近年來，人命安全的議題越趨重視，因此國際海事組織亦發布客船疏散分析相關文件，強制客船建造前，須經模擬以評估人員疏散安全性。有鑑於我國除了一般交通船之外，將來也有可能發展大型旅客船，故本研究針對不同的人口組成及人員初始位置分布，利用maritimeEXODUS軟體模擬各條件下兩種大型客艙設計之疏散情形，分析疏散特性及造成阻塞之原因，並試圖利用分流的概念，降低擁塞程度，以縮短全體的逃生時間。最後模擬不同船體傾斜程度對逃生時間之影響。
　　經由模擬結果得知，性別比例對逃生時間影響甚大，原因在於男性平均步行速度高於女性，故未來設定模擬條件時，應考量實際狀況下的性別比例，以增加模擬可靠度。相同船型下，改變乘載比例對於整體逃生趨勢影響不大，若乘載人數低於某一程度時，反應時間將直接對模擬結果產生影響，模擬結果的變異性較大。人員隨機分布的逃生時間較人員固定於座位上的逃生時間更長，因隨機分布會造成部分人員位於船艏、船艉等離逃生設備較遠之處。在相同的傾斜角度下，橫傾對人員移動速度的影響較縱傾大。而未來也可考慮針對必經動線上細部(例如樓梯)設計的改善及逃生設備數量與位置的影響，更仔細研究各種設計的優缺點，作為初步設計及擬定疏散計畫之參考。

In recent years, the issues of safety of life received more attention. For example, the International Maritime Organization published passenger evacuation analysis regulations. Before the passenger ship construction, simulation was required to evaluate the security of evacuation. In this study, we used the maritimeEXODUS software to simulate the conditions of two large cabin designs, then analyse evacuation characteristics and congestion. We tried to use concept of fluid to reduce the evacuation time. Finally, we simulated the conditions of various trim and heel angles.
The simulation results show that sex ratios have a great impact on evacuation time, because the average walking speed of male is faster than female’s. When setting simulation condition, we should take into account the actual situation of gender representation, to increase reliability of simulation. Under the same ship type, changing the number of passengers has little effect to the simulation results. When the number of passengers is very small, response time has a direct impact on the simulation results. Random distribution of passengers has a longer evacuation time than passengers on fixed seats. Under the same angle, heel has a greater impact on the speed of movement than trim.

1. Andrews, D.; Casarosa, L.; Pawling, R.; Galea, E.; Deere, S.; and Lawrence, P. (2008) Integrating Personnel Movement Simulation into Preliminary Ship Design, International Journal of Maritime Engineering, Volume 150 Part A1, pp. 19-34.
2. Brown, R.; Galea, E.; Deere, S.; Filippidis, L. (2012) Passenger response time data-sets for large passenger ferries and cruise ships derived from sea trials and recommendations to IMO to update MSC circ 1238, SAFEGUARD Passenger Evacuation Seminar 30 November 2012, London, UK, pp. 25-40.
3. Chu, C.W. and Pan, C.Z. (2008) Emergency Evacuation Route For The Passenger Ship, National Science Council of Taiwan, NSC96-2416-H-019-006.
4. FSEG (2008) maritimeEXODUS User Guide and Technical Manual, Revision: 4.1.
5. Galea, E. R. (2001) Simulating evacuation and circulation in planes, trains, buildings and ships using the EXODUS software, In: Proceedings of Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, pp. 203–226.
6. Galea, E.R.; Deere, S.; Sharp, G.; Filippidis, L.; Lawrence, P.; and Gwynne, S. (2007) Recommendations on the nature of the passenger response time distribution to be used in the MSC 1033 assembly time analysis based on data derived from sea trials, Int. J. of Maritime Eng., Vol. 149, Part A1, pp. 15-29.
7. Galea, E.R.; Brown, R.C.; Filippidis, L.; and Deere, S. (2011) Collection of Evacuation Data for Large Passenger Vessels at Sea, Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2010, 5th International Conference. Proceedings March 8-10, 2010, Springer, New York, NY, pp. 163-172.
8. Galea, E.R. (2012) Evacuation and Pedestrian Dynamics Guest Editorial – 21st Century Grand Challenges in Evacuation and Pedestrian Dynamics, Safety Science, Vol. 50, pp. 1653-1654.
9. Gwynne, S.; Galea, E.R.; Lyster, C. and Glen, I. (2003) Analysing the evacuation procedures employed on a Thames passenger boat using the maritimeEXODUS evacuation model, Fire Technology, Vol. 39(3), pp. 225-246.
10. IMO (2004) Recommendation on Evacuation Analysis For New And Existing Passenger Ships (FP 49/INF.9).
11. IMO (2007) Guidelines For Evacuation Analysis For New And Existing Passenger Ships (MSC/Circ.1238).
12. Lee, D.; Park, J.H.; Kim, H.; and Park, B.J. (2003) The current status and future issues in human evacuation from ships, Safety Science, Vol. 41, pp. 861-876.
13. Lee, D.; Park, J.H.; and Kim, H. (2004) A study on experiment of human behavior for evacuation simulation, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 931–941.
14. Park, J.H.; Lee, D.; Kim, H.; and Yang, Y.S. (2004) Development of evacuation model for human safety in maritime casualty, Ocean Engineering, Vol. 31, pp. 1537–1547.
15. Vanem, E.; Skjong, R. (2006) Designing for safety in passenger ships utilizing advanced evacuation analyses—A risk based approach, Safety Science, Vol. 44, pp. 111-135.
16. Chang, P.C. 張博超; Li, C.Y. 李志義 (2006) ，船上人員疏散過程之微觀式動態模擬，第十八屆中國造船暨輪機工程研討會，基隆市。
17. Chen, J.H. 陳政宏 (2003) ，船舶設計及研究的新方向：人因工程，第十五屆中國造船暨輪機工程研討會，高雄市。
18. Chen, J.H. 陳政宏 (2013) ，三體船佈置設計之人因工程研究，台灣國際造船股份有限公司研究報告。
19. Liu, C. 劉 謙; Chu, C.W. 朱經武; Lin, C.H. 林昭輝 (2011) ，客船撤離分析指南應用之研究—以育英二號訓練船為例，航運季刊，第二十卷，第二期，頁1～20。
20. Wu, M.C. 吳孟杰; Yeh, Y.H. 葉雨涵; Chen, J.H. 陳政宏 (2007) ，交通船疏散與座位佈置之模擬研究，第十九屆中國造船暨輪機工程研討會，高雄市。