簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 雷芷綾
Lei, Zhi-Ling
論文名稱: 臺灣東部地區新石器時代晚期史前陶土資源域策略
The Strategy of Prehistoric Pottery Raw Material Resources in Eastern Taiwan
指導教授: 趙金勇
Chao, Chin-yung
楊小青
Yang, Hsiao-Chin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 考古學研究所
Institute of Archaeology
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 236
中文關鍵詞: 陶土原料資源岩象學分析XRD分析pXRF分析資源域分析
外文關鍵詞: ceramic raw materials, petrography, XRD, XRF, catchment analysis
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 臺灣東部中央山脈與海岸山脈分別提供性質差異顯著的製陶原料,然而過往對於史前陶器「本地陶」與「外來陶」的判定,多依陶質、技術、文化風格或地質特徵等不同標準,致使陶器來源及人群互動的詮釋存在差異。本研究重新檢視臺灣東部本地陶的判定標準,整合岩象學、地球化學與資源域分析,比較主流陶與遺址周邊土壤資源,以探討史前陶工的原料選擇策略,並重新評估四處遺址主流陶的來源。
    本研究以荖山、瑞北、松浦及港口四處史前遺址為研究對象,整合偏光顯微鏡岩象分析、便攜式X射線螢光分析儀(pXRF)、微區X射線螢光光譜儀(Micro-XRF)、X光繞射儀(XRD)及地理資訊系統資源域分析,比較陶片與遺址周邊土壤及河流沉積物之岩象、化學與黏土礦物組成。
    研究結果顯示,四處遺址主流陶多屬本地取材,陶工在原料選擇上主要受到距離成本、資源可及性及文化傳統等因素共同影響。值得注意的是,荖山一、二類陶雖與花岡山文化部分主流陶器具有相似文化風格,但其地球化學特徵(尤其Cr/Ni比值)明顯不同,顯示兩者可能分別利用各自所在地的原料製陶,反映共同文化傳統下的地方化生產,而非外來陶輸入。
    本研究認為,本地陶的判定應建立於地質來源、技術選擇與文化脈絡的多角度整合證據,而非僅依單一標準判斷,如此才可以更全面的視角理解臺灣東部史前社會的資源利用策略與文化互動。

    Eastern Taiwan comprises two contrasting geological areas, the Central Range and the Coastal Range, which provide ceramic raw materials with distinct geological characteristics. Previous studies have identified locally produced and non-local pottery using different criteria, leading to inconsistent interpretations of pottery provenance and prehistoric interaction. This study re-examines the concept of locally produced pottery by integrating petrographic, geochemical, and site catchment analyses.
    Four prehistoric sites, Laoshan, Ruibei, Songpu, and Gangkou, were investigated, where unearthed pottery sherds and on-site soil and fluvial sediment samples were compared, employing petrographic analysis, portable X-ray fluorescence(pXRF), micro-XRF, X-ray diffraction(XRD), and GIS-based catchment analysis.
    The results indicate that the dominant pottery assemblages at all four sites were primarily produced from locally available raw materials. Raw material selection was influenced by transportation cost, resource availability, and cultural tradition. Although Type I and Type II pottery from Laoshan closely resemble Huagangshan Culture pottery in style, their geochemical signatures, particularly the Cr/Ni ratio, differ significantly, indicating independent local production rather than the importation of finished vessels.
    This study demonstrates that the identification of locally produced pottery should integrate geological, technological, and archaeological evidence rather than rely solely on stylistic characteristics, providing a more comprehensive understanding of prehistoric ceramic production and resource use in eastern Taiwan.

    中文摘要 i The strategy of prehistoric pottery raw material resources in eastern Taiwan ii 致謝 vii 目錄 x 表目錄 xiv 圖目錄 xv 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、前言 1 第二節、何謂本地陶 3 第三節、研究主旨與設計 4 第二章、遺址考古與地質文獻回顧 8 第一節、遺址考古背景 8 一、荖山遺址 8 二、瑞北遺址 9 三、松浦遺址 10 四、港口遺址 12 第二節、遺址地質背景 14 一、四個研究區域地質背景 14 二、遺址範圍地質岩性與土壤母質 21 三、花東區域土壤資訊回顧 24 第三章、陶器考古溯源研究 26 第一節、陶器溯源研究的重要性 26 第二節、陶器溯源研究的限制 27 第三節、本地陶與外來陶 29 第四節、判斷本地陶與外來陶的考古學方法 30 一、豐度標準的本地陶 31 二、製陶技術標準的本地陶 33 三、地質環境標準的本地陶 35 第五節、民族考古學與科學分析交會的陶器溯源分析 37 第六節、遺址資源域(site catchment analysis) 40 第四章、研究方法 42 第一節、抽樣原則 42 第二節、陶器成分分析 47 一、陶片岩象分析 47 二、陶片pXRF化學成分量測以及主成分分析 50 三、微區X光螢光分析 53 第三節、距離成本計算野外調查範圍及野外調查 54 一、距離成本的計算 54 二、野外調查 57 第四節、土樣分析方法 57 一、土壤塑性實驗 57 二、土壤岩象切片 59 三、土壤pXRF化學成分量測 60 四、土壤樣本黏土礦物XRD分析 61 第五章、研究區域陶片分析 63 第一節、陶片岩相學礦物 63 一、荖山的陶片 63 二、瑞北的陶片 65 三、松浦的陶片 66 四、港口的陶片 67 五、陶片岩象觀察小結 68 第二節、遺址主流陶片XRF分析 74 一、遺址主流陶主成分分析 74 二、pXRF元素組成與地球化學特徵分析 79 三、微區X光螢光分析(Micro-XRF) 84 第三節、陶片分析小結 86 第六章、遺址資源域GIS分析及田野調查成果 88 第一節、距離成本疊農試所土壤圖分析結果 88 第二節、田野調查結果 91 一、野外田野調查結果 91 二、民族誌紀錄與田野採訪 95 第七章、資源域範圍內土壤樣本分析 97 第一節、各遺址資源域土壤岩象分析 97 一、荖山遺址陶片與荖山遺址資源域土樣 97 二、松浦遺址陶片和松浦遺址資源域土樣 98 三、瑞北遺址陶片和瑞北遺址資源域土樣 100 四、港口遺址陶片和港口土樣 101 第二節、土壤XRD分析 102 第三節、土壤pXRF分析 103 一、各遺址資源域範圍內土樣之化學元素差異 103 二、各遺址資源域範圍內土樣之化學元素特徵 105 三、土壤樣本化學元素比值反映風化程度 109 第八章、討論與結論 111 第一節、臺灣東部不同地質背景下的陶土資源差異 111 第二節、本研究臺灣東部四個遺址的主流陶是否為本地陶? 113 一、陶片與土壤對比:史前人是否使用本地資源製陶 113 二、以脈絡化形式論證各遺址主流陶是否為本地陶 118 第三節、研究限制 123 第四節、未來研究展望 124 參考文獻 126 附錄一、土壤樣本XRD結果圖 143 附錄二、訪問內容 146 第一節、馬武拉外工作室口述歷史訪談 146 第二節、洪甗藝坊口述歷史訪談問題 151 第三節、馬佛燒陶口述歷史訪談問題 157 第四節、陶錫工藝口述歷史訪談問題 166 附錄三、陶片pXRF原始數據 170 第一節、標準樣本 170 第二節、四個遺址主流陶原始數據 173 一、主要元素 173 二、微量元素 175 三、其他元素 177 第三節、花岡山主流陶原始數據 178 一、主要元素 178 二、微量元素 179 三、其他元素 179 附錄四、Micro-XRF原始數據 180 第一節、荖山遺址主流陶 180 一、荖山遺址第一類陶 180 二、荖山遺址第二類陶 184 三、荖山遺址第三類陶 191 第二節、瑞北遺址主流陶 195 第三節、松浦遺址主流陶 203 第四節、港口遺址主流陶 207 附錄五、土壤pXRF原始數據 214 第一節、土樣pXRF原始數據 214 一、主要元素 214 二、微量元素 215 三、其他元素 217

    Acosta, J. A., S. Martínez-Martínez, A. Faz, and J. Arocena 2011 “Accumulations of major and trace elements in particle size fractions of soils on eight different parent materials.” Geoderma 161(1-2): 30-42.
    Adan‐Bayewitz, D., and I. Perlman 1985 “LOCAL POTTERY PROVENIENCE STUDIES: A ROLE FOR CLAY ANALYSIS.” Archaeometry 27(2): 203-217.
    Albero Santacreu, D., and G. Mateu Vicens 2012 “Raw Materials and Pottery Production at the Late Bronze and Iron Age Site of Puig de Sa Morisca, Mallorca, Spain.” Geoarchaeology 27(4): 285-299.
    Arnold, D. E., H. Neff, and M. D. Glascock 2000 “Testing assumptions of neutron activation analysis: communities, workshops and paste preparation in Yucatán, Mexico.” Archaeometry 42(2):301-316.
    Arnold, Dean. E.1985 Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge University Press.
    Arnold, Dean E., H. Neff, and R. L. Bishop 1991 “Compositional Analysis and “Sources” of Pottery: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach.” American Anthropologist 93(1): 70-90.
    Aronson, M., J. M. Skibo, and M. T. Stark 1994 “PRODUCTION AND USE TECHNOLOGIES IN KALINGA POTTERY.” In Kalinga Ethnoarchaeology: Expanding Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by William A. Longacre and James M. Skibo. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 83-122
    Babu, S. S., V. Purnachandra Rao, and M. R. Mohan 2025 “Clay Mineralogy and Major and Trace Element Geochemistry of Recent Sediments in Rivers Along the West Coast of India: Implications for Provenance and Chemical Weathering.” Minerals 15(1): 1-43.
    Bishop, R. L., R. L. Rands, and G. R. Holley 1982 “Ceramic compositional analysis in archaeological perspective.” In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, edited by Michael B. Schiffer. New York: Academic Press, pp. 275-330.
    Boivin, N. 2004 Soils, Stones and Symbols: Cultural Perceptions of the Mineral World. London: Psychology Press.
    Bray, T. L. 1995 “The Panzaleo Puzzle: Non-Local Pottery in Northern Highland Ecuador.” Journal of Field Archaeology 22(2): 137-156.
    Chamley, H. 1989 Clay Sedimentology. Berlin: Springer.
    Chen, W. S., S. L. Chung, H. Y. Chou, Z. Zugeerbai, W. Y. Shao, and Y. H. Lee 2017 “A reinterpretation of the metamorphic Yuli belt: Evidence for a middle‐late Miocene accretionary prism in eastern Taiwan.” Tectonics 36(2): 188-206.
    Chen, Z. S., Z. Y. Hseu, and C. C. Tsai 2015 The Soils of Taiwan. Dordrecht: Springer.
    Cheng, C. H., S. H. Jien, H. Tsai, Y. H. Chang, Y. C. Chen, and Z. Y. Hseu 2009 “Geochemical element differentiation in serpentine soils from the ophiolite complexes, eastern Taiwan.” Soil Science 174(5): 283-291.
    Costin, C. L. 2000 “The use of ethnoarchaeology for the archaeological study of ceramic production.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(4): 377-403.
    Croffie, M. E., P. N. Williams, O. Fenton, A. Fenelon, and K. Daly 2022 “Rubidium measured by XRF as a predictor of soil particle size in limestone and siliceous parent materials.” Journal of Soils and Sediments 22(3): 818-830.
    Druc, I. 2013 “What is local? Looking at ceramic production in the Peruvian Highlands and beyond.” Journal of Anthropological Research 69(4): 485-513.
    El Ouahabi, M., H. E. B. El Idrissi, L. Daoudi, M. El Halim, and N. Fagel 2019 “Moroccan clay deposits: physico-chemical properties in view of provenance studies on ancient ceramics.” Applied Clay Science 172: 65-74.
    Goldich, S. S. 1938 “A Study in Rock-Weathering.” The Journal of Geology 46(1): 17-58.
    Gosselain, O. P. 2000 “Materializing Identities: An African Perspective.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3): 187-217.
    Gosselain, O. P. 2008a “Thoughts and Adjustments in the Potter's Backyard.” In Breaking the Mould: Challenging the Past through Pottery, edited by Ina Berg. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 67–79.
    Gosselain, O. P. 2008b “Pottery chaînes opératoires as Historical Documents.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History, edited by Thomas T. Spear. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–41.
    Gosselain, O. P., and A. Livingstone Smith 2005 “The Source: Clay Selection and Processing Practices in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Pottery Manufacturing Processes: Reconstruction and Interpretation 1349: 33–47.
    Grave, P., L. Kealhofer, B. Marsh, U. D. Schoop, J. Seeher, J. W. Bennett, and A. Stopic 2014 “Ceramics, trade, provenience and geology: Cyprus in the Late Bronze Age.” Antiquity 88(342): 1180–1200.
    Haschke, M., and S. Boehm 2017 “Micro-XRF in Scanning Electron Microscopes.” In Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, edited by Peter W. Hawkes. Cambridge: Elsevier, pp. 1–60.
    Heidke, J. M., E. J. Miksa, and H. D. Wallace 2002 “A Petrographic Approach to Sand-Tempered Pottery Provenance Studies.” In Ceramic Production and Circulation in the Greater Southwest: Source Determination by INAA and Complementary Mineralogical Investigations, edited by Donna M. Glowacki and Hector Neff. Los Angeles: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, University of California, pp. 152–178.
    Hein, A., P. M. Day, P. S. Quinn, and V. Kilikoglou 2004 “The geochemical diversity of Neogene clay deposits in Crete and its implications for provenance studies of Minoan pottery.” Archaeometry 46(3): 357–384.
    Higgs, E. S. 1972 “Prehistoric Economies: A Territorial Approach.” In Papers in Economic Prehistory, edited by E. S. Higgs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–36.
    Hirth, K. G. 1984 “Catchment analysis and formative settlement in the Valley of Mexico.” American Anthropologist 86(1): 136–143.
    Hseu, Z. Y. 2006 “CONCENTRATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHROMIUM AND NICKEL FRACTIONS ALONG A SERPENTINITIC TOPOSEQUENCE.” Soil Science 171(4): 341–353.
    Hunt, A. M. W., and R. J. Speakman 2015 “Portable XRF Analysis of Archaeological Sediments and Ceramics.” Journal of Archaeological Science 53: 626–638.
    Iizuka, Y., and H. C. Hung 2005 “Archaeomineralogy of Taiwan Nephrite: Sourcing Study of Nephritic Artifacts from the Philippines.” Journal of Austronesian Studies 1(1): 35–81.
    Ingold, T. 2000 “The Temporality of the Landscape.” In The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge, pp. 189–201.
    Jordan, J., and K. Prufer 2020 “Identifying Local and Non-Local Pottery in Three Tombs at Uxbenká, Toledo District: Results of Thin Section Analysis.” Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology 17: 209–219.
    Jorge, A., M. I. Dias, and P. M. Day 2013 “PLAIN POTTERY AND SOCIAL LANDSCAPES: REINTERPRETING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CERAMIC PROVENANCE IN THE NEOLITHIC.” Archaeometry 55(5): 825–851.
    Keegan, W. F., L. C. Bloch, E. C. Kracht, and M. P. Pateman 2022 “The distribution of nonlocal pottery in Lucayan archaeological sites, Bahama archipelago.” Journal of Caribbean Archaeology 22: 1–16.
    Kudelić, A., and N. Neral 2025 “Selection of raw material through the history of pottery production in Istria (Croatia): Social implications of paste variability.” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 17(3): Article 67.
    Leclerc, M. 2016 Investigating the Raw Materials Used for Lapita and Post-Lapita Pottery Manufacturing: A Chemical Characterisation of Ceramic Collections from Vanuatu. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Archaeology and Anthropology, The Australian National University, Canberra.
    Li, C., X. Shi, S. Kao, M. Chen, Y. Liu, X. Fang, H. Lü, J. Zou, S. Liu, and S. Qiao 2012 “Clay mineral composition and their sources for the fluvial sediments of Taiwanese rivers.” Chinese Science Bulletin 57(6): 673–681.
    MacKenzie, W. S., and C. Guilford 2014 Atlas of the Rock-Forming Minerals in Thin Section. London: Routledge.
    Michelaki, K., G. V. Braun, and R. G. V. Hancock 2015 “Local Clay Sources as Histories of Human–Landscape Interactions: A Ceramic Taskscape Perspective.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 22(3): 783–827.
    Miksa, E. J. 1998 A Model for Assigning Temper Provenance to Archaeological Ceramics with Case Studies from the American Southwest. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
    Minc, L. D., R. J. Sherman, C. Elson, M. Winter, E. M. Redmond, and C. S. Spencer 2016 “Ceramic provenance and the regional organization of pottery production during the later Formative periods in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico: Results of trace-element and mineralogical analyses.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 8: 28–46.
