| 研究生: |
張文俊 Chang, Wen-Chun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
利用約略集合理論作供應商的分類與選擇 The Classification and Selection of Suppliers Using Rough Set Theory |
| 指導教授: |
陳梁軒
Chen, Liang-Shiuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 70 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 供應商選擇 、約略集合理論 、決策規則 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | rough set theory, supplier selection, decision rules |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:116 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
面對全球化和競爭激烈的挑戰,企業透過供應鏈管理,在全球化的競爭市場達到降低成本、提高利潤和增加企業競爭優勢。如何從眾多的優劣供應商中挑選符合企業本身需求的廠商,並建立良好穩固的供應商關係,一起合作參與供應鏈管理的規劃、流程設計和資訊分享,將是供應鏈管理成功的最初步要求。為了進行供應商的選擇,企業必須事先收集與供應商的相關資料。隨著資訊科技的發達,使資料的收集整理工作更容易進行,因此如何從收集的資料中彙整處理成有用的資訊提供企業使用,便成為近來熱門的議題。除此之外,考量到資料本身可能因為人為或不可控制因素造成的不正確 (imprecision)、不確定(uncertainty)、模糊(vagueness)或不完整(incompleteness) 的情形,和同時處理定性和定量資料時分析的困難性,本研究擬使用約略集合理論(rough set theory)來克服上述情況。透過此理論方法對供應商資料進行歸納推導,找出供應商評等的關聯性績效指標和建立分類與選擇的規則庫,提供決策者參考和使用,並運用至預測供應商績效評估結果。模擬資料的分析證實本研究所提出的供應商分類與選擇方法能夠達到避免不必要的全面性供應商審核與評估,降低供應商選擇的處理時間和提高效率,並能選擇出合理的最合適供應商。且藉由約略集合理論推導得到的決策規則,其預測供應商績效表現的效果不錯,證實決策規可以幫助使用者預測供應商的績效評估結果。
Facing with the globalization and intense competition, enterprises apply Supply Chain Management (SCM) to reduce costs, raise profits, and gain the business competitive advantages in the world market. In performing SCM, the first step is to select the suitable supplier from a number of supplier candidates for meeting the company’s needs. Then the company can establish a firm-supplier relationship to design the SCM process together. Therefore, the data collection and analysis of supplier candidates are very important prior to supplier selection. In addition, the data obtained may be of imprecision, vagueness and incompleteness in nature. In the analyses, it’s also difficult to deal with the qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously. In this research, we used rough set theory to overcome the data process and analysis problems. Through rough set theory, we can induce the decision rules from the supplier data and find out the key performance factors of suppliers’ evaluation. We not only established a supplier classification and selection rule base, but used these rules to predicate the supplier’s performance. From the simulation analysis, we concluded that the proposed supplier classification and selection method can avoid unnecessary suppliers’ examination, decrease the process time of the supplier selection, and increase the efficiency of selection effort. The supplier selected by the proposed approach can achieve the required conditions.
Banker, R.D. and Khosla, I.S., “Economics of operations management: A research perspective,” Journal of Operations Management, 12, 423-425 (1995).
Barbarosoğlu, G. and Yazgaç, T., “An application of the analytic hierarchy process to the supplier selection problem,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 38(1), 14-21 (1997).
Bharadwaj, N., “Investigating the decision criteria used in electronic components procurement,” Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 317-329 (2004).
Błaszcyński, J. and Słowiński, R., “Incremental induction of decision rules from dominance-based rough approximations,” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 82(2), 1-12 (2003).
Carter, J.R. and Narasimhan, R., “Is purchasing really strategic ? ,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(1), 20-28 (1996).
Chaudhry, S., Forst, F. and Zydiak, L., “Vendor selection with price break,” European Journal of Operational Research, 70, 52-66 (1993).
Cook, R.L., “Case-based reasoning systems in purchasing: Applications development,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(1), 32-39 (1997).
de Boer, L., Labro, E. and Morlacchi, P., “A review of methods supporting supplier selection,” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7, 75-89 (2001).
