消費偏好的改變與市場的競爭激烈下，包裝的發展趨勢逐漸朝向精緻化，但此現象卻造成了過度包裝的問題。過度包裝產生的廢棄物量甚多、其龐大體積與複雜的結構，不但增加前期銷售端組裝操作的不便與耗時、更讓消費者在使用期間增加負面感知與操作不便性，導致消費者對於重複使用與正確拆解回收的意願下降。為了使包裝設計更能貼近消費者使用方便性，而非只注重在視覺或外型上的變化，本研究期望以重新設計結構的方式改善過度包裝現象，以包裝的使用生命週期之相關聯的動作為基礎，結合消費者對於使用之中的操作性，並以簡易方便的視覺感知與減量材料使用之目的進行設計。
研究首先會分成兩個部分，並以市售常見包裝：分別為「折疊式」、「鎖底式」、「裝配式」對應食品、化妝品、酒品包裝為目標，以「操作可見性」理論為方向探討使用者對於包裝的操作性，並應用MDS多維尺度對包裝的操作可見性(Affordance)進行聚類分析，將較概念化的操作可見性以關鍵字的型態，收斂成設計規範。第二部分會定義包裝的功能，分析與識別其重要功能，將部件合併並建立群組，將其以功能為基礎產生不同型態，並使用模糊評判基礎計算各部件隸屬度以建立設計方案。最後再以操作可見性關鍵字來建立評估模型，結合操作性實驗驗證模糊評判的結果，並從中選擇出最佳方案。最後針對得出之最佳方案進行材料減量、操作性來驗證最佳方案的可行性，由結果可知此操作可見性評估模型得出的設計優於原公版的設計，因此證明該設計流程的應用可以利於後續提供該產業發展。

With the change of consumer preferences and intense market competition, the evolution of packaging trends is changing progressively, also has inadvertently led to the issue of excessive packaging. The consequential waste generated from excessive packaging, is by its considerable volume and intricate structures, not only contributes to inconveniences and time consumption during assembly at the retail end but also exacerbates negative consumer perceptions and operational difficulties during use. This situation subsequently diminishes consumers' willingness to engage in reuse and proper disassembly for recycling.
This research seeks to address the problem of excessive packaging through a structural redesign approach. Through analyzing lifecycle-associated actions of packaging usage, the study merges consumers' operational perspectives with a focus on visual perceptibility and reduced material usage. The research is divided into two main parts, focusing on commercial used packaging types: "Folding," "Tuck-Lock," and "Assembly" packaging, corresponding to food, cosmetics, and wine packaging. Guided by the theory of "Affordance". In the first part, users' perceptions of packaging usability are investigated and established, then, applying Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) and clustering analysis, to extract the conceptual aspects of Affordance into keywords of design requirement. In the second part, packaging functions are identified by the design requirements. Components are separated and regrouped, merged based on these functions, generating various forms in functionality to establish morphological charts. Then fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is applied, by calculating the membership function of individual components to create design alternative based on it. The final step involves establishing an evaluation model using Affordance keywords. This model is validated through operational experiments, corroborating the outcomes of fuzzy comprehensive results of the optimal design. Subsequently, the selected optimal solution is subjected to material reduction and operational validation to verify its feasibility. The results demonstrate that the design derived from the Affordance assessment model surpasses the original generic design, validating the applicability of this design process, and suggesting its potential contribution to the industry's future development.

呂穎彬（2020），生命週期概念與產品碳足跡計算，永續產業發展季刊，（54），45-56. [Lu, Y. B. (2020). Life cycle concept and product carbon footprint calculation, Sustainable Industrial Development Quarterly, 54. 45-56]
曾漢壽（1996），迎接綠色年代的包裝設計觀 (上)，貿易周刊，（1706），4-8. [Tseng, H. S. (1996). Concept of Packaging Design for the Green Age (Part 1), Trade Weekly, 1706. 4-8]
曾漢壽（1999），綠色包裝設計之五－ISO14000與包裝，台灣包裝工業雜誌（64-70頁），台北. [Tseng, H. S. (1996). Concept of Packaging Design for the Green Age (Part 1), Taiwan Packaging Industry Magazine (pp,64-70), Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC]
許杏蓉（1997），論紙器包裝與其形態的重要性─以商業包裝為例，藝術學報，（61），51-58. [Hsiu, S. R. (1997). On the Importance of Paper Packaging and Its Shape──Taking Commercial Packaging as an Example, Art Journal. 51-58]
林忠毅（2013）．符合通用設計原則的紙盒包裝提把結構設計準則 (未發表的碩士論文)．國立臺灣藝術大學。[Lin, C. Y., (2013). A Study on Design Criteria of Carton Portable Handling Structures for Consisting with Universal Design Principles (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan University of Arts, Taiwan, ROC.]
涂家營（2016）．操作可見性與詮釋結構矩陣於高齡者輔具設計之應用研究 (未發表的碩士論文)．國立成功大學工業設計學系。[Tu, J. Y. (2016). Application research of Affordance and interpretation structure matrix in the design of assistive devices for the elderly (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, ROC.]
蕭惠華（2016）．操作可見性與詮釋結構矩陣於高齡者輔具設計之應用研究 (未發表的碩士論文)．國立成功大學工業設計學系。[Hsiao, H. H. (2016). Research on Applying Affordance Principles to Product Development (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, ROC.]
李尹婷（2009）．建立產品「操作可見性」之線上評價模式．國立成功大學工業設計學系 (未發表的碩士論文)。[Lee, Y. T. (2009). Establish an online evaluation model for product "Affordance". National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, ROC.]
黃嘉儀（2004）．綠色包裝設計教學規劃之探討 (未發表的碩士論文)．銘傳大學設計管理研究所。[Huang, C. Y. (2004). Discussion on Teaching Planning of Green Packaging Design (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ming Chuan University, Taiwan, ROC.]
鄭宇涵（2011）．臺中市烘焙名店之商品與包裝策略研究 (未發表的碩士論文) ．臺中技術學院商業設計系。[Cheng, Y. H. (2011). Research on Commodities and Packaging Strategies of Famous Bakery Stores in Taichung City (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taichung Institute of Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
楊文達（2015）．包裝容器之多樣化功能之結構設計 (未發表的碩士論文)．遠東科技大學創新設計與創業管理研究所。[Yang, W. D. (2011). Structural Design of Diversified Functions of Packaging Containers (Unpublished master’s thesis). Far East University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
廖唯涵（2016）．探討產品過度包裝對綠色購買意願之影響:以綠色品牌態度和綠色品牌知名度為中介變數 (未發表的碩士論文)．遠國立臺北大學企業管理學系。[Liao, W. H. (2011). To explore the impact of product overpackaging on green purchase intention: with green brand attitude and green brand awareness as mediating variables (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University, Taiwan, ROC.]
姚伯勳（2008）．可再使用的包裝紙器設計 (未發表的碩士論文)．國立臺北科技大學創新設計研究所。[Yao, B. S. (2011). Reusable packaging paper container design (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
王玉筑（2016）．可持續性設計應用於紙材包裝結構之創作-以無患子為例 (未發表的碩士論文)．國立雲林科技大學視覺傳達設計系。[Wang, Y. C. (2016). Sustainability Design Applied to the Creation of Paper Packaging Structure - Taking Sapindus Sapindus as an Example (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
張雅琪（2011）．食品包裝紙盒結構與造型多樣化設計之研究 (未發表的碩士論文)．朝陽科技大學工業設計系碩士班。[Chang, Y. C. (2016). A study on paper structure and formative variety of food package design (Unpublished master’s thesis). Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
黃安琪（2021）．綠色新生活？綠色包裝、綠色品牌形象和綠色溢價的作用 (未發表的碩士論文) ．國立臺灣科技大學企業管理系。[Huang, A. C. (2011). Green new life? The role of green packaging, green brand image and green premium (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
林純綺（2014）．綠色新生活？綠色包裝、綠色品牌形象和綠色溢價的作用(未發表的碩士論文)．國立臺灣科技大學設計研究所。[Lin, C. C. (2011). A Study on the Correlation Between Affordance and Attractiveness (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC.]
鄧成連 （1987）. 現代商品包裝設計 . 台北市：北星。 [Deng, C. L. (1987). Modern commodity packaging design. Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: North Star.]
陳偉賢、南部章、仁科公治等人 （1992）. 包裝結構設計 . 台北市：新形象出版。 [Chen, W. S., Nambu, A., Nishina, K. (1992). Packaging structure design. Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: New Image Publishing.]
鞠海 （2009）. 包裝結構 . 遼寧省：遼寧科學技術出版社。 [Ju, H. (1992). Packaging Structure. Liaoning Province, China: Liaoning Science and Technology Press]
吳明隆 （2009）. SPSS操作與應用 : 多變量分析實務 . 台北市：五南出版社。 [Wu, M. L. (1992). SPSS Operation and Application: Multivariate Analysis Practice. Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC: Liaoning Science and Technology Press]
Adriano B Galvao, K. S. (2005). Affordances in Product Architecture: Linking Technical Functions and Users’ Tasks.
Brovensiepen, G., Fink, H., Schnück, P., Rumpff, S., Raimund, S., (2018). Verpackungen im Fokus - Die Rolle von Circular Economy auf dem Weg zu mehr Nachhal- Tigkeit. Retrieved from Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Chemero, A. (2001). What we perceive when we perceive affordances. Ecological Psychology, 13, 111-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1302_3
Chemero, A. (2003). “An outline of a theory of affordances.” Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
Fuente, J., et al. (2015). An Affordance-Based Methodology for Package Design. Packaging Technology and Science, 28, 157–171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ pts.2087
Galvao, A.B., & Sato, K. (2005). Affordances in product architecture: linking techni- cal functions and users’ tasks. Paper Presented at the ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference in USA, 5, 1-11.doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2005-84525
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. New York: ACM.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordance. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gibson, J. J. (1979/1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Harleen Kour, N. A., Towseef Wani, Anisa Malik, Raj Kaul, Harmeet Chauhan, Prerna Gupta and Anju Bhat (2013). Advances in food packaging – a review. Stewart Postharvest Review, 9(4): 1-7.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2212/spr.2013.4.7
Hanssen, Ole & Olsen, Arild & Møller, Hanne & Rubach, Synnøve. (2003). National indicators for material efficiency and waste minimization for the Norwegian packaging sector 1995–2001. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 38, 123-137, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00104-0
Hsiao, S.-W., et al. (2012). An online affordance evaluation model for product design. Design Studies, 33(2), 126-159.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.003
Hsiao, S.W., (2002), Fuzzy logic-based decision model for product design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 21, 103-116.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00072-8
Hsiao, S.-W. (2002). Concurrent design method for developing a new product. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 29(1), 41-55.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00048-8
Hsiao, S.-W. (1996). A concurrent engineering-based method for developing a baby carriage. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 12(6), 455-462.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01186935
Hsiao, S.-W., Chang, C.-H. (2017). Concurrent Design Strategy in Modeling and Structure of Electric Scooter for Taiwan. Advances in Intelligent Systems Research, 131, 227-233.doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/icoi-17.2017.42
Jerzyk, E. (2016). Design and Communication of Ecological Content on Sustainable Packaging in Young Consumers’ Opinions. Journal of Food Products Marketing 22(6), 707-716.doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2015.1121435
Lindh, H., Olsson, A., Williams, H., (2016a). Consumer perceptions of food packaging: contributing to or counteracting environmentally sustainable development. Packaging Technology Science. 29, 3-23.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2184.
Lindh, H., Williams, H., Olsson, A., Wikstro€m, F., (2016b). Elucidating the indirect contributions of packaging to sustainable development. A terminology of packaging functions and features. Packaging Technology Science, 29 (4/5), 225-246.doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2197
Magnier, L., Anne Wiese, A.P.S.D., Crie, D, (2015). Communicating packaging eco- friendliness. Int. J. Retail Distribute. Management. 43 (4/5), 350-366,doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2014-0048
Magnier, L. and J. Schoormans (2015). Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 53-62.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.0 05
Mumani, R. T. S. (2018). A Design for Affordances Framework for Product Packaging: Food Packaging Case Study. Journal of Applied Packaging Research, 10(4), 65-78.
