我國金融控股公司法自九十年十一月實施後，至九十三年已成立了14 家金控公司，金控公司成立後，具有規模經濟效益之優勢，是否就能提高競爭力，資產規模、人才培養、服務品質、資訊創新、風險控制及經營策略等要素，對於合併案之綜效是否有所影響，值得併案加以探討。
本文主要是以台灣地區金融市場現有14 家金融控股公司，選出一家以銀行為核心，資產規模1.5 兆，存、放款市佔率5％以上，歷史悠久，在國內金融業中具有代表性的金控公司作為個案研究對象；並對其他競爭者，包括其他13 家金控做績效比較分析，結合相關之文獻理論，如：購併和動機理論，績效評估理論等，以個案研究法做研究，主要內容在探討第一金控及其子公司之經營概況和競爭策略，從公司沿革、經營理念、組織架構，關係企業控股情況，
經營績效比較，金融業五力分析、SWOT 分析後，採行之策略行動，股價分析，合併綜效評估等，以了解金控公司在國內外競爭激烈之金融環境中，如何透過各種策略行動，以期達成台灣最賺錢金控公司之一的願景。
本文延續先前研究者之探討，認為，金融過度競爭是台灣金融產業面臨的問題，金融整合朝大型化發展，是台灣金融產業無可避免的趨勢，第一金控在策略管理上，實施一系列的策略行動，包括落實乾淨資產品質政策，發行GDR強化財務結構，加強風險管理機制，翼圖在合併綜效上有所收獲。但當有關數據顯示綜效不如預期，該公司於九十四年將明台產務保險公司出售，又於九十五年四月進行組織再造，終於能去蕪存精，創造公司良好的獲利能力，於九十
五年成為台灣地區獲利最佳的金控公司。
從以上個案實證分析所得之結論 ，本文認為合併可以擴增經營規模，不等於必然擴增金控公司的綜效，但是金融業者要如何找出自己的經營策略，佈局全球，強化自身體質，落實公司治理和風險管理，並運用各種策略行動，以提高競爭優勢，則是一個永續不斷的工作。

In recent years, the development of international finance has an obvious change.
In the way of merging, the financial industries in U.S. and Japan have established integrated financial groups which contain businesses of banking, securities,
insurance and so on. The global financial industries have already trended towards maximization and grouping gradually. With the implementation of the Financial
Holding Company Act in November 2001, it has already established 14 financial holding companies until 2004. After the establishment of financial holding company,
though they have advantages in economic benefits of scale, whether competitiveness has been raised depends on several essential factors such as scale of assets,personnel training, service quality, information innovating, risk & management strategy and so on. Not all mergers can produce integrated effects.
This essay mainly chooses a company which takes banking as its corn business,as well as its capital asset scale is 1,500 billion, market share rate in saving and loaning is over 5%, and has a long history. This object of case study included current 14 financial holding companies of financial market in Taiwan. Furthermore,it compares and analyzes the performance of other competitors, including other 13 financial holding companies, as well as combines related reports and theories. Such as merger motive theory and performance evaluation theory are two theories to
investigate in the way of case study. The main content of this essay is to study for the business situation and competitive strategy of the First Financial Holding Co.
Ltd and its subsidiary companies. Through its company history, business ideal, organization structure, holding status of its related businesses, comparison of
business performance, five factors analysis, SWOT analysis, adopted strategic actions, execution of organization reengineering, strategic planning and execution of merger, future strategy of merger, analysis of stock price, integrated effect of merger
and so on, analyzing, it tries to realize under such a drastic competition in domestic and foreign financial environment, how financial holding companies use various
strategic actions to achieve the most profitable financial holding company in Taiwan.In conclusion, it shows that over competition in financial region will be the
problem of the financial industry in Taiwan. Also, integrating and developing to large-scale for finance is an unavoidable trend for financial industry in Taiwan. The
First Financial Holding Co. Ltd. complies with governmental finance reformatory policy. In the aspect of strategic management, it executes a series of strategic actions,including activating the policy of clear capital quality, issuing GDR to strengthen financial structure, enhancing risk management mechanism to settle the foundation of profits earning in 2004, executing organization reengineering in the second half
of 2004, establishing marketing culture, activating policies of performance management and risk management, replacing the profitable growth in cost side by
income side. In future, it expects to become a regional leading bank. Although in the aspect of organizational change, it faces some organizational conflict, it doesn’t
obstruct the advance of organization reengineering. Meaningfully, in the aspect of merger strategy, it focuses on setting corn business and taking market beneficial
result as the most powerful motive. Furthermore, in the aspect of integrated effect of merger, it hasn’t been obvious in the end of 2004. However, its future growth has
been valued highly by the market.
From the above conclusion by practical analysis for the case, it suggests that if a financial business can depend on governmental policy and start from the role of an
administrator to find out its management strategy, including how to operate globally, developing international financial specialists, strengthening its own condition,activating company management and risk management, and use various strategic action to enhance competitive advantage. It will achieve its goal and become a regional leading bank.

1. 陳佳怡，「金融控股公司經營績效之探討—財務面評估研究」，國立中山大學財務管理研究所論文，2003。
2. 陳佳桓，「金融機構跨業合併與合併溢價之實證研究」，國立政治大學金融系碩士論文，2003。
3. 郭照榮，「金融機構合併之考量因素及其對象選擇」，金融財務第五期，1-11頁，2000。
4. 黃金印，「企業併購與企業再造-跨世紀競爭策略」，經濟情勢暨評論，第四卷第四期，P170~199，1999。
5. 彭金隆，「金融控股公司法制監理與經營策略」，P23~139，2004。
6. 陳萬淇，「個案研究法」，P37~39，1995。
7. 邱杏茹，「影響本國銀行購併因素之探討」，文化大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文，2000。
8. 沈中華與張雲翔，「歐系綜合銀行與美系綜合銀行何者較能增加銀行績效？由46 國資料比較分析」，台灣財務金融專利，第2 輯第2 期，P85~95，2001。
9. 陳太齡，「金融控股公司關鍵成功因素分析」，政大企管研究所碩士論文，2002。
10. 台灣金融研訓院，「我國金融機構併購問題及個案探討」，2002。
11. 成大企管所第五屆企業經營管理個案論文集上下冊，2002。
12. 盧正昕(1998)，「銀行業購併的實務與趨勢」，華信金融季刊，第3 期，P85-100。
13. 張紹勳，「研究方法」，P287~346，2004。
14. 呉萬益、林清河，「企業研究方法」，P221~223，2000。
15. 賴鈺城，「本土財務金融管理個案分析」，2004。
103
16. 楊雲明，「總體經濟學」(macroeconimics)，P603~604，2005。
17. 陳明朗，「總體經濟學」，P196~200，2002。
18. 黃仁德等，「金融控股公司監理之研究」，經建會委託研究案，2003。
19. 彭金隆與司徒達賢，「金融控股公司法，金融集團總體策略與金融機構網
站定位策略」，保險實務與制度，P2~35，2002。
20. Charles W.L.Hill,Careth R Jones 原著，黃營杉譯，「策略管理」，1999。
21. 周一鴻，楊德庸，「金融控股公司法解析」金融控股公司法，台灣金融研訓院，2004。
22. 蔡政憲，「銀行跨業兼營保險之模擬分析」，「風險管理政策」第3 卷第1期，P71~97，2001。
23. 呉宗璠，資訊管理個案研究方法，資訊管理學報，4 卷，1 期，P7~17，1997。
24. 蔡麟囿，「金融控股公司合併綜效實例分析」，2005。
25. Cargill Thomas F.（1989）,’’CAMEL Rating and the CD Market,Journal of Financial Services Research, 3, PP. 347~358.
26. Allen,L.and A.S.Ceboyan,’’Bank acquisitions and ownership structure：theory and evidence,’’Journal of Banking and Finance,15,PP,425~428.
27. Brealey,Richard A. and Stewart C. Myers, Principles of Corporate Finance, McGraw-Hill,1988.
28. Berger,A N .,S.D.Rebecca and E.S.Philip,’’The consoledation of the financial services Industry：Causes,consequences, and implications for the future,’’Journal of Banking and Finance,23,PP.135~193,1999.
29. Robert D.Edwards andjohn magee,’’TECHNICAL ANLYSIS of STOCK TRENDS’’2001.
30. Palepu,Bernard,＆Healy,’’Introduction to Business Analysis ＆ Valuation’’1997.
31. Ross,westerfield ＆ Jordan,’’Fundamentals of Corjorate Finace’’2003.
32. Boyd, J. H. Graham,S.L.and R.S.Hewitt,’’Bank Holding Company Mergers with Nonbank Financial Firm, Effects on theＲisk of Failure’’Journal of Banking and Finance,17,1,1993,PP.43~63.
33. Yin,R.K.,Case Study Research Design and Methods,1994,Sage Publications,C A.
34. Miller,W.L. and Crabtree,B.F.,”Primary Case Research：A Multimethod Typology and Qualitative Road Map, in Carbtree and Mller(eds)”,Doing Qualitative Research,1992,Sage,Newbury Park,CA,PP.3-28.
35. Markus,M.L.,”Case Selection in a Disconfirmatory Case Study,in Cash,J.I. and P.R.Lawrence(eds)”,The Information Systems Research Challenge：Qualitative Methods,Harard Business School Research Colloquium,1989,1,Harvard Business School,Boston,MA.
36. Grardner,M.J.(1984),”Minority Owned Banks：A Manager and Performance Analysis,” Journal of Bank Research,PP.293~313.
37. West,Robert Craig(1985),”A Facter-Analytic Approach to Bank Codition,” Journal of Banking ＆Finance, Vol.9,PP.253~266.38. Venkartraman, N. and Vasudevan RamanuJan,”Measurement of Business Performance on Strategy Research：A Comparsion of
Approaches,”Academy of Management Review(1986),PP.801~814.
39. Woo, C. Y., and G Willard,”Performance Representation in Business Policy Research：Discussion and Recommendation,”Annual National Meetings of Management(1986).