簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 尚林霖
Shang, Linlin
論文名稱: 概念形成的處理容量與創造力之間的關係
Relationship between Processing Capacity of Concept Formation and Creativity
指導教授: 楊政達
Yang, Cheng-Ta
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 心理學系
Department of Psychology
論文出版年: 2016
畢業學年度: 104
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 57
中文關鍵詞: 概念形成創造力信息處理容量系統性多因子技術
外文關鍵詞: concept formation, creativity, processing capacity, systems factorial technology
相關次數: 點閱:107下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 人們如何整合特征信息形成概念?在現實生活中,我們無時不刻不在處理概念信息。因此,理清這一機制對我們尤為重要。為解決這一問題,我們使用系統性多因子技術 (systems factorial technology) 設計一個概念形成實驗 (a concept formation task),來獲取不同任務條件下概念形成的信息處理容量 (information processing capacity)。之後,受試者將進行包括中文遠距聯想測試 (A version of Chinese Remote Associates Test) 和問題解決測試 (Test of Problem Solving) 在內的兩個創造力測驗。其結果將被用於和概念形成的處理容量做相關分析。實驗結果表明,容量係數的Z分數和兩個版本的創造力得分之間分別存在負相關。說明,在概念形成過程中,創造力亦可能被捲入其中,起到重要作用。

    How do individuals integrate attribute information to form a concept? In real life, we have to process such information all the time. Thus, clarifying the processing mechanism is significant, which provides an effective approach for us to understand how human beings interact with the external world. In order to solve this problem, we would adopt systems factorial technology (SFT) to design a concept formation task to explore the processing mechanism of concept formation under two different conditions (under the exhaustive rule: AND condition, under the self-stopping rule: OR condition), especially the processing capacity of concept formation. Then we would require participants to perform a remote associates test (Chinese version) and a problem solving test to verify the whether there was a relationship between the Z-scores of the capacity coefficient and the scores of the creativity tests. The results displayed that there was a negative correlation between capacity and creativity, suggesting during the process of concept formation, creativity could be involved in.

    中文摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF FIGURES VI Introduction 1 The processing capacity of concept formation 1 Creativity in the process of concept formation 6 The selective filter and resource distribution of concept formation 9 Experiment 1 10 Method 11 Result 17 Experiment 2 34 Method 34 Result 35 Discussion 43 Conclusion 46 References 47 Appendix A – Word List 53 Appendix B – The List of the Number of Correct Answers (AND Condition) 54 Appendix C – Capacity in AND Condition 55 Appendix D – The List of the Number of Correct Answers (OR Condition) 56 Appendix E – Capacity in OR Condition 57

    Altieri, N., Fific, M, Little, D. R., & Yang C-T. (2016). Historical foundations and a tutorial introduction to systems factorial technology. In. D. R. Little, N. Altieri, M. Fific, & C-T. Yang (Eds.) Systems Factorial Technology: A Theory-Driven Methodology for Identifying Perceptual & Cognitive Mechanisms (pp. 1-46).Mechanisms: Elsevier.
    Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
    Bamunusinghe, J., & Alahakoon, D. (2007). Concept Learning from Visual Experiences using Unsupervised Neural Networks. In H. C. Watson, T. Nanayakkara, D. Alahakoon, & L. Udawatta (Eds.), Third International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS) (pp. 46-51). Melbourne, Australia: IEEE Explorer. doi: 10.1109/ICIAFS.2007.4544779
    Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
    Bink, M. L., and Marsh, R.L. (2002). Cognitive regularities in creative activity. Review of General Psychology, 1, 59-78.
    Burns, D., Houpt, J., Townsend, J., & Endres, M. (2013). Functional principal components analysis of workload capacity functions. Behav Res Methods, 45(4), 1048-1057.
    Bower, G., & Trabasso, T. (1964). Concept identification. In R. C. Atkinson, (Ed.), Studies in Mathematical Psychology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.
    Collins, A.M. and Loftus, E.F. (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407- 428.
    Collins, A. M., and Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
    Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster, (Ed. and trans.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland
    Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Fisher, Pazzani, & Langley. (1991). Concept formation: knowledge and experience in unsupervised learning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
    Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference cognitive functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135.
    Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2012). Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56: 341–355.
    Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill
    Harding, B., Goulet, M-A., Jolin, S., Tremblay, C., Villeneuve, S-P., & Durand, G. (2016). Systems factorial technology explained to humans. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(1), 39-56.
    Huang, Po-Sheng & Chen, Hsueh-Chih. (2012). A Version of Chinese Remote Associates Test. Taipei: Chinese Behavioural Science Corporation.
    Hull, C. L. (1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts. Psychological Monographs, XVIII, 1.123, 1–86.
    Ju, Gin-Fon. (2005). Test of Problem Solving. Taipei: Psychological Publishing.
    Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. New Jersey: Prentice-Hal.
    Kneller, G. F. (1971). Introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons.
    Kim, K. H., & Pierce, R. A. (2013). Convergent Versus Divergent Thinking. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 245-250).
    Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
    Kris, E. (1952). Notes on the development and on some current problems of psychoanalytic child psychology. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 26, 24-46.
    Levine, M. (1966). Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 331-338.
    Levine, M. (1975). A cognitive theory of learning: Research on hypothesis testing. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. Concepts, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/concepts/>
    Marsh, R. L., Landau, L. D., and Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 669-680.
    Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
    Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107–120.
    Nielsen, B., Pickett, C., & Simonton, D. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks?. Psychology of Awsthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131–138.
    Novak, J., and Cañas, A. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, available at: http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
    Peterson, C., Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press. Riaz, M. N., and Ali, N. N. (2002). Structural cognition: A comparison of creative and non-creative adults. Joural of Personality and Clinical Studies, 18(1-2), 1-8.
    Riaz, M. N., & Ali, N. N. (2002). Structural cognition: A comparison of creative and non-creative adults. Journal of Personality and Clinical Studies, 18(1-2), 1-8.
    Roeckelein, J. E. (1998). Dictionary of Theories, Laws, and Concepts in Psychology. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Group
    Seel, N. M. (2012). Concept formation: Characteristics and functions. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 723-728). New York, NY: Springer.
    Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 94-120
    Sternberg, R. J. & Sternberg, K. (2011). Cognitive Psychology (6th ed.). CA: Cengage Learning.
    Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder’s method. In W. G. Koster (ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs. parallel processing: Sometimes they look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1(1), 46–54.
    Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–359.
    Trabasso, T., & Bower, G. H. (1968). Attention in Learning. New York: John Wiley & Sons
    Vartanian, O. (2002). Cognitive disinhibition and creativity. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, The University of Maine, Orono, The United States of America.
    Vygotskil, L. S. (2012). Thought and Language (E. Hanfmann, G. Vakar, & A. Kozulin, Trans.). Massachusetts: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1934).
    Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the art orientation. NJ: Norwood.
    Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of conceptual structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.
    Ward, T. B., Smith, S., & Vaid, J. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Valid (Eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp. 1-27). Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.
    Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2001). Computational, Geometric, and Process Issues in Facial Cognition: Progress and Challenges. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Wetherick, N. E. (1969). Bruner's Concept of Strategy: An experiment and a critique. The Journal of General Psychology. 81(1), 53-58.
    Whitehurst, G. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1979). Concepts and Classification. The Functions of Language and Cognition (pp. 57-81). New York: Academic Press.
    Yang, C.-T. (2011). Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6),1708-1728.
    Yoo, S. A. (2008). An analysis of incubation effects in problem solving using a computer-administered assessment tool. Unpublished doctorial dissertation, Texas A&M University, Texas, The United States of America.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2021-08-26公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE