核能發電一直在世界上占有在相當重要的一環，目前在世界上所佔的發電百分比有10.8%，而台灣由於天然資源的缺乏，核能發電更是不可或缺的電力來源，民國100年台灣發電來源，有12.4%來自核能發電，因此現階段來說核能發電在目前的台灣依然是不可或缺的一部分，核能發電除了比再生能源發電，提供較為穩定、高效率的發電模式，也不像火力發電產生大量二氧化碳，造成溫室效應的問題，與節能減碳的趨勢不符合，但核能雖然經濟便利，也有其最主要的缺點，那就是輻射污染的問題，當核反應爐冷卻功能失效的時候(Loss-of-Coolant-Accident)導致內壓上升或者是強烈地震的情況，要如何確保核電廠圍阻體結構是否安全，以及輻射是否會外洩等問題產生。
因此本文利用有限元素法軟體ABAQUS，來對馬鞍山核電廠的圍阻體進行分析，本文主要可分為兩個部份，第一部分是模擬其極限耐壓能力，第二部份受地震力的影響及破壞模式。由於在耐壓分析的部份由於已有關於馬鞍山核電廠耐壓分析的相關研究，因此第一部份主要在嘗試以不同分析方法並且加以驗證本文模形之正確性，並且對於其內部承壓模式的基本變形模式以及破壞模式做探討，第二部份則是利用PGA=0.65g的集集地震歷時，以了解設計PGA為0.4g的馬鞍山核電廠圍阻體的運動行為及破壞情形…等，並且探求馬鞍山為阻體的自然震動頻率加以比較，加以檢驗馬鞍山發電廠的安全性是否無虞。

Nuclear power generation has been occupied a very important part of the current share of the world's power generation, having 10.8% of total power generation in the world. Due to the lack of natural resources in Taiwan, nuclear power generation is an indispensable source of electricity, however; nucler power generation has a vary important shortcoming, that is, radiation pollution problem. When the nuclear reactor cooling function is failure (Loss-of-Coolant-Accident), it will lead to an increase in internal pressure to possible explosion.
Therefore, this paper uses the finite element model ABAQUS to analyze the containment of Maanshan nuclear power plant. This paper can be divided into two parts. The first part is to simulate the ultimate pressure resistance, and the second part is the behavior affected by the earthquake. Since the part of the pressure analysis has been already been studied in our research team, the first part is mainly trying to differentiate the method and verify the correctness of the model, and for its basic deformation to do the discussion. The second part is the use the chichi earthquake which PGA is 0.65g to simulate, in order to understand the behavior of maanshan containment that its design is for PGA 0.4g. In addition, the natural vibration frequency of Maanshan has been simulated and then compared to the the simulation that containment under seismic load, for making sure the Maanshan containment is safe .

[1] ACI Committee 216. (1994). Guide For Determining the Fire Endurance of Concrete Elements(ACI 216R-89), American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan

[2] ACI Committee, American Concrete Institute, & International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.

[3] Amin, M., Eberhardt, A. C., & Erler, B. A. (1993). Design considerations for concrete containments under severe accident loads. Nuclear engineering and design, 145(3), 331-338.

[4] Attard, M. M., & Setunge, S. (1996). Stress-strain relationship of confined and unconfined concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 93(5).

[5] Bolisetti, C. (2015). Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Advanced Seismic Soil Structure Modeling

[6] Balmer, G. G. (1949, October). Shearing Strength of Concrete under High Triaxial Stress-Computation of Mohr’s Envelope as a Curve. Structural Research Laboratory Report, No. Sp-23, Denver, Colorado.

[7] Chen, W. F. (1982). Plasticity in reinforced concrete. McGraw Hill, 1982.

[8] Desayi, P., & Krishnan, S. (1964, March). Equation for the stress-strain curve of concrete. In ACI Journal Proceedings (Vol. 61, No. 3). ACI.

[9] General Electric Company. (1999). ASME Comtainment Vessel Design Specification.

[10] Gilbert, R. I., & Warner, R. F. (1978). Tension stiffening in reinforced concrete slabs. Journal of the structural division, 104(12), 1885-1900.

[11] Hillerborg, A., Modéer, M., & Petersson, P. E. (1976). Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and concrete research, 6(6), 773-781.

[12] Hu, H. T., & Liang, J. I. (2000). Ultimate analysis of BWR Mark III reinforced concrete containment subjected to internal pressure. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 195(1), 1-11.

[13] Hu, H. T., & Lin, Y. H. (2006). Ultimate analysis of PWR prestressed concrete containment subjected to internal pressure. International journal of pressure vessels and piping, 83(3), 161-167.

[14] Hu, H. T., & Schnobrich, W. C. (1988). Nonlinear analysis of plane stress state reinforced concrete under short term monotonic loading. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

[15] Hu, H. T., & Schnobrich, W. C. (1990). Nonlinear analysis of cracked reinforced concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 87(2).

[16] Kwak, H. G., & Filippou, F. C. (1990). Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures under monotonic loads (pp. 33-39). Berkeley, CA, USA: Department of Civil Engineering, University of California.

[17] Lin, F. & Li, Li.(2015). Safety analysis of nuclear containment vessels subjected to strong earthquakes and subsequent tsunami

[18] Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H. K., & Rusch, H. (1969, August). Behavior of concrete under biaxial stresses. In ACI Journal proceedings (Vol. 66, No. 8). ACI.

[19] Kotsovos, M. D., & Newman, J. B. (1977, September). Behavior of concrete under multiaxial stress. In ACI Journal Proceedings (Vol. 74, No. 9). ACI.

[20] Maekawa, K., & Okamura, H. (1983). The deformational behavior and constitutive equation of concrete using the elasto-plastic and fracture model.Journal of the Faculty of Engineering. University of Tokyo. Series B, 37(2), 253-328.

[21] Meyer, C., & Okamura, H. (1986). Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ASCE.

[22] Nakamuraa, N., & Akitab, S., (2010). Study of ultimate seismic response and fragility evaluation of nuclear power building using nonlinear three-dimensional finite element mode
[23] Nelissen, L. J. M. (1972). Biaxial testing of normal concrete. HERON, 18 (1), 1972.

[24] Nilson, A. H. (1972, July). Internal measurement of bond slip. In ACI Journal Proceedings (Vol. 69, No. 7). ACI.

[25] Nilson, A. H. (1982). State-of-the-art report on finite element analysis of reinforced concrete. ASCE.

[26] Richart, F. E., Brandtzaeg, A., & Brown, R. L. (1928). A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses. University of Illinois Bulletin; v. 26, no. 12.

[27] Rashid, Y. R. (1968). Ultimate strength analysis of prestressed concrete pressure vessels. Nuclear engineering and design, 7(4), 334-344.

[28] Rots, J. G., & Blaauwendraad, J. (1989). Crack models for concrete, discrete or smeared? Fixed, multi-directional or rotating?. HERON, 34 (1), 1989.

[29] SIMULIA Abaqus Analysis User's Manuals, Therory Manuals and Example Problems Manuals. (2014). (Version 6.14 ed.). France: Dassault Systèmes Corporation.

[30] Shokoohfar, A.(2016).Nonlinear analysis of pre-stressed concrete containment vessel(PCCV) using the damage plasticity model

[31] Tu˜n´on-Sanjur a, S. Orr a,1,Tinic b,Pe˜na.(2007). Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites

[32] Wang, C. K., & Salmon, C. G. (1979). Reinforced concrete design.

[33] Zienkiewicz, O. C., Owen, D. R. J., Phillips, D. V., & Nayak, G. C. (1972). Finite element methods in the analysis of reactor vessels. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 20(2), 507-541.

[34] 台灣核能電廠簡介,陳建中http://gensci.phys.nthu.edu.tw/NRsciences/files/irr/14.pdf