    Moore, D. M., and R. J. Reynolds 1997 X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Nayak, K., A. T.-S. Lin, K.-F. Huang, Z. Liu, N. Babonneau, G. Ratzov, R. K. Pillutla, P. Das, and S.-K. Hsu 2021 “Clay-mineral distribution in recent deep-sea sediments around Taiwan: Implications for sediment dispersal processes.” Tectonophysics 814: 228974.
    Neff, H., and M. Martinón-Torres 2014 “Pots as Signals: Explaining the Enigma of Long-Distance Ceramic Exchange.” In Craft and Science: International Perspectives on Archaeological Ceramics, edited by Marcos Martinón-Torres. Doha: Bloomsbury Qatar Foundation, pp. 1–11.
    Nesbitt, H. W., and G. M. Young 1982 “Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites.” Nature 299: 715–717.
    Neupert, M. A. 2000 “Clays of Contention: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Factionalism and Clay Composition.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3): 249–272.
    Ortega, D., J. J. Ibañez, L. Khalidi, V. Méndez, D. Campos, and L. Teira 2014 “Towards a Multi-Agent-Based Modelling of Obsidian Exchange in the Neolithic Near East.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21(2): 461–485.
    Osborne, J. W., and A. B. Costello 2004 “Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 9: 11.
    Oze, C., S. Fendorf, D. K. Bird, and R. G. Coleman 2004 “Chromium geochemistry in serpentinized ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils from the Franciscan complex of California.” American Journal of Science 304(1): 67–101.
    Quinn, P. S. 2022 Thin Section Petrography, Geochemistry and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Archaeological Ceramics. Oxford: Archaeopress Publishing Ltd.
    Quinn, P. S., I. V. Gregory, H. B. Page, A. H. Abdelrahman Adam, and M. Brass 2025 “Ceramic manufacturing traditions and sources from the multi-period agro-pastoral cemetery of Jebel Moya, Sudan.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 65: 105194.
    Renfrew, C. 1977 “Alternative models for exchange and spatial distribution.” In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Timothy K. Earle and Jonathon E. Ericson. New York: Academic Press, pp. 71–90.
    Rice, P. M. 2015 Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook, 2nd edition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    Rodríguez-Alegría, E., H. Neff, and M. D. Glascock 2003 “Indigenous ware or Spanish import? The case of Indígena ware and approaches to power in colonial Mexico.” Latin American Antiquity 14(1): 67–81.
    Roper, D. C. 1979 “The method and theory of site catchment analysis: A review.” Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 2: 119–140.
    Ross, J., K. D. Fowler, I. Shai, H. J. Greenfield, and A. M. Maeir 2018 “A Scanning Method for the Identification of Pottery Forming Techniques at the Mesoscopic Scale: A Pilot Study in the Manufacture of Early Bronze Age III Holemouth Jars and Platters from Tell es-Safi/Gath.” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 18: 551–561.
    Roux, V. 2019 Ceramics and Society: A Technological Approach to Archaeological Assemblages. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
    Ruby, B. J., and C. M. Shriner 2005 “Ceramic Vessel Compositions and Styles as Evidence of the Local and Nonlocal Social Affiliations of Ritual Participants at the Mann Site, Indiana.” In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case. New York: Springer, pp. 553–572.
    Sharratt, N., M. Golitko, P. Ryan Williams, and L. Dussubieux 2009 “Ceramic production during the Middle Horizon: Wari and Tiwanaku clay procurement in the Moquegua Valley, Peru.” Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 24(6): 792–820.
    Sheldon, N. D., G. P. Retallack, and J. J. Tanaka 2002 “Geochemical Climofunctions from North American Soils and Application to Paleosols across the Eocene–Oligocene Boundary in Oregon.” The Journal of Geology 110(6): 687–696.
    Shepard, A. O. 1956 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
    Smith, A. L., and A. Viseyrias 2010 “Shaping Kabambian Pottery: Identification and Definition of Technical Features” Open Anthropology Journal 3: 124–141.
    Stark, M. T., R. L. Bishop, and E. Miksa 2000 “Ceramic technology and social boundaries: Cultural practices in Kalinga clay selection and use.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7: 295–331.
    Tan, L. P., and H. Y. Chuay 1979 “Serpentinites of the Fengtien-Wanyung Area, Hualien, Taiwan.” Acta Geologica Taiwanica 20: 52-68.
    Underhill, A. P. 2003 “Investigating Variation in Organization of Ceramic Production: An Ethnoarchaeological Study in Guizhou, China.” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10(3): 203–275.
    Vaughn, K. J., and H. Neff 2004 “Tracing the clay source of Nasca polychrome pottery: Results from a preliminary raw material survey.” Journal of Archaeological Science 31(11): 1577–1586.
    Vita-Finzi, C. 1969 “Early Man and Environment.” In Trends in Geography, edited by Ronald J. Chorley. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 102–109.
    Vita-Finzi, C., E. S. Higgs, D. Sturdy, J. Harriss, A. J. Legge, and H. Tippett 1970 “Prehistoric Economy in the Mount Carmel Area of Palestine: Site Catchment Analysis.” Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36: 1–37.
    Weigand, P. C., G. Harbottle, and E. V. Sayre 1977 “Turquoise Sources and Source Analysis: Mesoamerica and the Southwestern U.S.A.” In Exchange Systems in Prehistory, edited by Timothy K. Earle and Jonathon E. Ericson. New York: Academic Press, pp. 15–34.
    Williams, R., G. Taylor, and C. Orr 2020 “pXRF method development for elemental analysis of archaeological soil.” Archaeometry 62(6): 1145–1163.
    Wilson, A. L. 1978 “Elemental analysis of pottery in the study of its provenance: A review.” Journal of Archaeological Science 5(3): 219–236.
    尹意智、莊家銘 2017 《花蓮縣崇德遺址工程基地(下崇德段834地號)試掘評估報告書暨遺物清冊》,花蓮縣文化局委託。
    甘聿群、江芝華 2023 〈虎頭山公園的史前陶胎:岩象分析與實驗考古的物質性探討〉,《考古人類學刊》99:1-74。
    石磊 1962 〈陶工〉,李亦園主編,《馬太安阿美族的物質文化》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所,頁253-290。
    余奕南 2013 〈花岡山遺址出土陶片原料來源與河流沉積物之對應關係〉,花蓮:國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文。
    吳意琳 2015 〈潮來橋遺址所見細繩紋陶文化陶器技術傳統〉 Journal of Austronesian Studies 6(2):1-54。
    李坤修 2017 〈花蓮縣富里山遺址史前文化內涵初探〉,《田野考古》19(1):1-76。
    阮昌銳 1969 《大港口阿美族〔上、下冊〕(專刊之十八)》,臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
    林佳穎 2017 《花蓮豐田地區天星礦場的蛇紋岩與閃玉之成因》,基隆:國立臺灣海洋大學應用地球科學研究所碩士論文。
    林淑芬 2000 〈附錄一、台東縣遺址出土陶片分析〉,劉益昌、潘常武主編,《台東縣史前遺址內涵及範圍研究:海岸山脈東側與綠島》,臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所,附1-6。
