隨著都市化發展與集合住宅型態的普及化，公寓大廈之停車空間已成為住宅生活中不可或缺的重要設施。惟我國早期停車空間之產權與登記制度發展歷程複雜，受到法制演變、行政函釋以及建築設計形式差異等因素影響，導致停車空間在所有權、使用權及登記方式上產生多重類型，進而衍生諸多實務爭議，例如停車位產權與使用權混淆、登記方式不一致、分管契約效力不明以及建商重複出售等問題，對不動產交易安全及公寓大廈管理秩序造成影響。
本研究以「產權明確化」之觀點，探討公寓大廈停車空間登記制度之現況與問題，並評估改善其營運與管理之可行性。研究首先透過文獻分析法，整理我國公寓大廈停車空間相關法律制度、土地登記制度及區分所有權之理論基礎，並比較各國區分所有建築物之登記制度，以作為制度檢討之基礎。其次，透過案例分析法，蒐集公平交易委員會裁罰案例及法院判決，分析實務上停車位爭議之主要類型與法律爭點。最後，藉由問卷調查及專家訪談，蒐集地政機關及建管機關實務人員之意見，並運用層級分析法（Analytic Hierarchy Process， AHP）進行專家問卷分析，以評估各項制度改善對策之優先順序與可行性。
研究結果顯示，現行停車空間登記制度在資訊透明度與權利明確性方面仍有不足，尤其共用部分停車位僅以持分方式登記而未標示具體位置與編號，現地停車位亦無編號，易造成交易資訊不對稱與權利認知混淆。為提升停車空間權利明確性及交易安全，本研究建議應強化停車空間之編號登記制度，建立更清楚之產權標示方式，並透過法制修正及行政制度完善，以提升停車空間管理效率與不動產市場之交易透明度。本研究期望透過制度檢討與政策建議，提供政府未來修正相關法規及建立完善停車空間登記制度之參考，以促進公寓大廈停車空間管理之合理化與制度化發展。

Urbanization, rising land prices, and the rapid growth of condominium developments have significantly transformed residential environments in Taiwan. As private vehicle ownership increases, parking spaces have become an essential component of residential buildings rather than merely auxiliary facilities. However, unlike residential units, the legal status and registration mechanisms governing parking spaces have evolved through different legislative stages and administrative interpretations, resulting in a complex legal framework marked by multiple ownership structures, inconsistent registration practices, and varying management mechanisms, generating numerous disputes involving ownership, usage rights, property transactions, and condominium management.
Historically, Taiwan's parking space registration system has undergone several legislative transitions. Before the Ministry of the Interior issued its administrative interpretation on September 18, 1991 (the "918 Interpretation"), parking spaces could be registered as independent ownership, accessory buildings, or common property. Afterward, statutory parking spaces were generally required to be registered as common property jointly owned by condominium owners. Because this interpretation was not applied retroactively, buildings constructed before and after the change became subject to different legal frameworks, so similar parking spaces may possess different legal characteristics despite existing within comparable developments—a fragmented evolution that remains a major source of legal uncertainty in Taiwan's real estate market. Practical disputes also frequently arise from the ambiguity between ownership rights and exclusive usage rights.
Purchasers often believe they have acquired ownership of a specific parking space when, in reality, they merely obtain an ownership share in the common area accompanied by an exclusive-use agreement established through a management contract. Because such agreements are contractual rather than real-property in nature, their enforceability against subsequent purchasers may become uncertain if not properly disclosed or registered, creating legal risks during property transfers, judicial auctions, and inheritance proceedings. Developers have also occasionally engaged in questionable practices, such as repeated sale of parking spaces, undermining consumer confidence and increasing litigation.
Against this background, this research adopts the perspective of property rights clarification to examine the institutional deficiencies of Taiwan's condominium parking space registration system and to explore feasible approaches for improving parking space management. This study argues that effective management depends fundamentally upon establishing clear, transparent, and legally reliable property rights, and that a registration system accurately reflecting ownership status and physical location is the foundation for protecting property rights and ensuring transaction security.
This study employs a mixed-method research design integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, a literature review examines Taiwan's legal framework concerning condominium ownership, land registration, and parking space regulations, while the registration systems of Japan, Germany, Switzerland, and the United States are comparatively reviewed, showing that many foreign jurisdictions offer more explicit methods for identifying parking spaces. Second, case studies examine decisions issued by Taiwan's Fair Trade Commission together with judicial decisions on condominium parking space disputes, classifying them into principal categories—including disputes over ownership, exclusive usage rights, management agreements, developer misconduct, and inconsistent registration. Finally, empirical evidence is collected through questionnaire surveys and expert interviews with land administration, building administration, cadastral, and condominium management professionals, evaluated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to convert expert opinions into quantitative priority rankings.
The empirical findings reveal that Taiwan's current registration system still suffers from insufficient transparency, inconsistent legal classification, and inadequate protection of property rights. A key problem is that parking spaces registered as common property are generally recorded only by ownership shares, without indicating exact locations or identification numbers, so records fail to correspond to the actual location of each space—increasing transaction costs and weakening legal certainty.
The case analyses further show that disputes rarely arise from a single legal issue, but usually involve overlapping problems, including unclear ownership structures, inconsistent registration, deficiencies in management agreements, inadequate disclosure, and conflicting regulatory interpretations. Historical differences in registration methods mean parking spaces within neighboring buildings, or even the same project, may be governed by entirely different legal regimes.
The expert questionnaire and AHP analysis provide additional evidence on reform priorities. Experts agreed that improving the clarity of property rights should receive the highest priority among proposed measures. Standardized parking space numbering, explicit identification of locations within registration records, and greater consistency between building approval documents and land registration records were regarded as the most effective approaches for reducing disputes.
Comparative analysis with foreign registration systems provides further insight. In Germany and Switzerland, the legal relationship between individual and common ownership is more explicitly defined, and records more clearly identify the physical boundaries and legal status of parking spaces. In the United States, condominium declarations and recorded plans generally describe exclusive-use parking areas in detail, while Japan maintains relatively comprehensive registration practices. Each system reflects a different historical background, but shares a common objective: ensuring registration records accurately correspond to the physical reality of the property.
Based on these findings, several policy recommendations are proposed. First, a standardized parking space identification and numbering system should be incorporated into Taiwan's land registration framework, with every space possessing a unique number corresponding to both its registration record and physical location.
Second, registration records should describe the location, dimensions, and identification number of each parking space rather than merely recording ownership shares. Third, legislative amendments should further integrate land registration regulations, condominium management legislation, and building administration requirements, improving consistency among planning approval, construction completion, registration, and property management. Finally, future reforms should address not only newly constructed buildings but also mechanisms for improving registration information for existing developments.
This research contributes to the existing literature by integrating perspectives from architecture, land administration, and property law into an interdisciplinary framework, and by combining comparative legal analysis, case studies, expert interviews, and quantitative AHP evaluation to develop practical recommendations.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the long-term improvement of condominium parking space management depends fundamentally upon establishing a transparent, reliable, and legally consistent property registration system. Clarifying ownership rights through standardized registration can effectively reduce legal disputes, improve transaction security, and strengthen public confidence in the real estate market. The findings and recommendations are expected to provide useful references for future legislative reform and administrative policy development in Taiwan.

一、書籍
溫豐文，建築物區分所有權之研究，三民書局，1992年。
林永汀，停車位實例問題研析，世潮出版公司，1998 年10 月，初版。
謝哲勝，土地法，台灣財產法暨經濟法研究協會，2006 年7 月初版。
陳華彬，建築物區分所有權，中國法制出版社，2011年8月。
溫豐文，土地法，2014年8月修訂版。
謝在全，民法物權論（上），2014年9月修訂六版。
許文昌，土地登記基礎，元照出版有限公司，2015年9月初版。
謝哲勝（主編），不動產登記法律與政策，元照出版有限公司，2016年2月初版。
謝仰泰，建築法講堂，詹氏書局，2019年4月初版。
李明洲，公寓大廈管理條例，新學林出版股份有限公司，2019年11月一版。
王澤鑑，民法物權，翔盛印刷有限公司，2022年9月增訂三版。
黃健彰等，公寓大廈管理組織之實體法與程序法，元照出版有限公司，2023 年1 月初版。
勒邦忠，購屋寶典──不動產交易實務與案例解析，新學林出版股份有限公司，2024年1月一版。
林永汀，地下室停車位， 永然文化出版股份有限公司，民國87 年2 月。
古振暉等，公寓大廈管理條例註釋書（一），新學林出版股份有限公司，2026年5月一版。
古振暉等，公寓大廈管理條例註釋書（二），新學林出版股份有限公司，2026年5月一版。
二、期刊
吳光明，〈公寓大廈管理委員會之地位〉，月旦法學雜誌，第249號，2016年2月。
吳光明，默示分管契之探討，月旦法學雜誌，第209 期，2012 年9 月。
吳瑾瑜，占用自己專有之騎樓暨無法利用之共有法定空地構成不當得利?，月旦民商
林永汀，論公寓大廈管理條例規範的「公寓大廈」，軍法專刊，第45 卷第6 期，1999年6 月。
林清汶，從區分所有權到以使用範圍獨立作為權利客體的探討，月旦法學雜誌，2012年12 月。
法雜誌，第55 期，2017 年3 月。
陳如吟，〈停車位買賣糾紛與建築技術規則〉，消費者保護研究，第23輯，2019年3月。
溫豐文，公寓大廈管理條例若干規定之實像，月旦法學雜誌，第226 期，20 14 年3月。
溫豐文，區分所有建築物物權構造之解析，月旦法學雜誌，第168 期，2009 年5 月。
溫豐文，區分所有權─民法物權編修正草案之評析，台灣本土法學雜誌，第90期，2007 年1 月。
溫豐文，論區分所有建物共用部分之專用使用權，法令月刊，第41 卷第6 期，1990年6 月。
溫豐文，論區分所有建物與基地之關係，法學叢刊，第35 卷第2 期，1990 年4 月。
溫豐文，論區分所有建築之專有部分，法令月刊，第42 卷第7 期，1991 年7 月。
溫豐文，默示的分管契約／最高院98 臺上1087，台灣法學雜誌，第170 期，2011 年2 月15 日。
戴東雄，〈論建築物區分所有權之理論基礎（Ⅱ）〉，法學叢刊，第29卷第3期，1984年7月。
三、學位論文
王宗富，公寓大廈停車位產權與使用權爭議之研究，中原大學，財經法律學系碩士論文，2021年
李沛隆，公寓大廈區分所有權之研究─以地下層停車位產權實務問題為中心，高雄大學法律學系碩士論文，2013年
徐淑貞，區分所有建築物地下室停車空間產權登記問題之研究，逢甲大學土地管理學系在職專班碩士論文，2006年
張修慈，公寓大廈法定停車空間法律問題之探討，國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文，2005年。
張家禎，公寓大廈停車位產權問題之研究，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士班論文，2008年
四、法令規範
民法第50條第1項。
司法院院字第1919號解釋（民國28年）。
司法院院字第1956號解釋（民國29年）。
最高法院91年度台上字第1030號民事判決。
內政部74年3月18日台（74）內地字第393173號函。
內政部82年6月10日台內地字第8207254號函（同法務部79年7月7日律字第9656號函意旨）。
法務部79年7月7日律字第9656號函。
內政部80年9月18日台內營字第8071337號函。
五、網路資訊
（一） 中文與日文
日本《建物區分所有法》第22條至第24條，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/3kbeyO。
日本最高裁判所平成10年（1998年）2月24日第三小法廷判決，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/Dxbolj。
公寓大廈名義變更完全指南：手續、費用與必要文件，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/ppK5bl。
公寓大廈停車位專用使用權，檢索日期：2026年2月26日， https://reurl.cc/yOK6AO。
公寓大廈登記簿謄本解讀完全指南，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/xWK6KL。
建築確認與登記簿建物面積不一致：原因完全解析，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/dpqmO6。
停車位之「敷地權」是什麼？簽約時必知的「所有權」與「使用權」，檢索期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/L2Q65L。
停車位專用使用權的變更（廢止、收費化、調漲使用費）之可行性，檢索日期：2026年2月26日，https://reurl.cc/K2O3om。
台南旅遊網，檢索日期：2026年3月15日，map-travel-overall_-desktop.jpg（908×559）。
（二）外文
Act on the Ownership of Apartments and the Permanent Residential Right internet.de/englisch_woeigg/englisch_woeigg.html.
Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift für die Ausstellung von Bescheinigungen,internet.de/bsvwvbund_06072021_SW35.htm.
Art. 712a ZGB, Art. 712g ZGB. Besonderes Nutzungsrecht – Gerichte-zh.ch,Client Alert: Significant Court of ... – Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLP, retrieved Condo Corner: What Kind of Parking Space Is Being Sold with the
Condominium Parking Spaces: Insights from LTGC Since 1967, retrieved
Condominium Parking Spaces | Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. – Advocus,Eintragung eines Sondernutzungsrechts als Inhalt des Sondereigentums –
Florida Statutes Title XL. Real and Personal Property § 718.106 – FindLaw, Grundeigentümer, Parkplätze und Autoeinstellhallen – HEV Schweiz, retrieved
LAWINFO–Stockwerkeigentum/Eigentumswohnungen–LAW.CH,retrieved https://reurl.cc/xWK6yV.
Limited Common Element: Definition and Laws Governing It–Investopedia,Mietrecht Arbeitsrecht Berlin Wilmersdorf–Condominiums in Germany–Kanzlei Wenderoth, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/epVdqK.
Mit- und Stockwerkeigentum: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede – Voser Rechtsanwälte, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/18k3R9.
Pitfalls When Dealing with Assigned Parking Spaces–Altitude Community Law, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/yOKYMl.
Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Beurkundungs-und Grundbuchrecht–Huser Baurecht, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/GaGjVG.
Sondereigentum an Grundstücksflächen nach der Reform des WEG 2020 – Strunz Alter, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/18k3oG.
Sondernutzungsrecht in der WEG | Was Sie wissen sollten–etg24, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/Z2l9MW.
Sondernutzungsrecht Stellplatz: Infos für Eigentümer | Ralph, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/3kb7G0.
Sondernutzungsrechte im WEG » Rechte, Pflichten & Reform 2025, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/Wb8RdL.
Sonderrecht oder Sondernutzungsrecht? – Hausinfo.ch, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/xWKL85.
Stockwerkeigentum in der Schweiz: Ihre rechtliche Grundlagen – GetYourLawyer, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/dpqLkq.
Stockwerkeigentum – Rechte, Pflichten und was es zu beachten gilt! – immoverkauf24, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/9Wb7mv.
Teileigentum | Alles Was Sie wissen müssen – etg24, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/nplrEn.
The parking spot we bought in our new condo building is too small – Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C., retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/K2O37y.
Unterschied Sondereigentum und Sondernutzungsrecht: Klarheit, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/epVLaK.
Ways to hold title to parking in Chicago condominiums, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/A9b05Q.
WEG – Aufteilungsplan Anforderungen des § 7 Abs. 4 Satz 1 Nr. 1 WEG, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/V2mNWY.
WEG (Wohnungseigentumsgesetz)–Unselbständigkeit des Sondereigentums– Hausverwaltung Reiner, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/lpagNQ.
WEG-Novelle | Der neue § 3 WEG: Sondereigentum an Stellplätzen, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/O6RGp9.
WEG-Reform 2020: Was sich am Wohnungseigentumsgesetz ändert, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/V2mNaR.
WEG-Reform: Wie der Stellplatz zu Sondereigentum wird – immoverkauf24, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/zQKlYk.
Wohnungsgrundbuch | Bedeutung & Erklärung | Legal Wiki, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/18k37V.
Zuschreibung eines Kraftfahrzeugstellplatzes zur Wohnung im Wohnungsgrundbuch, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/lpagAj.
Zürich Verwaltungsgericht 27.03.2024 SB.2024.00001, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/4lbjzV.
BGH, Beschluss v. 07.03.2024 – V ZB 46/23 – NWB Datenbank, retrieved
9C_279/2024, 14.02.2025 – Schweizerisches Bundesgericht, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/aXMLYG.
LCE Registry, LLC. – Community Systems Inc., retrieved February 27, 2026,(WEG), retrieved February 27, 2026, https://www.gesetze-im-
retrieved February 27, 2026, https://www.verwaltungsvorschriften-im-
retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/Emb4dn.
February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/V2mNQR.
February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/grna9Q.
Condominium Unit?, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/Q2VZO0.
February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/6GbQe5.
retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/GaGK0W.
Das Stockwerkeigentum, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/GaG4YA.
DNotI-Report WEG-Reform-Spezial, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/7Eb7XQ.
Voraussetzungen, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/aXML7Z.
retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/nplLKl.
FORUM 1/2023 – BDVI, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/nplro8.
February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/9Wb7Y8.
February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/9Wb7MO.
retrieved February 27, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/limited- common-elements.asp.
Parking Issues – KSN Law, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/epVdKb.
Untitled, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/53b47n.
WEG-Reform 2020 – BDVI, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/K2O4Ae.
ZGB 712a-t – Paul Baumann Immobilien, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://reurl.cc/nplNVd.
§ 3 WEG – Einzelnorm – Gesetze im Internet, retrieved February 27, 2026, https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/woeigg/__3.html.