relationship between housing relocation expectations and falls. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 29(2), 231-250.
85. Sun, Y., Fang, Y., Yung, E. H., Chao, T. Y. S., & Chan, E. H. (2020). Investigating the links between environment and older people’s place attachment in densely populated urban areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103897.
86. Teaff, J. D., Lawton, M. P., Nahemow, L., & Carlson, D. (1978). Impact of age integration on the well-being of elderly tenants in public housing. Journal of Gerontology, 33(1), 130-133.
87. Thompson, E. E., and N. Krause. 1998. Living alone and neighborhood characteristics as predictors of social support in late life. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Science, 53B(6): S354-S364.
88. Tyvimaa, T., & Kemp, C. L. (2011). Finnish seniors’ move to a senior house: Examining the push and pull factors. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 25(1), 50-71.
89. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). World population ageing 2020 highlights.
90. Van Der Pers, M., Kibele, E. U., & Mulder, C. H. (2015). Intergenerational proximity and the residential relocation of older people to care institutions and elsewhere. Ageing & Society, 35(7), 1429-1456.
91. Walker, E., & McNamara, B. (2013). Relocating to retirement living: An occupational perspective on successful transitions. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60(6), 445-453.
92. Walker, M. E., Wasserman, S., & Wellman, B. (1993). Statistical models for social support networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(1), 71-98.
93. Wiseman, R. F. (1980). Why older people move: Theoretical issues. Research on aging, 2(2), 141-154.
94. Wolfson, N., Cavanagh, T., & Kraiger, K. (2013). Older adults and technology-based instruction: Optimizing learning outcomes and transfer. Academy of Management Learning & Education. Retrieved December 26,2019, from http://amle.aom.org/content/early/2013/04/29/amle.2012.0056
95. Kim, J. J., & Kim, J. (2012). A study of health care system housing and environment of the elderly. The Journal of the Korea institute of electronic communication sciences, 7(4), 925-930.
96. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(3), 273-281.
（二） 中文文獻
1. 王怡雯, & 張政亮. (2006). 生活環境滿意度與人口遷移關係之研究-以台南市為例. 北市教大社教學報, (5), 33-52.
2. 王璽權. (2013). 不同世代同住傾向, 孝道觀念對親子同住之影響. 成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文, 1-98.
3. 白麗. (2018). 智慧科技於高齡者生活與照護應用之前瞻發展建議. 福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 6(3).
4. 朱芳妮, 張金鶚, & 陳淑美. (2008). 已購屋者及購屋搜尋者之購屋需求決策比較分析-兼論顯示性偏好及敘述性偏好之差異. 都市與計畫, 35(4), 339-359.
5. 行政院（2016）。長期照顧十年計畫2.0核定本。
6. 吳至中. (2005). 檢視住宅選擇行為中的異質性與相似性-以台灣地區都市層級選擇為例 成功大學都市計劃學系碩士論文, 1-93.
7. 李宗派. (2007). 老化概念 (Ⅱ) 行為科學之老化理論與老化理論研究趨勢. 臺灣老人保健學刊, 3(2), 25-61.
8. 李素馨, 張淑貞, 侯錦雄, & 胡志宏. (2015). 高齡者鄰里公園休閒活動支應性之研究. 造園景觀學報, 20(3), 71-94.
9. 周月清, 李婉萍, & 王文娟. (2018). 兩代 [三老] 家庭照顧轉銜與老年遷移: 老年父母, 中老年智障者與手足. 臺大社 會工作學刊, (37), 99-149.
10. 林麗味, 許瓈勻, 蕭欣宜, 黃國城, 王香蘋, & 葉淑惠. (2018). 社區高齡者參與志願服務動機, 社會支持及生活滿意度. 長庚護理, 29(4), 517-532.
11. 济川, & 郭志剛. (2004). Logistic 回歸模型: 方法及應用. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
12. 胡淑華. (2020). 偏遠社區關懷據點服務與高齡者心理健康關係之探討-以石槽關懷據點為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
13. 徐仁輝. (2015). 六都後中央與地方財政關係的探討. 財稅研究 44(2), 1-16
14. 張桂霖, & 張金鶚. (2010). 老人居住安排與居住偏好之轉換: 家庭價值與交換理論觀點的探討. 人口學刊, (40), 41-90.
15. 許名中（2015）. 主要國家高齡者網路學習具體作法探究. 教育脈動, 1, p147-155
16. 連經宇. (2002). 家戶購屋決策影響因素之初探研究-結合模糊語意的因素分析法之實證比較. 臺灣土地研究, (4), 29-51.
17. 陳妍君. (2005). 住宅權屬選擇與預期遷移決策之聯立模式之建構 成功大學都市計劃學系博士論文, 1-80.
18. 陳佳欣, & 張曜麟. (2009). 運用羅吉斯迴歸與倒傳遞網路進行二元類別選擇之比較—對住宅成交機率之測試實驗. 嘉南學報 (科技類) 35: p. 316-328
19. 陳佳欣. (2007). 家戶首次購置住宅與生命歷程之關聯分析 成功大學都市計劃學系博士論文, 1-113.
20. 陳彥仲, & 吳京玲. (1998). 家戶住宅區位選擇與地方財政分配之實證研究. 都市與計劃, 25(2), 223-238.
21. 陳彥仲, & 陳靜怡. (2012). 從高齡者自評健康條件, 家庭資源及社會參與探討高齡者期望之居住安排. Journal of Taiwan Land Research, 15(2), 127-158.
22. 陳淑美, & 林佩萱. (2010). 親子世代的財務支援, 照顧需要對老人居住安排與生活滿意度影響之研究. 住宅學報, 19(1), 29-58.
23. 陳淑美, & 張金鶚. (1999). 三代同堂家庭遷移決策之研究. 台灣經濟學會 1999 年年會.
24. 陳淑美, & 張金鶚. (2002). 家戶遷移決策與路徑選擇之研究—台北縣市的實證研究. 住宅學報, 11(1), 1-22.
25. 陳靜怡. (2013). 高齡者獨立能力與居住安排之區域差異分析 成功大學都市計劃學系博士論文, 1-208.
26. 曾誰我, 馬永川, & 王彥儒. (2016). 高齡獨居者生活社交需求之調查. 福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 4(4), 505-520.
27. 黃寶祚, 陳麗貞, & 黃文灝. (2012). 北宜地區遷移行為之再檢視-以國道 5 號動工事件做例證. 人口學刊, (45), 1-34.
28. 楊國樞. (2018). 家庭因素與子女行為: 臺灣研究的評析. 楊國樞文集 (第六冊): 孝道與家庭, 429.
29. 葉淑娟, 施智婷, 莊智薰, & 蔡淑鳳. (2004). 社會支持系統與老人生活滿意度之關係-以高雄市老人為例. 中山管理評論, 12(2), 399-427.
30. 詹宜璋. (2014). 少小離家, 老大胡不歸? 遷居原住民的老年返鄉回流議題. 社會政策與社會工作學刊, 18(2), 37-72.
31. 劉正, & 齊力. (2019). 臺灣高齡者的居住狀況與機構照顧的需求趨勢. 國土及公共治理季刊, 7(1), 70-81.
32. 薛立敏, 李中文, & 曾喜鵬. (2003). 台灣區域人口遷移及其與就業市場, 住宅市場關係之實證研究. 都市與計劃, 30(1), 37-62.
33. 謝美娥. (2002). 失能老人與成年子女照顧者對失能老人遷居的歷程與解釋: 從家庭到機構. 社會政策與社會工作學刊, 6(2), 7-63.
34. 柯瓊芳. (2002). 誰來照顧老人? 歐盟各國奉養態度的比較分析. 人口學刊, 24, 1-32.
35. 李晏佐, & 蔡博方. (2020). 以關係做照顧: 活躍老化的另類可能. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 25(4).
36. 國家發展委員會. (2020). 「數位科技時代下我國超高齡社會 因應策略」委託研究案. https://www.ndc.gov.tw/nc_708_34461
37. 行政院主計總處. (2002). 91年國內遷徙調查統計結果. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4606&ctNode=1517&mp=1
38. 行政院主計總處. (2008). 96年國內遷徙調查報告. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=23150&ctNode=1517&mp=1
39. 行政院主計總處. (2013). 101年國內遷徙調查報告. https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=34212&ctNode=1517&mp=1
40. 中央研究院社會學研究所. (2018). 台灣社會變遷基本調查. https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/browsingbydatatype_result.php?category=surveymethod&type=1&csid=2