簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 章凌偉
Zhang, Ling-Wei
論文名稱: 從生活實驗室的觀點探討社區閑置空間的過渡性使用- 以臺南市仁愛里與臨安社區的大學生場域實踐型人才培育為例
Transitional Use of Vacant Community Spaces from a Living Lab Standpoint: Case Studies of Place-Based, Practice-Oriented Talent Development for University Students in Ren’ai and Lin’an Community, Tainan City
指導教授: 陳世明
Chen, Shih-Ming
盧紀邦
Lu, Chi-Pang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 194
中文關鍵詞: 生活實驗室閒置空間再利用大學社會責任場域實踐型人才培育
外文關鍵詞: Living Lab, Temporary Urbanism, Vacant space reuse, Place-based practice talent, University Social Responsibility
相關次數: 點閱:20下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iv 目錄 v 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 ix 第1章 緒論 1 1-1 研究背景與動機 1 1-2 研究目的 2 1-3 研究對象 2 1-4 研究方法 4 1-4-1 核心研究方法:理論導向的行動研究 4 1-4-2 分析觀點:生活實驗室 4 1-4-3 資料收集方法 5 1-4-4 資料分析方法 5 1-5 預期貢獻與研究限制 5 1-5-1 預期貢獻 5 1-5-2 研究限制 6 1-6 關鍵名詞釋義 7 1-7 研究時程與研究架構 8 1-7-1 研究時程 8 1-7-2 研究架構 8 第2章 文獻回顧與理論探討 10 2-1 理論基石(一):生活實驗室 10 2-1-1 生活實驗室的核心概念、理論基礎與發展脈絡 10 2-1-2 生活實驗室的類型與運作模式 13 2-1-3 生活實驗室的潛力與挑戰 17 2-1-4 生活實驗室:一個用以詮釋在地實踐的分析觀點 17 2-2 理論基石(二):都市閒置空間活化之策略與模式 19 2-2-1 都市閒置空間的成因與應對策略 19 2-2-2 短期介入策略:暫時性都市主義的興起與實踐 20 2-2-3 長期治理模式:台南社區營造的在地實踐 24 2-2-4 生活實驗室與閒置空間活化的內涵連結 31 2-2-5 生活實驗室:整合都市閒置空間短期試驗與長期治理的可能性 36 2-3 理論基石(三):大學社會責任下的場域實踐型人才培育 37 2-3-1 大學社會責任、知識生產模式以及人才培育 37 2-3-2 大學社會責任(USR)計畫 39 2-3-3 場域實踐型建築與環境營造人才培育的發展與變化 41 2-3-4 生活實驗室的詮釋性觀點:深化USR場域實踐與人才培育的內涵 46 2-4 小結 47 第3章 USR下建築教育的場域實踐:由社區服務向共創參與演進 50 3-1 建築系的課程學習與場域參與歷程 50 3-2 場域實踐的前期探索 52 3-2-1 南美里歷史街區規劃課程的參與學習 52 3-2-2 萬福庵廟埕閒置空地的參與式規劃行動實踐 57 3-2-3 USR計畫下的社區場域初步參與:研究場域選擇 60 3-3 核心案例背景:作為實踐載體的大學部場域實踐型課程與實踐場域介紹 63 3-3-1 場域實踐型課程 63 3-3-2 場域實踐型課程的實踐場域介紹 66 3-4 小結 73 第4章 場域實作案例:「仁愛里長期共創實作」與「臨安社區初期介入」 74 4-1 仁愛里社區:生活實驗室觀點下的深化共創實踐 74 4-1-1 環境規劃方案實作課程:共創試驗過程與初步成果 75 4-1-2 環境規劃程序與場域實踐課程:反饋調整與成果深化 85 4-2 臨安社區:生活實驗室觀點下的兩次臨時性介入實踐 91 4-2-1 環境規劃方案實作課程:社區組織內部諮詢型參與式設計的過程與成果 92 4-2-2 環境規劃程序與場域實踐課程:社區間介入型參與式設計的過程與成果 106 4-3 小結 114 第5章 生活實驗室觀點下場域實踐型課程實作的效益與反思 115 5-1 仁愛里案例分析 116 5-1-1 仁愛里社區場域實作成效 116 5-1-2 仁愛里學生學習成效 118 5-2 臨安社區案例分析 123 5-2-1 臨安社區場域實作成效 123 5-2-2 臨安社區學生學習成效 127 5-3 小結 130 第6章 結論與建議 131 6-1 研究發現與總結 131 6-2 後續建議 133 6-3 結語 134 參考文獻 136 附錄一 臺南市歷史核心區失落空間過渡性使用構想 140 附錄二 仁愛里圍牆綠美化最終設計與活動規劃 144 附錄三 臨安教會親和性圍籬設計 147 附錄四 臨安教會路口交通規劃設計 149 附錄五 社區訪談逐字稿 151 附錄六 課程學生心得 174

    王宣筑(2022)。歷史區域中高齡者的社區生活與環境營造的參與-以臺南市中西區南美里溫陵社區的參與為例。國立成功大學。
    何翌綺(2024)。場域實踐型人才培育中社區參與多樣性議題學習的展開-以臺南市中西區南美里溫陵社區為例。台南市。
    林雨潔(2018)。社區綠空間營造與綠生活經營-以台南市同安社區與國平社區為例。國立成功大學。
    張渝嘉(2023)。臺南市安平區國平社區居民與大學學生參與社區「開心農場」空間的規劃與實作。國立成功大學。
    陳佩雯(2014)。駐地工作室與歷史區域再生-以台南市銀同里為例。國立成功大學。
    陳思妤(2024)。高齡者與大學學生在歷史區域的社區生活與環境營造的參與-以臺南市南美里溫陵社區為例。國立成功大學。
    黃一中(2021)。臺南市舊城歷史區域再生的參與式規劃與實踐-以社區及學校的參與操作經驗為例。國立成功大學。
    葉家丞(2020)。場域實踐型建築人才的培育 -以臺南市官田區隆田里暨周邊區域的營造為例。國立成功大學。
    蕭稦宸(2023)。場域實踐型建築與環境營造人才培育-以臺南市官田區隆田社區環境營造與北區仁愛里愛憩園空間規劃實作為例。國立成功大學。
    鍾瀅薇(2022)。從暫時性都市主義觀點探討閒置空間再生之社區參與研究。國立成功大學。
    蘇原弘(2012)。台南市空地管理政策之研究。國立成功大學。
    陳世明(2019)。大學社會責任計畫的展開與社會實踐導向建築人才培育的可能性。臺灣建築學會會刊雜誌,94,11–16。
    曾憲嫻(2013)。臺南舊市中心空間再生之研究:由街區結構和文化再生之觀點。都市與計劃,40(3),267–286。https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.40.3.267
    曾憲嫻、呂偉婷、倪佩君(2007)。舊市中心再生計畫之研究─以台南市為例。環境與藝術學刊,5,41–53。
    黃一中、陳世明、盧紀邦、蔡佳芳(2018)。支援舊市中心區高齡者在地生活發展之空間供給研究-以台南市中西區銀同社區為例。建築學報,106(S),1–22。https://doi.org/10.3966/101632122018120106010
    Ali, M., Mustapha, I., Osman, S., & Hassan, U. (2021). University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124931
    Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1995). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Contemporary Sociology, 24(6), 751. https://doi.org/10.2307/2076669
    Bickford, D. M., & Reynolds, N. (2002). Activism and service-learning: Reframing volunteerism As acts of dissent. Pedagogy, 2(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-2-2-229
