簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳涵瑜
Wu, Han-Yu
論文名稱: 台灣地區老人經濟地位不一致性與健康之相關性分析
Economic status inconsistency and elderly health in Taiwan
指導教授: 胡淑貞
Hu, Shu-Chen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 公共衛生學系
Department of Public Health
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 81
中文關鍵詞: 自評健康地位不一致老年人主觀經濟地位
外文關鍵詞: self-rated health, Elders, Subjective economic status, Stutas inconsistency
相關次數: 點閱:74下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 背景: 台灣從一九九三年步入高齡化社會後,在十五年間老年人口 已從占全人口的7.1%上升至10.2%,相較於歐、美等先進國家約50-100年的老化速度,台灣社會因應人口老化的反應時間相對有限。由於世界老年人口的快速增長,與老年相關的各式研究也不斷增加。在很多的研究中發現,老年人的健康不平等差異是存在的,很重要的影響因子為社經的狀況。在台灣,老年的各種生活期望與未來擔憂問題中,健康與經濟是老人最關心的兩大項目。
    方法: 本研究將使用行政院衛生署國民健康局自2003年所進行的大規模「臺灣地區中老年身心社會與生活狀況長期追蹤調查」(以下簡稱TLSA)資料,選取65歲以上老年樣本共3778人,以量化分析去檢視老年人的經濟狀況和健康的關係,本研究將以主觀經濟地位、客觀經濟地位和主客觀經濟地位不一致性三個角度來加以探討。
    主觀經濟地位代表的是個人對自己目前的經濟狀況的認知,客觀經濟地位則是個人的實際所的情況,在地位不一致性方面則利用主觀經濟地位以及客觀經濟地位兩者間的落差來做衡量。在健康的測量上本研究使用自評健康狀況和身體活動功能分數兩個項目作為指標。在自評健康的部份將採行邏輯式回歸分析,身體活動功能分數則利用線性迴歸來進行。
    結果: 主觀經濟地位以及客觀經濟地位與自評健康狀況是呈現正相關的。在身體活動功能方面,無論是主觀經濟地位或是客觀經濟地位則呈現負相關的結果。經濟地位的不一致性和健康的關連上,可以發現當個人對主觀經濟地位評價優於自己的客觀經濟地位時,有較佳的身體健康狀況,其次才為主觀客觀為一致無落差者。在人口變項上,則以男性、沒有慢性病者、年齡小者、教育程度高者、有偶和居住在都市者之健康狀況較佳
    結論: 對於老人家來說,經濟和健康間的相關性是不容懷疑的,並且在自身亦存在主觀和客觀的落差。在本研究發現當老年人的實際所得越高或是自認為較滿足自己的經濟情況則健康狀況較佳。由於本研究發現個人經濟地位不一致性對健康產生了不同的結果。也就是說ㄧ個人如果能樂天知命、知足常樂,對於自己的經濟狀況給予較實際所得更高的評價,則將有較好的健康情況。所以說,在考量到給予老年人經濟支援時,也應關懷其因社會變遷,傳統觀念式微或比較心理對其內心造成的衝擊和落差。同時兼顧老年人身、心、靈的平衡及安適狀態,方為對健康最好的註解。

    Background: Since Taiwan has become an aging population society in 1993, its old population in the percentage of nationwide population has risen from 7.1% to 10.2% within 15 years. Compared to western developed countries, which took 50 to 100 years to become aging society, Taiwan society has comparatively limited time to react to the population aging process. As it is a worldwide phenomenon, research about aging population has been increasing.
    Several findings suggest that there actually exists unfair bias among the health inequality of aging people, and the most influential factor is the social economic status. Nowadays, health and economy are the two key aspects which aging people care most in Taiwan.
    Methods: The finding uses the survey data, TLSA, from Bureau of Health Promotion, Department of Health, R.O.C in 2003, to quantitatively analyze the relations between economic status and health of aging people. The study sample consists of 3778 elders age 65 and above.In addition, from three different perspectives, which are subjective economic status ,objective economic status and inconsistence of economic status.
