摘要
　　因半導體產業的成熟及TFT LCD產業的帶動下，造就了今日的明星產業～驅動IC。由於驅動IC產業主要的競爭優勢在於研發及外包管理，因此在企業本身基礎建設完備的情況下，如何做到供應鏈績效管理顯得更加重要。換句話說，驅動IC產業是該供應鏈的發動機，因此在整個供應鏈中扮演舉足輕重的地位，若要做好供應鏈管理，最重要的第一步就是選擇最適合的供應商，以達到驅動IC公司「顧客價值」的策略目標，同時亦可提高供應鏈的管理績效。
　　本研究藉由個案研究法及深度訪談法的質性研究方式來探討供應商稽核模式。研究過程中首先藉由平衡計分卡分析驅動IC產業以「長期股東價值」為願景，並為達到「顧客價值」而建構出驅動IC產業的策略目標，同時針對此目標做為評量供應商時所依循的策略，整個研究過程透過平衡計分卡的關聯性分析來完成供應商評量項目
　　研究中選取驅動IC產業具代表性的個案做為研究樣本，以分析個案稽核供應商的流程及評量供應商的項目，最後同稽核供應商的專家們共同研討，以完成驅動IC產業選擇供應商之模式。
　　本研究以系統性的分析方式建構出驅動IC產業供應商選擇的評估模式，使IC設計業者可以依本研究的分析架構，一步步分析以找出適合公司的供應商，同時提供給供應商評估績效時的參考，以瞭解本身的企業有沒有能力通過驅動IC產業種種的稽核認證。

Abstract
　　Due to semiconductor industry was mature and TFT LCD industry fast grows, Driver IC industry will be a start business in the future. Driver IC core value is in R&D and outsourcing management. Hence, how to manage the supplier chain is very important. Meanwhile, Driver IC is a trigger in TFT LCD industry, and the supplier selection is first priority in this supplier chain management. One hand it can enhance supplier management performance. On the other hand, it can achieve shareholder value.
　　The research here combines tow methods that are Case Study and Expert interview to create a survey model of supplier selection. First, the research began to analyses Driver IC strategy value by Balanced Scoredcard. Meanwhile, this research use Balanced Scoredcard to define the evaluation item base on the target of Driver IC strategy value.
　　In the research, it use the representative IC Design House - H company to be a case study sample. To setup one model that is supplier selection in Driver IC design house depend on the result that discuss the auditing item with Design house expert.
　　The purpose of this thesis is to develop a systematic method for the evaluation of Driver IC industry. To let some enterprisers want to involve this industry can follow this model to select suitable by them. And this research can let supplier do a test to review themselves if can pass Design house’s auditing.

一、中文部分：
1. ARC遠擎管理顧問公司策略績效事業部譯, Robert S. Kaplan, David P. Norton著, 2001, “策略核心組織：以平衡計分卡有效執行企業策略”, 臉譜文化出版。
2. 于泳泓譯, Paul R. Niven著, 2002, “平衡計分卡最佳實務：按部就班成功導入”, 商周出版。
3. 于泳泓, 2002, “平衡計分卡實戰系列探討（一）：企業現狀剖析與導入架構檢核” 會計研究月刊, 198期, 16-25頁。
4. 于泳泓, 2002, “平衡計分卡實戰系列探討（二）：平衡計分卡導入的三大步驟要點與手法” 會計研究月刊, 199期, 84-92頁。
5. 朱道凱譯, Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton著, 1999, “平衡計分卡：資訊時代的策略管理工具” 臉譜文化出版。
6. 朱柔若, 2000, “社會研究方法” 台北：揚智文化。
7. 吳思華, 1998, “策略九說：策略思考的本質”, 台北：臉譜文化。
8. 果云, 1999, “供應鏈管理的現在與未來”, 資訊與電腦, 8月, 50-51頁。
9. 胡慧幼、姚美華, 1996, “一個質性方法上的思考”, 台北：巨流圖書公司。
10. 胡慧幼主編, 1996, “質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例”, 台北：巨流圖書公司。
11. 許士軍, 2000, “走向創新時代的組織績效評估” 天下文化哈佛商業評論－績效評估導讀, 3-9頁。
12. 陳正平等譯, Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton著, 2004, “策略地圖：串聯組織策略從形成到徹底實施的動態管理工具”, 臉譜文化出版。
13. 陳啟政, 2003, “運用總品質成本分析之供應商績效評估方法”, 中原大學工業工程學系博士學位論文。
14. 趙碧華、朱美珍譯, 2000, “研究方法”, 台北：學富文化事業有限公司。
15. 錢鑄鈞, 2000, “運用AHP法建構策略性合夥關係之供應商評選模式”, 輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士學位論文。
16. 譚伯群、林清河、施坤壽、張音, 2000, “網際網路應用（價值鏈觀點）與經營策略及資訊化成熟度之關係—台灣製造業的實證研究”, 管理評論, 151-182頁。

