| 研究生: |
吳思瑩 Wu, Ssu-Ying |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
藉由互動數位藝術探索土地人文的轉譯與創造:以 mov.i.print 的應用與影響為例 Exploring the Translation and Creation of Culture through Interactive Digital Art, with Reference to the Application and Impact of mov.i.print |
| 指導教授: |
卓彥廷
Cho, Yen-Ting |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 科技藝術碩士學位學程 Master Program on Techno Art |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 114 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 數位藝術 、田調資料 、公共藝術 、mov.i.print 、參與式共創 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Interactive digital art, Fieldwork data, Public art, Co-creation, mov.i.print |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:121 下載:12 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在透過兩個Project的創作過程以及成果,深入探討以下研究問題:1)研究田調資料如何進入數位藝術領域,探討其在數位藝術創作中的應用方式和過程;2)研究數位技術特性如何幫助土地人文轉譯再造的過程,包括數位技術特性在土地人文轉譯中的應用和效果;3)研究互動數位藝術作品如何與觀眾互動,透過個人與群體的數據共創作品,創造對話的機會,促進土地文化的傳播與互動;4)探討如何透過數位藝術工具「mov.i.print」提供實用的指導和幫助給創作者,以最大化該工具在創作過程和創作成果中的應用價值。
本研究將以「mov.i.print」系統作為創作工具,整理豐富的田調資料,將其轉化為具現代感的視覺意象。研究過程中,筆者將探討田調資料如何進入數位藝術領域,並瞭解其在數位藝術創作中的應用方式和過程。同時,將探究數位技術特性如何幫助土地人文轉譯與創造,並評估其在土地人文轉譯中的應用和效果。
透過這些研究問題的探討,本研究旨在深入瞭解數位藝術、田調資料和公共藝術領域之間的關聯,透過創作實踐推動創新應用的發展。最終呈現出來的創作結果,將有助於豐富土地人文轉譯和數位藝術創作的理論與實踐。
In this extended abstract, I delve into the application and impact of the mov.i.print digital tool within the context of interactive digital art creation, focusing on its innovative translation of cultural and environmental data into visual expressions. By examining the outcomes of two distinct projects, I explore the dynamic interplay between digital technology and land-based cultural narratives. Through a combination of creative practice and technological exploration, I reinterpret and convey local knowledge, history, and human interactions with the land. My investigation reveals how mov.i.print not only facilitates the translation of fieldwork data but also catalyzes a new form of artistic expression that fosters engagement, interaction, and dialogue among creators, audiences, and the environment.
王玉龄. (2005). 玩藝學堂: 校園公共藝術. 行政院文化建設委員會.
张钟萄. (2020). 数字资本主义的文化逻辑: 从艺术批判到数据生产中的 “参与”. 文艺理论研究, 40(4), 188.
周伶芝. (2020). 田調不是創作護身符. https://par.npacntch.org/tw/article/doc/FTJCSNS63B
施登騰. (2019). 數位轉譯系列:深度內容的數位轉譯技術. https://medium.com/artech-interpreter/%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E8%BD%89%E8%AD%AF%E7%B3%BB%E5%88%97-%E6%B7%B1%E5%BA%A6%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B9%E7%9A%84%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E8%BD%89%E8%AD%AF%E6%8A%80%E8%A1%93-5380327f01f3
胡寶林. (2006). 公共藝術空間新美學 New genre public art. 公共藝術/公共空間: 9, 1-160.
曾旭正. (2005). 打造美樂地: 社區公共藝術. 行政院文化建設委員會.
蔡敦浩, 劉育忠, & 洪榮志. (2013). 從對立到合作:文化商品生成中的社會創業 [From Antagonism to Cooperation: Social Entrepreneurship in the Becoming of Cultural Products]. 輔仁管理評論, 20(1), 81-103.
Allen, S. (2000). Practice: architecture. technique and representation, g+ b arts international. C. Australia.
Atkins, S., & Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: a review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing, 18(8), 1188-1192.
Bishop, C. (2006). Participation.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational Aesthetics, les presses du réel. Trans. Pleasance, S. and Woods, F.(First published in French as Esthétique relationnelle, Les presses du reel, 1998).
Briken, K., Chillas, S., Krzywdzinski, M., & Marks, A. (2017). Labour process theory and the new digital workplace. In The new digital workplace. How new technologies revolutionise work (pp. 1-17). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brinkmann, R. (2008). The art and science of digital compositing: Techniques for visual effects, animation and motion graphics. Morgan Kaufmann.
Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63-69.
Carson, F., & Pajaczkowska, C. (2016). Feminist visual culture. Routledge.
Cho, Y.-T., Kuo, Y.-L., Yeh, Y.-T., & Lee, Y.-C. (2019). MovIPrint: Move, Explore and Fabricate. Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia,
Cohen, D., & Crabtree, B. (2006). Qualitative research guidelines project. In.
Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B., & Bharath, A. A. (2018). Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE signal processing magazine, 35(1), 53-65.
De Oliveira, L. C. (2019). The Handbook of TESOL in K-12. John Wiley & Sons.
Dragicevic, S. (2010). Manual of Geospatial Science and Technology. Geomatica, 64(4), 483-484.
Duranti, A. (2011). Linguistic anthropology: Language as a non-neutral medium. The Cambridge handbook of sociolinguistics, 28-46.
Flinders, D. J., & Thornton, S. J. (2021). The curriculum studies reader. Routledge.
Fry, B. J. (2004). Computational information design Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Harrison, C., & Wood, P. (2004). Art in Theory 1900-2000.2 Med. In: Carlton: Blackwell.
Hughes, K. (2008). Design to promote girls' agency through educational games: The Click! Urban adventure. Beyond Barbie and Mortal Combat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming, 230-246.
Kester, G. H. (2011). The one and the many: Contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press.
Knight, C. K. (2008). Public Art: Theory. Practice and Populism. Blackwell Publishing. Oxford.
Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: a practitioner's guide to user research. Elsevier.
Lacy, S. (1995). Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. Bay Press.
Lee, J. H., & Ostwald, M. J. (2019). Grammatical and Syntactical Approaches in Architecture: Emerging Research and Opportunities: Emerging Research and Opportunities.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1992). The view from afar. University of Chicago Press.
Manovich, L. (2002). The language of new media. In: University of Toronto Press.
Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. Debates in the digital humanities, 2(1), 460-475.
Martin, B., Hanington, B., & Hanington, B. M. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Pub.
Mul, G., & Masson, E. (2018). Data-Based Art, Algorithmic Poetry: Geert Mul in Conversation with Eef Masson. TMG Journal for Media History, 21(2).
Noble, I., & Bestley, R. (2005). Visual Research-An Introduction to Research Methods for Graphic Designers. Worthing: AVA Academia, 189.
O'brien, J. A., & Marakas, G. M. (2006). Management information systems (Vol. 6). McGraw-Hill Irwin New York, NY, USA.
Paterson, C., & Chapman, J. (2013). Enhancing skills of critical reflection to evidence learning in professional practice. Physical Therapy in Sport, 14(3), 133-138.
Phillips, P. C. (1989). Temporality and public art. Art Journal, 48(4), 331-335.
Pöchhacker, F. (2016). Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge.
Robèrt, K.-H., Schmidt-Bleek, B., De Larderel, J. A., Basile, G., Jansen, J. L., Kuehr, R., Thomas, P. P., Suzuki, M., Hawken, P., & Wackernagel, M. (2002). Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. Journal of Cleaner production, 10(3), 197-214.
Schulz, C. N. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Academy Editions, London.
Zeisel, J. (1984). Inquiry by design: Tools for environment-behaviour research. CUP archive.