本研究主要目的為建立一60 kW級之微型渦輪發電系統，並且搭配復熱器及廢熱鍋爐之熱回收系統，分析方法為利用商用套裝軟體GasTurb11作為系統模擬之工具，選擇參考離心式渦輪增壓器TD-08H做為系統模擬之重要設計參數，渦輪增壓器之質量流率為0.55 kg/s、壓縮比(γ)為3.2，在空氣條件為海平面288.15 K、空氣濕度60%、大氣壓力101.325 kPa進行設計點分析。
本研究先利用敏感性分析法找出對系統性能影響程度較大之設計參數，進一步以參數研究法探討重要參數對系統之性能及各站位氣體性質之影響，得出渦輪發電系統之新設計點，再以數值優化方法驗證該設計點為最佳熱力循環操作點。最後針對熱回收配置進行分析，以各復熱器有效性條件下之渦輪發電系統性能作為配置廢熱鍋爐之參考依據，得知欲達到系統設計目標，復熱器有效性90%時，鍋爐最少熱回收量為68 kW，實驗結果得到系統輸出功為64.1 kW，熱電效率34.64%，成功模擬得到高效率渦輪發電系統之設計參數。

The main purpose of this paper is to establish a 60 kW micro-gas turbine power generation system with heat recovery system by a recuperator and a heat recovery boiler. The study method is using the commercial package software GasTurb11 for the gas turbine system simulation tool. The centrifugal turbocharger TD-08H is selected for the system simulation as important design parameters. The turbocharger has mass flow rate of 0.55 kg/s, compression ratio (γ) of 3.2. The design point analysis is also simulated at the air condition 288.15 K at sea level, 60% air humidity, and atmospheric pressure 101.325 kPa.
In this study, using the sensitivity analysis method can find out which design parameters is much more effective on the system performance. The parameter study method is used to investigate the influence on the system performance and the gas properties on each station. Then, new design point of the turbine power generation system is obtained. Simultaneously, the study using optimization method verify the new design point as the optimal thermodynamic cycle operation point. Finally, the heat recovery configuration is analyzed by the condition of system performance with difference recuperator effectiveness, and we can know the rated power of heat recovery boiler. If the system would like to meet the requirement of design target, the 90% effectiveness recuperator system needs to cooperate with a 68 kW rated power of heat recovery boiler.
The experimental results show that the system output power is 64.1 kW and the thermal efficiency is 34.64%. The design parameters of the high efficiency turbine power generation system are successfully simulated.

[1]https://www.capstoneturbine.com/products/c1000s
[2]Epstein, A.H., “Millimeter-scale, MEMS Gas Turbine Engines.” ASME Turbo Expo, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp.669-696, June, 2003.
[3]https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-fossil-fuel-consumption
[4]Xiao, G., Yang, T.-F., Liu, H.-L., Ni, D., Ferrari, M., Li, M., Luo, Z., Cen, K., Ni, M., “Recuperator for Micro Gas Turbines: A Review,” Applied Energy, Vol.197, pp.83-89, 2017.
[5]Treece, B., Vessa, P., McKeirnan, R., “Microturbine Recuperator Manufacturing and Operating Experience,” ASME Turbo Expo, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp.1017-1023, June, 2002.
[6]洪偉稜, 高轉速渦輪發電系統之設計與驗證研究，國立成功大學航空太空工程系碩士論文，2012年6月。
[7]張維庭, 微型渦輪發電系統之動力流路設計及分析研究，國立成功大學航空太空工程系碩士論文，2018年7月。
[8]Giorgettia, S., Parentea, A., Bricteuxc, L., Continob, F., De Paepea, W., “Carbon Clean Combined Heat and Power Production from micro Gas Turbines: Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Scenarios,” Applied Energy, Vol.142, pp.1622-1628, 2017.
[9]McDonald, C.F., “Recuperator Considerations for Future Higher Efficiency Microturbines,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol.2, pp.1463-1487, 1998.
[10]Kurzke, J., “Gas Turbine Cycle Design Methodology: A Comparison of Parameter Variation with Numerical Optimization,” ASME, Vol.2, München, Germany, June, 1998.
[11]Gas Turbine Engine Performance Station Identification and Nomenclature, Aerospace Recommended Practice, SAE ARP 755A, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrandale, Pennsylvania, 1974.
[12]https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/16177/what-are-the-differences-between-a-helicopter-engine-turboshaft-and-an-aircraf
[13]廖智群, 微型渦輪發電系統測試與驗證研究，國立成功大學航空太空工程系碩士論文, 2013年6月。
[14]Manfred, F., “Directly Driven Dynamo Electric Machine-Gas Turbine Generator Structure,” U.S. Patents No.4,253,031, 1981.
[15]http://www.mhiet.co.jp/en/products/turbocharger/technical/index.html
[16]http://www.proepowersystems.com/proe90.htm
[17]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118534786.app1