二、英文部分：
1. Anderson, E.L.Jr., 1994, “Evaluate Critical Suppliers,” Purchasing, vol.117, no.1, pp.53-56.
2. Beamon, B.M., 1998, “Supply Chain Design and Analysis: Models and Methods”, Production Economics, vol.55, no.3, pp.281-294.
3. Berg, B.L., 1998, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bogdan, R.C., and Biklen, S.K., 1982, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Brew, P.C. and Thomas, W.S., 2000, “Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance.”, Journal of Business Logistics, vol.21, no.1, pp.75-93.
6. Carter, J.R. and Ferrin, B.G., 1995, “The Impact of Transportation Costs on Supply chain Management”, Journal Of Business Logistics, vol.16, no.1, pp.189-212.
7. Chow, C.W., K. M. Haddad, and J. E. Williamson, 1997, ”Applying the balanced scorecard to small companies.” Management Accounting, pp.21-27.
8. Cheng, T.C.E. and Podolsky, S., 1996, Just-in-Time Manufacturing: An Introduction, Chapman & Hall, pp.107-115.
9. Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S., 1998b, Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, London: Sage Publications.
10. Dobler, D.W. and Burt, D.N., 1996, Purchasing and Supply Management: Text and Cases, McGraw-Hill Company, pp.430-463.
11. Dowlatshahi, S., 2000, “Designer-buyer-supplier Interface: Theory versus Practice,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol.63, pp.111-130.
12. Feagin, J.R., Orum, A.M., and Sjoberg, G.,. 1991. A Case for the Case Study, The University of North Carolina Press.
13. Fontana, A., and Frey, J.H., 1998, Interviewing: The art of science, In N.K. Denzing & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, London: Sage Publications.
14. Goffin, K., Szwejczewski, M. and New, C., 1997, “Managing Suppliers: When Fewer Can Mean More”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol.27, no.7, pp.422-436.
15. Handfield, R.B., Kannan, V.R., and Tan, K.C.,1998. “Supply chain management: Supplier performance and firm performance”, International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, vol.34, no.3, pp.2-9.
16. Hokey Min, 1994, “International Supplier Selection: A multi-attribute utility approach”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , vol.24, pp.24-33.
17. Houlihan, J.B., 1987, “International Supply Chain Management”, Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management, vol.17, no.2, pp:51-66.
18. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 1992, “The balanced scorecard: measures that drive Performance”. Harvard Business Review, vol.70, no.1, pp.71-79.
19. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 1993, ”Putting the balanced scorecard to work.” Harvard Business Review, vol.71, no.5, pp.34-47.
20. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 1996a, ”Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system.” Harvard Business Review, vol.74, no.1, pp.75-85.
21. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 1996b, The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
22. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 1996c, ”Link the balanced scorecard to strategy.” California Management Review, vol.39, no.1, pp.53-79.
23. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P, 2001, ”Having Trouble with your Strategy? Then Map It!.” Harvard Business Review, vol.78, no.5, pp.167-177.
24. Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G.., 1985, Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Lin, Lei, Ren, Shou-Ju, Liu, Wen-Huang and Wang, Wei, 2001, “Supply chain management mode based on coordination.”, Systems, Man, and Cybernetics IEEE International Conferenc, vol.3.
26. Maloni, M.J. and Benton, W. C., 1997, “Supply Chain Partnership: Opportunities for Operations Research”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.101, no.3, pp.419-429.
27. Min, H., 1994, “International Supplier Selection: A multi-attribute utility approach”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management., vol.24, pp.24-33.
28. Mohanty, R.P. and Deshmukh, S.G.,1993, “Using of Analytic Hierarchic Process for Evaluating Sources of Supply,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol.23, no.3, pp.22-28.
29. Mummalaneni, D. and Chian-nan Chao., 1996, “Chinese Purchasing Managers’ Preferences and Trade-offs in Supplier Selection and Performance Evaluation.”, Industrial Marketing Management,vol.25, pp115-124.
30. Narasimhan, R. and Das, A., 2000, “Purchasing Competence and Its Relationship with Manufacturing Performance,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol.36, no.2, pp.17-28.
31. Park, H.Y., Reddy, C.S. and Sarkar, S., 2000, “Make or buy strategy of firms in the U.S.”, Multinational Business Review, Detroit Fall
32. Paul, R.N., 2002, Balanced Scorecard Step by Step：Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results., New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Riggs, D.A. and Robbins, L., 1998, “The Executive’s Guide to Supply Management Strategies, Building Supply Chain Thinking Into All Business Processes”, AMACOM, pp.83.
34. Snow, D.A. and Anderson, L., 1991, “Researching the homeless: The characteristic features and virtues of the case study, In J. R. Feagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study”, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 148-173.
35. Steensma, H.K. and Corley, K.G., 2000, “On the Performance of Technology-Sourcing Partnerships: The Interaction between Partner Interdependence and Technology Attributes”, Academy of Management Journal, vol.43, no.6, pp.1045-1067.
36. Stevenson, W.J., 1999. Production/Operations Management., McGraw-Hill Company, 6th ed.
37. Supply-Chain-Council, 2002, “SCOR, Part 1: An Introduction to the Supply Chain Operations Reference Model”.
38. Venkatapparao, M., Khalid M.D., and Chiang-nan C., 1996, “Chinese Purchasing Managers’ Preferences and Trade-offs in Supplier Selection and Performance Evaluation.”, Industrial Marketing Management, vol.25, pp.115-124.
39. Weber, C.A., John, R.C. and Benton, W.C., 1991, “Vendor Selection Criteria and Method.”, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.50, no.1, pp.2-18.
40. Yin, R.K., 1993, Case Study Research: Design and Methods., London: Sage Publications.