本研究旨在評估台灣上市上櫃散熱模組產業的經營績效，並探討其在產業中的相對效率。為達成此目的，本研究運用資料包絡式分析（DEA）方法，評估不同公司在生產和經營方面的效率，我們收集了相關數據，包括產業在生產階段以及市場階段的資料，以綜合評估該產業的整體經營狀況。研究結果顯示，一些公司在特定方面表現出色，但在其他方面則較弱，資料揭示出產業內部的差異性和潛在的改善空間，通過比較不同公司的效率表現，我們能夠識別出最佳實踐方法和潛在的最佳作法，這有助於其他公司提高其經營效率和競爭力，本研究提供了對台灣散熱模組產業經營績效的深入理解，並為業界決策者提供了有價值的參考和建議。
研究將以台灣上市與上櫃的散熱模組產業為研究對象，研究15家台灣上市櫃散熱模組產業於 2018年至 2022年的經營效率，透過兩階段動態資料包絡式分析法（Two-stage dynamic SBM），分成生產階段與市場階段做績效分析，研究結果如下:
1. 台灣上市與上櫃的散熱模組產業研究期間平均整體效率值僅為0.29，表現出台灣整體散熱模組產業都有待加強的趨勢。其中，雙鴻表現最佳，效率值為0.73。
2. 台灣散熱模組產業研究期間生產階段平均效率值為 0.25，市場階段平均效率值為0.33，說明散熱模組產業在市場階段效率顯著高，應首要加強在人力以及研發費用的效率。
3. 生產階段表現最佳者為鴻準、敦吉和安力-KY，在市場階段表現最佳者為安力-KY。

This study evaluates the operational performance and efficiency of the Taiwan-listed and over-the-counter (OTC) Thermal Module Industry using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). By analyzing data from both production and market stages, it identifies areas for improvement within the industry. Comparing companies' efficiency performances helps identify best practices, aiding others in enhancing their competitiveness. The research focuses on 15 companies from 2018 to 2022, employing the Two-stage dynamic SBM method for analysis. The Two-stage dynamic SBM method is employed to conduct performance analysis in both the production and market stages. The key findings of this research are as follows:(1).The average overall efficiency value of the Taiwan-listed and OTC Thermal Module Industry during the study period is only 0.29, indicating a need for improvement across the industry. Among them, Auras Technology Co., Ltd. performs the best with an efficiency value of 0.73.(2).The average efficiency value during the production stage is 0.25, while during the market stage, it is 0.33, indicating significantly higher efficiency in the market stage. The focus should be on enhancing efficiency in manpower and research and development (R&D) expenses.(3).The top performers during the production stage are Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd., Audix, and Anli International Co.,Ltd., while Anli International Co.,Ltd. performs the best in the market stage.

Arsal, M. (2021). Impact of earnings per share and dividend per share on firm value. ATESTASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 4(1), 11-18.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444.
Carbone, T. A. (2000). Measuring efficiency of semiconductor manufacturing operations using data envelopment analysis (DEA). 2000 IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop. ASMC 2000 (Cat. No. 00CH37072), , Boston, MA, USA, 2000, pp. 56-62, doi: 10.1109/ASMC.2000.902558.
Charoenrat, T., & Harvie, C. (2017). The performance of Thai manufacturing SMEs: Data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Global Business Review, 18(5), 1178-1198.
Chen, T.-c., Guo, D.-Q., Chen, H.-M., & Wei, T.-t. (2019). Effects of R&D intensity on firm performance in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 32(1), 2377-2392.
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120(3), 253-281.
Färe, R., & Whittaker, G. (1995). An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. Journal of agricultural economics, 46(2), 201-213.
Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Journal of the operational research society, 48(6), 656-656.
Freihat, A. R. F., & Kanakriyah, R. (2017). Impact of R&D expenditure on financial performance: Jordanian evidence. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(32), 73-83.
Gharaibeh, A. T., Saleh, M. H., Jawabreh, O., & Ali, B. J. (2022). An empirical study of the relationship between earnings per share, net income, and stock price. Appl. Math, 16(5), 673-679.
Hemadivya, K., & Devi, V.R. (2013). A Study on Relationship between Market Price&earnings per Share with Reference to Selected Companies. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services and Management Research, 2, 126-133.
Klopp, G. A. (1985). The analysis of the efficiency of productive systems with multiple inputs and outputs: University of Illinois at Chicago.
Konak, F., & Kendirli, S. (2016). Impact of R&D Expenses on Firm Performance: Emprical Evidence From the BIST Information Technology Index. China-USA Business Review, 15(5), 226-231.
Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1365-1410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00095-9
Lu, W.-M., & Hung, S.-W. (2010). Assessing the performance of a vertically disintegrated chain by the DEA approach–a case study of Taiwanese semiconductor firms. International Journal of Production Research, 48(4), 1155-1170.
Latif, M. S. A., Fahmy-Abdullah, M., & Sieng, L. W. (2019). Determinants factor of technical efficiency in machinery manufacturing industry in Malaysia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(6), 917-928.
Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de estadística, 4(2), 209-242.
Mahadevan, R. (2002). A DEA approach to understanding the productivity growth of Malaysia's manufacturing industries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19, 587-600.
Mok, V., Yeung, G., Han, Z., & Li, Z. (2007). Leverage, Technical Efficiency and Profitability: an application of DEA to foreign-invested toy manufacturing firms in China. Journal of contemporary china, 16(51), 259-274.
Prieto, A. M., & Zofio, J. L. (2007). Network DEA efficiency in input–output models:
With an application to OECD countries. European journal of operational research,
178(1), 292-304.
Tunji, S. T., Olakunle, O. O., Eyibio, O. E., & Kafayat, A. A. (2022). The effect of debt on earnings per share using manufacturing companies in Nigeria from 2011 to 2021. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 159-169. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i1930667
Sexton, T. R., & Lewis, H. F. (2003). Two-Stage DEA: An Application to Major League Baseball. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 19(2), 227-249.
Schmidt-Ehmcke, J., & Zloczysti, P. (2009). Research efficiency in manufacturing: An application of DEA at the industry level. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1460765
Saeidi, R. G., Amin, G. R., Raissi, S., & Gattoufi, S. (2013). An efficient DEA method for ranking woven fabric defects in textile manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68, 349-354.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis.
European journal of operational research, 130(3), 498-509.
Talluri, S., Vickery, S. K., & Droge, C. L. (2003). Transmuting performance on manufacturing dimensions into business performance: an exploratory analysis of efficiency using DEA. International Journal of Production Research, 41(10), 2107-2123.
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach.
Omega, 38(3), 145-156.
Tahir, I. M., & Memon, M. A. (2011). Applying DEA in analyzing the efficiency of top manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 1(2), 225-239.
Wang, J.-C., & Tsai, K.-H. (2004). Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in Taiwan's manufacturing firms. In Growth and productivity in East Asia (pp. 277-296). University of Chicago Press.
Wang, Y.-M., & Chin, K.-S. (2009). A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers. International Journal of Production Research, 47(23), 6663-6679.