在全球文化遺產保存與創意經濟日益交融的脈絡下，傳統藍染已不僅是一項染織技藝，更是一種同時承載物質實踐、文化意義與社會關係的複合文化系統。然而，藍染文化如何在當代社會中維持其文化延續性，並進一步實現產業創新與永續發展，其內在運作機制仍有待系統性闡明。既有研究多聚焦於技藝傳承、文化符號、遺產保存或產業轉型等個別面向，對於物質文化與非物質文化如何相互作用、共同形塑藍染文化發展路徑的理解，仍多停留於描述性層次，尚缺乏能夠整合兩者動態關係的理論解釋框架。
本研究以藍染文化為研究對象，結合物質文化與非物質文化遺產的理論視角，探討藍染文化永續發展與創新的結構條件、運作機制及演化路徑。依據不同的發展邏輯與組織型態，本研究選取四組具代表性的案例，包括中國貴州丹寨與安順、廣東連南瑤族地區、臺灣卓也藍染，以及國立臺灣工藝研究發展中心自然色工坊，分別呈現日常生活嵌入、文化維繫、產業整合與機構推廣等差異化發展情境。
研究採取多案例質性研究設計，透過多地點田野調查、參與式與非參與式觀察，以及43次半結構式訪談蒐集一手資料，並運用NVivo軟體輔助紮根理論分析。資料分析依序進行開放編碼、主軸編碼與選擇性編碼，共形成1,977項開放編碼及251個初始類別，據此辨識核心類別、結構關係與跨案例發展模式。
研究結果顯示，藍染文化的永續發展並非由單一資源、技藝或制度因素所決定，而是物質文化結構與非物質文化結構持續互動所形成的動態協同系統。物質文化構成藍染發展的「實踐可供性結構」，透過技藝、原料、工具、生產空間與基礎設施，提供文化實踐得以延續的具體條件；非物質文化則形成「象徵賦權結構」，藉由文化認同、信仰體系、地方記憶、工藝倫理與價值規範，賦予實踐行動以意義、正當性與社會動力。兩者並非彼此分離，而是透過持續的互譯與互構而共同演化：物質實踐使文化意義得以具體化、可感知化與可傳遞化，文化意義則持續重塑物質生產的價值導向、社會功能及產業定位。
研究進一步發現，不同協同模式之間的轉換並不會自然發生，而有賴於若干關鍵催化條件，包括物質基礎的重建、文化意義的重新詮釋，以及制度與組織機制的有效介入。當上述條件不足，或當過度市場化、制度僵化及生態耗竭破壞物質文化與非物質文化之間的互動時，藍染文化系統可能出現「去協同化」現象，導致結構連結弱化、系統韌性下降，並限制文化傳承、產業轉型與創新發展。
基於上述發現，本研究提出「雙核驅動三層六結構協同模型」。該模型以物質文化核心與非物質文化核心的持續互動為主要驅動機制，將藍染文化的發展系統區分為物質基礎層、文化意義層與產業運作層三個相互關聯的層次，並進一步辨識技藝結構、物質結構、文化結構、產業結構、組織結構與生態結構六項運作要素。此模型說明六項結構要素如何在雙核心驅動下相互耦合、補償與轉化，進而形塑藍染文化的發展韌性及創新能力。
跨案例比較進一步辨識出四種典型協同模式。貴州案例呈現「內源型協同」，藍染技藝仍深度嵌入地方生活、生計系統與族群文化之中；連南案例呈現「失衡型協同」，文化意義及族群認同持續存在，但物質基礎與實踐條件逐漸衰退；卓也藍染呈現「轉譯型協同」，透過品牌建構、設計轉譯與體驗消費，將文化意義轉化為市場及經濟價值；國立臺灣工藝研究發展中心自然色工坊則呈現「系統型協同」，藉由制度化教育、研究資源及組織支持，促進技藝知識的保存、傳播與結構性再生產。
制度邏輯分析亦顯示，不同制度安排是形塑藍染文化發展路徑的重要中介機制。中國大陸案例主要受到國家嵌入型制度邏輯影響；卓也藍染的發展較受市場美學型邏輯驅動；國立臺灣工藝研究發展中心自然色工坊則呈現結合政府、文化與市場力量的混合型制度邏輯。不同制度邏輯影響物質與非物質文化資源的動員、配置與轉化方式，因而使具有相近文化基礎的地區形成不同的永續發展路徑。
本研究的理論貢獻主要包括四個方面。第一，將可供性理論延伸至傳統工藝與文化產業研究，指出藍染的物質可供性並非固定不變的客觀屬性，而是在制度重構、市場中介與社會實踐中持續被激活、轉譯與再生產。第二，超越物質文化與非物質文化之間的靜態二元區分，將兩者重新概念化為動態互構的結構力量，從而揭示物質載體與文化意義之間持續耦合的關係。第三，將傳統工藝研究由保存或產業化的描述性討論，推進至多重結構協同的機制性解釋，並以結構韌性為核心，辨識協同轉換的催化條件、臨界狀態、去協同化風險及補償性激活機制。第四，引入制度邏輯觀點，說明國家嵌入型、市場美學型與混合型制度邏輯如何中介雙核心及六項結構要素之間的互動，並解釋不同地區發展路徑的差異。
在方法論上，本研究建立了由田野資料、概念編碼、類別建構、理論抽象至跨案例驗證的完整分析鏈結。在實務上，研究結果可為政策制定者、文化遺產保存機構、地方組織、創意產業實踐者及教育研究機構提供策略參考，協助其在文化傳承、產業創新、生態永續與社會再生之間形成更具韌性與適應性的發展模式。

Against the growing convergence of cultural heritage preservation and the creative economy, traditional indigo dyeing should be understood not merely as a textile craft, but as a complex cultural system encompassing material practices, cultural meanings, and social relations. Nevertheless, the mechanisms through which indigo culture maintains cultural continuity while simultaneously achieving industrial innovation and sustainable development remain insufficiently theorized. Existing studies have tended to examine indigo dyeing from isolated perspectives, including craft transmission, cultural symbolism, heritage preservation, and industrial transformation. Consequently, current understanding remains largely descriptive and lacks an integrative explanatory framework capable of accounting for the dynamic interplay between material culture and intangible cultural heritage.
This study investigates the structural conditions, operational mechanisms, and evolutionary pathways underlying the sustainable development and innovation of indigo culture. Drawing on the theoretical perspectives of material culture and intangible cultural heritage, four representative cases were selected according to their distinctive developmental logics and organizational configurations: Danzhai and Anshun in Guizhou Province, the Liannan Yao region in Guangdong Province, Zhuo Ye Indigo in Taiwan, and the Natural Dye Workshop of the National Taiwan Craft Research and Development Institute (NTCRI). These cases respectively represent development contexts characterized by embeddedness in everyday life, cultural maintenance, industrial integration, and institutional promotion.
A qualitative multiple-case research design was adopted. Primary data were collected through multi-sited fieldwork, participant and non-participant observation, and 43 semi-structured interviews. Grounded theory analysis was conducted with the assistance of NVivo. The analytical process involved open, axial, and selective coding, generating 1,977 open codes and 251 initial categories. These procedures enabled the identification of core categories, structural relationships, and cross-case patterns of development.
The findings demonstrate that the sustainable development of indigo culture is not determined by any single resource, craft, or institutional factor. Rather, it emerges from a dynamic system of synergy between material and non-material cultural structures. Material culture constitutes a structure of practical affordance, providing the tangible conditions necessary for cultural practice through techniques, raw materials, tools, production spaces, and infrastructure. Non-material culture, in contrast, operates as a structure of symbolic empowerment, generating meaning, legitimacy, and social motivation through cultural identity, belief systems, collective memory, craft ethics, and value norms.
These two dimensions are neither independent nor sequential. Instead, they continuously co-evolve through processes of mutual translation and co-constitution. Material practices render cultural meanings tangible, perceptible, and transmissible, while cultural meanings continually reshape the value orientations, social functions, and industrial positioning of material production.
The study further reveals that transitions between different synergistic configurations do not occur automatically. Such transitions depend on several catalytic conditions, including the reconstruction of material foundations, the reinterpretation of cultural meanings, and the effective activation of institutional and organizational mechanisms. When these conditions are absent—or when excessive commercialization, institutional rigidity, and ecological depletion disrupt the relationship between material and non-material cultural structures—the system may undergo a process of de-synergization. This process weakens structural interconnections, reduces systemic resilience, and constrains cultural transmission, industrial transformation, and innovation.
Based on these findings, this study proposes the Dual-Core-Driven Three-Layer Six-Structure Synergy Model. The model identifies the continuous interaction between the material culture core and the non-material culture core as the principal driving mechanism of indigo cultural development. It conceptualizes the system across three interrelated layers: the material foundation layer, the cultural meaning layer, and the industrial operation layer. Within these layers, six operational structures are identified: technical, material, cultural, industrial, organizational, and ecological structures. The model explains how these six structures interact, compensate for one another, and undergo transformation under the influence of the dual cultural cores, thereby shaping the resilience and innovative capacity of indigo culture.
Cross-case comparison identifies four distinctive modes of synergy. The Guizhou case demonstrates an endogenous synergy mode, in which indigo dyeing remains deeply embedded in local livelihoods, everyday practices, and ethnic culture. The Liannan case represents an imbalanced synergy mode, characterized by the persistence of cultural meaning and ethnic identity alongside the gradual erosion of material foundations and practical conditions. Zhuo Ye Indigo illustrates a translational synergy mode, through which cultural meaning is converted into market and economic value by means of branding, design translation, and experiential consumption. The NTCRI Natural Dye Workshop exemplifies a systemic synergy mode, in which institutionalized education, research resources, and organizational support facilitate the preservation, dissemination, and structural reproduction of craft knowledge.
The institutional analysis further demonstrates that institutional logics operate as critical mediating mechanisms in shaping development pathways. The mainland Chinese cases are predominantly influenced by a state-embedded institutional logic; Zhuo Ye Indigo is primarily driven by a market-aesthetic logic; and the NTCRI Natural Dye Workshop reflects a hybrid institutional logic integrating governmental, cultural, and market forces. These institutional logics influence how material and non-material cultural resources are mobilized, allocated, and transformed, thereby explaining why regions with comparable cultural foundations may develop divergent pathways toward sustainability.
This study makes four primary theoretical contributions. First, it extends affordance theory to the study of traditional crafts and cultural industries by demonstrating that the material affordances of indigo dyeing are not fixed or inherent properties. Rather, they are continuously activated, translated, and reproduced through institutional reconstruction, market mediation, and social practice. Second, it moves beyond a static dualism between material and non-material culture by conceptualizing them as dynamically co-constitutive structural forces, thereby revealing the continuous coupling of material carriers and cultural meanings. Third, it advances traditional craft research from descriptive accounts of preservation and industrialization toward a mechanism-based explanation of multi-structural synergy. In doing so, it develops a dynamic framework centered on structural resilience and identifies the catalytic conditions, critical thresholds, risks of de-synergization, and compensatory activation mechanisms involved in systemic transformation. Fourth, it incorporates an institutional logic perspective to explain how state-embedded, market-aesthetic, and hybrid institutional logics mediate interactions between the dual cultural cores and the six structural elements, thereby producing divergent regional development trajectories.
Methodologically, this study establishes an integrated analytical process linking fieldwork evidence, conceptual coding, category construction, theoretical abstraction, and cross-case validation. Practically, the findings provide strategic implications for policymakers, heritage preservation institutions, local organizations, creative industry practitioners, and educational and research institutions seeking to develop more resilient and adaptive approaches to cultural transmission, industrial innovation, ecological sustainability, and social regeneration.

萬建中（2006）. 非物質文化遺產與「物質」的關係——以民間傳說為例. 北京師範大學學報（社會科學版），（6），45–49。[Wan, J. Z. (2006). Non-material culture legacy versus "material": A case in folk legend. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), (6), 45–49.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0209.2006.06.006
文化部文化資產局（n.d.）. 重要傳統工藝登錄項目. 臺中：文化部文化資產局。[Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture. (n.d.). Registered items of important traditional crafts. Taichung: Bureau of Cultural Heritage, Ministry of Culture.] Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/assets/advanceSearch/traditionalCraft
全國人民代表大會常務委員會（2011）. 中華人民共和國非物質文化遺產法（中華人民共和國主席令第四十二號）. 北京：全國人民代表大會常務委員會。[Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. (2011). Law of the People's Republic of China on intangible cultural heritage (Presidential Decree No. 42). Beijing: Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.] Retrieved from https://zwgk.mct.gov.cn/zfxxgkml/zcfg/fl/202012/t20201214_919523.html
吳淑生, 田自秉（1986）. 中國染織史. 上海：上海人民出版社。[Wu, S. S., & Tian, Z. B. (1986). History of Chinese dyeing and weaving. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House.]
吳元新（2011）. 藍印花布. 南京：江蘇美術出版社。[Wu, Y. X. (2011). Blue calico. Nanjing: Jiangsu Fine Arts Publishing House.]
余舜德（2006）. 物與身體感的歷史：一個研究取向之探索. 思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，44（1），5–47。[Yu, S. D. (2006). Objects and history of experience of the body: Contemplation of a new approach. Thought and Words: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 44(1), 5–47.] https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.200603.0005
李硯祖（2006）. 物質與非物質：傳統工藝美術的保護與發展. 文藝研究，（12），106–117。[Li, Y. Z. (2006). Material and immaterial: Protection and development of traditional crafts and fine arts. Literature & Art Studies, (12), 106–117.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-5876.2006.12.014
金少萍（2022）. 絞纈的世界：白族扎染縫紮技法和紋樣圖案研究. 北京：社會科學文獻出版社。[Jin, S. P. (2022). The world of jiaoxie: Research on the sewing and tying techniques and pattern designs of Bai tie-dye. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.] Retrieved from https://xianxiao.ssap.com.cn/book/23007.html
汪媛, 楊坤, 張聰, 何葉麗, 紀俊玲（2016）. 天然靛藍的生態染色工藝. 印染，42（19），26–30。[Wang, Y., Yang, K., Zhang, C., He, Y. L., & Ji, J. L. (2016). Ecological dyeing process with natural indigo. China Dyeing & Finishing, 42(19), 26–30.]
國務院（2006）. 國務院關於公佈第一批國家級非物質文化遺產名錄的通知（國發〔2006〕18號）. 北京：國務院。[State Council. (2006). Notice of the State Council on announcing the first batch of national intangible cultural heritage list (Guofa [2006] No. 18). Beijing: State Council.] Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2006-06/02/content_297946.htm
國務院（2008）. 國務院關於公佈第二批國家級非物質文化遺產名錄和第一批國家級非物質文化遺產擴展項目名錄的通知（國發〔2008〕19號）. 北京：國務院。[State Council. (2008). Notice of the State Council on announcing the second batch of national intangible cultural heritage list and the first batch of extension items (Guofa [2008] No. 19). Beijing: State Council.] Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/govweb/zwgk/2008-06/14/content_1016331.htm
張才前, 孟少妮（2020）. 傳統藍染產業文化傳承及創新策略. 輕紡工業與技術，49（9），106–108。[Zhang, C. Q., & Meng, S. N. (2020). Cultural inheritance and innovation strategies of traditional blue dyeing industry. Light and Textile Industry and Technology, 49(9), 106–108.] http://dx.chinadoi.cn/10.3969/j.issn.2095-0101.2020.09.048
張毅, 王旭娟（2009）. 手工染藝技法. 上海：東華大學出版社。[Zhang, Y., & Wang, X. J. (2009). Manual dyeing and printing techniques. Shanghai: Donghua University Press.]