De, S.K. and Krishna, P.R., “Clustering web transactions using rough approximation,” Fuzzy Sets and System, 148, 131-138 (2004).
Degraeve, Z. and Roodhooft, F., “Improving the efficiency of the purchasing process using total cost of ownership information: The case of heating electrodes at Cockerill Sambre S.A.,” European Journal of Operational Research, 112, 42-53 (1999).
Degraeve, Z., Labro, E. and Roodhooft, F., “An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective,” European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 34-58 (2000).
Dickson, G., “An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions,” Journal of Purchasing, 2, 28-41 (1966).
Dimitras, A.I., Słowiński, R., Susmaga, R. and Zopounidis, C. , “Business failure prediction using rough sets,” European Journal of Operational Research, 114, 263-280 (1999).
Ellram, L.M., “Total cost of Ownership: An analysis approach for purchasing,” Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 25(8), 4-23 (1995).
Ellram, L.M., Zsidisin, G.A., Siferd, S.P. and Stanley, M.J., “The impact of purchasing and supply management activities on corporate success,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(1), 4-20 (2002).
Ghodsypour, S.H. and O’Brien, C., “A decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process and linear programming,” International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 199-212 (1998).
Goh, M., Lau, G.T. and Neo, L., “Strategic role and contribution of purchasing in Singapore: A survey of CEO,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 35(4), 12-22 (1999).
Holt, G.D., “Which contractor selection methodology ?,” International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 153-164 (1998).
Hong, G.H., Park, S.C., Jang, D.S. and Rho, H.M., “An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship,” Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 629-639 (2005).
Jackson, A.G., LeClair, S.R. and Pawlak, Z., “Rough sets applied to the discovery of materials knowledge,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 279, 14-21 (1998).
Katsikeas, C., Paparoidamis, N. and Katsikea, E., “Supply source selection criteria: The impact of supplier performance on distributor performance,” Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 755-764 (2004).
Kryszkiewicz, M., “Rough set approach to incomplete information system,” Information Science, 112, 39-49 (1998).
Kusiak, A., “Rough set theory: A data mining tool for semiconductor manufacturing,” IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 24(1), 44-50 (2001).
Kusiak, A. and Kurasek, C., “Data mining of printed-circuit board defects,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(2), 191-196 (2001).
Lee, E.K., Ha, S. and Kim, S.K., “Supplier selection and management system consider relationship in supply chain management,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3), 307-318 (2001).
Liu, F.H. and Hai, H.L., “The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier,” International Journal of Production Economics, 97, 308-317 (2005).
Mandal, A. and Deshmukh, S.G., “Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM),” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(6), 52-59 (1994).
Martínez, I.G. and Pérez, R.B., “Making decision in case-based systems using probabilities and rough sets,” Knowledge-based Systems, 16, 205-213 (2003).
Mi, J.S., Wu, W.Z. and Zhang, W.X., “Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model,” Information Science, 159, 255-272 (2004).
Mummalaneni, V., Dubas, K.M. and Chao, C., “Chinese purchasing managers’ preference and trade-off in supplier selection and performance evaluation,” Industrial Marketing Management, 25(2), 115-124 (1996).
Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S. and Mendez, D., “Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: An empirical examination,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(3), 28-37 (2001).
Noci, G., “Designing ‘green’ vendor rating systems for the assessment of a supplier’s environmental performance,” European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 103-114 (1997).
Nydick, R.J. and Hill, R.P., “Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure ,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28(2), 31-36 (1992).
Patton, W.W., “Use of human judgment models in industrial buyer’s vendor selection decision,” Industrial Marketing Management, 25, 135-149 (1996).
Pawlak, Z., “Rough sets,” International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences, 11, 341-356 (1982).
Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets. Theory Aspects of Reasoning about Data, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991).
Pawlak, Z., “Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support,” European Journal of Operational Research, 99, 48-57 (1997).
Pawlak, Z. and Słowiński, R., “Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis ,” European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443-459 (1994).
Petroni, A. and Braglia, M., “Vendor selection using principal component analysis,” Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), 63-69 (2000).
Porter, M.E., “Strategy and the Internet,” Harvard Business Review, March, 63-78 (2001).
Predki, B. and Wilk, Sz.,“Rough Set Based Data Exploration Using ROSE System ,”In: Ras, Z.W. and Skowron, A. (Eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 172-180 (1999).
Questier, F., Arnaut-Rollier, I., Walczak, B., and Massart, D.L., “Application of rough set theory to feature selection for unsupervised clustering,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 63, 155-167 (2002).
Sarkis, J. and Talluri, S., “A model for strategic supplier selection,” Journal of Supply Chain Managemen, 38(1), 18-28 (2002).
Shen, L. and Loh, H.T., “Applying rough sets to timing decision,” Decision Support System, 37, 583-597 (2004).
Słowiński, R. (ed.), Intelligent Decision Support, Handbook of Applications and Advances of The Rough Set Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1992).
Swiniarski, R.W. and Skowron, A., “Rough set methods in feature selection and recognition,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 833-849 (2003).
Talluri, S., “A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids,” European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 171-180 (2002).
Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R., “Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max-min approach,” European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 543-552 (2003).
Tan, K.C., Kannan, V.R. and Handfield, R., “Supply chain management: Supplier performance and firm performance,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 34(3), 2-9 (1998).
Tay, E.H. and Shen, L., “Economic and financial prediction using rough sets model,” European Journal of Operational Research 141, 641-659 (2002).
Timmerman, E., “An approach to vender performance evaluation,” Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 22(4), 2-8 (1986).
Tsumoto, S., “Automated discovery of positive and negative knowledge in clinical databases,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, July/August, 56-62 (1999).
Turner, I., “An independent system for the evaluation contract tenders,” Journal of Operational Research Society, 39(6), 551-561 (1988).
Verma, R. and Pullman, M.E., “An analysis of the supplier selection process,” Omega, 26(6), 739-750 (1998).
Vokurka, J., Choobineh, J. and Vadi, L., “A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential suppliers,” International Journal of Operational Production Management, 16(12), 106-127 (1996).
Walczak, B. and Massart, D.L., “Tutorial rough set theory,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory System, 47, 1-16 (1999).
Wang, F.S., “On acquiring classification knowledge from noisy data based on rough set,” Expert Systems with Applications, 29, 49-64 (2005).
Weber, C.A. and Current, J.R., “A multiobjective approach to vendor selection process,” European Journal of Operational Research, 68(2), 173-184 (1993).
Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Benton, W.C., “Vendor selection criteria and methods,” European Journal of Operational Research, 50(1), 2-18 (1991).
Weber, C.A., Current, J.R. and Desai, A., “Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection,” European Journal of Operational Research, 108(1), 208-223 (1998).
Weber, C.A. and Desai, A., “Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers,” European Journal of Operational Research, 90(1), 142-155 (1996).
Weber, C.A. and Ellram, L.M., “Supplier selection using multiobjective programming,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 23(2), 3-14 (1993).
Wei, S., Zhang, J. and Li, Z., “A supplier-selecting system using a neural network,” In: IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Processing Systems, IEEE Press, New York, 468-471 (1997).
Wilk, Sz., Greco, S., Michałowski, W. and Słowiński, R., “Supporting triage of children with abdominal pain in the emergency room,” European Journal of Operational Research, 160, 696-709 (2005).
Willis, T.H., Hudson, C.R. and Pohlkamp, F., “Evaluation measures of just-in-time supplier performance,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 34(2), 1-6 (1993).
Wilson, E., “The relative importance of supplier selection criteria: A review and update,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 30(3), 35-41 (1994).
Zhang, H., Li, X., Liu, W., Li, B. and Zhang, Z., “An application of the AHP in 3PL vendor selection of a 4PL system,” 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2, 1225-1260 (2004).
校內:2031-06-14公開