我國政府在推行社會住宅政策時，經常遭受鄰里居民的反對，因而採用混合居住政策改善鄰避標籤問題以促進社會融合。然而，政策未針對社會融合目標進行混合居住政策成效的探討，甚至對於社會融合的定義也存在不同的解釋，且國外研究也指出混合居住可能存在加劇隔閡的風險。因此，本研究旨在釐清我國住宅政策的社會融合意涵，並透過量化分析臺北市社會住宅鄰里目前的社會融合情形，且基於過往研究提出混合居住屬性、社經背景屬性與社宅政策影響屬性等變數，以進一步瞭解相關變數與社會融合程度之間的關聯性。
本研究經由文獻回顧綜整出有關我國社會住宅政策之發展與問題、國內外混合居住政策之差異與優劣以及社會融合理論與相關衡量方式等，協助釐清本研究架構。此外，本研究採用問卷調查法收集相關變數資料，並使用社區融合衡量(Community Integration Measure, CIM)與社會網絡指標(Social Network Index, SNI)兩項量表作為本研究有關社會融合程度之衡量，針對兩處具有相近社會經濟背景之社會住宅所處鄰里作為研究範圍，以探討其社會融合情形，研究對象則包含社會住宅中的弱勢住戶與一般住戶以及非社會住宅的鄰里住戶，並作為本研究混合居住屬性之重要變數，以探究混合居住身份與社會融合程度之間的關聯性。本研究採用獨立樣本T檢定與單因子變異數分析進行不同類別之間社會融合程度的比較分析，並使用皮爾森相關性分析與多元線性迴歸分析探討各屬性變數與社會融合程度之間的線性關係。
根據比較分析結果顯示，鄰里住戶的社會融合(調整後SNI及SNI)與社區融合(CIM)程度顯著高於社會住宅住戶，以及社會住宅弱勢住戶的社區融合(CIM)程度顯著低於社會住宅一般住戶與鄰里住戶，這項結果符合過往文獻的論點。而關聯性分析結果也顯示出相似的情形，具有社會住宅住戶身份與社會融合(調整後SNI及SNI)之間存在顯著的低度負相關，而具有社會住宅弱勢住戶身份則與社區融合(CIM)之間存在顯著的低度負相關。然而，家庭經濟水準與社會融合(調整後SNI及SNI)及社區融合(CIM)之間則皆為不具顯著差異或關係，此結果則與過往的研究有所不同，通常認為不同經濟階層間存在隔離的現象。
經本研究發現，我國住宅政策之社會融合意涵存在規劃尺度上的區別，可協助後續研究釐清相關概念上的差異。而在混合居住政策下，臺北市社會住宅鄰里範圍內之社會融合情形表現尚可，但仍可能存在高估的現象，因而建議後續研究根據社會融合理論與我國社會背景研擬相關量表，以更適於我國社會環境，除此之外，也針對研究內容提出其他後續研究建議與相關政策的改進建議，以促使我國社會住宅混合居住政策實踐社會融合目標。

This study aims to clarify the social integration implications of Taiwan's housing policy and quantitatively analyze the current integration situation in Taipei's social housing neighborhoods, focusing on mixed dwelling attributes, socioeconomic background, and policy impacts. The study reviews literature on the development and issues of Taiwan's social housing policies, domestic and international differences in mixed dwelling policies, and social integration theories and measurements. Using a questionnaire survey, it employs the Community Integration Measure (CIM) and Social Network Index (SNI) to measure integration levels. The study utilized statistical analysis to examine two communities with similar socio-economic backgrounds, including disadvantaged and general households in social housing, as well as non-social housing residents.
Results show that neighborhood residents have higher social and community integration levels than social housing residents. Disadvantaged social housing households have lower community integration than general social housing and neighborhood residents. There is a low negative correlation between social housing identity and integration, but no significant relationship between family economic level and integration. The study finds distinctions in social integration implications within National Housing Policy at the planning scale level. It suggests future research develop scales based on social integration theories and Taiwan's social context to better fit the environment, along with other policy improvement suggestions to achieve integration goals in Taiwan's mixed dwelling policy.

一、外文文獻
【Journal Article】
Adame, A. L., Perry, C., & Pierce, E. (2020). Community and Housing First: A qualitative analysis of USA residents' perspectives. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(4), 1292-1300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12962
Arthurson, K., Levin, I., & Ziersch, A. (2015). What is the Meaning of ‘Social Mix’? Shifting perspectives in planning and implementing public housing estate redevelopment. Australian Geographer, 46(4), 491-505. doi: 10.1080/00049182.2015.1075270
Aubry, T., & Myner, J. (1996). Community integration and quality of life: A comparison of persons with psychiatric disabilities in housing programs and community residents who are neighbours. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 15(1), 5-20.
Belau, M. H., Becher, H., & Kraemer, A. (2021). Loneliness as a mediator of social relationships and health-related quality of life among refugees living in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12303-5
Berg, P., & timmermans, h. (2015). A multi-level path analysis of social networks and social interaction in the neighborhood. REGION, 2, 55-66. doi: 10.18335/region.v2i1.32
Berg, P., van der Wielen, K., Maussen, S., & Arentze, T. (2021). A path analysis of factors influencing social cohesion and neighbor support in collective self-build housing. The importance of getting to know future neighbors. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36. doi: 10.1007/s10901-020-09807-8
Berger-Schmitt, R., & Noll, H.-H. (2000). Conceptual Framework and Structure of a European System of Social Indicators.
Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality: A Nine-year follow-up Study of Alameda County Residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186-204. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112674
Bernard, P. (1999). La cohésion sociale : critique dialectique d’un quasi-concept. Lien social et Politiques(41), 47-59. doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/005057ar
Bricocoli, M., & Cucca, R. (2014). Social mix and housing policy: Local effects of a misleading rhetoric. The case of Milan, in "Urban Studies". Urban Studies. doi: 10.1177/0042098014560499
Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering Social Cohesion: Developing a Definition and Analytical Framework for Empirical Research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273-302. doi: 10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1
Chang, S.-C., Glymour, M., Cornelis, M., Walter, S., Rimm, E. B., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E., . . . Kubzansky, L. D. (2017). Social Integration and Reduced Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Women. Circulation Research, 120(12), 1927-1937. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.116.309443
Chaskin, R., & Joseph, M. (2011). Social Interaction in Mixed-Income Developments: Relational Expectations and Emerging Reality. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33, 209-237. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00537.x
Chaskin, R., Khare, A., & Joseph, M. (2012). Participation, Deliberation, and Decision Making The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion in Mixed-Income Developments. Urban Affairs Review, 48, 863-906. doi: 10.1177/1078087412450151
Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2013). ‘Positive’ Gentrification, Social Control and the ‘Right to the City’ in Mixed-Income Communities: Uses and Expectations of Space and Place. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 480-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01158.x
Chen, K. J., Peng, C. W., & Lee, M. H. (2021). Determinants of the Public's Attitude Towards Social Housing Construction Under High Home Ownership Rate. International Real Estate Review, 24(1), 87-112.
Chu, C., Nomura, R., & Mori, S. (2019). Actual Conditions of Mixed Public–Private Planning for Housing Complexes in Beijing. Sustainability, 11(8), 2409. doi: 10.3390/su11082409
Clark, W. A. V., Huang, Y., & Yi, D. (2021). Can millennials access homeownership in urban China? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 69-87. doi: 10.1007/s10901-019-09672-0
Cohen, S. (1997). Social Ties and Susceptibility to the Common Cold. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277(24), 1940. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03540480040036
Cole, I., & Goodchild, B. (2000). Social Mix and the `Balanced Community' in British housing policy – a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal, 51(4), 351-360. doi: 10.1023/A:1012049526513
Coley, R. L., Spielvogel, B., Hwang, D., Lown, J., & Teixeira, S. (2023). Did HOPE VI Move Communities to Opportunity? How Public Housing Redevelopment Affected Neighborhood Poverty, Racial Composition, and Resources 1990–2016. Housing Policy Debate, 33(4), 909-940. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2022.2121614
Collier, P. M. (2005). Governance and the quasi-public organization: a case study of social housing. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(7), 929-949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.01.003
Cowan, S. (2003). NIMBY syndrome and public consultation policy: the implications of a discourse analysis of local responses to the establishment of a community mental health facility. Health & Social Care in the Community, 11(5), 379-386. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00439.x
Davison, G., Legacy, C., Liu, E., & Darcy, M. (2016). The Factors Driving the Escalation of Community Opposition to Affordable Housing Development. Urban Policy and Research, 34(4), 386-400. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2015.1118377
Dayton-Johnson, J. (2003). Social capital, social cohesion, community: A microeconomic analysis. The economic implications of social cohesion, 43-78.
Dear, M. (1992). Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(3), 288-300. doi: 10.1080/01944369208975808
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Fellin, P. (1993). Reformulation of the context of community based care. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare, 20, 57.
Freeman, L. (2002). Subsidized Housing and Neighborhood Impacts: A Theoretical Discussion and Review of the Evidence. Journal of Planning Literature, 16, 359-378. doi: 10.1177/08854120222093419
Hagan, M. J., Hall, A. R., Mamo, L., Ramos, J., & Dubbin, L. (2020). Homeplace: Care and resistance among public housing residents facing mixed-income redevelopment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 90(5), 523-534. doi: 10.1037/ort0000452
Harris, T., Dunton, G., Henwood, B., Rhoades, H., Rice, E., & Wenzel, S. (2019). Los Angeles housing models and neighbourhoods’ role in supportive housing residents’ social integration. Housing Studies, 34(4), 609-635. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2018.1462308
Ho, K. C., & Chua, V. (2017). The neighbourhood roots of social cohesion: Notes on an exceptional case of Singapore. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 290-312. doi: 10.1177/2399654417710659
Hsiao, H. (2021). Transformation and issues of public housing policies facing aging society: Case review of Osaka City, Japan. JAPAN ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW, 4(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1002/2475-8876.12198
Hyra, D. (2013). Commentary: Mixed-Income Housing: Where Have We Been and Where Do We Go From Here? Cityscape, 15(2), 123-133.
Joseph, M., Chaskin, R., & Webber, H. (2007). The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-Income Development. Urban Affairs Review - URBAN AFF REV, 42, 369-409. doi: 10.1177/1078087406294043
Keene, D. E., & Geronimus, A. T. (2011). Community-Based Support among African American Public Housing Residents. Journal of Urban Health, 88(1), 41-53. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9511-z
Keene, D. E., & Geronimus, A. T. (2011). "Weathering" HOPE VI: the importance of evaluating the population health impact of public housing demolition and displacement. J Urban Health, 88(3), 417-435. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9582-5
Keene, D. E., & Ruel, E. (2013). "Everyone called me grandma": Public housing demolition and relocation among older adults in Atlanta. Cities, 35. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.10.011
Kleit, R. G. (2005). HOPE VI New Communities: Neighborhood Relationships in Mixed-Income Housing. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 37(8), 1413-1441. doi: 10.1068/a3796
Korsu, E. (2016). Building social mix by building social housing? An evaluation in the Paris, Lyon and Marseille Metropolitan Areas. Housing Studies, 31(5), 598-623. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1114075
Kumar, V. (2020). When Heritage Meets Creativity: A Tale of Two Urban Development Strategies in Kampong Glam, Singapore. City & Community, 19(2), 398-420. doi: 10.1111/cico.12427
Kuppens, E., & van den Broek, T. (2022). Social integration and mental health of Somali refugees in the Netherlands: the role of perceived discrimination. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 2223. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14655-y
La Motte-Kerr, W., Rhoades, H., Henwood, B., Rice, E., & Wenzel, S. (2020). Exploring the Association of Community Integration in Mental Health among Formerly Homeless Individuals Living in Permanent Supportive Housing. American Journal of Community Psychology, 66(1-2), 3-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12459
Lake, R. (1993). Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 87-93. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975847
Levin, I., Santiago, A. M., & Arthurson, K. (2022). Creating mixed communities through housing policies: Global perspectives. Journal of Urban Affairs, 44(3), 291-304. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2021.1983442
Livingston, M., Kearns, A., & Bailey, N. (2013). Delivering Mixed Communities: The Relationship between Housing Tenure Mix and Social Mix in England's Neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 28(7), 1056-1080. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2013.812723
Marcuse, P. M. (1985). Gentrification, Abandonment, and Displacement: Connections, Causes, and Policy Responses in New York City. Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 28, 195-240.
Mase, S. (2016). Initiatives to Transform UR Housing Estates into Regional Medical and Welfare Centres (Mixed Communities) in Response to a Super-Aged Society - Examples of Initiatives in Housing for the Elderly, Including the Attraction of Serviced Housing for the Elderly. [間瀬昭一, 超高齢者社会に対応したＵＲ団地の地域医療福祉拠点化（ミクストコミュニティ）の取り組み～サービス付き高齢者向け住宅の誘致等高齢者向け住宅の取組事例～]. Urban Housing Studies, 2016(93), 53-57. doi: 10.11531/uhs.2016.93_53
McColl, M. A., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., Minnes, P., Shue, K., Davies, D., & Karlovits, T. (1998). The definition of community integration: perspectives of people with brain injuries. Brain Injury, 12(1), 15-30. doi: 10.1080/026990598122827
McColl, M. A., Davies, D., Carlson, P., Johnston, J., & Minnes, P. (2001). The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(4), 429-434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.22195
McCormick, N. J., Joseph, M. L., & Chaskin, R. J. (2012). The new stigma of relocated public housing residents: Challenges to social identity in mixed‐income developments. City & Community, 11, 285-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01411.x
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Mereine-Berki, B., Malovics, G., & Cretan, R. (2021). "You become one with the place": Social mixing, social capital, and the lived experience of urban desegregation in the Roma community. Cities, 117. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103302
Minnes, P., Carlson, P., Ann Mccoll, M., Lou Nolte, M., Johnston, J., & Buell, K. (2003). Community integration: a useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Injury, 17(2), 149-159. doi: 10.1080/02699050301828
Mizuuchi, T., & Jeon, H. G. (2010). The new mode of urban renewal for the former outcaste minority people and areas in Japan. Cities, 27, S25-S34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.03.008
Murayama, H., Nishi, M., Matsuo, E., Nofuji, Y., Shimizu, Y., Taniguchi, Y., . . . Shinkai, S. (2013). Do bonding and bridging social capital affect self-rated health, depressive mood and cognitive decline in older Japanese? A prospective cohort study. Social Science & Medicine, 98, 247-252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.026
Nguyen, M. T., Basolo, V., & Tiwari, A. (2013). Opposition to Affordable Housing in the USA: Debate Framing and the Responses of Local Actors. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(2), 107-130. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2012.667833
Nguyen, M. T., & Payton Scally, C. (2019). Affordable Housing and Its Residents Are Not Pollutants. Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 363-368. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2019.1574377
Nzau, B., & Trillo, C. (2021). Harnessing the real estate market for equitable affordable housing provision: insights from the city of Santa Monica, California. Housing Studies, 36(7), 1086-1121. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2020.1746244
O'Hare, M. (1977). Not On My Block You Don't: Facility Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation. Public Policy, 25, 407-458.
Oxoby, R. (2009). Understanding social inclusion, social cohesion, and social capital. International Journal of Social Economics, 36, 1133-1152. doi: 10.1108/03068290910996963
Petros, R., Tuohy, M., Bressi, S., Kerrick, G., & Solomon, P. (2021). Measuring Community Integration: Development and Psychometrics of the Community Connections and Engagement Scale. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 48, 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01095-2
Quilgars, D., & Pleace, N. (2016). Housing First and Social Integration: A Realistic Aim? Social Inclusion, 4(4), 5-15. doi: 10.17645/si.v4i4.672
Ronald, R., & Lee, H. (2012). Housing policy socialization and de-commodification in South Korea. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(2), 111-131.
Segal, S. P., Baumohl, J., & Moyles, E. W. (1980). Neighborhood types and community reaction to the mentally ill: A paradox of intensity. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(4), 345.
Srivarathan, A., Kristiansen, M., Jorgensen, T. S. H., & Lund, R. (2022). The association between social integration and neighborhood dissatisfaction and unsafety: a cross-sectional survey study among social housing residents in Denmark. Arch Public Health, 80(1), 190. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00945-9
Storey, K. (1993). A Proposal for Assessing Integration. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28(4), 279-287.
Thurber, A., Bohmann, C. R., & Heflinger, C. A. (2018). Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being. Urban Studies, 55(9), 1859-1874.
Tian, Y., Bi, X., & Li, D. (2007). Feasibility analysis of mixed-income housing in China. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China, 1(3), 371-377. doi: 10.1007/s11709-007-0050-y
Tighe, J. R. (2012). How Race and Class Stereotyping Shapes Attitudes Toward Affordable Housing. Housing Studies, 27(7), 962-983. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2012.725831
Tighe, J. R., & Goetz, E. G. (2019). Comment on “Does the Likely Demographics of Affordable Housing Justify NIMBYism?”. Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 369-373. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2019.1574376
Van Der Veer, J., & Schuiling, D. (2005). The Amsterdam housing market and the role of housing associations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(2), 167-181.
Van Kempen, R., & Bolt, G. (2009). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 457-475. doi: 10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1
Weder di Mauro, B. (2018). Building a cohesive societythe case of Singapore's housing policies. Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.
Wolfensberger, W., & Thomas, S. (1983). PASSING: program analysis of service systems' implementation of normalization goals: normalization criteria and ratings manual. (No Title).
Wong, Y.-L. I., & Solomon, P. L. (2002). Community Integration of Persons with Psychiatric Disabilities in Supportive Independent Housing: A Conceptual Model and Methodological Considerations. Mental Health Services Research, 4(1), 13-28. doi: 10.1023/A:1014093008857
Yang, S., Kim, H., Kim, S.-N., & Ahn, K. (2018). What is achieved and lost in living in a mixed-income neighborhood? Findings from South Korea. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 33(4), 807-828.
Yasui, N. Y., & Berven, N. L. (2009). Community integration: conceptualisation and measurement. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(9), 761-771. doi: 10.1080/09638280802306638
【Book Section】
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows Step-by-Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 14.0 update (7th Edition). http://lst-iiep.iiep-unesco.org/cgi-bin/wwwi32.exe/[in=epidoc1.in]/?t2000=026564/(100).
Harloe, M. (2008). The People's Home?: Social Rented Housing in Europe and America: Wiley.
Harriott, S., Matthews, L., & Grainger, P. (1998). Social Housing: An Introduction: Longman.
Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping Social Cohesion [computer File] : the State of Canadian Research: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: Guilford Publications.
Lubben, J., & Matz-Costa, C. (2021). Social Network Index (pp. 4590-4592): Springer International Publishing.
Mallery, P., & George, D. (2000). SPSS for windows step by step: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
【Conference Paper】
Jeannotte, M. S. (2008). Promoting Social Integration – A Brief Examination of Concepts and Issues. Paper presented at the Prepared for Experts Group Meeting July 8-10, 2008 Helsinki, Finland.
Pyatok, M. (2011). Mixed-Income Housing: Social Integration or Cultural Hegemony? Paper presented at the 社會住宅國際研討會 居住正義與社會包容, 臺大醫院國際會議中心. https://library.tier.org.tw/webpac/bookDetail.do?id=18078
Van der Veer, J., & Schudiling, D. (2011). The role and History of Housing Associations in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Paper presented at the 社會住宅國際研討會 居住正義與社會包容, 臺大醫院國際會議中心. https://library.tier.org.tw/webpac/bookDetail.do?id=18078
【Report】
UN-ECOSOC. (2016). Identifying social inclusion and exclusion Report on the World Social Situation 2016: United Nations Economic and Social Council.
UN-Habitat. (2023). Annual Report 2022. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations.
Spagnolo, G., & Lippert, S. (2005). Networks of Relations and Social Capital. C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
【Web Page】
World Bank. (2015). Inclusive City. from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/inclusive-cities. (2023/09/04)

二、中文文獻
【期刊論文】
Forrest, R., & 黎德星（2012）。社會住宅：過去、現在和未來。住宅學報， 21（2），頁 91-99。 doi: 10.6375/jhs.201212.0091
王南喻，劉峰旗，黃志仁，張煜明（2020）。誰需要社會住宅？。住宅學報， 29（2），頁 99-129。
王秋元（2015）。歐洲的社會住宅──給台灣的啟示。城市與設計學報（23），頁 185-204。 doi: 10.30008/cd.201509_(23).0006
江尚書（2011）。以社會住宅的實踐凝聚城市的進步性。中華民國建築學會會刊雜誌， 63，頁 31-34。
江穎慧（2011）。社會住宅的迷思。新社會政策（15），頁 30-31。 doi: 10.29752/nst.201104.0008
米復國（1988）。台灣的公共住宅政策。台灣社會研究季刊， 1（2&3），頁 97-147。 doi: 10.29816/TARQSS.198807.0003
李子瑋，李長晏（2013）。社會住宅政策問題建構與對策提出。中國地方自治， 66（6），頁 20-60。 doi: 10.6581/lsgc.2013.66(6).03
李永展（1997）。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃， 24（1），頁 69-79。
李永展，陳柏廷（1996）。從環境認知的觀點探討「鄰避」設施的再利用。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報（8），頁 53-65。 doi: 10.6154/jbp.1996.8.004
李得全，羅煊，謝一鋒（2020）。論居住正義及其解方：臺灣與臺北。台灣土地研究， 23（2），頁 157-193。 doi: 10.6677/JTLR.202011_23(2).0002
沈孟穎，傅朝卿（2015a）。台灣「國民」住宅設計與現代住居空間再現。住宅學報， 24（1），頁 55-88。
沈孟穎，傅朝卿（2015b）。台灣現代住宅設計之轉化：以1920年代至1960年代公共（國民）住宅為例。設計學報， 20（4），頁 43-62。
林倖如（2017）。社會福利設施之鄰避紛爭處理方法－兼介紹日本鄰避設施之居民合意形成程序。法令月刊， 68（2），頁 90-117。 doi: 10.6509/tlm.2017.6802.04
林萬億（2003）。論我國的社會住宅政策與社會照顧的結合。國家政策季刊， 2（4），頁 53-82。 doi: 10.6407/NPQ.200312.0053
林萬億（2011）。社會住宅如何興建。中華民國建築學會會刊雜誌。
林曉彤（2019）。公共住宅混居之社會網絡與居住滿意度研究 -以台北市興隆公共住宅為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班，臺北市。
花敬群，江尚書，徐旻穗（2017）。社會住宅質量並進的策略及挑戰。社區發展季刊， 158，頁 6-14。
胡志平，林帝佑（2013）。住宅標籤化與社區意識及維護績效路徑分析－結構方程模型應用。住宅學報， 22（1），頁 81-105。
孫斌棟，劉學良（2009）。美國混合居住政策及其效應的研究述評。城市規劃學刊， 179（1），頁 90-97。
孫碧霞（2018）。社會排除與社會融合：比較歐盟與台灣的政策。人文與社會學報， 3（7），頁 49-76。
師豫玲，孫淑文，陳肯玉（2008）。臺北市平價住宅問題探討、因應策略與未來發展方向。社區發展季刊， 121，頁 100-119。
張金鶚（2011）。當前社會住宅的期待。中華民國建築學會會刊雜誌， 63，頁 10-13。
張雅惠（2009）。國民住宅轉型社會住宅之課題分析。土地問題研究季刊， 8（2），頁 79-88。 doi: 10.29604/BGYY.200906.0006
許立民，林淑娥，許韶芹（2016）。居住正義－以公民審議方式擬定臺北市公共住宅特殊身份保障戶分配機制之過程。國土及公共治理季刊， 4（4），頁 99-104。
陳怡伶，黎德星（2010）。新自由主義化、國家與住宅市場臺灣國宅政策的演變。地理學報， 59，頁 105-131。 doi: 10.6161/jgs.2010.59.06
陳冠儒（2021）。民眾對社會住宅弱勢保障比率態度之影響因素分析。住宅學報， 30（1），頁 1-26。
彭建文，李美杏，陳冠儒（2018）。台灣地區居住滿意度影響因素之實證分析。都市與計劃， 47（3），頁 243-270。 doi: 10.6128/CP.202009_47(3).0003
彭建文，楊宗憲（2007）。自動估價系統對不動產估價師之潛在衝擊分析。住宅學報， 16（1），頁 79-98。 doi: 10.6375/JHS.200706.0079
惠曉曦（2012）。尋求社會公正與融合的可持續途徑: 荷蘭社會住宅的發展與現況。URBAN PLANNING INTERNATIONAL， 27（4），頁 13-22。 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9493.2012.04.003
黃怡潔，江穎慧，張金鶚（2017）。臺北市公共住宅對周圍住宅價格之影響。都市與計劃 ， 44（3），頁 227-302。 doi: 10.6128/CP.44.3.277
楊宗憲，蘇倖慧（2011）。迎毗設施與鄰避設施對住宅價格影響之研究。住宅學報， 20（2），頁 61-80。 doi: 10.6375/jhs.201112.0062
【書籍】
田野（2007）。轉型期中國城市不同階層混合居住研究）。 北京：中國建築工業出版社。
吳明龍，涂金堂（2005）。SPSS與統計應用分析）：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
林萬億（2012）。臺灣的社會福利: 歷史經驗與制度分析）：五南圖書出版公司。
夏鑄九，米復國（1988）。台灣的住宅政策: 《國民住宅計劃》之社會學分析）：國立台灣大學土木工程學硏究所都市計畫硏究室。
陳正昌，程炳林，陳新豐，劉子鍵（2005）。多變量分析方法: 統計軟體應用）：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
【政府計畫及資料】
內政部營建署（2015）。整體住宅政策(104.9.15核定版). 行政院內政部營建署國民住宅組。
內政部營建署（2022）。社會住宅興辦計畫（第二次修正核定本）。
臺北市大同區公所（2023）。低收入戶人口按里別。檢自: http://pxweb.dtdo.gov.taipei/pxweb/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=SW00015YA&ti=%A4j%A6P%B0%CF%A6%AC%A4J%A4%E1%A4H%A4f%AB%F6%A8%BD%A7O&path=../PXfile/CountyStatistics&lang=9&strList=L。(2024/07/08)
臺北市政府信義區公所（2023）。低收入戶人口按里別。檢自: http://pxweb.xydo.gov.taipei/pxweb/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=SW00015YA&ti=%ABH%B8q%B0%CF%A7C%A6%AC%A4J%A4%E1%A4H%A4f--%AB%F6%A8%BD%A7O&path=../PXfile/CountyStatistics&lang=9&strList=L。(2024/07/08)
臺北市大同區戶政事務所（2023）。人口統計資料。檢自: https://reurl.cc/g4mDrp。(2023/12/23)
臺北市信義區戶政事務所（2023）。人口統計資料。檢自: https://reurl.cc/WRLGWk。(2023/12/23)
臺北市政府民政局（2023）。臺北市每年人口數依性別及年齡分(按行政區、里別)。檢自: https://reurl.cc/bDRn96。(2023/12/23)
臺北市政府安心樂租網（2023）。臺北市社會住宅配租概況表。檢自: https://reurl.cc/54laV6。(2023/12/23)
臺北市政府社會局（2023）。身心障礙人數統計表。檢自: https://dosw.gov.taipei/cp.aspx?n=BA5B128CF7454DDC。(2024/07/08)
臺北市政府社會局（2023）。社會住宅其他特殊情形身分戶評點表。檢自: https://reurl.cc/54laV6。(2023/12/23)
臺北市政府都市發展局（2023）。社會住宅興建計畫及戰情中心。檢自: https://hms.udd.gov.taipei/。(2023/12/23)
【學位論文】
李滫鈞（2022）。社會住宅招租後對周遭租房市場的影響：以臺北市為例。碩士學位論文，國立臺灣大學經濟學研究所，臺北市。
李曜霖（2019）。居住正義實踐? 臺北市社會住宅政策探討。碩士學位論文，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所，新北市。
沈孟穎（2015）。臺灣公共(國民)住宅空間治理(1910s～2000s)。博士學位論文，國立成功大學建築學系，臺南市。
邢淑伶（2021）。從鄰避到迎毗：以健康社會住宅居民與周遭社區居民對社會住宅之態度為例。碩士學位論文，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，臺北市。
周仲璿（2022）。我國社會住宅周邊環境可近性評估-以六都為例。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學公共行政學系，臺北市。
林貝珊（2018）。台北市公共住宅對周邊居住環境影響之研究。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學地政學系，臺北市。
林郁期（2022）。社會住宅不同屬性住戶使用認知之比較研究—以南港東明社會住宅為例。碩士學位論文，中原大學建築學系，桃園市。
林益谷（2017）。高雄市居民對社會住宅之認知與態度之研究–兼論公民參與制度與社會住宅支持度之關聯。碩士學位論文，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所，高雄市。
林純綺（2018）。社會住宅去標籤化與創意階層混居之研究。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學地政學系，臺北市。
林曉彤（2019）。公共住宅混居之社會網絡與居住滿意度研究 -以台北市興隆公共住宅為例。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學地政學系碩士在職專班，臺北市。
高維志（2022）。社會住宅中的公共性:以臺北市社會住宅之公共空間為例（2011-2022）。碩士學位論文，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，臺北市。
曾采蓁（2020）。創造混合收入社區：台北市安康平價住宅到興隆社會住宅的轉型。碩士學位論文，國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所，臺北市。
曾意辰（2015）。居住正義－臺灣社會住宅論述與政策之分析。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學國家發展研究所，臺北市。
黃如瀅（2019）。臺北市公共住宅鄰避效應之探討。碩士學位論文，國立臺灣大學公共事務研究所，臺北市。
黃麒睿（2016）。社會住宅對於周邊房價影響之研究-以臺北市為例。碩士學位論文，國立臺北科技大學建築與都市設計研究所，臺北市。
詹幃棠（2022）。探討社會住宅引進社福服務的協力互動過程與影響因素。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學公共
行政學系，臺北市。
戴承廷（2020）。社會住宅對周邊房屋價格之影響－以台北市文山區為例。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學財政學研究所，臺北市。
蘇宥維（2021）。社會住宅管理與社會福利資源輸送初探－以雙北市為例。碩士學位論文，國立臺北大學社會工作學系，新北市。
蘇曉瑞（2021）。社會住宅供給對房價與地方消費之影響。博士學位論文，國立政治大學地政學系，臺北市。
【網頁資料】
國家發展委員會（2016）。國發會小知識─1分鐘解讀「社會融合」。檢自: https://reurl.cc/A0nGp8。(2023/09/04)
專業者都市改革組織（2016）。民間版住宅法修法說明。 檢自: https://ours.org.tw/2021/05/18/press_release0518/。(2023/09/04)
專業者都市改革組織（2021）。【新聞稿】《住宅法》修法三讀通過！弱勢保障顯著提升，其餘項目仍待努力。檢自: https://ours.org.tw/2021/05/18/press_release0518/。(2023/09/04)
彭揚凱，廖庭輝（2020）。社會住宅給誰住？破除自償迷思，追求可負擔租金。檢自: https://ours.org.tw/2020/09/06/socialhousing10-02/。(2023/09/04)