張儷斌, 王趁, 李姍, 王雨華（2019）. 我國藍草的傳統植物學知識研究. 廣西植物，39（3），386–393。[Zhang, L. B., Wang, C., Li, S., & Wang, Y. H. (2019). Traditional botanical knowledge of Chinese indigo-yielding plant species. Guihaia, 39(3), 386–393.] https://doi.org/10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201803038
張海超, 曹津永（2015）. 地方性知識與比較視野下的大理藍染植物種植與利用研究. 西南邊疆民族研究，（2），151–157。[Zhang, H. C., & Cao, J. Y. (2015). Research on cultivation and utilization of indigo dye plants in Dali from the perspective of local knowledge and comparative study. Journal of Southwest FronlayerEthnic Studies, (2), 151–157.] https://doi.org/10.13835/b.eayn.2015.02.018
彭慕蘭（2003）. 大分流：歐洲、中國及現代世界經濟的發展（史建雲譯）. 南京：江蘇人民出版社。（原著出版於2000年）[Pomeranz, K. (2003). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy (Shi, J. Y., Trans.). Nanjing: Jiangsu People's Publishing House. (Original work published 2000)]
廣東省文化廳（2016）. 廣東省第六批省級非物質文化遺產代表性項目名錄. 中國民族文化資源網。[Guangdong Provincial Department of Culture. (2016). The sixth batch of representative items of provincial intangible cultural heritage of Guangdong Province. China Ethnic Culture Resources Network.] Retrieved from http://47.92.121.167/eportal/ui?pageId=663068&articleKey=766228&columnId=765294
蔡成琴, 張瑞萍, 趙晴（2013）. 純棉織物的植物靛藍生態染色. 印染，39（5），1–4。[Cai, C. Q., Zhang, R. P., & Zhao, Q. (2013). Ecological dyeing of cotton fabric with natural indigo dyes. China Dyeing & Finishing, 39(5), 1–4.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-4017.2013.05.001
劉道廣（2010）. 中國藍染藝術及其產業化研究. 南京：東南大學出版社。[Liu, D. G. (2010). Research on Chinese blue dyeing art and its industrialization. Nanjing: Southeast University Press.]
劉劍, 王業宏, 郭丹華（2009）. 傳統靛青染料的生產工藝. 絲綢，（11），42–43, 50。[Liu, J., Wang, Y. H., & Guo, D. H. (2009). The processing technique of traditional indigo dyes. Journal of Silk, (11), 42–43, 50.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7003.2009.11.014
劉魁立（2007，6月12日）. 非物質文化遺產保護的理論與實踐. 中國社會科學院院報. [Liu, K. L. (2007, June 12). Theory and practice of intangible cultural heritage protection. Journal of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.] Retrieved from http://iel.cass.cn/xrda/ltxlxz/L/lkl_23824/ftbd/202503/t20250326_5861886.shtml
劉錫誠（2006）. 非物質文化遺產的文化性質問題. 中國非物質文化遺產網. [Liu, X. C. (2006). On the cultural nature of intangible cultural heritage. China Intangible Cultural Heritage Network.] Retrieved from https://www.ihchina.cn/luntan_details/8560.html
郭智偉, 夏燕靖（1993）. 染藍歷史及其發展. 藝苑（美術版），（4），56–57。[Guo, Z. W., & Xia, Y. J. (1993). History and development of indigo dyeing. Yiyuan (Fine Arts Edition), (4), 56–57.]
高丙中, 張岳公（主編）（2018）. 非物質文化遺產志：襄垣縣鄉土田野調查. 北京：商務印書館。[Gao, B. Z., & Zhang, Y. G. (Eds.). (2018). Intangible cultural heritage records: A field survey of Xiangyuan County. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]
馬芬妹（2010）. 臺灣藍染工藝產業的變遷與新發展. 臺灣文獻，61（2），153–188。[Ma, F. M. (2010). The transformation and new development of Taiwan indigo dyeing craft industry. Taiwan Historica, 61(2), 153–188.] Retrieved from https://ws.th.gov.tw/002/TH/tjpdf20241015/var/www/html/new_site/05publish/03publishquery/02journal/tj/401061207.pdf
賈秀玲, 崔運花, 韓雅嵐, 冉唯, 吳秋蒙, 何旭, 陸佳歡（2011）. 植物靛藍染料的開發應用現狀及展望. 紡織科技進展，（2），24–26。[Jia, X. L., Cui, Y. H., Han, Y. L., Ran, W., Wu, Q. M., He, X., & Lu, J. H. (2011). Development and application of plant indigo and its prospect. Progress in Textile Science & Technology, (2), 24–26.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-0356.2011.02.005
烏丙安（2008）. 非物質文化遺產的界定和認定的若干理論與實踐問題. 中國非物質文化遺產網. [Wu, B. A. (2008). Several theoretical and practical issues in the delimitation and identification of intangible cultural heritage. China Intangible Cultural Heritage Network.] Retrieved from https://www.ihchina.cn/Article/Index/detail?id=8387
陳興貴（2009）. 人類學整體觀視野下的物質文化與非物質文化. 重慶三峽學院學報，25（5），16–20。[Chen, X. G. (2009). The material culture and intangible cultural from the anthropological holistic viewpoint. Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University, 25(5), 16–20.] https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8135.2009.05.005
Adire African Textiles. (2018). Indigo in West Africa. Retrieved from https://www.adireafricantextiles.com/textiles-resources-sub-saharan-africa/an-introduction-to-sub-saharan-african-textiles/indigo-in-west-africa/
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051
Aino, K., Hirota, K., Okamoto, T., Tu, Z., Matsuyama, H., & Yumoto, I. (2018). Microbial communities associated with indigo fermentation that thrive in anaerobic alkaline environments. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9, Article 2196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02196
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. London: Sage.
Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1986). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819582
Balfour-Paul, J. (1998). Indigo. London: British Museum Press.
Balfour-Paul, J. (2011). Indigo: Egyptian mummies to blue jeans (Rev. ed.). London: British Museum Press.
Balfour-Paul, J. (2016). Indigo: Egyptian mummies to blue jeans (Rev. ed.). London: Archetype Publications.
Bechtold, T., & Mussak, R. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of natural colorants. Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744970
Bechtold, T., Turcanu, A., Ganglberger, E., & Geissler, S. (2003). Natural dyes in modern textile dyehouses: How to combine experiences of two centuries to meet the demands of the future? Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00077-X
Berger, A. A. (2014). What objects mean: An introduction to material culture (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Bodolec, C. (2012). The Chinese paper-cut: From local inventories to the UNESCO Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. In R. F. Bendix, A. Eggert, & A. Peselmann (Eds.), Heritage regimes and the state (pp. 249–264). Göttingen, Germany: Göttingen University Press.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
Bowitz, E., & Ibenholt, K. (2009). Economic impacts of cultural heritage: Research and perspectives. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2008.09.002
Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperBusiness.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press.
Buragohain, D., Meng, Y., Deng, C., Li, Q., & Chaudhary, S. (2024). Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. Heritage Science, 12, Article 295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1
Cardon, D. (2007). Natural dyes: Sources, tradition, technology and science. London: Archetype Publications.
Chandel, N., Singh, B. B., Dureja, C., Yang, Y.-H., & Bhatia, S. K. (2024). Indigo production goes green: A review on opportunities and challenges of fermentative production. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 40, Article 62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-023-03871-2
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Oxford: Berg Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293884
Csordas, T. J. (1990). Embodiment as a paradigm for anthropology. Ethos, 18(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1990.18.1.02a00010
Cultural Heritage Administration of Korea. (n.d.). National Intangible Cultural Heritage No. 115: Naju indigo dyeing. Retrieved from https://www.heritage.go.kr
Dant, T. (1999). Material culture in the social world: Values, activities, lifestyles. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
Ellis, C. (2012). The weaver's studio: Woven shibori (Rev. ed.). Loveland, CO: Interweave Press.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fahlander, F., & Oestigaard, T. (Eds.). (2004). Material culture and other things: Post-disciplinary studies in the 21st century. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Archaeology.
Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857930
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2013). Sociology (7th ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
Grand View Research. (2024). Synthetic dyes market size, share & trends analysis report by product, by end-use, by region, and segment forecasts, 2024–2030. Retrieved from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/synthetic-dyes-market-report
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Gwangju News GIC. (2021, September). Living to dye: Indigo master, Jung Kwan-chae. Retrieved from https://gwangjunewsgic.com/features/profile/master-jung/
Gwilt, A. (2014 a). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. London: Fairchild Books / Bloomsbury. Retrieved from https://shura.shu.ac.uk/8124/
Gwilt, A. (Ed.). (2014 b). Fashion design for living. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315770758
Hafstein, V. T. (2008). Intangible heritage as a list: From masterpieces to representation. In L. Smith & N. Akagawa (Eds.), Intangible heritage (pp. 93–111). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884973-10
Haga, T., & Ariuchi, N. (2024). Class planning and practice of science education using traditional crafts. CiNii Research. https://doi.org/10.14935/jssej.34.268
Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.
Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: SAGE Publications in association with the Open University.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business School Press.
Howard, P. (2003). Heritage: Management, interpretation, identity. London: Continuum.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466025
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055
Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927595
Jung, K. C. (2014). Korean traditional indigo dyeing. Natural Dyeing Culture Center Press.
Kang, H. (2022, September 9). The ancient art of indigo dye [Photograph series]. The Korea Herald. https://www.koreaherald.com/article/2954008
Karell, E., & Niinimäki, K. (2020). A mixed-method study of design practices and designers' roles in sustainable-minded clothing companies. Sustainability, 12(11), Article 4680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114680
Katibi, K. (Photographer), & Enaholo, P. (Curator). (n.d.). 500 years of tie and dye production [Exhibition]. The Centenary Project, Pan-Atlantic University. Google Arts & Culture. https://artsandculture.google.com/story/500-years-of-tie-and-dye-production/7wVRhbHix5iuLA
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2004). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 56(1–2), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00458.x
Knappett, C. (2005). Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
KONYA Co., Ltd. (2021). Ai-iro 48-shoku: 48 shades of indigo blue [Color chart]. Konya Kyoto. Retrieved from https://konya-kyoto.com/aboutus/ai48/
Korean Culture and Information Service (KOCIS). (2020, March). Dyeing to preserve tradition: Monthly KOREA, March 2020. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Republic of Korea. Retrieved from https://www.kocis.go.kr/eng/webzine/202003/sub02.html
Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: A critical appraisal. Museum International, 56(1–2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00459.x
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Li, S., Cunningham, A. B., Fan, R., & Wang, Y. (2019). Identity blues: The ethnobotany of the indigo dyeing by Landian Yao (Iu Mien) in Yunnan, Southwest China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0289-0
Lee, Y.-H., Hwang, E.-K., & Kim, H.-D. (2009). Colorimetric assay and antibacterial activity of cotton, silk, and wool fabrics dyed with peony, pomegranate, clove, Coptis chinensis and gallnut extracts. Materials, 2(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2010010
Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Lowenthal, D. (1998). The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lubar, S., & Kingery, W. D. (Eds.). (1993). History from things: Essays on material culture. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Luckman, S. (2015). Craft and the creative economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137399687
Mabuza, L., Sonnenberg, N., & Marx-Pienaar, N. (2023). Natural versus synthetic dyes: Consumers' understanding of apparel coloration and their willingness to adopt sustainable alternatives. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 18, Article 200146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200146
Mahapatra, N. N. (2016). Textile dyes. New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing India.
Maximize Market Research. (2019). Global textile chemical market. Retrieved from https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-textile-chemical-market/16123/
McKinley, C. E. (2011). Indigo: In search of the color that seduced the world. New York: Bloomsbury.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, D. (1985). Artefacts as categories: A study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Miller, D. (Ed.). (2005). Materiality. Duke University Press.
Miller, D. (2010). Stuff. Cambridge: Polity.
Miller, D., & Tilley, C. (1996). Editorial. Journal of Material Culture, 1(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/135918359600100101
Mocquard, J., Le Lamer, A.-C., Fabre, P.-L., Mathieu, C., Chastrette, C., Vitrai, A., & Vandenbossche, V. (2022). Indigo dyeing from Isatis tinctoria L.: From medieval to modern use. Dyes and Pigments, 207, Article 110675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110675
Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
Munjeri, D. (2004). Tangible and intangible heritage: From difference to convergence. Museum International, 56(1–2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350-0775.2004.00453.x
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Notar, B. E. (2006). Authenticity anxiety and counterfeit confidence: Outsourcing souvenirs, changing money, and narrating value in reform-era China. Modern China, 32(1), 64–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0097700405282348
Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2001). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00093.x
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Periyasamy, A. P., & Periyasami, S. (2023). Critical review on sustainability in denim: A step toward sustainable production and consumption of denim. ACS Omega, 8(5), 4472–4490. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06374
Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation. New York, NY: Farrar & Rinehart.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Quan, H., Li, Y., Liu, D., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Protection of Guizhou Miao batik culture based on knowledge graph and deep learning. Heritage Science, 12, Article 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01317-y
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/sach17314
Samanta, A. K., & Agarwal, P. (2009). Application of natural dyes on textiles. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research, 34(4), 384–399. Retrieved from http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/6886
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Shahid, M., Shahid-ul-Islam, & Mohammad, F. (2013). Recent advancements in natural dye applications: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 53, 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.031
Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Milosz, M., Powroznik, P., & Lukasik, E. (2022). 3D technologies for intangible cultural heritage preservation — literature review for selected databases. Heritage Science, 10, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00633-x
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Son, K., Shin, Y., & Yoo, D. I. (2019). Effect of pH condition on natural indigo (Indigofera tinctoria) reduction by yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Fibers and Polymers, 20(12), 2570–2580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-019-9214-3
Splitstoser, J. C., Dillehay, T. D., Wouters, J., & Claro, A. (2016). Early pre-Hispanic use of indigo blue in Peru. Science Advances, 2(9), e1501623. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501623
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Sun, Y., & Suthers, D. D. (2023). From affordances to cultural affordances: An analytic framework for tracing the dynamic interaction among technology, people and culture. Cultures of Science, 6(2), 209–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083231176863
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001
Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590106
Throsby, D. (2009). Tourism, heritage and cultural sustainability: Three 'golden rules'. In L. Fusco Girard & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Cultural tourism and sustainable local development. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
Tilley, C., Keane, W., Küchler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of material culture. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607972
Tokushima Prefecture. (n.d.). Awa indigo. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://www.pref.tokushima.lg.jp/en/japanese/natural_culture/traditional_culture/awa-ai
Torimaru, T., & Hedstrom, A. L. (2010). Chinese blue & white itajime (jiaxie): Folk tradition of carved board clamp resist dyeing in Zhejiang Province. In Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 54). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=tsaconf
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester: Wiley.
Ueno, Y. (2023). Indigo dyeing and fermentation sukumo, essential for traditional Japanese indigo dyeing. Arts and Sciences, 7(3). Retrieved from https://openscience.fr/IMG/pdf/iste_artsci23v7n3_1.pdf
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
UNESCO. (2009). Batik of Indonesia. Inscribed on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/indonesian-batik-00170
UNESCO. (2018). Blaudruck/Modrotisk/Kékfestés/Modrotlač, resist block printing and indigo dyeing in Europe. Retrieved from https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/blaudruck-modrotisk-kkfests-modrotla-resist-block-printing-and-indigo-dyeing-in-europe-01365
UNESCO. (n.d.). Sustainable development and living heritage. Retrieved April 23, 2026, from https://ich.unesco.org/en/sustainable-development-and-living-heritage
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2009). The 2009 UNESCO framework for cultural statistics. Retrieved from https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/unesco-framework-for-cultural-statistics-2009-en.pdf
Van Roojen, P. (2001). Batik design. Amsterdam: Pepin Press.
Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.
Wada, Y. I., Rice, M. K., & Barton, J. (1999). Shibori: The inventive art of Japanese shaped resist dyeing. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
Wang, K., Luo, Q., Ding, W., Zhang, Q., Ji, D., Wang, R., & Qin, X. (2025). Nitrogen-mediated dyeing of denim with natural indigo: Towards sustainable and efficient coloration. Dyes and Pigments, 239, Article 112778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2025.112778
Watt, J. C. Y., & Wardwell, A. E. (1997). When silk was gold: Central Asian and Chinese textiles. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Woodward, I. (2007). Understanding material culture. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446278987
Xu, W., Zhang, L., Cunningham, A. B., Li, S., Zhuang, H., Wang, Y., & Liu, A. (2020). Blue genome: Chromosome-scale genome reveals the evolutionary and molecular basis of indigo biosynthesis in Strobilanthes cusia. The Plant Journal, 104(4), 864–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14992
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yu, H., Li, T. N., Ran, Q., Huang, Q. W., & Wang, J. (2021). Strobilanthes cusia (Nees) Kuntze, a multifunctional traditional Chinese medicinal plant, and its herbal medicines: A comprehensive review. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 265, Article 113325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113325
Yusuf, M., Shabbir, M., & Mohammad, F. (2017). Natural colorants: Historical, processing and sustainable prospects. Natural Products and Bioprospecting, 7(1), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-017-0119-9
Zahari, N. S., & Sabran, S. F. (2025). Bibliometric analysis of Indigofera-based natural dyes in the Asia–Pacific: Research trends and future directions. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01421-4
Zhang, L., Wang, L., Cunningham, A. B., Shi, Y., & Wang, Y. (2019). Island blues: Indigenous knowledge of indigo-yielding plant species used by Hainan Miao and Li dyers on Hainan Island, China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15, Article 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0314-3
Zhou, Y., Sun, J., & Huang, Y. (2019). The digital preservation of intangible cultural heritage in China: A survey. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 48(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2019-0004