成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	張靖楓 Chang, Ching-Feng
論文名稱：	The Impacts of Top Management Team Characteristics and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Management Competence and Performance The Impacts of Top Management Team Characteristics and Entrepreneurial Orientation on Management Competence and Performance
指導教授：	吳萬益 Wu, Wann-yi
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration
論文出版年：	2005
畢業學年度：	93
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	96
外文關鍵詞：	Absorptive Capacity, Entrepreneurial Orientation, Top Management Team, Core Competence, Management Performance
相關次數：	點閱：80 下載：2
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

　　自從Hambrick 與 Mason在1984年提出「高層理論」之後，高階經營團隊議題就一直被學術界廣為探討。高階經營團隊是組織的靈魂，其所制定的決策均主導組織未來的方向。再者，高階經營團隊的特性，亦影響組織的學習能力、對於創業活動的態度、以及對於核心能力的重視，進而創造良好的績效。因此，本研究欲建立一整合性的模式，探討高階經營團隊之特性、核心能力、創業導向、吸收能力、與經營績效之關係。

　　透過一系列之專家訪談及郵寄問卷調查，本研究之實證結果發現，高階經營團隊專業背景與教育背景對於吸收能力，創業導向對於公司取得核心能力有顯著之影響。吸收能力與創業導向是提升公司核心能力之重要因素。同時，當組織愈呈現創業導向，且愈具有吸收能力與核心能力時，愈能夠創造良好的經營績效。

　Ever since Hambrick and Mason proposed upper echelon theory in 1984, top management team (TMT) issues have been received tremendous attentions from academician and practitioners. Especially in the dynamic, fast-moving, and global world, the importance of TMT has become inevitably important nowadays. TMT is the soul of organization in that they make strategic decisions which effect firm’s future. Furthermore, splendid performance stems from the firm’s learning ability, the attitude toward entrepreneurial activities, and the emphasis of core competence, all of these issues which are affected by TMT characteristics. Hence, this study at-tempts to integrate relevant literature to develop a comprehensive research model, as well as to investigate the interrelationships among TMT characteristics, absorptive capacity, core competence, entrepreneurial orientation, managerial performance.

　Through a series of questionnaire survey, the results of this study indicate that TMT functional background diversity and educational background level have sig-nificant influences on a firm’s absorptive capacity, entrepreneurial orientation and core competence have significant impacts on its core competence. Furthermore, a firm’s absorptive capacity and entrepreneurial orientation. Finally, the results also suggested that firms characterized by higher entrepreneurial orientation, absorptive capacity and core competence are more likely to gain excellent managerial per-formance

ABSTRACT ........................................................................I
TABLE OF CONTENTS..............................................................III
LIST OF TABLES.................................................................VII
LIST OF FIGURES...............................................................VIII
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ........................................................1
1.1 Research Background and Motivations .........................................1
1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions .......................................3
1.3 Research Procedure...........................................................4
1.4 The Structure of this Study .................................................5
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW....................................................7
2.1 Definition of Relevant Research Variables ...................................7
2.1.1 Top Management Team Characteristics........................................7
2.1.2 Entrepreneurial Orientation ..............................................14
2.1.3 Absorptive Capacity.......................................................17
2.1.4 Core Competence...........................................................18
2.1.5 Management Performance ...................................................19
2.2 Interrelationship among Research Constructs ................................21
2.2.1 Interrelationships between Top Management Team Demography,
Absorptive Capacity, Core Competence, and Entrepreneurial
Orientation ....................................................................21
2.2.2 Interrelationships between Top Management Team Culture,
Absorptive Capacity, Core Competence, and Entrepreneurial
Orientation ....................................................................23
2.2.3 Interrelationships between Absorptive Capacity, Entrepreneurial
Orientation and Core Competence.................................................24
2.2.4 Interrelationships between Absorptive Capacity, Core Competence,
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Management Performance .........................25
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY...................................28
3.1 The Conceptual Model........................................................28
3.2 Construct Measurement ......................................................29
3.2.1 Top Management Team Characteristics.......................................29
3.2.2 Absorptive Capacity.......................................................31
3.2.3 Entrepreneurial Orientation ..............................................32
3.2.4 Core Competence...........................................................33
Managemen Performance...........................................................34
3.2.6 The Information of Firms and Respondents .................................34
3.3 Hypotheses to Be Tested ....................................................35
3.4 Questionnaire Design........................................................36
3.5 Sampling Plan ..............................................................36
3.6 Data Analysis Procedures ...................................................36
3.6.1 Descriptive Statistic Analysis ...........................................37
3.6.2 Purification and Reliability of the Measurement Variables ................37
3.6.3 Interrelationships between Research Variables.............................38
CHAPTER FOUR DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS AND RELIABILITY TESTS .....40
4.1 Introduction................................................................40
4.2 Descriptive Analysis .......................................................40
4.2.1 Response Rate.............................................................40
4.2.2 Characteristics of Respondents ...........................................41
4.2.3 Measurement Results for Relevant Research Variables.......................42
4.3 Reliability Tests...........................................................45
4.3.1 Absorptive Capacity.......................................................45
4.3.2 Entrepreneurial Orientation ..............................................48
4.3.3 Core Competences .........................................................50
4.3.4 Management Performance ...................................................54
CHAPTER FIVE RESEARCH RESULTS AND ANALYSIS.............................55
5.1 Comparisons of Research Constructs under Different Level of TMT
Characteristics and Different Types of TMT Organizational Culture...............55
5.1.1 Different Level of Top Management Team Member’s Tenure and
Age in the Research Constructs .................................................55
5.1.2 Different Types of Top Management Team Culture in the Research
Constructs .....................................................................57
5.2 Structural Equation Model (SEM) ............................................59
5.3 Regression Analysis of for Factors Influencing Research Constructs .........63
5.3.1 The Relationships between TMT Functional Background Diversity,
Educational background Level and Entrepreneurial Orientation....................64
5.3.2 The Relationships between TMT Functional Background Diversity,
Educational background Level, Entrepreneurial Orientation and
Absorptive Capacity.............................................................65
5.3.3 The Relationships between TMT Functional Background Diversity,
Educational background Level, Absorptive Capacity, Entrepreneurial
Orientation and Core Competence.................................................67
5.3.4 Regression Analysis for Factors Influencing Management
Performance ....................................................................70
CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS ........................................73
6.1 Research Conclusions .......................................................73
6.2 Research Suggestion for Future Research ....................................79
REFERENCES......................................................................81
APPENDIX SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE ..................................................89

                                    

Anonymous, (2001). Creating innovation that crosses organizational boundaries. Strate-gic Direction, 18-20.
Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: Theory , Method, and Prac-tice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Bantel K.A. & Jackson S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the demography of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Jour-nal Summer Special Issue, 10,107-124
Boyd. B.K. & Fulk J. (1996). Exective scanning and perceived uncertainty: a multidi-mensional model. Journal of management, 22, 1-21.
Brown, John S. & Paul Duguid (1991). Organizational learning and communi-ties-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Or-ganization Science, 2, 40-57.
Carpenter, Mason A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the rela-tionship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275-284.
Chanvarasuth, Pisit & Ravichandran, T. (2003). Absorptive capacity and strategic Alli-ances in the supply chain context. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi-neering, 340-344.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of stra-tegic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22
Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1989). Innovation and learning : two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 99, 569-596.
Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A.(1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35,128-152.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989), Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
Daun Anderson (2003). The integration of gender and political behavior into Hambrick and Mason’s upper echelons model of organizations, Journal of American Acad-emy of Business, 3, 29-36.
Drejer.A. (2000). Organisational learning and competence development. The Learning Organization, 7(4), 206-220.
Eisenhardt, K.M., Kahwajy, J.L., & Bourgeois, L.J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice: how top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2), 42-32.
Goll, Irene, Sambhrya, Rakesh, B. & Tucci, Louis A. (2001). Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. Management Interna-tional Review, 41(2), 109-128.
Hambrick D.C. & D’Aveni R.A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38, 1445-1466.
Hambrick D.C. & Finkelstein S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar-views on organizations In Research in organizational Behavior. Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds.). Greenwich, CT.
Hambrick D.C. & Mason P.A.(1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Hitt, M.A. & Tyler, B.B. (1991). Strategic decision models: integrating different perspec-tives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327-351.
Ingelgard, Anders, Roth, Fonas, Shani, A.B. (Rami) & Styhre, Alexander (2002) Dy-namic learning capability and actionalbe knowledge creation: clinical R&D in a pharmaceutical company. The Learning Organization, 9, 65-77
Kamoe, P. (1995). Competence as process and the social embeddedness of competence building. Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings.
Kilduff, Martin, Angelmar, Reinhard & Mehra, Ajay (2000), Top management-team di-versity and firm performance: examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science,11(1), 21-34.
Kisfalvi, Veronika & Pitcher, Partrcia (2003), Doing what feels right: the influence of CEO character and emotions on top management team dynamics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(1), 42-66.
Lane, Peter J.& Lubatkin, Michael (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interor-ganizational Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
Long, C. & Vickers-Koch. M. (1995) Using core capabilities to create competitive ad-vantage. Organizational Dynamics, summer, 7-22.
Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, Gregory G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, Gregory G. (2000). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451.
Markides, Constantinos C. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corpo-rate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 149-165
Miller, D. & Friesen, P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strate-gic Management Journal, 4, 221-235
Miller, Danny, Manfred F. R. de Vries & JeanMarie Toulouse (1981). Organizational in-novation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
Mowery, D.C. & Oxley, J.E.(2000). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 67-93.
Murry A.I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance”, Strate-gic Management Journal Summer Special Issue, 10, 125-141
Nevis, E.C. KiBella, A.J. & Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learn-ing Systems. Sloan Management Review.
O’Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
Pegels, Carl. C, Song, Yong I. & Yang, Balk (2003). Management heterogeneity, com-petitive interaction groups, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 911-923.
Pfeffer (1983). Organizational demography. In Research in organizational behavior, Staw B, Cummings LL (eds). Geenwich, CT, 299-357.
Pitcher, P, Chreim, S. & Kisflvi,V. (2000). CEO succession research. Management Jour-nal, 21(6), 625-648.
Powell, Walter W. & Peter Brantley (1992). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks? In N Nohria and R. Eccles (eds), Networks and Or-ganizations, 366-394, Harvard Business School Press.
Powell, Walter W., Koput, Kenneth W. & Smith-Doerr, Laurel (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnol-ogy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
Prahalad, C. & Hamel, G.. (1990). The core competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the leaning organization, Random House, London.
Spender, J.C.(1996). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? unpacking the con-cept and its strategic implications. Organizational Learning and Competitive Ad-vantage. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. (1994). What executives notice: accurate perceptions in top man-agement teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360-1378.
Teece, K.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1990). University of California, Berkeley, CA
Watkins, K.E. & Marsick, V.J., 1993, Sculpting the Learning Organisation, Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Wiersema M.F & Batel K.A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121.
Wright, Patrick M., McMahan, Gary C., McCormick, Baline & Sherman, Scott W., (1998). Strategy, core competence and HR involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance. Human Resource Management, 37, 17-29.
Yeung, A.K., Ulrichm, K. O., Nason, S.W. & Von Glinow, M.A. (1999). Organisational learning capability: generating and generalising ideas with iImpact, university Press, Oxford.
Zagra, Shaker A., & George Gerard (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptu-alization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
Alderson, Siobhan (1993). Reframing management competence: focusing on the top management team. Personnel Review, 22(6), 53-62.
Anonymous, (2001). Creating innovation that crosses organizational boundaries. Strate-gic Direction, 18-20.
Argyris, C. & Schon, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: Theory , Method, and Prac-tice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Bantel K.A. & Jackson S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the demography of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Jour-nal Summer Special Issue, 10,107-124
Boyd. B.K. & Fulk J. (1996). Exective scanning and perceived uncertainty: a multidi-mensional model. Journal of management, 22, 1-21.
Brown, John S. & Paul Duguid (1991). Organizational learning and communi-ties-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Or-ganization Science, 2, 40-57.
Cameron, K. S. & Quinn, Robert. E. (1985). Culture congruence strength and type rela-tionship to effective. Beyond Rational Management. 142-143.
Carpenter, Mason A. & Sanders, WM. Gerard (2002), Top management team compensa-tion: the missing link between CEO pay and firm performance. Strategic Man-agement Journal, 23, 367-375.
Carpenter, Mason A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the rela-tionship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275-284.
Chanvarasuth, Pisit & Ravichandran, T. (2003). Absorptive capacity and strategic Alli-ances in the supply chain context. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi-neering, 340-344.
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of stra-tegic choice. Sociology, 6, 1-22
Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A. (1989). Innovation and learning : two faces of R&D. Economic Journal. 99, 569-596.
Cohen, W.M. & Levinthal, D.A.(1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35,128-152.
Covin, J. G., & Covin, J. (1990). Competitive aggressiveness, environmental context, and small firm performance. Entrepreneurship: theory and practice, 14(4), 395-50.
Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989), Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
Daft, Richard L. (2004) Organization theory and design (8th ed.). New York: South-Western
Daun Anderson (2003). The integration of gender and political behavior into Hambrick and Mason’s upper echelons model of organizations, Journal of American Acad-emy of Business, 3, 29-36.
Deal, T. E. & Kennedy A. A.(1982). Corporate culture; the rite and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
Deshpande R. & Farley J. U. (1999). Executive insights: corporate culture and market orientation: comparing Indian and Japanese firms. Journal of International Mar-keting. 7(4), 111-127.
Drejer.A. (2000). Organisational learning and competence development. The Learning Organization, 7(4), 206-220.
Eisenhardt, K.M., Kahwajy, J.L., & Bourgeois, L.J. (1997). Conflict and strategic choice: how top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2), 42-32.
Gilley, Mathew K., Walters, Bruce A. & Olson, Bradley J. (2002). Top management team risk taking propensities and firm performance: direct and moderating effects. Journal of Business Strategies, 19(2), 95-114.
Ginsberg. A. (1985). Measuring changes in entrepreneurial orientation following industry deregulation: the development of a diagnostics instrument. Proceedings of the in-ternational Council of Small Business, 50-57.
Goll, Irene, Sambhrya, Rakesh, B. & Tucci, Louis A. (2001). Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. Management Interna-tional Review, 41(2), 109-128.
Hage, J. (1980), Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Hambrick D.C. & D’Aveni R.A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38, 1445-1466.
Hambrick D.C. & Finkelstein S. (1987). Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar-views on organizations In Research in organizational Behavior. Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds.), London: Greenwich, CT.
Hambrick D.C. & Mason P.A.(1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
Hill, Charles W.L. & Careth R. Jones (2004). Strategic management theory: an integrated approach.(6th ed), Houghton Mifflin.
Hitt, M.A. & Tyler, B.B. (1991). Strategic decision models: integrating different perspec-tives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327-351.
Hodgett, Richard M. & Luthans Fred (1994). Riding the waves of culture: understanding diversity in global business, Burr Ridge.
Hodgett, Richard M. & Luthans Fred (2002). International management culture, strategy and behavior. Ohio: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Ingelgard, Anders, Roth, Fonas, Shani, A.B. (Rami) & Styhre, Alexander (2002) Dy-namic learning capability and actionalbe knowledge creation: clinical R&D in a pharmaceutical company. The Learning Organization, 9, 65-77
Kamoe, P. (1995). Competence as process and the social embeddedness of competence building. Academy of Management Journal Best Papers Proceedings.
Kilduff, Martin, Angelmar, Reinhard & Mehra, Ajay (2000), Top management-team di-versity and firm performance: examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science,11(1), 21-34.
Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (eds.), Handbook of organizational design: Vol.1. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kisfalvi, Veronika & Pitcher, Partrcia (2003), Doing what feels right: the influence of CEO character and emotions on top management team dynamics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(1), 42-66.
Kotter J. P. & Heskett J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. Kotter Associates, Inc.
Lane, Peter J.& Lubatkin, Michael (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interor-ganizational Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 461-477.
Long, C. & Vickers-Koch. M. (1995) Using core capabilities to create competitive ad-vantage. Organizational Dynamics, summer, 7-22.
Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, Gregory G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, Gregory G. (2000). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429-451.
MacMillan, I. C. (1982). Seizing competitive imitative. Journal of Business Strategy, 2, 43-57.
Markides, Constantinos C. (1994). Related diversification, core competences and corpo-rate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 149-165
Miller, D. & Friesen, P. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strate-gic Management Journal, 4, 221-235
Miller, Danny, Manfred F. R. de Vries & JeanMarie Toulouse (1981). Organizational in-novation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689-713.
Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247-259.
Mowery, D.C. & Oxley, J.E. (1999) Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 67-93.
Murry A.I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance”, Strate-gic Management Journal Summer Special Issue, 10, 125-141
Nevis, E.C. KiBella, A.J. & Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learn-ing Systems. Sloan Management Review.
Norburn, D. & Birely, S. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 1(9), 225-237.
O’Reilly C, Snyder R & Boothe J. (1993). Effects of executive team demography on or-ganizational change. In Organizational Change and Redesign. Huber G Glick W (eds), New York: Oxford university Press.
O’Reilly, C.A., Caldwell, D.F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21-37.
Pegels, Carl. C, Song, Yong I. & Yang, Balk (2003). Management heterogeneity, com-petitive interaction groups, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 911-923.
Pettigrew, Andrew M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly, 24, 270-581.
Pfeffer (1983). Organizational demography. In Research in organizational behavior, Staw B, Cummings LL (eds). Geenwich, CT, 299-357.
Pitcher, P, Chreim, S. & Kisflvi,V. (2000). CEO succession research. Management Jour-nal, 21(6), 625-648.
Powell, Walter W. & Peter Brantley (1992). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks? In N Nohria and R. Eccles (ed), Networks and Or-ganizations, 366-394, Harvard Business School Press.
Powell, Walter W., Koput, Kenneth W. & Smith-Doerr, Laurel (1996). Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnol-ogy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
Prahalad, C. & Hamel, G.. (1990). The core competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Robbins, Stephen P. (1990). Organization theory: structure, design and applications. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Rynes, Sara, Bartunek, Jean & Daft, Richard L, (2001). Across the great divide: knowl-edge creation and transfer between paractioners and academics. Academy of Management Journal. 44(2), 340-356.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, Harper & Brothers.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the leaning organization, Random House, London.
Sonnefeld, J. A. (1989). Managing career systems channeling: the flow of executive ca-reers. Homewood, IL: Irwin. 1989.
Spender, J.C.(1996). Competitive advantage from tacit knowledge? unpacking the con-cept and its strategic implications. Organizational Learning and Competitive Ad-vantage. California: Sage, Newbury Park.
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. (1994). What executives notice,: accurate perceptions in top man-agement teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360-1378.
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. (1994). What executives notice: accurate perceptions in top man-agement teams. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1360-1378.
Teece, D.J, Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic manage-ment. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
Trompenaars, Fons & Woolliams, Peter (2003). A new framework for managing change across cultures. 3(4), 361-375.
Wallach E. J. (1983). Individuals and organizations: the culture match. Training and De-velopment Journal, 29-36.
Watkins, K.E. & Marsick, V.J., 1993, Sculpting the Learning Organisation, Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
Wiersema M.F & Batel K.A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121.
Wright, Patrick M., McMahan, Gary C., McCormick, Baline & Sherman, Scott W., (1998). Strategy, core competence and HR involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance. Human Resource Management, 37, 17-29.
Yeung, A.K., Ulrichm, K. O., Nason, S.W. & Von Glinow, M.A. (1999). Organisational learning capability: generating and generalising ideas with iImpact, university Press, Oxford.
Zagra, Shaker A., & George Gerard (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptu-alization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.

校內：2007-07-07公開
校外：2008-07-07公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文