簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蘇俊賢
So, Chun-Yin
論文名稱: 會計師稅務專家與企業避稅行為:以台灣為例
Auditor Tax Expertise and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Taiwan
指導教授: 劉梧柏
Liu, Wu-Po
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 稅務專家避稅避稅天堂移轉訂價
外文關鍵詞: Tax Expert, Tax Avoidance, Tax Haven, Transfer Pricing
相關次數: 點閱:194下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以台灣2005-2019年上市櫃公司作為樣本作為分析,探討當企業任用稅務專家後是否為增加自身之避稅效果。此外,本研究進一步檢驗任用稅務專家之效果是否因企業採用避稅天堂及移轉訂價之避稅方法而異。本文採不同於以往使用會計師事務所審計公費來衡量該會計師是否為稅務專家,而是改採用公司稅率來區分,並參考以往文獻將稅務專家分為國家、城市及個人層級來進行分析。實證結果發現,雖然在國家層級之稅務專家並未發現證據,但在城市層級及個人層級中可觀察到,這兩個層級之稅務專家較能為企業帶來更大之租稅效益。
    除此之外,本研究發現當把避稅天堂加入考量時,發現企業採用避稅天堂會比非採用避稅天堂之企業更能降低稅率之結論。接著本文也參考以往國內學者產生常規交易樣本之做法,將企業分成有移轉訂價跡象和常規交易之群組作分析。實證結果發現,在有移轉訂價之樣本下,顯示出三個層級除個人層級外會因企業採用移轉訂價之避稅方法而較其他企業獲得更多租稅利益。
    接著本研究也考慮以往學者分析具某些特徵之企業會增加其避稅之效果,本文加入了企業規模、受四大會計師事務所查核及獲利能力來分析。研究發現大型企業會比小型企業任用國家層級及城市層級稅務專家時會較有避稅之優勢,但在個人層級之統計差異檢定中單尾顯著。接著在受四大會計師事務所查核之企業樣本中,得出受四大會計師事務所查核之企業任用各層級稅務專家會比非受四大會計師事務所查核之企業時的避稅效果較佳之結論。然後在加入企業之獲利能力作考量後,獲利較小企業會因任用國家層級之稅務專家會比獲利較佳的企業避稅能力較好,惟在城市層級及個人層級並未得出會因獲利能力之差異造成影響之結論。
    最後本文分析導入IFRS後是否影響企業與避稅之關係,在三個層級之實證結果中可以發現,當導入IFRS後會降低稅務專家為企業避稅之效果。

    This study uses Taiwan's listed and OTC companies from 2005 to 2019 as samples to explore whether enterprises can increase their tax avoidance effects after employing tax experts. In addition, this study further examines whether the effect of appointing tax experts varies with the tax havens and transfer pricing. In this paper, the corporate tax rate is adopted instead of using accounting firm public audit fees to judge whether the accountant is a tax expert, where tax experts are divided into national, city, and individual levels for analysis with reference to previous literature. The empirical results show that although no evidence for tax experts at the national level was found, it was observed that tax experts at the city level and individual level can provide greater tax benefits to enterprises.
    In addition, it was found that when tax havens are taken into consideration, companies adopting tax havens can lower their tax rates more than companies that do not adopt them. This article also refers to the previous practice of domestic scholars in terms of generating samples of conventional transactions, where the companies are divided into groups with signs of transfer pricing and conventional transactions for the purpose of the analysis. The empirical results indicated that in the sample with transfer pricing, three levels, with the exception of the individual level, will receive more tax benefits than other companies due to the adoption of a transfer pricing method including tax avoidance.
    This study also considers the result of the analyses of previous scholars, who found that tax avoidance effects will be more apparent in enterprises with specific characteristics. This paper adds some additional characteristics, including enterprise size, audit by Big Four accounting firms, and profitability. It is found that large enterprises have more advantages in terms of tax avoidance than small enterprises when employing tax experts at the national and city levels, but there is a significant one-tailed difference in the statistical difference test at the individual level. Then, in the sample of enterprises audited by Big Four accounting firms, it was concluded that the enterprises audited by Big Four accounting firms have better tax avoidance effects than enterprises not audited by Big Four accounting firms. After considering the profitability of enterprises, enterprises with smaller profits were found to have better tax avoidance abilities when employing tax experts at the national level as compared to those with better profits. However, there is no evidence found that differences in profitability will affect tax avoidance abilities at the city level and individual level.
    Finally, in this work, an attempt is made to determine whether the introduction of the IFRS will affect the relationship between enterprises and tax avoidance. It was found that the introduction of the IFRS reduces the effects of tax avoidance for enterprises.

    壹、 緒論 1 貳、 文獻回顧與研究假說 6 參、 研究設計 12 一、 樣本選取過程 12 二、 迴歸模型 13 三、 應變數之定義 13 四、 解釋變數定義 14 五、 控制變數定義 16 六、 預期方向表 20 七、 變數定義表 21 肆、 實證結果 24 一、 敘述性統計 24 二、 單變量分析 26 三、 迴歸結果 27 伍、 結論與建議 94 參考文獻 96

    中文部份:

    1. 黃美祝與楊珮璇,2011,集團企業與非集團企業避稅程度之比較,會計學報,4卷1期:1-22。
    2. 黃美祝,2015,我國不合常規移轉訂價制度對企業避稅程度之影響,會計學報,6卷1期:35-62。
    3. 黃美祝,2019,董事連結與企業避稅程度之關聯性,臺大管理論叢,29卷2期 : 201-231。
    4. 汪瑞芝與李佳駿,2019,企業社會責任對避稅行為之影響,證券市場發展季刊,31卷1期:47-86。
    5. 林宜勉,2010,會計師審計品質與財務報表重編之關聯性,中山管理評論,18卷2期:407-445。
    6. 林昭伶,2017,我國審計市場競爭與審計品質之關聯性研究,商管科技季刊,18卷4期:431-473。
    7. 林嬌能,2017,會計產業專家、會計師公費與企業租稅規劃相關性之研究,會計學報,7卷1期:51-88。
    8. 陳明進、林世銘與張天勳,2001,證券及土地交易所得免稅對我國公司有效稅率之影響,中華會計學刊,2卷1期:33-56。
    9. 陳明進,2002,營利事業有效稅率決定因素之實證研究,會計評論,34期:57-75。
    10. 陳明進與蔡麗雯,2006,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,23卷6期:739-763。
    11. 陳明進與蔡麗雯,2010,移轉訂價與盈餘管理之研究,證券市場發展季刊,22卷2期:141-176。
    12. 陳明進,2017,產業創新條例限縮研發支出投資抵減對公司研究發展支出之影響,管理學報,34卷2期:277-305。
    13. 陳皆碩、鄭國枝與康湘婷,2016,會計師產業簽證經驗與簽證工作量對財務報表重編之影響,中山管理評論,24卷1期:153-198。
    14. 薛敏正、林于璿與邱彥毅,2017,避稅行為與資訊透明度之關聯性研究,管理學報,34卷2期:167-187。
    15. 魏春燕與陳磊,2016,審計人員之產業專精與客戶租稅規避:中國實證研究,臺大管理論叢,26卷2期:1-36。
    16. 姚維仁、金成隆與王肇蘭,2018,銀行債務契約訂定與財稅差異之關聯性,會計評論,66期:1-39。
    17. 張凱平,2015,家族企業、租稅規避與企業策略,國家政治大學碩士論文。
    18. 劉天道,2008,國際租稅規劃,臺北市進出口商業同業公會。

    英文部份:

    1. Addison, S., and F. Mueller. 2015. The dark side of professions: the big four and tax avoidance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 28 (8):1263-1290.
    2. Ahn, J., R. Hoitash, and U. Hoitash. 2019. Auditor task-specific expertise: The case of fair value accounting. The Accounting Review 95 (3): 1–32.
    3. Baldenius, T., S. Reichelstein, N. Melumad. 2004. Integrating managerial and tax objectives in transfer pricing. Accounting Review 79 (3): 591–615.
    4. Badertscher, B., S. Katz, and S. Rego. 2009. The impact of private equity ownership on corporate tax avoidance. Working Paper 10-004, Harvard Business School.
    5. Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 22 (2): 71–98.
    6. Bonner, S., J. Davis, and B. Jackson. 1992. Expertise in corporate tax planning: The issue at the identification stage. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (Supplement): 1–28.
    7. Carcello, J.V., and A.L.Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (9): 55-69.
    8. Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
    9. Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng, and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive than Non‐Family Firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95: 41–61.
    10. Cheong, E. H., and Y. S. Woo. 2016. The effect of tax avoidance on discretionary expenses: Evidence from Korea. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 13(1): 24-31.
    11. Col, B., & Patel, S. 2019. Going to Haven? Corporate social responsibility and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Ethics 154: 1033-1050.
    12. Dhaliwal, D., S. Huang, W. Moser, and R. Pereira. 2011. Corporate tax avoidance and the level and valuation of firm cash holdings. 2011 American Accounting Association Annual Meeting - Tax Concurrent Sessions.
    13. Duan, T., Ding, R., Hou, W., & Zhang, J. Z. 2018. The burden of attention: CEO publicity and tax avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 87: 90–101.
    14. Dunn, K.A., B.W. Mayhew. 2004. Audit Firm Industry Specialization and Client Disclosure Quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9: 35-58.
    15. Dyreng, S.D., M.Hanlon, and E.L. Maydew. 2010. The Effects of Executives on Corporate Tax Avoidance. The Accounting Review 8: 1163-1189.
    16. Elder, R., D. Harris, and J. Zhou. 2008. Tax Consulting and Reported Weakness in Internal Control. Working paper, Syracuse University Whitman School of Management.
    17. Ferguson, A., J. Francis, and D. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 429–448.
    18. Francis, J., K. Reichelt, and D. Wang. 2005. The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review 80 (1): 113–136.
    19. Francis, J. R., and M. D. Yu. 2009. Big Four Office Size and Audit Quality. The Accounting Review 84(5): 1521–1552.
    20. Frank, M., L. Lynch, and S. Rego. 2009. Are Financial and tax reporting aggressiveness reflective of broader corporate policies? The Accounting Review 84 (2): 467-498.
    21. Gallemore, J., and E. Labro. 2015. The importance of the internal information environment for tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics 60 (1): 149–67.
    22. Godfrey, J. M. & Hamilton, J. (2005). The impact of R&D intensity on demand for specialist auditor services. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 22, No. 1: 55–93.
    23. Graham, J., and A. Tucker. 2006. Tax Shelters and Corporate Debt Policy. Journal of Financial Economics 81: 563–94.
    24. Gravelle, J.G. 2009. Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion. National Tax Journal 62 (4): 727-753.
    25. Gul, F. A., D. Wu, and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review 88 (6): 1993–2023.
    26. Gupta, S., and K. Newberry. 1997. Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates: Evidence from Longitudinal Data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 16: 1–34.
    27. Grubert, H., T. Goodspeed and D. Swenson. 1993. Explaining the Low Taxable Income of Foreign-Controlled Companies in the United States. Studies in International Taxation. University of Chicago Press.
    28. Hammersley, J.S. 2006. Pattern identification and industry specialist auditors. The Accounting Review 81 (2): 309-336.
    29. Haislip, J. Z., Peters, G. F., & Richardson, V. J. 2016. The effect of auditor IT expertise on internal controls. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 20: 1–15.
    30. Hogan, C. E., and D. C. Jeter. 1999. Industry Specialization by Auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18: 1–17.
