隨著台灣社會高齡化程度逐漸加深，高齡駕駛者將日益增加，所衍生的交通安全問題將更顯重要。台灣地區交通事故致死案件中，每四人有一人是高齡者，而台南市交通事故致死案件中每三到四人就有一人為高齡者，其中又以高齡駕駛者為最應優先探討之高危險族群。為了提升安全駕駛的品質，以降低高齡駕駛者交通事故的發生可能，先前研究多針對交通安全事故影響因子或駕駛行為進行探討，且將焦點放在高齡駕駛者。對此，本研究不同於以往，將以高齡駕駛者之「家庭成員」作為研究探討的切入點。主要原因為，高齡駕駛者是否停止駕駛應和家庭成員有密切關連性，且透過家庭成員對高齡駕駛者之正面影響力，將是未來政府持續推動高齡者交通事故防制的新契機。本研究透過台南市老人福利團體為媒介，發放日常行為問卷(Everyday Behavior Questionnaire)給台南市高齡駕駛者之家庭成員填寫，最後共回收407份有效問卷，並以相關統計驗證方法得到假設驗證成立之結果。
基於此等資料，本研究進一步建立「台南市高齡者日常行為問卷」和問卷總得分對照表，該問卷有兩個單元分別為潛在交通事故次數與潛在受傷程度，其中影響交通事故次數之因素依重要性由高至低排序為：認知、聽力、反應與視力因素；而影響受傷程度之因素由高至低重要性排序為：認知、反應與聽力因素。本研究建立之日常行為問卷，可引導家庭成員與家中高齡駕駛者一同正視高齡者安全駕駛的重要性，研究結果將提供給有關單位在發展交通政策時作參考。

According to the related statistical data, elderly population is expending in our country. Driving safety of the elderly has become an important issue to discuss. Elderly people proportion of Taiwan traffic accident death is about 26.3%; Tainan is about 33.6% higher than Taiwan average. Among elderly drivers should be given to explore, because they are the high-risk groups. To improve elderly people traffic safety environment, previous studies are aimed at factors of traffic fatality and driver behavior, usually focus on elderly drivers themselves. Therefore, unlike previous studies, this study’s questionnaire answered by elderly drivers’ family members. First, because when or whether elderly drivers stop driving is concerning not only to the drivers themselves but also to their family members. Second, government needs to enhance force in elderly traffic accident prevention. In this study, we will use an elderly drivers’ Everyday Behavior Questionnaire (EBQ), and answered by elderly drivers’ family members. The total effective sample size for this study is 407, we use many statistical methods, and our hypotheses are established.
Because our hypotheses are established, we create two chapters in the Tainan Everyday Behavior Questionnaire and scoring tables for the questionnaire. The main objectives of this study are established the Tainan Everyday Behavior Questionnaire, and confirm family members are important when promoting elderly traffic accident prevention.

1.中華民國統計資訊網，網站：http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/pxweb/Dialog/statfile9.asp。
2.台南市政府都市發展局(民100)，台南市區域計畫研究規劃案，台南市政府都市發展局。
3.行政院經濟建設委員會(民100)，2011年世界人口估計要覽表，行政院經濟建設委員會。
4.行政院經濟建設委員會(民101)，2012年至2060年臺灣人口推計，行政院經濟建設委員會。
5.交通部統計處(民98)，97年道路交通事故高齡者特性分析，交通部統計處。
6.交通部運輸研究所(民98)，高齡駕駛人自我健康評估檢表，網站：http://168.motc.gov.tw/GIPSite/wSite/ct?xItem=21421&ctNode=1369&mp=1。
7.吳宗修(民85)，「美國駕駛行為教育」，世界先進國家交通安全教育概況專論，中華民國交通安全教育學會，頁176-182。
8.吳萬益、林清河(民90)，企業研究方法，台北：華泰書局。
9.呂寶靜(民88)，「家庭成員在正式社會服務體系角色之初探：從個案管理的觀點分析老人成年子女的角色」，國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，第九卷第二期，頁347-363。
10.沈添財等(民92)，智慧型運輸系統技術於高齡化社會之應用研究，交通部運輸研究所與鼎漢國際工程顧問股份有限公司合作辦理。
11.林豐福等(民93)，我國職業駕駛執照考領及持用更效條件之檢討，交通部運輸研究所。
12.林豐福等(民93)，道路交通事故當事人特性分析之研究，交通部運輸研究所。
13.夏征農(民81)，辭海，台北市：東華出版社。
14.徐業良(民99)，「高齡者的交通問題」，99年度全國道路交通安全研討會論文集，頁276-294。
15.張開國等(民92)，改進亞太地區道路交通安全對策之調查研究，交通部運輸研究所。
16.張銘峰(民100)，高齡者交通安全政策之研究-從交通行為和法規認知探討，中央警察大學交通管理研究所。
17.許銓倫(民90)，高齡者交通特性與交通設施之檢討，交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
18.陳一昌、葉祖宏(民99)，「高齡者事故防治對策研析」，高齡者事故防制99年度全國道路交通安全研討會論文集，頁174-193。
19.陳一昌等(民99)，小型車職業駕駛人執業年齡延長至68歲之評估研究，交通部運輸研究所。
20.陳順宇(民94)，多變量分析，四版，台北：華泰書局。
21.傅家雄(民80)，老年與老年調適，台北：正中出版社。
22.曾平毅等(民91)，駕駛執照換(補)發與審驗規定現況探討及制度改善之研究，交通部運輸研究所。
23.黃惠璣等(民100)，老人服務與照護，台北：威仕曼文化出版社。
24.黃愛黎(民94)，引進駕駛行為自我評估手冊評估本國高齡者駕駛安全，國立成功大學工業與資訊管理系研究所碩士論文。
25.楊世瑩(民95)，SPSS統計分析實務，台北：旗標出版股份有限公司。
26.董基良等(民96)，駕駛人生理功能、心理因素、行為特質與交通安全之關聯性研究（1/3），交通部運輸研究所。
27.劉霈等(民101)，高齡者道路交通事故特性與道安防制措施研究計畫，交通部運輸研究所。
28.蔡琰、臧國仁(民100)，老人傳播：理論、研究與教學實例，台北：五南出版社。
29.蔡維唐(民97)，影響小客車駕駛人駕駛技能與行為之因素研究，交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
30.藍武王、楊幼文(民81)，「老人運輸方式之規劃」，中華道路，第三十一卷第二期，頁19-27。 
31.顏進儒等(民96)，道路交通安全講習委外辦理之研究，交通部運輸研究所。
32.魏健宏、徐文遠(民86)，「老人運輸特性之分析」，中華道路，第三十六卷第二期，頁3-14。
33.魏健宏、徐文遠(民86)，「老人運輸課題研擬之研究」，運輸計劃季刊，第二十六卷第一期，頁119-142。
34.魏惠娟等(民100)，老人交通安全教育教材，台北：交通部道路交通安全督導委員會。
35.AfWåhlberg, A. E. (2003), “Some Methodological Deficiencies in Studies on Traffic Accident Predictors,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, pp. 473-486.
36.Anderson, R. E. and Carter, I. (1984), Human Behavior in the Social Environment: A Social Systems Approach, New York: Aldine.
37.Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
38.Cantor, M. and Little, V. (1985), Aging and Social Care. In: R.H. Binstock and E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 745-781), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
39.Clarke, D. D. et al. (2010), “Older Drivers’ Road Traffic Crashes in the UK,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, pp. 1018-1024.
40.Creative Research Systems (1982) Sample Size Calculator, Capture date: 2012.10.1, Website: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm.
41.DeWinter, J. C. F. and Dodou, D. (2010), “The Driver Behavior Questionnaire as a Predictor of Accidents: A Meta-analysis,” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 41, pp. 463-470.
42.Eby, D. W. et al. (2000), Driving Decisions Workbook (Report No. UMTRI-2000-14), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
43.Eby, D.W. et al. (2003), “Improving Older Driver Knowledge and Self-awareness through Self-assessment: The Driving Decisions Workbook,” Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 34, pp. 371-381.
44.Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. and Wahlstörm, B. (1998), “Why Do Older Drivers Give Up Driving,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 30, pp. 305-312.
45.Hatakka, M. et al. (2002), “From Control of the Vehicle to Personal Self-control; Broadening the Perspectives to Driver Education,” Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 5, pp. 201-215.
46.Horswill, M. S. et al. (2013), “How Realistic Are Older Drivers’ Ratings of Their Driving Ability,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, pp. 130-137.
47.James, A. B. (2009), Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living. In: Crepeau, E. B., Cohn, E. S., and Schell, B. A. B. (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s Occupational Therapy (11th ed). Philadephia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
48.Lawton, M. P. (1971), “The Functional Assessment of Elderly People,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 465-481.
49.Mahoney, F. I. and Barthel, D. (1965), “Functional Evaluation: the Barthel index,” Maryland State Medical Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 61-65.
50.McGwin, G. et al. (1999), “Characteristics of Traffic Crashes among Young, Middle-aged, and Older Drivers,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, pp. 181-198.
51.McKnight, A. J. and McKnight, A. S. (1999), “Multivariate Analysis of Age-related Driver Ability and Performance Deficits,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, pp. 445-454.
52.Nakagawa, Y. et al. (2013), “Elderly Drivers’ Everyday Behavior as a Predictor of Crash Involvement- Questionnaire Responses by Drivers’ Family Members,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, pp. 397-404.
53.Oxley, J. et al. (1997), “Differences in Traffic Judgments between Young and Old Adult Pedestrians,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 29, pp. 839-847.
54.Parker, D. et al. (1995), “Behavioral Characteristics and Involvement in Different Types of Traffic Accident,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 27, pp. 571-581.
55.Parker, D. et al. (2000), “Elderly Drivers and Their Accidents: The Aging Driver Questionnaire,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 32, pp. 751-759.
56.Patomella, A. (2008), Driving Ability Among People with Stroke: Developing Assessments and Exploring the Lived Experience, ISBN 978-91-7409-149-6, Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet.
57.Peräaho, M. et al. (2003), Driver Competence in a Hierarchical Perspective: Implications for Driver Education. Traffic Research, University of Turku.
58.Reason, J. (1990), Human Error, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.Roscoe, J. T. (1975), Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavior Sciences, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
60.Ross et al. (2012), “Self-rated Driving and Driving Safety in Older Adults,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 48, pp. 523-527.
61.Sullivan, K. A. et al. (2011), “Older Adults’ Safety Perceptions of Driving Situations: Towards a New Driving Self-regulation Scale,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, pp. 1003-1009.
62.Sussman, M. B. (1985), The Family Life of Older People. In: R. H. Binstock and E. Shanas (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences (2nd ed., pp. 415-449), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
63.Tronsmoen, T. (2008), “Associations between Self-assessment of Driving Ability, Driver Training and Crash Involvement among Young Drivers,” Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 11, pp. 334-346.
64.U.S. Department of Transportation (1997), Improving Transportation for a Maturing Society, DOT-P10-97-01.
65.West, R. et al. (1993), “Mild Social Deviance, Type-A Behavior Pattern and Decision Making Style as Predictors of Self-reported Driving Style and Traffic Accident Risk,” British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 207-219.