本文對銅合金C2680 厚度0.8mm材料進行拉伸實驗以及可成形性試驗，以獲取真實材料的機械性質以及成形極限圖，將實驗所得之成形極限圖與K、n、R值代入有限元素分析軟體中，與實際開發的成品喇叭端子之連續沖模料帶作比較。
在模擬上，本文分別使用兩個方式進行模擬，第一個方式為一個接一個沖頭的順序，模擬材料單獨受力時的厚度應變情形，第二個方式是使用接近實際生產時，多沖頭同時加工的情形，材料受到其他道次引伸時的差異，並針對兩個方式的模擬結果與實際料帶厚度比對。得到成形厚度的趨勢接近，但第一個模擬方法在第五道次即出現破裂情形，第二個模擬方法在第四道次即出現破裂情形，造成後續引伸時厚度極速變薄，無法逼近實際值，探究模擬條件，模具形狀參數值的取得誤差最大，為探討各模具參數對成形性的影響，規劃田口實驗做觀察。
最後針對第一道次成形使用田口實驗設計方法進行模擬，得到沖壓行程對成形厚度的影響最大為(63%)，其次是模肩r角(21%)及摩擦係數(4%)，其他因子影響並不大。

The study reported in this thesis investigated the mechanical properties, the simulation and experiments of forming process of sheet metal of copper alloy (i.e. C2680) with 0.8 mm thickness. Employing tensile testing and forming testing machines, the data of tensile strength and plastic deformation performance (including n value, K value, R value, forming limit diagram-FLD) can be obtained. Those properties are then used to simulate the drawing process of a terminal, connecting component for speakers, by a metal forming analysis software. The analysis results including strain and thickness are compared to the actual data of drawing process of the component using an existing progressive die.
Based on the selected progressive die, two methods are used to simulate the draw forming of the specific component. The first method is progressively punching the shape from the flat strip of copper sheet one by one individual step until the shape of final drawing step is reached. The other method is similar to the real production process with multi-punch that involves the first step to the final step of drawing process. The results of these two simulations are compared with the real strip punched by the progressive die. Although the trend of thickness reduction between simulations and real strip is similar, there are still significant discrepancies of thickness reduction rates. That because there are unreasonable simulation results at fourth and following steps. Since the geometric shape and dimensions of selected progressive die are not uniform, such as the draw radii at drawing steps, the simulation conditions may have differences from the specific die. On the other hand, there are several factors that influence the results of draw forming. The details of the influence factors are worth to be conducted.
To understand the factors that influence the results of draw forming, Taguchi method is used to design a simulation plan to estimate how much contribution of each factor. The analysis results of first step of drawing process concluded that punching stroke contributes 63% to the thickness reduction of strip; draw radii contributes 21%; and friction coefficient contributes 4%; the other factors are very little.

1. ASTM, E517-00, Standard Test Method for Plastic Strain Ratio r for Sheet Matel, 2006.
2. ASTM, E 8M – 04, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials [Metric]
3. ASTM, E2218-02, Standard Test Method for Determining Forming Limit Curve, 2002.
4. ASTM, A370-06, Tension Test, 2006.
5. Bleck, Wolfgang, Zhi Deng, Kostas Papamantellos, and Christopher Oliver Gusek, “A comparative study of the forming-limit diagram models for steels,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.83, pp.223-230, 1998.
6. Banabic, D., “Limit Strains in the Sheet Metals by Using the New Hill’s Yield Criterion (1993),” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.92-93, pp.429-432 , 1999.
7. Engineering Technology Associates, Dynaform-Pc Application Manual, 2004 .
8. Engineering Technology Associates, eta/Post User Manual,2004.
9. Kim, Heung-Kyu, Hong,Seok Kwan , ”FEM-base optimum design of multi-stage deep drawing process of molybdenum,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.184, pp.354-362,2007.
10. Kim, Se-Ho, Kim, Seung-Ho and Huh,Hoon, “Tool design in a multi-stage drawing and ironing process of a rectangular cup with a large aspect ratio using finite element analysis,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.42, Issue 7, pp.863-875, 2002.
11. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Ls-Dyna Keyword User’s Manual, 2003.
12. Park,D.H., Kang,S.S., Park, S.B., ”A study on the improvement of formability for elliptical deep drawing process,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol.113, pp.662-665,2001.
13. Wang, L. and T.C.Lee, “The effect of yield criteria on the forming limit curve prediction and the deep drawing process simulation,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol.46, Issue 9, pp.988-995, 2006.
14. 山口 文雄原著陳玉心 編譯，連續沖壓模具之基礎與應用，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，2003。
15. 矢野 宏 原著陳耀茂 編譯，品質工程計算法入門，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，2004。
16. 李榮顯、許光城，“數位影像處理在板金成形極限圖建立之應用”，中國材料科學學會，第467-471 頁，1989。
17. 李榮顯，塑性加工學，三民書局股份有限公司，1986。
18. 吳復強 編著，產品穩健設計－田口方法之原理與應用，全威圖書有限公司，2005。
19. 金屬工業發展中心，沖壓模具設計手冊， 2004。
20. 莊偉倫，應用有限元素法於板金成形極限之模擬分析，碩士論文，成功大學機械工程研究所，1990。
21. 莊益彰，應用能量準則於板金成形之可成形性評估系統之研究，碩士論文，成功大學機械工程研究所，1995。
22. 莊達人，VLSI製造技術，高立出版社，1999。
23. 許光城，尺度效應與表面狀況在細微結構件塑性成形製程參數之研究(Ⅰ)，國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：NSC89-2212-E-151-023，2001。
24. 許光城，板金成形工程分析之研究(II)，國科會專題研究計畫成果報告，計畫編號：NSC89-2212-E-151-019，2001。
25. 經濟部技術處，金屬二次加工Technology roadmap專題研究-沖壓、鍛造，2003。
26. 董福清，應用微影方法於網格微細化之板金可成形性研究，碩士論文，成功大學機械工程研究所，2000。
27. 龍又安，半導體微影技術，五南圖書出版公司，2004。
28. 賴子、楊義雄編譯，沖壓加工便覽，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，1989。
29. 蘇貴福、陳煌源、林宏仁編譯，沖壓成形難易指南，全華科技圖書股份有限公司，1991。