    31. Hogan, B., and T. Noga. 2015. Auditor‐provided tax services and long‐term tax avoidance. Review of Accounting and Finance 14 (3): 285–305.
    32. Horngren, C.T., G. Foster, and S. M. Dator. 1996. Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, 9th Edition.
    33. Horngren, C.T., M.D. Srikant, and M.F. George. 2006. Cost Accounting, 12th Edition.
    34. Huang, M.J., H. Chen. R. C. Rickards. 2018. The Effects of IFRS Adoption on Tax Avoidance in Europe Mei-Juh Huang. Journal of Management and Business Research (Taiwan) 35(1): 57-78.
    35. Siegfried , J.J. 1972. The relationship between economic structure and the effect of political influence: Empirical evidence from the corporation income tax program. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin.
    36. Stanley, J. D., and F. T. DeZoort. 2007. Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: An analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26 (2): 131–59.
    37. Jones C, Temouri Y, Cobham A. 2018. Tax Haven Networks and the Role of the Big 4 Accountancy Firms. Journal of World Business 53(2), 177–193.
    38. Kerr, J. 2019. The value relevance of taxes: International evidence on the proxy for profitability role of tax surprise. Journal of Accounting & Economics 67: 297–305.
    39. Kovermann, J., and P. Velte. 2019. The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance - A literature review. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 36: 1-29.
    40. Krishnan, G.V. 2003. Audit Quality and the Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory 22 (1): 109-126.
    41. Laplante, S. K., H. A. Skaife, L. A. Swenson, D. D. Wangerin. 2019. Limits of tax regulation: Evidence from strategic R&D classification and the R&D tax credit. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 38 (2): 89-105.
    42. Lee, R. J., and H. S. Kao. 2018. The Impacts of IFRSs and Auditor on Tax Avoidance. Advances in Management & Applied Economics 8 (6): 17-53.
    43. Lisowsky, P. 2010. Seeking shelter: empirically modeling tax shelters using financial statement information. The Accounting Review 85 (5): 1693-1720.
    44. Liu, L.‐L., X. Xie, Y.‐S. Chang, and D. A. Forgione. 2017. New clients, audit quality, and audit partner industry expertise: evidence from Taiwan, International Journal of Auditing 21(3): 288–303.
    45. McGuire, S. T., T. C. Omer, and D. Wang. 2012. Tax avoidance: Does tax‐specific industry expertise make a difference? The Accounting Review 87 (3): 975–1003.
    46. Minnick, K., and T. Noga. 2010. Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management? Journal of Corporate Finance 16 (5): 703–18.
    47. OPEC. 2000. Report to the 2000 ministerial council meeting and recommendations by the committee on fiscal affairs.
    48. Owhoso, V. E.; W. F. Messier; and J. G. Lynch. 2002. Error Detection by Industry‐Specialized Teams during Sequential Audit Review. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (12): 883–900.
    49. Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. Ohloft‐Rego. 2003. Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 491–521.
    50. Rego, S. 2003. Tax‐Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (4): 805–833.
    51. Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. 2010. National and office‐specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (3): 647–86.
    52. Sikka,P., H. Willmott. 2013. The tax avoidance industry: Accountancy firms on the make. Critical Perspectives on International Business 9 (4): 415-443.
    53. Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Product differentiation in auditing: Auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issues. Vancouver: The Canadian Certified General Accountants Research Foundation.
    54. Solomon, I., M. D. Shields, and O. R. Whittington. 1999. What Do Industry‐Specialist Auditors Know? Journal of Accounting Research 37: 191–208.
    55. Stickney, C., and V. McGee. Effective Corporate Tax Rates. 1982. The Effect of Size, Capital Intensity, Leverage, and Other Factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1: 125–52
    56. Wilkie, P., and S. Limberg. 1990. The Relationship between Firm Size and Effective Tax Rate: A Reconciliation of Zimmerman and Porcano. Journal of the American Taxation Association 11 (2): 76–91.
    57. Wilson, R. 2009. An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review 84 (3): 969-999
    58. Xie, H. 2001. The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 76 (3): 357-373
    59. Zimmerman, J. 1983. Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 119–49.

    下載圖示 校內:2025-06-02公開
    校外:2025-06-02公開
    QR CODE