| 研究生: |
李明鴻 Li, Ming-hung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
校舍固定窗耐震性能研究 Seismic Performacne of Fixed Windows in School Buildings |
| 指導教授: |
姚昭智
Yao, Chao-Chih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系 Department of Architecture |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 248 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 非結構 、玻璃 、餘裕空間 、固定窗 、層間位移 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | non-structure, clearance, glass, interstory drift, fixed window |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:130 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
校舍經過適當的結構補強後,在地震時能承受較大的層間位移角而不倒塌,增加逃生的時間。但因為舊有的玻璃窗工法未曾考量建築物提昇後的韌性,一旦超過既有玻璃窗所能承受的層間位移角,將導致玻璃窗在地震中損壞。並且根據統計教室前後門上方的固定窗玻璃,最容易在地震過程中損壞,因此本文研究固定窗耐震性能的重點,在防止玻璃在建築物倒塌前掉落造成人員傷害。
本文以理論公式探討影響固定窗耐震性能的因素,再以實驗場「面內加載實驗」及關廟國小「現地實驗」對這些因素進行驗證,過程中以量化的結果分析固定窗玻璃的破壞行為,並檢討固定窗耐震性能提昇的可能性,最後則提出適當的固定窗改善建議。
研究結果顯示以下結論:
I.正方形玻璃防止玻璃開裂的性能比高瘦形狀的玻璃差。
II.高瘦形狀的玻璃容易造成窗框凹陷損壞的情形。
III.鐵絲網玻璃對防止玻璃掉落的性能無明顯幫助,但膠合鐵絲網玻璃則有不錯的耐震性能表現。
IV.玻璃對摺破壞,將導致玻璃較早開裂。
V.框架餘裕空間能有效延緩玻璃開裂。
VI.考量材料成本與耐震性能,建議既有固定窗使用貼膜方式改善,新安裝之固定窗建議使用膠合玻璃。
Through proper retrofitting of the structure, school buildings can sustain greater story drift and preventing from collapse during earthquake, thus providing more time for students to evacuate from the buildings.
However, the conventional glass window engineering technique does not take into account the seismic performance of glass windows after building seismic improvement. During an earthquake, if the Story Drift Index exceeds that can be sustained by existing glass windows, the glass windows may be damaged. Statistics have revealed that the fixed windows above the front and rear classroom doors are most fragile. Therefore, this study was designed to increase the seismic performance of fixed windows, so as to prevent injuries caused by glass fallout during an earthquake.
Theoretical formulas were employed to explore the factors affecting the seismic performance of fixed windows, and these factors were validated through an “in-plane loading test” in the experimental field and “in-situ test” in Guan Miao Elementary School. The derived quantitative results were later used to analyze the fracture behavior of fixed window glass and investigate the possibility of seismic performance improvement. Finally, suggestions for improvement were also proposed.
The major findings of this study included:
I.Glass in square form was inferior to glass in upright rectangular form in anti-fracture performance.
II.Glass in upright rectangular form may easily cause damage to window frames.
III.Wired glass did not show significantly better anti-cracking performance, while laminated wired glass exhibited good seismic performance.
IV.The glass folding caused by failure of edge silicone would cause premature glass cracking.
V.Frame clearance could effectively delay occurrence of glass cracking.
VI.Considering material cost and seismic performace, this study recommends, respectively, attaching window film and using laminated glass for existing and new installed fixed windows to improve seismic performance.
1. 陳嘉基、張嘉祥 (2006) <低層RC建築物門窗震害探討─以兩個震害建築為例>《建築學報》,六十期:89~113。
2. Behr, R. A. (1998) "Seismic Performance of Architectural Glass in Mid-Rise Curtain Wall." Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol 4, No.3 : 94-98.
3. Memari, A. M., Behr, R. A., Kremer, P. A. (2004) "Dynamic Racking Crescendo Tests on Architectural Glass Fitted with Anchored Pet Film." Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol.10 : 5.
4. Memari, A. M., Kremer, P. A., Behr, R. A. (2006) "Architectural Glass Panels with Rounded Corners to Mitigate Earthquake Damage." Earthquake Spectra, Vol.22 : 129.
5. Memari, A. M., Chen, X., Kremer, P. A., Behr, R. A. (2006) "Seismic Performance of Two-Side Structural Silicone Glazing Systems." Arbor, Vol.1001 : 48109.
6. 吳宗憲 (2001) <從逃生門及牆窗戶玻璃震害探建築物功能設計>,國立成功大學碩士論文。
7. 日本建築學會 (2003) <建築工事標準仕様書・同解説JASS 17 ガラス工事 第四版>。
8. 木多彩子、柏原士郎、吉村英祐、阪田弘一 (1995) <阪神大震災の影響による大阪市中心部の窓ガラス等の破損状況について>,1995。
9. 伊藤弘、西田和生 (1995) <平成7年兵庫県南部地震における非構造部材の被害概要>。
10. 伊藤弘、西田和生 (1996) <平成7年兵庫県南部地震における非構造部材被害のマクロ分析>。
11. 日本文部科學省 (2008) <平成20年(2008年)岩手・宮城内陸地震による被害情報>,http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/20/06/08061806/009.htm。
12. Sucuoglu, H.,Vallabhan, C. V. G. (1997) "Behaviour of window glass panels during earthquakes." Engineering Structures, Vol.19, No.8 : 685-694.
13. 內政部 (2005) <建築物耐震設計規範及解說>,營建雜誌社。
14. ASCE (2006) "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, SEI/ASCE 7-05." American Society of Civil Engineers.
15. BCME (2000) "School Earthquake Safety Guildbook." Ministry of Education, British Columbia.
16. 營建署 (2004) <建築工程施工規範>。
17. AAMA (2001) "AAMA 501.4 Recommended static test method for evaluating curtain wall and storefront systems subjected to seismic and wind induced interstory drifts. and AAMA 501.6 Recommended dynamic test method for determining the seismic drift causing glass fallout from a wall system." American Architectural Manufacturers Association.
18. 日本工業規格 (1998) <JIS A5759,建築窓ガラス用フィルム>,日本規格協會, 東京。
19. ASTM (2007) "Standard Test Methods for Strength of Glass by Flexure (C 158-02)." American Society for Testing and Materials.
20. ASTM (2001) "Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio for Advanced Ceramics by Sonic Resonance (C 1198-01)." American Society for Testing and Materials.
21. 吳卓夫、葉基棟 (1991) <營造法與施工>,茂榮圖書有限公司。