    Blezer, S., Abujidi, N., & Sap, H. (2024). Urban living labs as innovation infrastructure for local urban intervention acceleration and student social learning: The impacts on community wellbeing in heerlen. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1242151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1242151
    Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3824459
    Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., Von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222
    Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J., & Rehman, S. S. (2016). Mode 3 knowledge production: Systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0045-9
    Chronéer, D., Ståhlbröst, A., & Habibipour, A. (2019). Urban living labs: Towards an integrated understanding of their key components. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(3), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1224
    Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003
    Daniel, W. (2000). Residual Space Re-evaluated [Portfolio]. Places, 13(3). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3xg939wr
    Davidson, A.-L., Harlap, A., & Bhuiyan, N. (2022). A living lab approach to prepare students to Be confident innovators. Interventions Économiques, 68. https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.19045
    Dell’Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living lab: A methodology between user‐centred design and participatory design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061
    Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L., & Wendler, J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: University campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005
    Harris, E. (2015). Navigating pop‐up geographies: Urban space–times of flexibility, interstitiality and immersion. Geography Compass, 9(11), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12248
    Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A systematic review of living lab literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
    Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., & Nyström, A.-G. (2012). Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602
    Morales, I., Segalás, J., & Masseck, T. (2023). Urban living labs: A higher education approach to teaching and learning about sustainable development. Sustainability, 15(20), 14876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014876
    Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., & Loorbach, D. (2013). Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
    Robazza, G., Priego-Hernández, J., Caputo, S., & Melis, A. (2024). Temporary urbanism as a catalyst for social resilience: Insights from an urban living lab practice-based research. Buildings, 14(6), 1513. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061513
    Rogers, S., Jeffery, A., Pringle, J., Law, A., Nobajas, A., Szkornik, K., Turner, A., Moolna, A., Davenward, B., & Hobson, L. (2023). Experiential and authentic learning in a living lab: The role of a campus-based living lab as a teaching and learning environment. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 28. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi28.1020
    Singer-Brodowski, M., Beecroft, R., & Parodi, O. (2018). Learning in real-world laboratories: A systematic impulse for discussion. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.7
    Talen, E. (2014). Do-it-yourself urbanism: A history. Journal of Planning History, 14(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513214549325
    Tercanli, H., & Jongbloed, B. (2022). A systematic review of the literature on living labs in higher education institutions: Potentials and constraints. Sustainability, 14(19), 12234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912234
    Tonkiss, F. (2013). Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city. City, 17(3), 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2013.795332
    Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H., & Kraines, S. B. (2014). Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 151–179. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct044
    Van Der Wee, M. L. E., Tassone, V. C., Wals, A. E. J., & Troxler, P. (2024). Characteristics and challenges of teaching and learning in sustainability-oriented living labs within higher education: A literature review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 25(9), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2023-0465
    Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.053
    Westerlund, M., & Leminen, S. (2011). Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: Experiences from living labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489
    國立成功大學人文社會科學中心(編輯)(2021)。微光成炬。國立成功大學出版社。
    曾旭正(2013)。台灣的社區營造: 新社會・新文化・新「人」。遠足文化事業股份有限公司。
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press.
    Barron, P., & Mariani, M. (edit). (2014). Terrain vague: Interstices at the edge of the pale (First edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552172
    Bishop, P., & Williams, L. (2012). The temporary city. Routledge.
    Bok, D. C. (edit). (2011). Beyond the ivory tower: Social responsibilities of the modern university. Harvard University Press.
    Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems: 21st-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
    Chase, J., Kaliski, J., & Crawford, M. (1999). Everyday urbanism: Featuring john chase. Monacelli Press.
    Franck, K. A., & Stevens, Q. (2007). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. Routledge.
    Gehl, J. (2011). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space (1st ed). Island Press.
    Haydn, F., & Temel, R. (2006). Temporary urban spaces: Concepts for the use of city spaces. Birkhäuser.
    Hou, J. (2010). Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. Routledge.
    Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities (Vintage books ed). Vintage Books.
    Lerner, J. (2014). Urban acupuncture. Island Press.
    Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-567-0
    Madanipour, A. (2017). Cities in time: Temporary urbanism and the future of the city. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Pic.
    Oswalt, P. (2012). Urban catalyst strategies for temporary use. Actar-D.
    Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban catalyst: The power of temporary use (1., neue Ausg). DOM publishers.
    Shek, D. T. L., & Hollister, R. M. (edit). (2017). University social responsibility and quality of life: A global survey of concepts and experiences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3877-8
    Steen, K., & Bueren, E. van. (2017). Urban Living Labs: A Living Lab Way of Working. AMS Institute.
    Stevens, Q., & Dovey, K. (2022). Temporary and tactical urbanism: (Re)assembling urban space. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003284390
    Trancik, R. (1986). Finding lost space: Theories of urban design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Yamagata, Y., & Maruyama, H. (2016). Urban resilience: A transformative approach. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39812-9
    Hadfield, P., Sharp, D., Pigeon, J., & Raven, R. (2025). Governing university living labs for sustainability transformations: Insights from 18 international case studies. Sustainability Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01690-y
    Hadfield, P., Sharp, D., Zarea, M., Pigeon, J., Peng, X., Rye, S., & Raven, R. (2023). Governing university living labs for sustainable development: Lessons from international case studies. Monash University. https://doi.org/10.26180/22138073
    Schuurman, D., DeLosRíos-White, M. I., & Desole, M. (2025). Living lab origins, developments, and future perspectives. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.14764597

    無法下載圖示 校內:2028-08-01公開
    校外:2028-08-01公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE