隨著淨零排放政策與空氣污染標準加嚴，焚化煙氣控制逐漸由單一污染物處理轉向碳排放與多污染物同步治理。本研究建立超音波霧化碳捕捉耦合催化過濾系統，探討低溫煙氣條件下CO₂、NOx與戴奧辛類污染物（polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, PCDD/Fs）之同步控制潛力，並比較不同催化劑金屬組成與載體結構對氧化還原協同反應之影響。
催化過濾部分以BK、V/W/TiO₂、V/W@UiO-66及Ce/W@UiO-66作為測試材料，比較不同操作溫度、活性金屬組成與載體結構對NOx還原與PCDD/Fs氧化之影響，並透過氣相/粒相分布、單位粒狀物（Particle Matter, PM）上PCDD/Fs負載及氯數同系物組成變化，區分污染物之物理捕集、吸附/脫附與實質催化降解行為。結果顯示以金屬有機骨架材料（Metal-Organic Frameworks, MOFs）作為載體可提供較高比表面積與孔隙結構，其中V/W@UiO-66於NOx與PCDD/Fs協同控制上展現較佳平衡性；然而Ce/W@UiO-66雖具Ce⁴⁺/Ce³⁺循環與氧空位潛力，其PCDD/Fs去除效果未能有更佳的表現；考量到高比表面積之載體未能絕對提升催化過濾整體效果。
碳捕捉部分則以氫氧化鈣（Ca(OH)₂）、碳酸鉀（K₂CO₃）與飛灰洗滌水作為鹼性吸收液，評估其於CO₂捕捉效率與操作穩定性。結果顯示，Ca(OH)₂於高pH條件下具有較高短期吸收能力，但易受CaCO₃沉澱影響而產生操作波動；K₂CO₃則因可逆碳酸鹽/碳酸氫鹽反應特性，展現較穩定之吸收行為，較具長時間操作潛力；飛灰洗滌水則具資源再利用潛力，但其吸收表現受鹼性來源與溶出成分影響，仍需進一步優化。
整體而言，初步證實碳捕捉耦合催化過濾系統應用於焚化煙氣多污染物同步控制之可行性，並指出催化性能並非僅由載體比表面積決定，而需同時考量金屬功能、載體結構、活性位點與污染物相分布行為。上述結果可作為後續低溫多污染物協同控制材料設計與整合式煙氣處理系統發展之參考。

This study evaluated a carbon capture–coupled catalytic filtration system for the simultaneous control of CO₂, NOx, and PCDD/Fs in low-temperature incineration flue gas. The main objectives were to examine how catalyst composition, support structure, and operating temperature affect NOx reduction and PCDD/Fs oxidation, and to compare the CO₂ capture performance of different alkaline absorbents under ultrasonic atomization.
Blank filter material, commercial V/W/TiO₂, V/W@UiO-66, and Ce/W@UiO-66 were tested in the catalytic filtration system. The catalysts were characterized by SEM, EDS, BET,XRD, and XPS. NOx removal was evaluated under NH₃-SCR conditions, while PCDD/Fs removal was assessed using total concentration, toxic equivalent concentration, gas/particle-phase distribution, PM-bound PCDD/Fs loading, and homologue profiles. CO₂ capture was tested using atomized Ca(OH)₂, K₂CO₃, and fly ash washing water.
The results showed that UiO-66 improved metal dispersion and pollutant contact through its porous structure. V/W@UiO-66 showed the most balanced performance for NOx and PCDD/Fs control. For CO₂ capture, Ca(OH)₂ provided strong short-term absorption but was affected by CaCO₃ precipitation, whereas K₂CO₃ showed more stable behavior. Overall, the proposed system shows preliminary potential for integrated multi-pollutant flue gas treatment.

1.國家發展委員會, 行., 經濟部,科技部,交通部,內政部,行政院農業委員會,金融監督管理委員會, 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明. 2022: 中華民國國家發展委員會. p. 20-22.
2.環境部. 環境部空氣品質改善維護資訊網. CEMS 政策推動 2026 2026/06/07; Available from: https://air.moenv.gov.tw/envtopics/StationarySource_9.aspx.
3.Lin, X., et al., Simultaneous suppression of PCDD/F and NOx during municipal solid waste incineration. Chemosphere, 2015. 126: p. 60-66.
4.Hajizadeh, Y., J.A. Onwudili, and P.T. Williams, Effects of gaseous NH3 and SO2 on the concentration profiles of PCDD/F in flyash under post-combustion zone conditions. Waste Management, 2012. 32(7): p. 1378-1386.
5.Han, L., et al., Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 by Using Novel Catalysts: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews, 2019. 119(19): p. 10916-10976.
6.Li, X., et al. A Review of Mn-Based Catalysts for Abating NOx and CO in Low-Temperature Flue Gas: Performance and Mechanisms. Molecules, 2023. 28, 6885 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28196885.
7.Qin, Y., et al., Catalytic oxidation of chlorobenzene and PCDD/Fs over V2O5-WO3/TiO2: insights into the component effect and reaction mechanism. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022. 29(28): p. 42809-42821.
8.Yang, B., et al., A superior Mn5CeTi5Ox catalysts for synergistic catalytic removal of chlorobenzene and NOx: Performance enhancement and mechanism studies. Molecular Catalysis, 2024. 569: p. 114634.
9.Sadakiyo, M., Support effects of metal–organic frameworks in heterogeneous catalysis. Nanoscale, 2022. 14(9): p. 3398-3406.
10.Mondal, M.K., H.K. Balsora, and P. Varshney, Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review. Energy, 2012: p. 431-441.
11.Chao, C., et al., Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021. 138: p. 110490.
12.沈寧衛, 我國垃圾處理設施興建營運與轉型活化成效之探討. 2017: 立法院.
13.Patil, A.A., A.A. Kulkarni, and B.B. Patil, Waste to energy by incineration. Journal of computing technologies, 2014. 3(6).
14.Vehlow, J., Air pollution control systems in WtE units: An overview. Waste Management, 2015. 37: p. 58-74.
15.Muzio, L.J. and G.C. Quartucy, Implementing NOx control: Research to application. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1997. 23(3): p. 233-266.
16.Miller, J.A. and C.T. Bowman, Mechanism and modeling of nitrogen chemistry in combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1989: p. 287-338.
17.Vries, W.d., Impacts of nitrogen emissions on ecosystems and human health: A mini review. Current Opinion in Environmental Science, 2021.
18.Yang, W., et al., An overview of inorganic particulate matter emission from coal/biomass/MSW combustion: Sampling and measurement, formation, distribution, inorganic composition and influencing factors. Fuel Processing Technology, 2021. 213: p. 106657.
19.Kennedy, I.M., The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007. 31(2): p. 2757-2770.
20.蔡岡廷 and 王建楠, 戴奧辛污染與健康危害. 中華職業醫學雜誌, 2007. 14(4): p. 261-268.
21.廢棄物焚化爐戴奧辛管制及排放標準. 環境部.
22.Altarawneh, M., et al., Mechanisms for formation, chlorination, dechlorination and destruction of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs). Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009. 35(3): p. 245-274.
23.Hung, P.C., Q.H. Chen, and M.B. Chang, Pyrolysis of MWI fly ash – Effect on dioxin-like congeners. Chemosphere, 2013. 92(7): p. 857-863.
24.Oh, J.-E., J.-S. Choi, and Y.-S. Chang, Gas/particle partitioning of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in atmosphere; evaluation of predicting models. Atmospheric Environment, 2001. 35(24): p. 4125-4134.
25.Zhou, H., et al., A review of dioxin-related substances during municipal solid waste incineration. Waste Management, 2015: p. 106-118.
26.Addink, R. and K. Olie, Mechanisms of Formation and Destruction of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans in Heterogeneous Systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995. 29(6): p. 1425-1435.
27.Zhang, Y., et al., Enhancing synergistic catalytic combustion for the co-removal of PCDD/Fs and additional pollutants from sintering flue gases: A review on catalyst development. Separation and Purification Technology, 2025. 363: p. 132132.
28.Li, X., et al., The recent progress on gaseous chlorinated aromatics removal for environmental applications. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022. 296: p. 121364.
29.Liu, X., et al., Simultaneous removal of PCDD/Fs and NOx from the flue gas of a municipal solid waste incinerator with a pilot plant. Chemosphere, 2015. 133: p. 90-96.
30.焚化廠流程介紹. 焚化廠營運管理資訊系統 2026 2026/05/20; Available from: https://swims.moenv.gov.tw/workflow.
31.Fritsky, K.J., J.H. Kumm, and M. Wilken, Combined PCDD/F Destruction and Particulate Control in a Baghouse: Experience with a Catalytic Filter System at a Medical Waste Incineration Plant. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001. 51(12): p. 1642-1649.
32.Fino, D., et al., A multifunctional filter for the simultaneous removal of fly-ash and NOx from incinerator flue gases. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004. 59(22): p. 5329-5336.
33.Saracco, G. and V. Specchia, Simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides and fly-ash from coal-based power-plant flue gases. Applied Thermal Engineering, 1998. 18(11): p. 1025-1035.
34.Bonte, J.L., et al., Catalytic destruction of PCDD/F in a fabric filter: experience at a municipal waste incinerator in Belgium. Waste Management, 2002. 22(4): p. 421-426.
35.Saracco, G. and L. Montanaro, Catalytic Ceramic Filters for Flue Gas Cleaning. 1. Preparation and Characterization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1995. 34(4): p. 1471-1479.
36.Saracco, G. and V. Specchia, Catalytic Ceramic Filters for Flue Gas Cleaning. 2. Catalytic Performance and Modeling Thereof. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1995. 34(4): p. 1480-1487.
37.Fritsky, K.J., J.H. Kumm, and M. Wilken, Combined PCDD/F destruction and particulate control in a baghouse: experience with a catalytic filter system at a medical waste incineration plant. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2001. 51(12): p. 1642-9.
38.Hung, P.C., et al., Pilot Tests on the Catalytic Filtration of Dioxins. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014. 48(7): p. 3995-4001.
39.Songxuan, C., et al., Application of PTFE composite catalytic filter material in synergistic purification of multiple pollutants in waste incineration flue gas. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 10221.
40.Wei, Y., et al., Recovery of spent SCR denitration catalyst: A review and recent advances. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2023. 11(3): p. 110104.
41.Gholami, F., et al., Technologies for the nitrogen oxides reduction from flue gas: A review. Science of The Total Environment, 2020. 714: p. 136712.
42.Busca, G., et al., Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1998. 18(1): p. 1-36.
43.Shan, W., et al., Theory and practice of metal oxide catalyst design for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Catalysis Today, 2021. 376: p. 292-301.
44.Malpartida, I., et al., The NO/NOx ratio effect on the NH3-SCR efficiency of a commercial automotive Fe-zeolite catalyst studied by operando IR-MS. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012. 113-114: p. 52-60.
45.Finocchio, E., G. Busca, and M. Notaro, A review of catalytic processes for the destruction of PCDD and PCDF from waste gases. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2006. 62(1-2): p. 12-20.
46.Weber, R., et al., Destruction efficiency of catalytic filters for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofurans in laboratory test and field operation — insight into destruction and adsorption behavior of semivolatile compounds. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2001. 31(3): p. 195-207.
47.Long, Y., et al., V2O5–WO3/TiO2 Catalyst for Efficient Synergistic Control of NOx and Chlorinated Organics: Insights into the Arsenic Effect. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021. 55(13): p. 9317-9325.
48.Ma, Y., et al., Elimination performance of NOx and chlorobenzene over VOx/TiO2-based commercial SCR catalysts at low temperature: Sulfur poisoning and regeneration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2026. 530: p. 173430.
49.Jiang, W., et al., Synergistic Elimination of NOx and Chloroaromatics on a Commercial V2O5–WO3/TiO2 Catalyst: Byproduct Analyses and the SO2 Effect. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019. 53(21): p. 12657-12667.
50.Lai, J.-K. and I.E. Wachs, A Perspective on the Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3 by Supported V2O5–WO3/TiO2 Catalysts. ACS Catalysis, 2018. 8(7): p. 6537-6551.
51.Marberger, A., et al., The Significance of Lewis Acid Sites for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide on Vanadium-Based Catalysts. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016. 55(39): p. 11989-11994.
52.Zhang, S. and Q. Zhong, Promotional effect of WO3 on O2− over V2O5/TiO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2013. 373: p. 108-113.
53.Suarez Negreira, A. and J. Wilcox, Role of WO3 in the Hg Oxidation across the V2O5–WO3–TiO2 SCR Catalyst: A DFT Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013. 117(46): p. 24397-24406.
54.He, Y., et al., Influence of catalyst synthesis method on selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3 with V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016. 193: p. 141-150.
55.Xiao, X., et al., Role of WO3 in NO Reduction with NH3 over V2O5-WO3/TiO2: A New Insight from the Kinetic Study. Catalysis Letters, 2016. 146(11): p. 2242-2251.
56.Liu, W., et al., Transition metals modified commercial SCR catalysts as efficient catalysts in NH3-SCO and NH3-SCR reactions. Molecular Catalysis, 2021. 515: p. 111888.
57.Ni, K., et al., Ceria accelerates ammonium bisulfate decomposition for improved SO2 resistance on a V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst in low-temperature NH3-SCR. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2022. 140: p. 104555.
58.Fatola, O.I., et al., Trends in vanadium neurotoxicity. Brain Research Bulletin, 2019. 145: p. 75-80.
59.Aguilar-Romero, M., et al., Acidity, surface species, and catalytic activity study on V2O5-WO3/TiO2 nanotube catalysts for selective NO reduction by NH3. Fuel, 2017. 198: p. 123-133.
60.Alemany, L.J., et al., Reactivity and Physicochemical Characterization of V2O5-WO3/TiO2 De-NOx Catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 1995. 155(1): p. 117-130.
61.Zhang, X., et al., Controlling effect of TiO2 carrier on formed vanadium species for effective catalytic oxidization of chlorobenzene. Applied Surface Science, 2022. 605: p. 154643.
62.Arfaoui, J., et al., New CeO2–TiO2, WO3–TiO2 and WO3–CeO2–TiO2 mesoporous aerogel catalysts for the low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Journal of Porous Materials, 2021. 28(5): p. 1535-1543.
63.Pan, Y., et al., Develop high efficient of NH3-SCR catalysts with wide temperature range by ball-milled method. Fuel, 2020. 282: p. 118834.
64.Lai, J., et al., Enhanced low-temperature simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides and polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans over vanadium-cerium-tungsten oxide supported on titanium dioxide catalyst: A pilot-scale evaluation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025. 13(4): p. 117353.
65.Wang, Q., et al., Effect of HCl and o-DCBz on NH3-SCR of NO over MnOx/TiO2 and MnOx-CeO2/TiO2 catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020. 605: p. 117801.
66.Yue Peng, K.L., Junhua Li, Identification of the active sites on CeO2–WO3 catalysts for SCR of NO x with NH3: An in situ IR and Raman spectroscopy study. 2013. 140-141: p. 483-492.
67.Wu, Z., et al., Active sites assembly effect on CeO2-WO3-TiO2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Molecular Catalysis, 2019. 479: p. 110549.
68.Kitagawa, S., R. Kitaura, and S.-i. Noro, Functional Porous Coordination Polymers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2004. 43(18): p. 2334-2375.
69.Lu, W., et al., Tuning the structure and function of metal–organic frameworks via linker design. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014. 43(16): p. 5561-5593.
70.Qian, Q., et al., MOF-Based Membranes for Gas Separations. Chemical Reviews, 2020. 120(16): p. 8161-8266.
71.Zhao, Q., et al., Synthesis and hydrogen storage studies of metal−organic framework UiO-66. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013. 38(29): p. 13104-13109.
72.Sun, L., M.G. Campbell, and M. Dincă, Electrically Conductive Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016. 55(11): p. 3566-3579.
73.Chaemchuen, S., et al., Metal–organic frameworks for upgrading biogas via CO2 adsorption to biogas green energy. Chemical Society Reviews, 2013. 42(24): p. 9304-9332.
74.Yang, Q., Q. Xu, and H.-L. Jiang, Metal–organic frameworks meet metal nanoparticles: synergistic effect for enhanced catalysis. Chemical Society Reviews, 2017. 46(15): p. 4774-4808.
75.Chughtai, A.H., et al., Metal–organic frameworks: versatile heterogeneous catalysts for efficient catalytic organic transformations. Chemical Society Reviews, 2015. 44(19): p. 6804-6849.
76.Corma, A., H. García, and F.X. Llabrés i Xamena, Engineering Metal Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chemical Reviews, 2010. 110(8): p. 4606-4655.
77.Jiao, L., et al., Metal–Organic Frameworks as Platforms for Catalytic Applications. Advanced Materials, 2018. 30(37): p. 1703663.
78.Cavka, J.H., et al., A New Zirconium Inorganic Building Brick Forming Metal Organic Frameworks with Exceptional Stability. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008. 130(42): p. 13850-13851.
79.Bae, S., et al., Rapid solvothermal synthesis of microporous UiO-66 particles for carbon dioxide capture. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018. 35(3): p. 764-769.
80.Wang, P., et al., Porous metal–organic framework MIL-100(Fe) as an efficient catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. RSC Advances, 2014. 4(90): p. 48912-48919.
81.Bauer, S., et al., High-Throughput Assisted Rationalization of the Formation of Metal Organic Frameworks in the Iron(III) Aminoterephthalate Solvothermal System. Inorganic Chemistry, 2008. 47(17): p. 7568-7576.
82.Li, C., et al., Cu-BTC metal-organic framework as a novel catalyst for low temperature selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by NH3: Promotional effect of activation temperature. Integrated Ferroelectrics, 2016. 172(1): p. 169-179.
83.Jeong, N.C., et al., Coordination-Chemistry Control of Proton Conductivity in the Iconic Metal–Organic Framework Material HKUST-1. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2012. 134(1): p. 51-54.
84.Song, K., et al., Metal-organic framework materials in NH3-SCR: Progress and prospects. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2025. 535: p. 216615.
85.Winarta, J., et al., A Decade of UiO-66 Research: A Historic Review of Dynamic Structure, Synthesis Mechanisms, and Characterization Techniques of an Archetypal Metal–Organic Framework. Crystal Growth & Design, 2020. 20(2): p. 1347-1362.
86.Vermoortele, F., et al., Synthesis Modulation as a Tool To Increase the Catalytic Activity of Metal–Organic Frameworks: The Unique Case of UiO-66(Zr). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013. 135(31): p. 11465-11468.
87.Phang, W.J., et al., Superprotonic Conductivity of a UiO-66 Framework Functionalized with Sulfonic Acid Groups by Facile Postsynthetic Oxidation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2015. 54(17): p. 5142-5146.
88.Dhakshinamoorthy, A., et al., Engineering UiO-66 Metal Organic Framework for Heterogeneous Catalysis. ChemCatChem, 2019. 11(3): p. 899-923.
89.Nouar, F., et al., Tuning the properties of the UiO-66 metal organic framework by Ce substitution. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51(77): p. 14458-14461.
90.Wang, F., et al., The design of the highly active NH3-SCR catalyst Ce-W/UiO-66: Close coupling of active sites and acidic sites. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022. 300: p. 121864.
91.Li, Y.-H., et al., UiO-66(Zr)-based functional materials for water purification: An updated review. Environmental Functional Materials, 2023. 2(2): p. 93-132.
92.Kanniche, M., et al., Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2010: p. 53-62.
93.Theo, W.L., et al., Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Applied Energy, 2016. 183: p. 1633-1663.
94.Jansen, D., et al., Pre-combustion CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015. 40: p. 167-187.
95.Asif, M., et al., Performance evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) utilizing a blended solution of ammonia and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) for CO2 capture. Fuel, 2015. 160: p. 513-524.
96.Li, X., et al., Oxy-fuel combustion for carbon capture and storage in internal combustion engines – A review. International Journal of Energy Research, 2022. 46(2): p. 505-522.
97.Nemitallah, M.A., et al., Oxy-fuel combustion technology: current status, applications, and trends. International Journal of Energy Research, 2017. 41(12): p. 1670-1708.
98.Oexmann, J., et al., Post-combustion CO2 capture: chemical absorption processes in coal-fired steam power plants. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2012. 2(2): p. 80-98.
99.Zhao, B., et al., Post-combustion CO2 capture by aqueous ammonia: A state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2012: p. 355-371.
100.Mondal, M.K., H.K. Balsora, and P. Varshney, Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review. Energy, 2012.
101.Lim, H., et al., Experimental study of hollow fiber membrane contactor process using aqueous amino acid salt-based absorbents for efficient CO2 capture. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024.
102.Spigarelli, B.P. and S.K. Kawatra, Opportunities and challenges in carbon dioxide capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2013: p. 69-87.
103.Samanta, A., et al., Post-Combustion CO2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012: p. 1438-1463.
104.Chao, C., et al., Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021.
105.Guo, J., et al., New insights into energy conversion mechanism, optimal absorbent selection criteria, and operation strategies of absorption carbon capture systems. Energy, 2024.
106.Hekmatmehr, H., et al., Carbon capture technologies: A review on technology readiness level. Flue, 2024.
107.Wu, H., X. Zhang, and Q. Wu, Research progress of carbon capture technology based on alcohol amine solution. Separation and Purification Technology, 2024. 333: p. 125715.
108.Yu, K., W.A. Mitch, and N. Dai, Nitrosamines and Nitramines in Amine-Based Carbon Dioxide Capture Systems: Fundamentals, Engineering Implications, and Knowledge Gaps. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017. 51(20): p. 11522-11536.
109.Tian, W., et al., Nonaqueous MEA/PEG200 Absorbent with High Efficiency and Low Energy Consumption for CO2 Capture. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021. 60(10): p. 3871-3880.
110.Feng, B., et al., Reduction of Energy Requirement of CO2 Desorption by Adding Acid into CO2-Loaded Solvent. Energy & Fuels, 2010. 24(1): p. 213-219.
111.Lian, S., et al., Recent advances in ionic liquids-based hybrid processes for CO2 capture and utilization. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2021. 99: p. 281-295.
112.Wehrung, Q., et al., Impact of Operational Parameters on the CO2 Absorption Rate in Ca(OH)2 Aqueous Carbonation─Implications for Process Efficiency. Energy & Fuels, 2024. 38(17): p. 16678-16691.
113.Blamey, J., et al., The calcium looping cycle for large-scale CO2 capture. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010. 36(2): p. 260-279.
114.Bassett, H., 276. Notes on the system lime–water, and on the determination of calcium. Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed), 1934(0): p. 1270-1275.
115.Don W. Green, R.H.P., Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook. 8 ed. 2008, McGraw-Hill: McGraw-Hill.
116.Cizer, Ö., et al., Phase and morphology evolution of calcium carbonate precipitated by carbonation of hydrated lime. Journal of Materials Science, 2012. 47(16): p. 6151-6165.
117.MacKenzie, A., et al., Economics of CO2 Capture Using the Calcium Cycle with a Pressurized Fluidized Bed Combustor. Energy & Fuels, 2007. 21(2): p. 920-926.
118.Chai, S.Y.W., L.H. Ngu, and B.S. How, Review of carbon capture absorbents for CO2 utilization. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, 2022. 12(3): p. 394-427.
119.Anderson, C., et al., Developments in the CO2CRC UNO MK 3 process: A multi-component solvent process for large scale CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2013. 37: p. 225-232.
120.Altway, A., et al., Modeling and Simulation of CO2 Absorption into Promoted Aqueous Potassium Carbonate Solution in Industrial Scale Packed Column. 2015, 2015: p. 14.
121.Bobicki, E.R., et al., Carbon capture and storage using alkaline industrial wastes. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012. 38(2): p. 302-320.
122.Zhu, F., et al., Comparison of two types of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ashes with different alkaline reagents in washing experiments. Waste Management, 2009. 29(1): p. 259-264.
123.Zhang, Y., et al., Treatment of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: State-of-the-art technologies and future perspectives. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021. 411: p. 125132.
124.Qin, J., et al., Carbonation of municipal solid waste gasification fly ash: Effects of pre-washing and treatment period on carbon capture and heavy metal immobilization. Environmental Pollution, 2022. 308: p. 119662.
125.Wang, L., et al., Accelerated co-precipitation of lead, zinc and copper by carbon dioxide bubbling in alkaline municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash wash water. RSC Advances, 2016. 6(24): p. 20173-20186.
126.Wang, L., et al., Geochemical modeling and assessment of leaching from carbonated municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016. 23(12): p. 12107-12119.
127.Ma, X., et al., Improve toxicity leaching, physicochemical properties of incineration fly ash and performance as admixture by water washing. Construction and Building Materials, 2023. 386: p. 131568.
128.Mahmoudi Marjanian, M., S. Shahhosseini, and A. Ansari, Investigation of the ultrasound assisted CO2 absorption using different absorbents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021. 149: p. 277-288.
129.Cho, M., et al., Novel Spray Tower for CO2 Capture Using Uniform Spray of Monosized Absorbent Droplets. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018. 57(8): p. 3065-3075.
130.Seyboth, O., et al., Development of a Spray Scrubbing Process for Post Combustion CO2 Capture with Amine Based Solvents. Energy Procedia, 2014. 63: p. 1667-1677.
131.Meus, P., Carbon capture using aerosol technology, in TRITA-CBH-GRU. 2023.
132.Maly, M., et al., Importance of atomizer choice for CO2 capture in spray columns. Fuel, 2025. 385: p. 134078.
133.Shen, L., et al., Noble-metal-free MoS2 co-catalyst decorated UiO-66/CdS hybrids for efficient photocatalytic H2 production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015. 166-167: p. 445-453.
134.Ma, Y., et al. The Mn-Doped UiO-66 Nano-Catalysts for Low-Temperature CO-SCR. Crystals, 2025. 15, 231 DOI: 10.3390/cryst15030231.
135.Duma, Z.G., et al. Thermocatalytic Hydrogenation of CO2 to Methanol Using Cu-ZnO Bimetallic Catalysts Supported on Metal–Organic Frameworks. Catalysts, 2022. 12, 401 DOI: 10.3390/catal12040401.
136.Fu, G., et al., Cr-doped UiO-66 with enhanced water adsorption for adsorption heat transformation. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2022. 331: p. 111642.
137.Yang, X., et al., Modification Effects of B₂O₃ on The Structure and Catalytic Activity of WO₃-UiO-66 Catalyst. Nanomaterials (Basel), 2018. 8(10).
138.Chi, G., et al., Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg0 over Ce-Cu modified V2O5/TiO2 based commercial SCR catalysts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017. 330: p. 83-92.
139.Elsafi, A., et al. Plasmon-Enhanced CO2 Reduction to Liquid Fuel via Modified UiO-66 Photocatalysts. Catalysts, 2025. 15, 70 DOI: 10.3390/catal15010070.
140.Dalapati, R., S. Nandi, and S. Biswas, Post-synthetic modification of a metal–organic framework with a chemodosimeter for the rapid detection of lethal cyanide via dual emission. Dalton Transactions, 2020. 49(25): p. 8684-8692.
141.Seah, M.P., The quantitative analysis of surfaces by XPS: A review. Surface and Interface Analysis, 1980. 2(6): p. 222-239.
142.Zhang, M., et al., Metal-organic framework loaded manganese oxides as efficient catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017. 11(4): p. 594-602.
143.Boningari, T., et al., Influence of elevated surface texture hydrated titania on Ce-doped Mn/TiO2 catalysts for the low-temperature SCR of NOx under oxygen-rich conditions. Journal of Catalysis, 2015. 325: p. 145-155.
144.Lee, A.Y., Powell, C.J., Gorham, J.M., Morey, A., Scott, J.H.J., Hanisch, R.J., Development of the NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Database, Version 5. Data Science Journal, 2024. 23: 45: p. 1-9.
145.Jing, L., et al., The surface properties and photocatalytic activities of ZnO ultrafine particles. Applied Surface Science, 2001. 180(3): p. 308-314.
146.Gu, T., et al., The enhanced performance of ceria with surface sulfation for selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Catalysis Communications, 2010. 12(4): p. 310-313.
147.Heo, I., et al., Combination of Photocatalysis and HC/SCR for Improved Activity and Durability of DeNOx Catalysts. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013. 47(8): p. 3657-3664.
148.Topsøe, N.-Y., Characterization of the nature of surface sites on vanadia-titania catalysts by FTIR. Journal of Catalysis, 1991. 128(2): p. 499-511.
149.Topsoe, N.Y., H. Topsoe, and J.A. Dumesic, Vanadia/Titania Catalysts for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of Nitric-Oxide by Ammonia: I. Combined Temperature-Programmed in-Situ FTIR and On-line Mass-Spectroscopy Studies. Journal of Catalysis, 1995. 151(1): p. 226-240.
150.Yin, X., H. Han, and A. Miyamoto, Active site and mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over V2O5: A periodic first-principles study. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2000. 2(18): p. 4243-4248.
151.Chen, L., et al., Enhanced activity of tungsten modified CeO2/TiO2 for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia. Catalysis Today, 2010. 153(3-4): p. 77-83.
152.Reddy, B.M., et al., Structural characterization of CeO2-TiO2 and V2O5/CeO2-TiO2 catalysts by Raman and XPS techniques. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003. 107(22): p. 5162-5167.
153.Chen, L., et al., Synergistic effect between ceria and tungsten oxide on WO3–CeO2–TiO2 catalysts for NH3-SCR reaction. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2012. 22(4): p. 265-272.
154.Zhang, B., S. Zhang, and B. Liu, Effect of oxygen vacancies on ceria catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Applied Surface Science, 2020. 529: p. 147068.
155.Zhou, Y., et al., Effect of oxygen vacancies on improving NO oxidation over CeO2 {111} and {100} facets for fast SCR reaction. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2021. 9(5): p. 106218.
156.Lin, X., et al., Distribution characteristics and formation mechanisms of PCDD/Fs during pyrolysis and gasification of municipal solid waste. Waste Management, 2025. 206: p. 115072.
157.Cunliffe, A.M. and P.T. Williams, Desorption of PCDD/PCDF from municipal solid waste incinerator flyash under post-combustion plant conditions. Chemosphere, 2007. 68(9): p. 1723-1732.
158.Lin, X., et al., Formation pathways, gas-solid partitioning, and reaction kinetics of PCDD/Fs associated with baghouse filters operated at high temperatures: A case study. Science of The Total Environment, 2023. 857: p. 159551.
159.Han, S.-J., et al., Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Calcium Hydroxide Aqueous Solution as the Absorbent. Energy & Fuels, 2011. 25(8): p. 3825-3834.