簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 彭憶亭
Peng, Yi-Ting
論文名稱: LTE核心網路中支援傳輸層行動數據分流的增強策略與計費控制系統
Enhanced Policy and Charging Control System for Transport-based Mobile Data Offloading in LTE Core Networks
指導教授: 蘇淑茵
Sou, Sok-Ian
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 電腦與通信工程研究所
Institute of Computer & Communication Engineering
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 41
中文關鍵詞: 策略與計費控制 (PCC)多重路徑TCP (MPTCP)行動數據分流流量檢測
外文關鍵詞: Policy and Charging Control (PCC), Multipath TCP (MPTCP), Mobile data offloading, Traffic detection
相關次數: 點閱:66下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著行動裝置的普及,全球資料傳輸流量快速的增加,現今的網路極度需要有效的行動數據分流解決方案。而在利用傳輸層進行分流的方法中,多重路徑TCP (MPTCP)可允許一份資料同時經由多條路徑進行傳輸,有利於資料傳輸效率的提升以及解決傳統移交程序進行時造成服務中斷的問題,為使用者提供具有更好的服務質量 (QoS) 和體驗質量 (QoE) 的服務。然而,現今核心網路中策略與計費控制系統 (PCC) 無法瞭解與實現多重路徑的運作方式,導致在分配核心網路頻寬時,總是依僅有核心網路的情況來進行頻寬分配,造成多數的頻寬資源浪費。
    為了妥善運用傳輸層中多重路徑TCP的優點來進行行動數據分流,本篇論文提出相關的模型讓策略與計費控制系統能夠實現相關封包的偵測並得知當下可使用的路徑資源,制訂更好的規則。此外,我們也提出數學模型與程式模擬來計算與驗證行動裝置使用無線網路的時間,並進一步針對多重路徑TCP資料分流的流量、比率、服務質量和體驗質量進行分析,以協助策略與計費控制系統更妥善的分配與節省核心網路頻寬資源。

    With the proliferation of mobile devices in recent years, the volume of global mobile data traffic has grown exponentially. As a result, effective methods for mobile data offloading are urgently required. A promising L4-approach known as Multipath TCP(MPTCP) has recently been proposed which allows a single transport connection to
    use multiple paths simultaneously over multiple interfaces. In theory, the use of multipath
    offloading overcomes the traditional barriers to the support of QoS and QoE over intermittently-connected WiFi networks. However, existing LTE Policy and Charging
    Control (PCC) system is unaware of possible multipath connections. As a result, it determines the guaranteed bit-rate to the user as though no WiFi connections exist,
    and hence the utilization efficiency of the cellular resources is seriously degraded. This thesis therefore proposes an L4 multipath offloading approach in which the LTE PCC system is rendered aware of alternative connection paths and allocates the available network resources accordingly. Moreover, an analytical model is proposed to assist the operator in evaluating the multipath offloading performance in terms of the offloading time, offloading volume, offloading ratio, and QoS/QoS satisfaction. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated by means of numerical simulations.

    Contents i List of Figures iii List of Tables iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Why L4-approach is better than existing IP flow mobility approach? 3 1.2 What happens when the MPTCP is used while traditional WiFi offloading is applied? 4 1.3 What happens when the PCC system is unaware of the existence of an MPTCP connection? 4 1.4 Why the predicted WiFi offloading time is important for PCC? 5 2 Background 6 2.1 WiFi-based mobile data offloading 6 2.2 Multipath TCP 7 2.3 3GPP PCC architecture 9 3 Related Work 11 4 MPTCP-based WiFi offloading model with PCC support 13 4.1 Enhanced PDNGW 14 4.2 MPTCP to PCC mapping tables 14 4.3 Detailed packet filtering procedure 16 5 Analytical Model 18 5.1 Deriving the distribution of tW 19 5.2 Deriving the expected value of tW 22 5.3 QoS/QoE of mobile video streaming 26 6 Numerical Examples 29 6.1 Simulation model 29 6.2 Expected value of tW 30 6.3 Cumulative distribution function of tW 31 6.4 Offloading volume and ratio 33 6.5 QoS/QoE satisfaction 34 7 Conclusion 37 Bibliography 38

    [1] Cisco, “Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update
    2015–2020 White Paper,” Feb. 2016.
    [2] F. Rebecchi et al., “Data Offloading Techniques in Cellular Networks: A Survey,”
    IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 580–603, Secondquarter, 2015.
    [3] A. Oliva et al., “IP flow mobility: smart traffic offload for future wireless networks,”
    IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 124–132, Oct. 2011
    [4] S.-I. Sou, ”Mobile data offloading with policy and charging control in 3GPP core
    network,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 3481–3486, Sep. 2013.
    [5] B. Han et al., “Mobile data offloading through opportunistic communications and
    social participation”, IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 821–834,
    Mar. 2012.
    [6] T. HoBfeld et al., “Quantification of YouTube QoE via crowdsourcing,” in IEEE
    Int. Symp. on Multimedia (ISM), Dana Point CA, Dec. 2011, pp. 494 – 499.
    [7] V. Burger et al., “Impact of WiFi offloading on video streaming QoE in urban
    environments,” in IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication Workshop (ICCW), London,
    2015, pp. 1717–1722.
    [8] M. Handley et al., “TCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses,”
    IETF RFC 6824, Jan. 2013.
    [9] C. Paasch et al., “Exploring mobile/WiFi handover with multipath TCP,” ACM
    CellNet, pp. 31–36, Aug. 2012.
    [10] M. A. P. Gonzalez et al., “Radio access considerations for data offloading with
    multipath TCP in cellular/WiFi networks,” in Int. Conf. on Information Networking
    (ICOIN), Bangkok, 2013, pp. 680–685.
    [11] D. Suh et al., “Efficiency Analysis of WiFi Offloading Techniques,” IEEE Trans.
    Veh. Technol., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 3813–3817, May 2015.
    [12] N. Banerjee et al., “Seamless SIP-Based Mobility for Multimedia Applica-tions,”
    IEEE Network, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 6–13, Mar. 2006.
    [13] J. Zhang et al., “A SIP-based seamless handoff (S-SIP) scheme for heterogeneous
    mobile networks,” in Proc. IEEE Wireless Commun. and Networking Conf.,
    Kowloon, 2007, pp. 3946–3950.
    [14] O. A. El-Mohsen et al., “SIP-based handoff scheme in next generation wireless
    networks,” in 6th Int. Conf. on Next Generation Mobile Applicat., Services and
    Technologies, Paris, 2012, pp. 131–136.
    [15] S. Salsano et al., “SIP-Based Mobility Management in Next Generation Networks,”
    IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 92–99, Apr. 2008.
    [16] W. M. Eddy, “At what layer does mobility belong?,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol.
    42, no. 10, pp. 155–159, Oct. 2004.
    [17] C. Raiciu, et al., “Improving Datacenter Performance and Robustness with Multipath
    TCP,” ACM SIGCOMM, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 266–277, Aug. 2011.
    [18] C. Raiciu et al., “Opportunistic mobility with multipath TCP” in Proc. of the 6-th
    Int. workshop on MobiArch, pp. 7–12, 2011.
    [19] Z. U. Shamszaman et al., “Feasibility considerations of multipath TCP in dealing
    with big data application,” in Int. Conf. on Information Networking (ICOIN),
    Bangkok, Jan. 2013, pp. 708–713.
    [20] 3GPP, “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services
    and System Aspects; Policy and charging control architecture (Release 13),”
    TS23.203 V13.5.0, Sep. 2015.
    [21] K. Lee et al., “Mobile data offloading: How much can WiFi deliver?,” IEEE/ACM
    Trans. Netw., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 536–550, Apr. 2013.
    [22] P. Fuxjager et al., “Measurementbased small-cell coverage analysis for urban
    macro-offload scenarios,” in Proc. IEEE VTC¡XSpring, Japan, 2011, pp. 1–5.
    [23] J. Korhonen et al., “Toward network controlled IP traffic offloading,” IEEE Commun.
    Mag., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 96–102, Mar. 2013.
    [24] S. Dimatteo et al., “Cellular traffic offloading through WiFi networks,” in Proc.
    IEEE Int. Conf. MASS, Spain, 2011, pp. 192–201
    [25] Y. Go et al., “Enabling DTN-based data offloading in urban mobile network environments,”
    in Proc. Int. Conf. Future Internet Technol., Korea, 2012, p. 48.
    [26] F. Mehmeti and T. Spyropoulos, “Is it worth to be patient? analysis and optimization
    of delayed mobile data offloading,” in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Canada,
    2014, pp. 2364–2372.
    [27] A. Ford et al., “TCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses”,
    RFC 6824, Jan. 2013.
    [28] R. Stewart and C. Metz, “SCTP: New Transport Protocol for TCP/IP,” IEEE
    Internet Comp., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 64-–69, Nov./Dec. 2001.
    [29] R. Stewart et al., “Stream control transmission protocol,” RFC 2960, Oct. 2000.
    [30] X. Hou et al., “Moving bits from 3g to metro-scale WiFi for vehicular network
    access: An integrated transport layer solution,” in Proc. IEEE ICNP, Vancouver,
    BC, Oct. 2011, pp. 353-–362.
    [31] S. J. Koh et al., “mSCTP for Soft Handover in Transport Layer,” IEEE Commun.
    Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 189–191, Mar. 2004.
    [32] C. Paasch et al., “How Hard Can It Be? Designing and Implementing a Deployable
    Multipath TCP,”Proc. USENIX Symposium of Networked Systems Design and
    Implementation(NSDI’12), pp. 29, 2012.
    [33] C.Paasch et al., “MultiPath TCP-Linux Kernel Implementation”, accessed: 2014-
    06-17. [Online]. Available: http://multipath-tcp.org/pmwiki.php/Users/Android
    [34] I. van Beijnum, “Multipath TCP lets Siri seamlessly Switch Between Wi-Fi and
    3G/LTE,” accessed: 2014-06-17. [Online]. Available: http://arstechnica.com/apple/
    2013/09/multipath-tcp-lets-siri-seamlesslyswitch-between-wi-fi-and-3glte/
    [35] O. Mehani et al., “An Early Look at Multipath TCP Deployment in the wild”,
    Proc. Int. Workshop on Hot Topics in Planet-Scale Measurement, pp. 7–12, Mar.
    2015.
    [36] S. I. Sou and H. Y. Hsieh, ”Modeling application-based charging management
    with traffic detection function in 3GPP,” ELSVIER Comput. Networks, vol. 91, pp.
    625–637, Nov. 2015.
    [37] Y. Fang, and I. Chlamtac, “Teletraffic analysis and mobility modeling for PCS
    networks,” IEEE Trans. on Commun., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1062–1072, Jul. 1999.

    下載圖示 校內:2021-07-01公開
    校外:2021-07-01公開
    QR CODE