Otto, S., et al. (2021). Food packaging and sustainability – Consumer perception vs. correlated scientific facts: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126733
Overbeeke, Kees & Wensveen, Stephan. (2003). From Perception to Experience, from Affordances to Irresistibles. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI '03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA, 92-97.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 782896.782919
Poças, Maria de Fátima Filipe; Moreira, Raquel. (2003) Segurança Alimentar e Embalagem. ESB/UCP: Porto.
Saaty, T. L. (1981), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sandu, R.-M., 2014. Green: marketing, products and consumers. SEA - Practical Application of Science, 2(5), 555-562.
Sun, A. (2013). Analysis on Structure and Morphological of Carton Packaging. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 442, 338-341. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/ www.scientific.net/AMM.442.338
Tseng, C.-C., Torng, C.-C. (2011). Prioritization Determination of Project Tasks in QFD Process Using Design Structure Matrix. Journal of Quality, 18(1), 137-153.
Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173-187.doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
Vihma, S. (1995). Products as representations: A semiotic and aesthetic study of design products. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Art and Design, Helsinki, Finland.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10(5), 683.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
You, H., & Chen, K. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Design Studies, 28(1), 23e38.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002
Zhang, G. (2012). Green Packaging Management of Logistics Enterprises. International Conference on Applied Physics and Industrial Engineering, 24, 900-905.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.135
PlasticsEurope, 2017. Plastics - the facts. Retrieved from Brussels, Belgium: https:// www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/5715/1717/4180/Plastics_the_facts_ 2017_FINAL_for_website_one_page.pdf. . Accessed 11 May 2019.
PlasticsEurope, 2018. Plastics - the facts. Retrieved from Brussels, Belgium: https:// www.plasticseurope.org/application/files/5715/1717/4180/Plastics_the_facts_ 2017_FINAL_for_website_one_page.pdf. . Accessed 11 May 2019.
環境資訊中心報導（2019）. 環保署秋節禮盒包裝調查結果. 取自https://enews.epa.gov.tw/page/3b3c62c78849f32f/79d524c9-040d-4afa-ad1b-d636473c2e49 [Environmental Information Center report, Taiwan, ROC. (2011). EPA Autumn Festival gift box packaging survey results. Retrieved from https://enews.epa.gov.tw/page/3b3c62c78849f32f/79d524c9-040d-4afa-ad1b-d636473c2e49]
行政院環保署（2016）. 公告限制產品過度包裝. 取自http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2012-10/09/nw.D110000zgqnb_20121009 _1-07.htm [Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan, ROC. (2016). Announcement to restrict excessive packaging of products. Retrieved from http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2012-10/09/nw.D110000zgqnb_20121009 _1-07.htm]
中國青年報（2012）. 97.5%的人認為商品過度包裝嚴重. 取自http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2012-10/09/nw.D110000zgqnb_20121009 _1-07.htm [China Youth Daily, China. (2012). 97.5% of people think that excessive packaging of goods is serious. Retrieved from http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2012-10/09/nw.D110000zgqnb_20121009 _1-07.htm]
中國環保科普網（2016）. 過度包裝有甚麼危害. 取自http://www.hbkp365.com/kpzs/sjar/2014-12-16-1827.html [China Environmental Science Popularization, China. (2016). What are the dangers of excessive packaging. Retrieved fromhttp://www.hbkp365.com/kpzs/sjar/2014-12-16-1827.html]
大愛科技報導（2014）. 禮盒包裝過度繁雜省思資源浪費. 取自http://www.daait.com/index.php/tc/2011-08-16-09-02-49/2011-10-21-09-14-49/3101-2014-02-19-03-00-28 [DA.AI TECHNOLOGY, Taiwan, ROC. (2011). Gift box packaging is too complicated and wastes resources. Retrieved from http://www.daait.com/index.php/tc/2011-08-16-09-02-49/2011-10-21-09-14-49/3101-2014-02-19-03-00-28]