| 研究生: |
張中瑋 Chang, Chung-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業購併型態對會計師出具審計意見之影響 The Effect of Merger Patterns on Audit Opinion Types |
| 指導教授: |
黃華瑋
Huang, Hwa-Wei |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 48 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 購併型態 、投入輸出法 、審計意見 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | merger patterns, IO-based method, audit opinion |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:145 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文以台灣上市公司為研究標的,針對研究期間為 1997 年至 2012 年間公司曾發生過購併事件者,探討對會計師簽發審計意見類型之影響,藉以了解會計師簽證保守性。實證結果發現(1)公司於年度購併與公司財務報表遭會計師簽發非無保留之審計意見呈現顯著之正向相關,顯示因購併使審計風險與訴訟風險增加而導致會計師以更保守之態度執行查核,表示公司購併會影響會計師簽證保守性。(2)公司購併型態為純水平式與年度財務報表遭會計師簽發非無保留之審計意見呈現顯著之負向相關;(3)公司購併型態為純垂直式與年度財務報表遭會計師簽發非無保留之審計意見呈現顯著之正向相關,表示企業購併對審計決策的影響程度,會隨著購併型態之所屬產業差異程度而有所影響,而購併型態之產業垂直相關程度對審計意見決策的影響上具有加乘效果。
換言之,購併受到跨越產業別之關係而會計師因對各產業瞭解程度有別而使審計決策愈趨於穩健保守,當公司為純水平式購併,會計師因為對相同產業瞭解程度愈高因而愈不會簽發非無保留意見查核報告;而當公司為純垂直式購併,會計師將以更保守之態度執行查核而愈不會對其簽發無保留意見。綜合以上結論,企業購併使審計風險提高,將導致會計師以更保守之態度執行查核,並隨著購併型態而有不同影響程度。
Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have been an active economic activity since the 1980s. They have played an important role in economic growth and increase market power. Such activities arouse stakeholders’ concerns including the disclosure of financial information and the type of audit report issued by auditors. This paper aims to investigate Taiwan domestic individual firms’ audit reports after their M&A activities and comparing them with non-participants. We evaluate whether M&A activities reduce the likelihood of firms receiving auditor unqualified opinions, since business failure and audit failure followed by negative news are likely to attract regulators’ scrutiny and investor class-action lawsuits. Prior studies indicate that legal liability and litigation risk affect auditors’ decisions. Therefore, we predict that, to reduce the risk of litigation, auditors will less likely to issue unqualified opinions after M&A activities involving their clients.
We evaluate this prediction empirically and find that the probability of issuing without unqualified opinion is positively associated with the occurrence of M&As. Further analysis indicates that this positive relation is also significant for firms with pure vertical merger patterns but negatively associated with firms with pure horizontal merger patterns. Our findings show that M&A participants are less likely to receive unqualified opinion, indicating that audit risk and litigation risk affect auditor conservatism.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R.著,朱文儀、陳建男、黃豪臣譯,策略管理,第七版,華泰文化出版,臺北,2007。
吳宗賢,購併型態對股票報酬與經營績效之影響,成功大學會計研究所碩士論文,2008。
李建然、陳政芳與李啟華,董監事持股集中度與會計師獨立性—對會計師出具繼續經營疑慮查核意見之影響,當代會計,第4卷,第2期,頁191-210,2003。
官月緞與梁盛泰,會計師更換與繼續經營疑慮審計意見,中華管理評論國際學報,第14卷,第1期,頁1-23,2011。
林孝倫與林嬋娟,臺灣審計研究之回顧與前瞻,會計審計論叢,第3卷,第1期,頁1-47,2013。
邱垂昌,台灣企業財務危機之預警-保留意見之警訊,當代會計,第7卷,第2期,頁195-236,2006。
洪玉舜與顏信輝,會計師懲戒程度對簽證保守性之影響,管理學報,第28卷,第4期,頁325-343,2011。
產業關聯延長表編製方法改進之研究,行政院主計處,頁1-23,2008。
許瑛玿,購併型態對長期股票報酬的影響,成功大學會計研究所碩士論文,2013。
傅鍾仁、張福星與陳慶隆,審計失敗對會計師保守主義的影響:Enron案是否存在產業蔓延效果,會計評論,第40期,頁37-61,2005。
黃劭彥、盧正宗、林琦珍與林麗琦,會計師簽發繼續經營疑慮審計意見對財務報表公告時間落差之影響,當代會計,第11卷,第1期,頁79-114,2010。
劉嘉雯、王泰昌與賴信蒼,訴訟風險與大型會計師事務所之客戶財務風險可接受水準,臺大管理論叢,第20卷,第1期,頁1-40,2009。
Beatty, C. A. Wanted: The prefect tiny acquisition. Business Quarterly, 58(4), 51-59, 1994.
Beneish, M. D., & Press, E. Costs of technical violation of accounting-based debt covenants. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 233-257, 1993.
Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following ‘new’ going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1), 95-117, 2003.
Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453-467, 2000.
Carcello, J. V., & Palmrose, Z-V. Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(3), 1-30, 1994.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Huss, H. F. Going–concern opinions: The effects of partner compensation plans and client size. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19, 67-77, 2000.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Huss, H. F. Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14(2), 133-143, 1995.
Carey, P., & Simnett, S. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81(3), 653-676, 2006.
Davies, B., & Whittred, G. P. The association between selected corporate: Attributes and timeliness in corporate: Reporting: Further analysis. Abacus, 16 (1), 48-60, 1980.
DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247-1274, 2002.
Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R. W., & Leftwich, R. W. Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables. The Accounting Review, 62(3), 431-454, 1987.
Fan, J. P. H., and Goyal, V. K. On the patterns and wealth effects of vertical mergers. The Journal of Business, 79(2), 877-902, 2006.
Fan, J. P. H., and Lang, L. H. P. The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. The Journal of Business, 73(4), 629-660, 2000.
Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. Which takeovers are profitable: Strategic or financial? Sloan Management Review, 38(4), 45-57, 1997.
Hermalin, B. E. Trends in corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 60(5), 2351–2384, 2005.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, G. R. Strategic Management: An Integrated Approach, 4th ed. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company, 1998.
Johnstone, K. M. Client acceptance decisions: Simultaneous effects of client business risk, audit risk, auditor business risk, and risk adaptation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(1), 1-25, 2000.
Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. Audit firm portfolio management decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 659-690, 2004.
Johnstone, K. M., & Bedard, J. C. Risk management in client acceptance decisions. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 1003–1025, 2003.
Klein, A. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 374-400, 2002.
Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review, 72(4), 539-560, 1997.
Lys, T., & Watts, R. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 65-102, 1994.
Maquieira, Carlos P., Megginson, William L., & Nail, Lance. Wealth creation versus wealth redistributions in pure stock-for-stock mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 3-33, 1998.
Matsusaka, J. G. Takeover motives during the conglomerate merger wave. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(3), 357-379, 1993.
McGuckin, R. H., Nguyen, S.V., & Andrews, S. H. The relationships among acquiring and acquired firms’ product lines. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 477-502, 1991.
McKeown, J. C., Mutchler, J. F., & Hopwood, W. Towards an explanation of auditor failure to modify the audit opinions of bankrupt companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10(Supplement), 1-13, 1991.
Mutchler, J. F. A multivariate analysis of the auditor’s going-concern opinion decision. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2), 668-682, 1985.
Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. M. The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295-310, 1997.
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Irwin: Homewood, IL, 1990.
Park, C. The effects of prior performance on the choice between related and unrelated acquisitions: Implications for the performance consequences of diversification strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1003-1019, 2002.
Perry, M. K. Vertical integration: Determinants and effects, ed. R. Schmalensee, and R.D. Willig, vol. 1. Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, 1989.
Perry, M. K., & Porter, R. H. Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger. American Economic Review, 75(1), 219-227, 1985.
Porter, M. E. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analysis industries and competitors. New York, NY: Free Press, 1980.
Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. Audit reports for companies in financial distress: Before and after SAS no. 59. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 14(1), 50-63, 1995.
Reynolds, J. K., & Francis, J. R. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375-400, 2000.
St, Pierre, K., & Anderson, J. An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 242-263, 1984.
Stice, J. D. Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 516-533, 1991.
Waterson, M. Economic theory of the industry. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Weiss, R. E., & Kalbers, L. P. Causes and consequences of auditor changes: A comparison of accelerated and non-accelerated filers. SSRN Working Paper, 2008.
Yermack, D. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211, 1996.
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–344, 1989.
Zmijewski, M. E. Methodological issue related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(Supplement), 59-82, 1984.
校內:2018-07-10公開