    The subjective economic status represents is a person to oneself present financial circumstance cognition, the objective economic status is individual reality situation, and economic status inconsistency aspect uses the gap between subjective economic status and the objective economic status .
    This research use from comments the state of health and the bodily activity function score two projects in the health survey takes the target. Logistic regression is used for
    Self-rated health and linear regression is used for the bodily activity function score
    Results: From the perspectives of subjective economic status, objective economic status or the consistence of economy, there are sufficient correlation between the health and economy. Being male, younger ,higher education, does not have the chronic disease, married and live in the urban are associated with better self-rated health and less the bodily activity function score.
    Conclusions: For the old people, there are no doubt about the correlation between economy and health; furthermore, there are some gaps between subjective and objective perspectives. However, considered giving old people financial support, we ought to care about the cultural gap and conflict between modern and original beliefs, which because of the change of society and pass-off of traditional values. At the same time, the best healthy solution for aging people should be the balance among body, mind and spirit.

    第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景1 第二節 研究目的4 第三節 研究假設4 第四節 論文架構5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 健康的測量方法6 第二節 影響健康的相關因素9 第三節 經濟地位與健康的相關性研究21 第四節 地位不一致的相關性研究23 第三章 研究方法與材料25 第一節 研究架構25 第二節 研究變項定義與測量26 第三節 研究材料與對象32 第四節 軟體使用與統計分析35 第四章 研究結果 37 第一節 描述性統計分析 37 第二節 相關分析39 第三節 多變項分析45 第五章 研究討論 48 第一節 研究假設驗證和討論48 第二節 研究限制50 第三節 建議 51 第六章 參考文獻 52 附錄一、原始問卷 77 表 目 錄 Table 3-1:變項定義表29 Table 3-2:臺灣地區中老人保健與生涯規劃調查樣本數目變化32 Table 4-1:個人基本資料之次數分析表60 Table 4-2:慢性病個數次數分配表61 Table 4-3:過去一年經濟地位次數分配表 62 Table 4-4:自評健康次數分配表63 Table 4-5:客觀經濟地位和人口變項顯著性差異分析64 Table 4-6:主觀經濟地位和人口變項顯著性差異分析65 Table 4-7:經濟地位差異和人口變項顯著性差異分析66 Table 4-8:研究結果歸納彙整表67 Table 4-9:自評健康和個人背景變項顯著性差異分析68 Table 4-10:ADL及IADL健康狀態之情形顯著性差異分析69 Table 4-11:健康狀態顯著性差異結果歸納彙整表70 Table 4-12:自評健康和經濟狀況變項顯著性差異分析71 Table 4-13:身體功能分數和經濟狀況變項顯著性差異分析71 Table 4-14:老人自評健康邏輯式迴歸分析72 Table 4-15:老人身體活動分數線性迴歸分析74 圖 目 錄 圖1-1:人口老化趨勢國際比較1 圖1-2:台灣三階段人口分布趨勢變化2 圖1-3:各國進入高齡社會所需時間比較2 圖2-1:影響社會經濟地位與健康關聯的可能因素9 圖3-1:研究架構圖25 圖3-2:經濟地位相關矩陣27

