本文主要利用10MW大尺度燃燒分析裝置和ISO 9705全尺度量熱裝置，針對不同數目之機車實體、耐燃以及非耐燃沙發等單元來進行煙氣特性與熱釋放率分析。經由機車實驗結果發現，單部機車之熱釋放率約為1MW，兩部機車約為2MW，而三部機車則為4MW。另外，機車引燃及延燒模式會影響最大熱釋放率，而機車數目愈多，其完全發展期持續的時間愈短。
　　沙發實驗方面，在引燃的難易度上，布面非耐燃沙發比耐燃沙發更易引燃。而耐燃沙發因在坐墊、靠背及前緣之內部有鋪設防火棉，初始延燒速度較為緩慢，具較佳之防火性能，但因其背部並未做任何防火處理，所以當耐燃沙發背部燒穿後，火勢即迅速增大。

　　A series of burning tests were conducted on motor scooters, fire-retardant sofas, and non-fire-retardant sofas by using either a 10MW large-scale fire products collector or a ISO 9705 full-scale fire products collector. The emissions characteristics and heat release rates of burning motor scooters, fire-retardant sofas, and non-fire-retardant sofas were identified.
　　From the experimental measurements of motor scooters, it was found that one motor scooter had a peak heat release rate of 1MW, and two scooters and three scooters had 2MW and 4MW peak heat release rate, respectively. The ignition and fire spreading patterns affected the maximal heat release rate considerably. As the number of scooters increased, the duration of the fully-developed burning period became shorter.
　　In the experiments of fire-retardant sofas and non-fire-retardant sofas, it was found that the ignitability of non-fire-retardant sofas was better than fire-retardant sofas. Because the interior of the front side of fire-retardant sofa had a layer of fire-proof cotton, the initial spread of the fire on a fire-retardant sofa was slower than a non-fire-retardant sofa. But the back side of fire-retardant sofa did not have fire-proof cotton, and therefore, fire grew rapidly when the back side was penetrated by fire.

1.日本總務省消防廳，http://www.fdma.go.jp/。
2.Karter, M. J., “Fire Loss in the United States During 1999,” Report, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2000.
3.Karter, M. J., “Fire Loss in the United States During 2000,” Report, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2001.
4.Karter, M. J., “Fire Loss in the United States During 2001,” Report, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2002.
5.Karter, M. J., “Fire Loss in the United States During 2002,” Report, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2003.
6.Karter, M. J., “Fire Loss in the United States During 2003,” Report, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, 2004.
7.林韋志，「建築騎樓下機車延燒行為研究」，國立台灣科技大學營建系碩士論文，民國87年。
8.林穎志，「機車燃燒模擬試驗研究-騎樓側壁對火焰行為影響」，國立台灣科技大學營建系碩士論文，民國90年。
9.張旭富，「建築騎樓主要可燃物燃燒行為研究-機車燃燒行為研究」，國立台灣科技大學營建系碩士論文，民國86年。
10.Chow, W. K., “Assessment on Heat Release Rate of Furniture Foam Arrangement by a Cone Calorimeter,” Journal of Fire Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 319-328, 2002.
11.Chao, C. Y. H., “Transition from Smoldering to Flaming Combustion of Horizontally Oriented Flexible Polyurethane Foam with Natural Convection,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 127, pp. 2252-2264, 2001.
12.Kozlowski, R., Mieleniak, B., and Muzyczek, M., “Fire Resistant Composites for Upholstery,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, Vol. 64, pp. 511-515, 1999.
13.Soderbom, J., Hess, P. V., and Meirsschaert, P., “Influence of Ignition Source on Heat Release Rate in the Furniture Calorimeter,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 20, pp. 61-67, 1996.
14.Stroup, D. W., DeLauter, L., Lee, J., and Roadarmel, G., “Upholstered Chair Fire Tests Using a California Technical Bulletin 133 Burner Ignition Source,” Report of Test FR 4012, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2001.
15.Madrzykowski, D., “Sofa Fire,” http://fire.nist.gov/fire/fires/sofa/sofa.html.
16.Babrauskas, V., Baroudi, D., Myllymaki, J, and Kokkala, M., “The Cone Calorimeter Used for Predictions of the Full-Scale Burning Behaviour of Upholstered Furniture,” Fire and Materials, Vol. 21, pp. 95-105, 1997.
17.Enright, P. A., Fleischmann, C. M., and Vandevelde, P., “CBUF Model II Applied to Exemplary NZ Furniture (NZ-CBUF),” Fire and Materials, Vol. 25, pp. 105-115, 2001.
18.蕭宜峯，「利用油盤火焰驗證10MW大尺度燃燒分析裝置」，國立成功大學機械工程學系碩士論文，民國九十三年五月。
19.ISO 9705, “Fire Tests-Reaction to Fire Full-Scale Room Test for Surface Products,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1993.
20.Janssens, M. L., “Measuring Rate of Heat Release by Oxygen Consumption,” Fire Technology, pp. 234-249, 1991.
21.Thornton, W., “The Relation of Oxygen to the Heat of Combustion of Organic Compounds,” Philosophical Magazine and J. of Science, Vol. 33, pp. 196-203, 1917.
22.Huggett, C., “Estimation of Heat Release by Means of Oxygen Consumption Measurement,” J. of Fire and Materials, Vol. 12, pp. 61-65, 1980.
23.Incropera, F. I., and DeWitt, D. P., “Introduction to Heat Transfer,” Fourth Edition, John Wiiley and Sons, New York, pp. 748-750, 2002.
24.Babrauskas, V., “Estimating Large Pool Fire Burning Rates,” Fire Technology, pp. 251-261, 1983.
25.Tananayev, A. V., Gontsov, N. G., and Marinova O. A., “Flow Structure in Pipe Elbows,” Fluid Mechanics-Soviet Research, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 7-13, 1982.
26.Hottel, H.C., Fire Res. Abstr. Rev.1, pp. 41-44, 1959.
27.Chatris, J., Quintela, J., Folch, J., Planas, E., Arnaldos, J., and Casal, J., “Experimental Study of Burning Rate in Hydrocarbon Pool Fires,” Combustion and Flame, Vol. 126, pp. 1373-1383, 2001.
28.Heskestad, G., “Fire Plumes,” SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, Second Edition, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, pp. 2/9-2/19, 1995.
29.黃素珍，「國內汽機車用塑膠材料現況」，化工資訊，第9卷第12期，11-24頁，民國84年12月。
30.Heskestad, G. and Delichatsios, M. A., “The initial Convective Flow in Fire,” Seventeenth Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp. 1113-1123, 1978.
31.“SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering,” Second Edition, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, Appendix C, pp. A-37-A-44, 1995.