| 研究生: |
李佳芳 Lee, Chia-Fang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
成本僵固性與非GAAP盈餘之關聯 Cost Stickiness and Non-GAAP Earnings |
| 指導教授: |
周庭楷
Chou, Ting-Kai 謝喻婷 Hsieh, Yu-Ting |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班 Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 112 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 34 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 成本僵固性 、非GAAP盈餘 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Cost stickiness, Non-GAAP earnings |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:63 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討成本僵固性與非 GAAP 盈餘的關聯性,研究公司的成本僵固性程度是否會影響管理者揭露非 GAAP 盈餘的意願與其排除規模之程度。非 GAAP 盈餘是經理人從 GAAP 盈餘中排除一些管理層認為的暫時性或非經常性費用來計算,用以補充公司核心盈餘的資訊,是經理人提供給投資者的另一項衡量績效的替代指標。本研究預期成本僵固反應的會是管理者對未來營收回復或成長的表現,但成本僵固伴隨的就是 較差 盈餘績效,但管理者對未來是有信心時,管理者會希望透過其他的自願揭露如發布非 GAAP 盈餘來傳遞對未來樂觀的展望,因此管理者傾向揭露非 GAAP盈餘。研究結果發現,成本僵固性越高越傾向揭露非 GAAP 盈餘,且成本越僵固之企業與排除項目的規模也呈現正相關。橫斷面測試採用依分析師 跟隨數來衡量企業的資訊透明度, 研究結果顯示成本僵固性高之企業揭露非 GAAP 盈餘會隨著資訊透明度降低而更加明顯。穩健性測試將樣本限縮在成本與收入連動性較高的製造業,以單一產業做測試,實證結果 仍 顯示成本僵固性越高之企業與揭露非 GAAP 盈餘以及排除項 目的規模皆呈現正相關。
This study aims to explore the association between cost stickiness and non-GAAP earnings.It investigates whether the degree of cost stickiness in companies affects managers' willingness to disclose non-GAAP earnings and the extent of exclusions from GAAP earnings. Non-GAAP earnings are calculated by managers excluding some temporary or non recurring expenses from GAAP earnings to supplement the company's core earnings information. It is another alternative performance measure communicated by managers to investors. The study expects that cost stickiness reflects managers' performance in future revenue recovery or growth, but cost stickiness will be accompanied by poorer earnings performance. However, when managers are confident about the future, managers will hope to other voluntary disclosures such as the release of non-GAAP earnings convey an optimistic outlook for the future, so managers tend to disclose non-GAAP earnings. The research findings indicate that firms with higher levels of cost stickiness are more inclined to disclose non-GAAP earnings , and the magnitude of exclusions correlates positively with the degree of cost stickiness. The cross sectional test uses analyst following as a proxy for corporate information transparency. The results show that companies with high cost stickiness will re veal non-GAAP earnings more pronounced as information transparency decreases. The robustness test confined the sample to manufacturing industries with higher cost revenue linkages. The results still show that companies with higher cost stickiness are positively related to the disclosure non-GAAP earnings and the magnitude of exclusions.
Abdel-Meguid, A., Jennings, J. N., Olsen, K. J. and Soliman M. T. (2021). The impact of the CEO’s personal narcissism on non-AAP earnings. The Accounting Review 96:1-25.
Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., and Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research 41:47-63.
Anderson, M., Mashruwala, R., Wang, Y. and Zhao, R. (2023). Cost uniqueness and inform ation uncertainty. Contemporary accounting research 40:2226-2255.
Allee, K. D., Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L. and Christensen T. E. (2007). Pro forma disclosure and investor sophistication:External validation of experimental evidence using archival da ta. Accounting,Organizations and Society 32:201-222.
Bhattacharya, N., Christensen, T., Liao, Q., and Ouyang, B. (2022). Can short sellers constrain aggressive non-GAAP reporting? Review of Accounting Studies 27:391-440
Black, D. E., Christensen T. E., Ciesielski, J. T. and Whipple, B. C. (2021). Non-GAAP earnings:A consistency and comparability crisis? Contemporary Accounting Research 38:1712-1747.
Black, D. E., Black, E. L. Christensen, T. E. and Gee, K. H. (2023). CEO pay components and aggressiv e non-GAAP earnings disclosure. Journal of accounting, auditing and finance 38:648-675.
Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., Kiosse, P. V. and Steffen, T. D. (2017b). Has the regulation of non-GAAP disclosures influenced managers’use of aggressive earnings exclusions?Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance 32:209-240.
Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., Joo, T. T. and Schmardebeck, R. (2017). The relation between earnings management and non-GAAP reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research 34:750-782.
Chen, C. X., Lu, H., and Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance,and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs.Contemporary Accounting Research 29:252-282.
Chen, J. V., Kama, I. and Lehavy , R. (2019). A contextual analysis of the impact of managerial expectations on asymmetric cost behavior. Review of Accounting Studies 24:665-693.
Chen, L. Y., and Wang, T. S. (2023). Effect of supplier cost stickiness on environmental,social and governanc e:Moderating role of customer bargaining power.Corporate social responsibility and environmental management 30:2304-2314.
Christensen, T. E., Gomez, E., Ma, M.,, and Pan, J. (2021). Analysts’role in shaping non-GAAP reporting:Evidence from a natural experiment.Review of Accounting Studies 26:172-217.
Costa, M., and and Habib, D. A. (2021). Trade credit and cost stickiness. Accounting and finance 61:1139-1179.
Doyle, J. T., Lundholm, R. J. J., and M. T. (2003). The predictive value of expenses excluded from‘pro forma’earnings. Review of Accounting Studies 8:145-174.
Doyle, J. T., Jennings, J. N. and Soliman, M. T. (2013). Do managers define non-GAAP earnings to meet or beat analyst forecasts? Journal of Accounting and Economics 56:40-56.
He, J., Tian, X., Yang, H. and Zuo, L. (2020). Asymmetric cost behavior and dividend policy. Journal of Accounting Research 58:989-1021.
Heflin, F. and Hsu, C. (2008). The impact of the SEC’s regulation of non-GAAP disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46:349-365.
Huang, Q. and Skantz, T. R. (2016).The informativeness of pro forma and street earnings:An examination of information asymmetry around earnings announcements. Review of Accounting Studies 21:198-250.
Kama, I. and Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of Accounting Research 51:201-224.
Kim, R. (2023). Do more able managers provide better non-GAAP earnings. Accounting and finance 63:1983-2012.
Kolev, K., Marquardt, C. and McVay, S. (2008). SEC scrutiny and the evolution of non-GAAP reporting. The Accounting Review 83:157-184.
Kyung, H., Lee, H. and Marquardt, C. (2019).The effect of voluntary clawback adoption on non-GAAP reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 67:175-201.
Leung, E. and Veenman , D. (2018). Non-GAAP earnings disclosure in loss firms. Journal of Accounting Research 56:1083-1137.
Liu, X., Liu, X., and Reid, C. D. (2019). Stakeholder orientations and cost management.Contemporary Accounting Research 36:486-512.
Lougee, B., and Marquardt, C. (2004). Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure:An empirical examination of “pro forma” earnings. The Accounting Review 79:769-795.
Seetharaman, A., Wang, X. and Zhang, S. (2014). An empirical analysis of the effects of accounting expertise in audit committees on non-GAAP earnings exclusions.Accounting Horizons 28:17-37.
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 85:1441-1471.