    一、中文部分:
    王雲東(2005)。台灣地區中老年與老年人醫療服務使用率的影響因素研究,健康城市學刊 ,4,141-163
    內政部主計處。(2005)。民國九十四年台閩地區老人狀況調查摘要分析報告。台北市:行政院
    內政部統計處。(2008) 內政統計通報,內政統計資訊服務網,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
    內政部統計處。(2006) 94年老人狀況調查報告新聞稿(95年8月28日),內政統計資訊服務網,http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/
    內政部主計處。(2000)台灣地區老人狀況調查報告。台北市:行政院
    行政院內政部統計處。(2005)。民國九十四年台閩地區老人狀況調查摘要分析報告。
    行政院。(2008)。行政院內政部戶政司老人社會福利之人口統計資料。
    行政院。(2008)。行政院內政部平均餘命資料。
    行政院。(2008)。行政院內政部臺閩地區國民生命表及簡易生命表資料。
    行政院內政部。(2008)。民國九十年臺閩地區簡易生命表提要報告。
    林宜平及呂宗學(2004)。談社經因素在流行病學研究的角色,台灣衛誌,23(5),335-336
    任小紅、王小萬、劉敬傳(2007)。南省三縣村居民健康不平等研究,中國現代醫學雜誌,17(9),1141-1143
    李仁輝(2007)。經濟成長與國民死亡率之關聯—台灣地區之實證研究,中央產業經濟研究所碩士論文
    吳淑瓊、張明正(1997)。台灣老人健康照護之現況分析,台灣老人研究叢書系列(六)。台中:台灣省家庭計畫研究所。
    周怜利譯。(2000) Erikson 老年研究報告-人生八大階段(Eril H. Erikson 原著)。台北:張老師文化。
    邱啟潤、張永源、陳武宗、黃洽鑽、及黃忠信(2000)。高樹鄉農村老人狀況的評估研究,護理研究,8(2),226-239。
    呂宗學(2006)。所得與道路交通事故死亡率關係之研究,台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文
    徐麗君、蔡文輝。(1996)老年社會學-理論與實務。台北:巨流。
    張慈桂(2004)。家庭社會經濟地位與學齡前兒童健康關聯之探討,陽明大學公共衛生研究所博士論文
    張明正(1997)。台灣地區高齡人口自評健康及功能障礙之追蹤研究,人口老化與老年照護,237-261。台北:中華民國人口學會。
    陳妙盡、王德睦、莊義利(1987)。台灣地區老人健康狀況與居住安排,人口老化與老年照護,325-357。台北:中華民國人口學會。
    陳惠茵(2004)。澎湖地區健康不平等之發展分析,陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
    陳惠真及王香蘋(2005)。台灣老人健康狀況初探:1989年至 1999年,台灣家醫誌,15(1),24-34。
    蔡文輝。(2008) 老年社會學。台北:三民。
    蔡文輝。(2006) 社會學理論。台北:三民。
    蔡文輝。(2005) 社會學。台北:三民。
    蔡文輝。(2003) 老年社會學。台北:三
    劉紘志,(2004)。臺灣地區老人健康行為對身體功能之影響,臺中健康管理研究所碩士論文。
    歐乃慈(1997):影響社區老人日常生活功能退化因素。國立臺灣大學公共衛生研所碩士論文。
    趙安娜(2002)。鄉村社區老年人生命意義、健康狀況與生活品質及其相關因素之探討,國立台北護理學院護理研究所碩士論文。
    謝淑芳(1982)。台北市六十五歲以上居民家庭照護需要評估及相關因素分析之研究,公共衛生,9(3),279-309。
    董和銳(2005)。台灣老年人口自評健康與功能障礙情形之轉變,身心障礙研究,3(2),72-87
    顏哲傑及林瑞雄(1990)。台北市北投區老人健康危險因素之調查研究,公共衛生,17(2),159-170。
    莊艷妃、宋惠娟、林麗萍(2005):偏遠礦區老人健康狀況及健康醫療資源使用之調查研究。慈濟護理雜誌,4(1),34-41。
    黃璉華(1992)。老人生活滿意度相關因素之因徑分析研究,護理雜誌,39:4,37-47。

    二、 英文部分
    Alwin, Duane F., Wray, & Linda A. (2005). A Life Span Developmental Perspective on Social Status and Health, The Journals of Gerontology, 60B, 7-14.
    Adler, Nancy E. & Katherine Newman (2002). Socioeconomic Disparities in Health: Pathways and Policies, Health Affairs, 21, 60-76.
    Adler,N.,Ostrove,J.M.,(2000) Socioeconomic status and health:what we know and what we don`t. Annal NewYork Academy of Sciences.3-15
    Andersen, Ronal, M., Hongjian, U, Roberta, Wyn, Pamela L. Davidson, Richard E.Brown, & Stephanie Teleki (2002). Access to Medical Care for Low Income Persons: How Do Communities Make a difference?, Medical Care Research and
    Review, 59, 384-411.
    Arber, S., Cooper, H. (1999). Gender Difference in Health in Later Life: The New Paradox?, Social Science and Medicine, 48(1), 61-76.
    Bergner, M. Y. (1985). Measurement of Health Status, Medical Care, 23(5),696-704.
    Borawski, E. A., Kinney, J. M., & Khana., E. (1996). The Meaning of Older Adults’ Health Appraisals: Congruence with Health Status and Determinant of Mortality, Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 51B(3), S157-S170.
    Bootsma-van der Wiel, Annetje, de Craen, Anto J. M., Exel, Eric Van, Macfarlane,Peter W., Gussekloo, Jacobijn, Westendorp, &Rudi G. J. (2005). Association between Chronic Diseases and Disability in Elderly Subjects with Low and High Income: the Leiden 85-Plus Study, European Journal of Public Health,15(5),494-497.
    Cheng,Y.H.,Chi,I.,Boey,K.W.,Ko,L.S.F., &Chou,K.L.(2002)Self-rated economic condition and the health of elderly persons in Hong Kong., Social science and medicine,55,1415-1424
    Cohen,S.,Adler,N.,Apler,C.M.,Doyle,W.J., &Treanor,J.J,(2008)Objeactive and subjective socioeconomic status and susceptibility to the common cold.Health Psychology,27(2),268-274
    Collins,A.L.,Goldman,N.,(2008)Perceived social position and health in older adults in Taiwan. Social science and medicine,66,536-54
    Demakakos,P.,Nazroo,J.,Breeze,E., &Marmot,M.(2006)Socioeconomic status and health:The role of subjective social status., Social Science and Medicine, 67,330-340.
    Deaton, Angus (2002). Policy Implications of the Gradient of Health and Wealth:An Economist Asks, Would Redistributing Income Improve Population Health?,Health Affairs, 21, 13-20.
    Duncan, G.J., Mary C.D., Peggy ,M., & David R.W. (2002).Optimal Indicators of Socioeconomic Status for Health Research, American Journal of Public Health,92, 1151-1157.
    Ecob, Russell ,&George ,D. S. (1999). Income and Health: What Is the Nature of the Relationship, Social Science and Medicine, 48, 693-705.
    Gerdtham, U. G., & Johannesson, M., (2001). The Relationship Between Happiness,Health, and Socioeconomic Factors: Results Based on Swedish micro Data,Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 553-557.
    Goldman,N.,Cornman,J.C., &Chang,M.C.,(2006)Measuring subjeactive social status:a case study of older Taiwanese. J Cross Culture Gerontol,21,71-89
    Grossman, M. (1972). On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health,Journal of Political Economy, 80, 223-255.
    Grossman, M., Kaestner, R.(1997). Effects of Education on Health in J. Behrman, N.
    Stacey, eds., The Social Benefits of Education, 69-123.
    Hadley, J. (1982). More Medical Care, Better Health?. Washington, D.C.: Urban
    Institute.
    Hadley, J. (1988). Medicare Spending and Mortality Rates of the Elderly, Inquiry,25:485-493.
    Ho, S. H. (2008). Survival analysis of living arrangements and health care utilization in terms of total mortality among the middle aged and elderly in Taiwan. The Journal of Nursing Research, 16(2), 160-168.
    Hu,P.,Adler, N.E.,Goldman,N.,Weinstein,M., &Seeman,T.E.(2005)Relationship between subjective social status and measures of health in older Taiwanese person. American Geriatrics Society,53,483-488
    Jatrana,S.,Chan,A.(2007)Do socioeconomic effect on health diminish with age? A Singapore case study. J Cross Culture Gerontol,22,287-301
    Khaw, K. T. (1997). Healthy aging. British Medical Journal,315, 1090–1096.
    Krochalk,P.C., Li,Y. & Chi,I.(2008)Widowhood and self-rated health among Chinese elders: The effect of economic condition, Australasian Journal on Ageing, 27 (1) , 26–32
    Kunst, Anton E., Bos, Vivian, Lahelma, Eero, Bartley, Mel, Lissau, Inge, Regidor,Enrique, Mielck, Andreas, Cardano, Mario, et al. (2004). Trends in Socioeconomic Inequalities in Self Assessed Health in 10 European Countries, International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 295-305
    Lantz, P.M., James S.H., James M.L., David R.W., Richard ,M.,& Jieming ,C. (1998).Socioeconomic Factors, Health Behaviors,and Mortality: Results From a Nationally Representative Prospective Study of US Adults, Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1703-1708.
    Lahelma, E., Kiyela, K., & Roos, E. et al. (2002). Analysing Changes of Health Inequalities in the Nordic Welfare States, Social Science of Medicine, 55,609-625.
    Liang, J., McCarthy, J. F., Jain, A., Krause, N., Bennett, J. M.,& Gu, S. (2000).Socioeconomic gradient in old age mortality in Wuhan, China. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 55B(4), S222–S233.
    Lynch, J., & Kaplan, G. (2000). Socioeconomic position. In L.F. Berkman, & I.Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp.13–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Lynch, John & George Kaplan (2000). Socioeconomic Position, Social Epidemiology,edited by Lisa F. Berkman and Ichiro Kawachi, New York: Oxford University Press.
    Mechanic, D. (2000). Rediscovering the Social Determinants of Health, Health Affairs, 19, 269-276.
    Nummela,O.,Sulander,T.T.,Heinonen,H.S., &Uutela, A. K.(2007) Self-rated health and indicators of SES among the aging in three types of communities.Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,35,39-47
    Ross,C.A.,Wu,C.L.(1995).The links between education and health. Am Sociol Rev,60,719-745
    Schnittker, Jason (2004). Education and the Changing Shape of the Income Gradient in Health, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(3), 286-305.
    Shaw, M., Dorling, D., Gordon D., & Davey, S. G. (2002). The Widening Gap:Health Inequalities and Policy in Britain, Bristol: The Policy Press.
    Siddiqi,A.,Hertzman,C.(2001)Economic Growth, Income Equality, and Population Health among the Asian Tigers .International Journal of Health Services,31,323-333
    Solie ,P.D., Backlund ,E., & Keller, J.B.(1995) US mortality by economic demographic and social characteristics: the National longitudinal Mortality
    Study. Am.J. Public Health , 85, 949-956.
    Smith, V. Kerry, Taylor, Donald H., & Sloan, Frank A. (2001). Longevity Expectations and Death: Can People Predict Their Own Demise?, The American Economic Review, 91(4), 1126-1134.
    Tallis, R. (1993). Biological ageing, illness in old age and geriatrics services. Journal of Hong Kong Geriatric Society,4, 4–11.
    Wagstaff,.A.,Doorslaer.E.,(2002) Income inequality and health: what does the literature tell us? Ann rev Public Health 2002,21,543-567
    Williams, D.R.,Collins, C.(1995)US socioeconomic and racial differences in health:patterns and explanations. Annu. Rev. Sociol,21, 349-86
    Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge
    Xi, Guolian, McDowell, Ian, Nair, Rama, Spasoff, &Robert (2005). Income Inequality and Health in Ontario, Canadian Journal of PublicHhealth, 96(3), 206-211.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2108-02-10公開
    校外:2108-02-10公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE