| 研究生: |
陳右霖 Chen, Yu-Lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
高中棒球投手變化球之生物力學分析 A Biomechanical Analysis among the Breakingball in High School Pitchers |
| 指導教授: |
王榮泰
Wang, Rung-Tai |
| 共同指導教授: |
周有禮
Chou, You-Li 周伯禧 Chou, Pei-Hsi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程科學系 Department of Engineering Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 154 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 棒球 、投手 、投球 、直球 、滑球 、曲球 、肌力 、肩關節 、關節活動角度 、肘關節 、運動學 、動力學 、前臂旋前 、訓練 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | baseball, pitcher, throw, fastball, slider, curveball, muscle strength, shoulder, range of motion, elbow, kinematic, kinetic, forearm pronation, training |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:124 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
前言:
棒球投手在比賽中若要順利解決打者,除了直球以外,如何有效的使用變化球,也是相當重要的因素。然而要學習一種新的變化球並不是相當容易,相較於直球,整體投球動作中的肩關節、肘關節、腕關節及膝關節都會有些許的變化和調整。也因為姿勢的改變,在練習變化球時造成的風險與對身體的負擔和練習直球時也有不同。
目的:
藉由直球、滑球與曲球的牛棚訓練了解台灣高中棒球投手在投擲一定數量的各種球路後,在肩及肘關節角度、投球力學與肌力的變化上的趨勢有何不同,從而針對投手擅長的球路建議加強訓練的方針,以減少比賽或練習時投擲變化球造成運動傷害的風險。
研究方法:
本研究受測者為9位甲組高中棒球投手。受測者分別於不同日期完成直球、滑球和曲球共三次實驗,實驗當天完成熱身後立即依投手本身負擔能力投擲50~60次該球種並全程以三維動作分析系統擷取投球動作。投球前、投球後、投球後第一天皆量測關節活動角度和肌力,來觀察其投球後關節活動角度和肌力變化。統計方法用重複測量變異數分析及配對t檢定分析。並以p<0.05為達顯著差異之標準。
結果:
投手進行投球測試前後的運動學分析方面,96項運動學參數中曲球有21項、直球有24項、滑球有25項達到統計上顯著差異;動力學分析方面,56項動力學參數中曲球有12項、直球有13項、滑球有21項達到統計上顯著差異。
相互比較結果方面,直球與曲球的分析結果,96項運動學參數有46項達到統計上顯著差異,56項動力學參數中,有33項達到統計上顯著差異;滑球與曲球的分析結果,96項運動學參數中有54項有達到統計上顯著差異,56項動力學參數中有41項達到統計上顯著差異;直球與滑球的分析結果,96項運動學參數中有44項達到統計上顯著差異,56項動力學參數中有21項達統計上顯著差異。
討論與結論:
投手在投擲曲球時,腕關節背屈力矩出現了比直球和曲球更高的數值,而在投球動作後期(Arm Deceleration phase),肘關節所受的力和力矩在反覆投球後都有明顯的上升,所以建議曲球使用度較高的選手可以加強對腕關節和肘關節附近肌群的訓練,以降低腕、肘關節受傷的風險。
滑球的投擲狀況,在投球動作後期,肩關節水平外展力矩、內旋力矩都出現了比其他球路更高的情形,進行反覆投球後,整個投球動作中肘關節前側力、屈曲力矩和旋轉力矩有增加的情形,在投球動作後期出現更多肩關節和肘關節所受力跟力矩提高的現象,因此常使用滑球的選手需要多訓練肩及肘關節附近的肌群,避免運動傷害的發生。
另外在曲球和滑球都在經過一定的投球數後,在前臂旋前角度上有明顯的差異,有可能因此導致投球機制的改變而提高受傷的風險以及降低投球的穩定性,故建議對於練習曲球和滑球的選手可以對前臂旋前、旋後動作的肌群加強訓練。
Introduction:
How to pitch the breaking balls effectively in addition to the fastball is an important task in baseball competition. However, learing a new kind of breaking ball is a difficult process, compared to the fastball, the pitching motion of the pitcher's shoulders, elbows, wrists and knees need to be adjusted. In the other hand, different risk of injurys and burdens of body may occur in practicing breaking ball with differet pitching motions.
Purpose:
To investigate the changes of kinematics, kinetics and muscle strengh of high school baseball pitcher's shoulders and elbows after throwing a certain number of different types of pitches, thus suggest the muscle training policy for each type of pitch to reduce the risk of injury in throwing the breakingball.
Method
Nine Taiwanese high school baseball pitchers of group A. The pitchers participated fastball, curveball and slider test on different dates respectively. In one test, the pitcher executed 50~60 pitches according to the affordability of the pitcher after adequate warm-up, the pitching motion of each pitch was captured with outdoor three dimensional motion analysis system. The range of motion and muscle strength were recorded at pre-test, post-test and Day1 for studying the changes after pitching. Statistical methods using repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-test. Significant at p < 0.05.
Result
Out of 96 kinematic parameters, 21 parameters in curveball test, 24 parameters in fastball test and 25 parameters in slider test were significantly different after pitching, respectively. Out of 56 kinetic parameters, 12 parameters in curveball test, 13 parameters in fastball test and 21 parameters in slider test were significantly different after pitching, respectively.
Between fastball and curveball, 46 of 96 kinematic parameters and 33 of 56 kinetic parameters were significantly different. Between slider and curveball, 54 of 96 kinematic parameters and 41 of 56 kinetic parameters were significantly different. Between fastball and slider, 44 of 96 kinematic parameters and 21 of 56 kinetic parameters were significantly different.
Discussion and Conclusion
When the pitcher throws curveball, there is a higher value at wrist dorsi flexion moment relative to fastball, and the elbows bear larger forces and moments in the late stage of pitching motion(Arm Deceleration phase). Therefore, more training of elbows and wrists may reduce the risk of injuries for the pitchers who throw curveball often.
In the late stage of the pitching motion, the shoulder horizontal abduction moment and shoulder internal rotation moment showed higher values in throwing slider relative to the other two balls, and after repeatedly throwing slider, the values of the elbow anterior force, flexion moment and rotation moment become larger in entire pitching process, more forces and moments that exert on the elbow and shoulder become larger in the late stage of the pitching motion. Therefore, the pitchers may proceed more training for the muscle near the shoulder and elbow to reduce the risk of injuries with throwing slider often.
On the other hand, both curveball and slider have significantly differences at the forearm pronation angle after a certain number of pitches. This may cause the pitching mechanism to change, further increase the risk of injury and decrease the stability of pitching, so training the muscle of forearm pronation and supination is suggested for practicing curveball and slider in this study.
[1] Lyman S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR,Osinski ED. Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med; 30: 463-468. 2002.
[2] Kindall J. Sports illustrated baseball: play the winning way. Sports Illustrated,Place, 1993.
[3] Fleisig GS, Andrews JR, Dillman CJ,Escamilla RF. Kinetics of Baseball Pitching with Implications About Injury Mechanisms. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 23: 233-239. 1995.
[4] Werner SL, Fleisig GS, Dillman CJ,Andrews JR. Biomechanics of the Elbow during Baseball Pitching. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy; 17: 274-278. 1993.
[5] Nadler SF. Injury in a throwing athlete: Understanding the kinetic chain. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation; 83: 79-79. 2004.
[6] Sabick MB, Torry MR, Lawton RL,Hawkins RJ. Valgus torque in youth baseball pitchers: A biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 13: 349-355. 2004.
[7] Meister K. Injuries to the shoulder in the throwing athlete. Part one: Biomechanics/pathophysiology/classification of injury. Am J Sports Med; 28: 265-275. 2000.
[8] Pappas AM,Zawacki RM,Sullivan TJ.Biomechanics of baseball pitching. A preliminary report. American Jornal of Sport Med; 36(3)523-527. 2008
[9] Bartlett LR, Storey MD,Simons BD. Measurement of upper extremity torque production and its relationship to throwing speed in the competitive athlete. Am J Sports Med; 17: 89-91. 1989.
[10] Stevenson JM. Finger release sequence for fastball and curveball pitches. Can J Appl Sport Sci; 10: 21-25. 1985.
[11] Elliott B, Grove J, Gibson B,Thurston B. A three-dimensional cinematographic analysis of the fastball and curveball pitches in baseball. Int J Sport Biomech; 2: 20-28. 1986.
[12] Lyman S, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR,Osinski ED. Effect of pitch type, pitch count, and pitching mechanics on risk of elbow and shoulder pain in youth baseball pitchers. Am J Sports Med; 30: 463-468. 2002.
[13] Larsson L, Grimby G,Karlsson J. Muscle strength and speed of movement in relation to age and muscle morphology. J Appl Physiol; 46: 451-456. 1979.
[14] 吳亭諭.Throwing Kinematics and Physical Characteristics in Youth Baseball Players with and without Medial Elbow Pain. 2007.
[15] Fleisig GS, Escamilla RF, Andrews JR, Matsuo T, Satterwhite Y,Barrentine SW. Kinematic and kinetic comparison between baseball pitching and football passing. J Appl Biomech; 12: 207-224. 1996.
[16] 張劭任.台灣職業棒球投手直球、滑球和曲球的生物力學分析.2012
[17] Escamilla RF,Andrews JR. Shoulder muscle recruitment patterns and related biomechanics during upper extremity sports. Sports Med; 39: 569-590. 2009.
[18] DiGiovine NM, Jobe FW, Pink M,Perry J. An electromyographic analysis of the upper extremity in pitching. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery; 1: 15-25. 1992.
[19] Putnam CA. Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills: descriptions and explanations. J Biomech; 26 Suppl 1: 125-135. 1993.
[20] Jobe FW, Tibone JE, Perry J,Moynes D. An EMG analysis of the shoulder in throwing and pitching. A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med; 11: 3-5. 1983.
[21] Jobe FW, Moynes DR, Tibone JE,Perry J. An EMG analysis of the shoulder in pitching. A second report. Am J Sports Med; 12: 218-220. 1984.
[22] Asmussen E,Bonde-Petersen F. Storage of elastic energy in skeletal muscles in man. Acta Physiol Scand; 91: 385-392. 1974.
[23] 盧英治。衝擊式訓練的理論與實際。大專體育; 95-102. 2000.
[24] Andrews JR,Angelo RL. Shoulder arthroscopy for the throwing athlete. Techniques in Orthopaedics; 3: 75. 1988.
[25] Dailsaku Hirayama, Norihisa Fujii. The kinematics changes of pitching during a simulated baseball game. Am J Sports Med; 35(1):23-33. 2007
[26] Escamilla RF, Barrentine SW, Fleisig GS, Zheng NQ, Takada Y,Andrews JR. Pitching biomechanics as a pitcher approaches muscular fatigue during a simulated baseball game. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 35: 23-33. 2007.
[27] Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Donofrio TM,Nicholas SJ. Upper and lower extremity muscle fatigue after a baseball pitching performance.American Journal of Sports Medicine; 33: 108-113. 2005.
[28] Barrentine SW, Takada Y, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Andrews JR.Kinematics and EMG changes in baseball pitching during a simulated game. American Sports Med; 29(2):137-142.2001
[29] Hess GW, Delta V,Salem V. Shoulder Fatigue Following a Pitching Bout: A Case Study Examination of Time to Recovery. RECORDER; 3. 2007-2008.
[30] Dale RB, Kovaleski JE, Ogletree T, Heitman RJ,Norrell PM. The effects of repetitive overhead throwing on shoulder rotator isokinetic work-fatigue. N Am J Sports Phys Ther; 2: 74-80. 2007.
[31] Reinold MM, Wilk KE, Macrina LC, Sheheane C, Dun S, Fleisig GS, Crenshaw K,Andrews JR. Changes in shoulder and elbow passive range of motion after pitching in professional baseball players. Am J Sports Med; 36: 523-527. 2008.
[32] Brown LP, Niehues SL, Harrah A, Yavorsky P,Hirshman HP. Upper Extremity Range of Motion and Isokinetic Strength of the Internal and External Shoulder Rotators in Major League Baseball Players. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 16: 577-585. 1988.
[33] Dempster WT. Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC Technical Report 55159; 55-159. 1955.
[34] Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Daniels and Worthingham s muscle testing: techniques of manual examination. Philadelphia, Plane.1995
[35] Woltring HJ. A Fortran Package for Generalized, Cross-Validatory Spline Smoothing and Differentiation. Advances in Engineering Software and Workstations; 8: 104-113. 1986.
[36] Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng NQ,Andrews JR. Kinematic comparisons of throwing different types of baseball pitches. J Appl Biomech; 14: 1-23. 1998.
[37] Nissen CW, Westwell M, Ounpuu S, Patel M, Solomito M,Tate J. A Biomechanical Comparison of the Fastball and Curveball in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 37: 1492-1498. 2009.
[38] Fleisig GS, Kingsley DS, Loftice JW, Dinnen KP, Ranganathan R, Dun S, Escamilla RF,Andrews JR. Kinetic comparison among the fastball, curveball, change-up, and slider in collegiate baseball pitchers. American Journal of Sports Medicine; 34: 423-430. 2006.
[39] Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Pizzo wD, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ.SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy;(6):274-279.1990
[40] Werner SL, Murray TA, Hawkins RJ, Gill TJ. Relationship between throwing mechanics and elbow valgus in professional baseball pitchers. Journal of Shoulder& Elbow Surgery; 11(2):151-155.2002.
[41] Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N, Escamilla RF,Andrews JR. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. J Biomech; 32: 1371-1375. 1999.
[42] Escamilla R, Fleisig G, Barrentine S, Andrews J,Moorman C, 3rd. Kinematic and kinetic comparisons between American and Korean professional baseball pitchers. Sports Biomech; 1: 213-228. 2002.
[43] Matsuo T, Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW,Andrews JR. Comparison of kinematic and temporal parameters between different pitch velocity groups. J Appl Biomech; 17: 1-13. 2001.