    林淑芬、劉益昌、王淑津 2008 〈由花蓮崇德遺址出土陶片之切片分析所得到的新認識〉。宣讀於「環臺灣地區考古學國際研討會暨2007年度臺灣考古工作會報」,國立臺灣大學人類學系主辦,2008年5月10-11日。
    施天晶 2022 《本地或外來—花岡山方格紋陶製作技術初探》,臺南:國立成功大學考古學研究所碩士論文。
    施國欽 2005 《大地工程學》。第四版。臺北:文笙書局股份有限公司。
    張仲民 1987 《普通土壤學》,臺北:國立編譯館。
    郭素秋 1995 《臺東縣馬武窟溪流域史前遺址調查與研究》,臺北:國立臺灣大學人類學系碩士論文。
    郭素秋 2015 〈花東縱谷北段重光遺址發掘報告〉,《南島學報》6(2):92-190。
    郭素秋 2023 〈宜蘭丸山遺址的甕棺與人獸形玉玦—兼論玉礦產區荖山遺址的甕棺〉,《古今論衡》40:3-32。
    陳文山 2016 《臺灣地質概論》,臺北:中華民國地質學會。
    陳文山、王源 1996 《臺灣東部海岸山脈地質(臺灣地質系列第七號)》,臺北:經濟部中央地質調查所。
    陳文山、林朝宗、楊志成、費立沅、謝凱旋、鞏慧敏、林佩儀、楊小青 2008 〈晚期更新世以來臺北盆地沉積層序架構與構造的時空演變〉,《經濟部中央地質調查所彙刊》21:61-106。
    陳光祖 1990 〈台東縣東河村附近遺址出土陶片之分析〉,《田野考古》1:73-94。
    陳有貝、尹意智、姚書宇 2016 《花蓮縣富源遺址範圍及文化內涵調查成果報告》,花蓮縣文化局委託國立臺灣大學人類學系。
    陳培源 1973 〈台灣黏土礦物與黏土礦物區域〉,《臺灣礦業》3、4期合刊:130-146。
    陳瑪陵、陳珮瑜、林宜羚 2016 〈技術選擇取徑再探陶器製作體系:以臺北盆地幾個史前文化為例〉,《國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊》84(1):1-38。
    陳肇夏 1998 《臺灣的變質岩(臺灣地質系列第十一號)》,臺北:經濟部中央地質調查所。
    黃士強 1989 《東部海岸陸域資源調查及分析—人文史蹟資料調查分析》。台灣省住都局市鄉規劃處委託。
    葉美珍 2000 〈花崗山文化之研究〉,《宜蘭文獻雜誌》43:67-127。
    葉美珍 2001 《花崗山文化之研究(國立臺灣史前文化博物館專刊第六號)》,臺東:國立臺灣史前文化博物館。
    葉美珍 2004 〈花蓮縣港口遺址2001年出土硬陶、瓷器之研究〉,《田野考古》12(一、二期合刊):53-80。
    葉美珍 2010 〈花蓮縣港口遺址繩紋陶文化初探--2001 年試掘出土繩紋陶片之分析〉,《田野考古》12(1/2):41-79。
    趙金勇 1999 〈下田組遺址考古試掘報告-兼論東海岸麒麟文化〉,《田野考古》8(一、二期合刊):45-93。
    劉益昌 2000 〈台灣東部麒麟文化的初步研究〉。宣讀於「東台灣鄉土文化學術研討會」,財團法人東台灣研究會文化藝術基金會主辦,10月6-7日。
    劉益昌 2001 《花蓮港口遺址:考古試掘暨口述歷史調查研究》,臺北:國立歷史博物館。
    劉益昌 2004 《台閩地區考古遺址普查研究計畫報告:宜蘭縣、花蓮縣》,內政部委託中央研究院歷史語言研究所。
    劉益昌、趙金勇 2010 《花岡山遺址搶救發掘報告第四冊:新石器時代》,花蓮縣政府委託中央研究院歷史語言研究所。
    劉益昌、趙金勇、鍾國風 2015 〈「花岡山文化探析」研究計畫(第二期)成果報告〉。宣讀於「2014 年度本院考古研究計畫成果發表會」中央研究院歷史語言研究所主辦,1月28日。
    劉益昌、趙金勇、鍾國風 2020 《花蓮縣考古遺址普查計畫(第一期)成果報告書》。花蓮縣文化局委託國立成功大學考古學研究所。
    劉益昌、劉瑩三、鍾國風 2018 《花蓮縣史前玉器製作工作坊調查研究》,花蓮縣文化局委託國立成功大學考古學研究所。
    劉益昌、鍾國風 2014 〈花蓮縣壽豐鄉重光遺址調查試掘報告〉,《田野考古》17(2):137-168。
    潘紫絹 2021 《從陶器的技術選擇研究探討花岡山文化》,臺北:國立臺灣大學人類學研究所碩士論文。
    賴允傑、莊珮嘉、李依庭、洪英修、黃泰祥、陳慎德、許正一、蔡呈奇、余炳盛、陳尊賢 2018〈台灣土壤重金屬背景濃度之建立及探討〉,《土壤及地下水汙染整治》5(3):143-162。
    鍾國風 2019 《花蓮縣港口列冊考古遺址(秀山段520地號)試掘評估計畫》,花蓮縣文化局委託國立成大考古學研究所。
    不著撰人 2015 〈詳測土壤圖〉。https://tssurgo.tari.gov.tw/Tssurgo2025/resource?parent=2&child=1,2016年10月13日上線。

    QR CODE