簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇蔚皓
Su, Wei-Hao
論文名稱: IAS40對信用評等及債務資金成本的影響
The Effects of IAS 40 on Credit Rating and Cost of Debt
指導教授: 謝喻婷
Hsieh, Yu-Ting
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所碩士在職專班
Graduate Institute of Finance (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 30
中文關鍵詞: 投資性不動產公允價值外部鑑價信用評等債務資金成本
外文關鍵詞: Investment property, Fair value, External appraisal, Credit rating, Cost of Debt
相關次數: 點閱:105下載:18
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 我國於2013年導入國際會計準則第40 號(IAS 40)「投資性不動產」,規定企業對於投資性不動產之後續衡量得選擇按公允價值模式或成本模式衡量,以及衡量投資性不動產之公允價值時,企業可選擇內部自行評估或採用外部鑑價。本研究探討投資性不動產雙重可選擇性和我國企業信用評等及有息負債利率之關聯,實證結果發現當後續衡量採公允價值模式之企業較採用成本模式者,公司信用評等等級顯著較差,有息負債利率亦顯著較高。此外,當公允價值採用外部鑑價之企業較採內部自行評估者,有息負債利率顯著增加。

    Taiwan adopted IAS 40 in 2013. IAS 40 permits firms to choose between a fair value model and a cost model for measuring investment property subsequent to the initial recognition. Additionally, firms can determine the fair value of investment properties based on internal or external valuation. Therefore, this study investigates whether the choices of fair value model and cost model for the subsequent measurement and the choices of fair value information sources will influence firms’credit rating and the interest rate of debt. The empirical results indicate that firms choosing fair value model have worse credit ratings and higher interest rate of debt than firms choosing cost model do. Moreover, firms disclosing fair value evaluated by external appraisers have higher interest rate of debt compared to firms disclosing fair value evaluated by insiders.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 VI 目錄 VII 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻探討與假說建立 4 第一節 投資性不動產後續衡量模式與債務資金成本之關聯 4 第二節 投資性不動產公允價值鑑價資訊來源與融資成本之關聯 6 第三章 研究方法與設計 8 第一節 研究期間及樣本 8 第二節 實證模型設計 10 第三節 變數定義與衡量 11 第四章 實證結果與分析 14 第一節 敘述性統計分析 14 第二節 相關係數分析 16 第三節 實證結果分析 18 第四節 額外測試 22 第五章 結論 24 第一節 研究結論 24 第二節 研究限制與建議 26 參考文獻 27 附錄 相關法規 29

    王炫斌、林嬋娟,2018 IAS 40 雙重可選擇性之決定因素與經濟後果,中華會計學刊,第14卷第2期:129-180。
    王炫斌、林嬋娟,2019 導入 IAS 40 對審計公費之影響,會計評論,第69期:43-82。
    方紹宇,2020 投資性不動產後續評價模式與債務資金成本之關聯,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    江美艷,2014 開放投資性不動產以公允價值後續評價,企業及投資人之實務因應,會計研究月刊,第342期:80-88。
    張能政,2003 不動產估價行為研究—行為理論應用,國立台北大學地政系碩士論文。
    張慈韡,2013,投資性不動產之認列與揭露,國立成功大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    張燕平,2015,邁向公允價值投資性不動產解析,證券服務,第641期:46-50。
    Anderson, R. C., S. A. Mansi, and D. M. Reeb. 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (3): 315-342.
    Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
    Barth, M. E. 1994. Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. Accounting Review, 69(1),1-25.
    Barth, M. E., & Clinch, G. 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 199-233.
    Bao, M. X., Billett, M. T., Smith, D. B., & Unlu, E. 2020. Does other comprehensive income volatility influence credit risk and the cost of debt?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 457-484.
    Christensen, H. B., & Nikolaev, V. V. 2013. Does fair value accounting for non-financial assets pass the market test?. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(3), 734-775.
    Dietrich, J. R., Harris, M. S., & Muller III, K. A. 2000. The reliability of investment property fair value estimates. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(2), 125-158.
    Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. 2005. Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1125-1162.
    Landsman, W. R. 2007. Is fair value accounting information relevant and reliable? Evidence from capital market research. Accounting and Business Research, 37(sup1), 19-30.
    McParland, C., Adair, A., & McGreal, S. 2002. Valuation standards: A comparison of four European countries. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 20(2), 127-141.
    Merton, R. C. 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of finance, 29(2), 449-470.
    Nellessen, T., & Zuelch, H. 2011. The reliability of investment property fair values under IFRS. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 29(1), 59-73.
    Quagli, A., & Avallone, F. 2010. Fair value or cost model? Drivers of choice for IAS 40 in the real estate industry. European Accounting Review, 19(3), 461-493.
    Ramanna, K., & Watts, R. L. 2012. Evidence on the use of unverifiable estimates in required goodwill impairment. Review of Accounting Studies, 17(4), 749-780.
    Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. Accounting review, 73( 4), 459-474.
    Smith, S. 2002. Predatory lending, mortgage fraud, and client pressures. The Appraisal Journal, 70(2), 200.
    Chen, T. Y., Chin, C. L., Wang, S., & Yao, W. R. 2015. The effects of financial reporting on bank loan contracting in global markets: Evidence from mandatory IFRS adoption. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(2), 45-81.
    Wittenberg-Moerman, R. 2008. The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(2-3), 240-260.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE