簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳穎慧
Chen, Ying-Hui
論文名稱: 評估矯正牽引的埋伏齒-追蹤與模擬
Evaluation of Orthodontic Traction on Impacted Tooth - Tracking and Simulation
指導教授: 劉佳觀
Liu, Jia-Kuang
張志涵
Chang, Chih-Han
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 口腔醫學研究所
Institute of Oral Medicine
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 96
中文關鍵詞: 有限元素分析立體影像埋伏齒
外文關鍵詞: finite element, stereovision, impaction
相關次數: 點閱:90下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 雖然臨床上矯正治療有很高的成功率,但是對於矯正造成牙齒移動的機制仍然不完全清楚,牙齒的移動主要是由於矯正力傳到牙周韌帶與齒槽骨上造成齒槽骨的骨頭重塑作用,近年來文獻對傳統的壓力/張力成造骨頭重塑的理論提出質疑,而準確地觀察牙齒移動的資料對於研究矯正牙齒移動的機制是基本且重要的。因此本實驗目的是發展與驗證一個觀測矯正牙齒移動的系統,並且整合有限元素分析模擬矯正病人的施力初期牙齒移動以確認在模擬時重要的力學因子。本實驗架設兩台相機組成立體影像系統,在校正與驗證準確度之後,先用來測量一位病人口內矯正器的移動以進行系統操作評估;之後,再用來測量矯正埋伏齒的移動作為模擬時比對基礎。另外臨床上同時紀錄矯正埋伏齒施力方向與大小,進而比對利用有限元素方法模擬牙齒矯正時牙齒的移動。實驗結果顯示立體影像系統的準確度最大誤差小於2%。測量矯正牙齒的試驗研究中,測量矯正器之間距離呈現合理的變化;側門牙施力後18天移動大約0.5 mm,其中大約一半的移動出現在第一天,而矯正力移除後96小時,側門牙與正中門牙之間距離減少0.15 mm。 臨床上共追蹤五位有埋伏齒的病人;在臨床觀測上,埋伏齒一個月移動距離為0.2 mm到3.96 mm之間,而有限元素方法能有效地模擬出各個病人施力初期矯正牙齒的移動。然而,矯正初期因為牙周膜韌帶變形造成牙齒移動,與長期的移動不完全一致。

    With the high success rate in orthodontic treatments, the mechanism of tooth movement induced by orthodontic force is still unclear. It is generally agreed that this tooth movement is due from the alveolar bone remodeling, which is triggered by the orthodontic forces working on the periodontal ligaments. Recent studies question the simple principle of compression-tension remodeling concept. Accurately quantitative tracking information about the tooth movement during treatment is essential for this mechanism investigation. The aims of this study were to develop and validate a tracking system to monitor the tooth movement and integrated with a finite element simulation to simulate the initial orthodontic tooth movement for specific patients to identify important mechanical factors during simulation. A stereovision system, two cameras with their relative position calibrated, was developed and validated for the measurement of the brackets’ position within mouth. This system was then applied to track the tooth movement of patients with impacted tooth as a foundation to compare with the results of simulation. The direction and magnitude of the orthodontic force during treatments for each patient were also recorded. These mechanical as well as the tooth movement data would be employed on finite element model of individual patient to simulate orthodontic tooth movement. The accuracy validation result revealed that the stereovision measurement system presents a maximum error less than 2%. For the pilot study on patient tracking, the distance changes between each pair of bracket presented a reasonable monotone increasing or decreasing trends during treatment follow up. The lateral incisor moved about 0.5 mm during the 18 days’ tracking while approximately half of the movement occurred during the first day. At 96 hours after the elastic removed, the distance between central incisor and lateral incisor decreased by 0.15 mm consisted with the relapse phenomenon. Five patients with impacted tooth ware followed for their treatment outcomes. The impacted teeth moved ranged from 0.2 to 3.96 mm. Finite element results of the initial orthodontic tooth movement can be simulated, semi-quantitatively, on individual patient condition. However, initial orthodontic tooth movement, due to PDL deformation, did not fully consistent to long-term tooth movement.

    中文摘要 1 Abstract 2 誌謝 4 List of Tables 8 List of Figures 9 Chapter 1 Introduction 13 1-1Background 13 1-2 Literature review 15 1-3 Motivation 18 1-4 Objective …18 Chapter 2 Clinical Pilot study 20 2-1 Objective 20 2-2 Material and methods 20 2-2-1 Flow chart 20 2-2-2 Patient selection 21 2-2-3 Measurements 21 2-3 Results 25 2-3-1 Patients included in these study 25 2-3-2 Factors of impacted incisors 25 2-4 Discussion and Conclusion 29 Chapter 3 Material and methods 30 3-1 Experimental flow chart 30 3-2 Stereovision system 31 3-2-1 Setup 31 3-2-2 Camera calibration 33 3-3 Accuracy validation of the stereovision system 34 3-4 Clinical observation 35 3-4-1 Clinical observation of pilot study 35 3-4-2 Clinical observation of impacted incisors 37 3-5 Finite element analysis 38 3-5-1 Material properties 38 3-5-2 3D model construction in pilot study 39 3-5-3 3-D finite element Model 41 3-5-4 Boundary and loading conditions 43 Chapter 4 Results 45 4-1 Accuracy of stereovision system 45 4-2 Results of pilot study in single patient 46 4-3 Clinical observation of follow up 47 4-3-1 patient included in the study 47 4-3-2 Clinical tracking 48 4-3-3 Force and displacement 60 4-3-4 Actual movement of bracket 63 4-3-5 Clinical tracking before and after force application 67 4-4 Finite element analysis 68 4-4-1 Patient 2 68 4-4-2 Patient 4 69 4-4-3 Analysis model of tooth 13 with bone block 73 Chapter 5 Discussion 78 5-1 Stereovision system 78 5-1-1 Accuracy 78 5-1-2 Limitation of the stereovision system 79 5-2 Clinical observation 80 5-3 3D superimposition 81 5-4 Finite element model 83 5-4-1Single patient pilot study 83 5-4-2 Results of finite element analysis 83 5-4-3 Simplified bone block model 84 5-4-4 Material properties 85 5-5 Limitations 87 5-6 Future works 88 Chapter 6 Conclusion 89 References 90 Appendix 94

    Andersen KL, Pedersen EH, Melsen B (1991). Material parameters and stress profiles within the periodontal ligament. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 99(5):427-440.

    Bourauel C, Vollmer D, Jager A (2000). Application of bone remodeling theories in the simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie 61(4):266-279.

    Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B (2005). The finite element method: a tool to study orthodontic tooth movement. Journal of dental research 84(5):428-433.

    Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B (2009). Strains in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by finite element. Orthodontics & craniofacial research 12(2):120-128.

    Farah JW, Craig RG, Sikarskie DL (1973). Photoelastic and finite element stress analysis of a restored axisymmetric first molar. Journal of biomechanics 6(5):511-520.

    Field C, Ichim I, Swain MV, Chan E, Darendeliler MA, Li W et al. (2009). Mechanical responses to orthodontic loading: a 3-dimensional finite element multi-tooth model. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 135(2):174-181.

    Galley SA, Michalek DJ, Donahue SW (2006). A fatigue microcrack alters fluid velocities in a computational model of interstitial fluid flow in cortical bone. Journal of biomechanics 39(11):2026-2033.

    Gonzales C, Hotokezaka H, Arai Y, Ninomiya T, Tominaga J, Jang I et al. (2009). An in vivo 3D micro-CT evaluation of tooth movement after the application of different force magnitudes in rat molar. Angle Orthod 79(4):703-714.

    Gonzales C HH, Arai Y, Ninomiya T, Tominaga J, Jang I (2009). An in vivo 3D micro-CT evaluation of tooth movement after the application of different force magnitudes in rat molar. Angle Orthod 79:703-714.

    Jones ML, Hickman J, Middleton J, Knox J, Volp C (2001). A validated finite element method study of orthodontic tooth movement in the human subject. Journal of orthodontics 28(1):29-38.

    Jonsdottir SH, Giesen EB, Maltha JC (2012). The biomechanical behaviour of the hyalinized periodontal ligament in dogs during experimental orthodontic tooth movement. European journal of orthodontics 34(5):542-546.

    Kojima Y, Fukui H (2005). Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 127(5):542-551.

    Liu DX WH, Chun-Ling W, Ling WC, Ping S, Xiao Y (2011). Modulus of elasticity of human periodontal ligament by optical measurement and numerical simulation. Angle Orthod 81(2):229-236.

    Marangalou JH GF, Mizakouchaki B (2009). Numerical simulation of orthodontic bone remodeling. Orthodontic waves 68:64-71.

    Melsen B (1999). Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 69(2):151-158.

    Melsen B CP, Dalstra M, Kraft DC (2007). The importanvce of force levels in relation to tooth movement. Semin Orthod 13:220-233.

    Middleton J, Jones ML, Wilson AN (1990). Three-dimensional analysis of orthodontic tooth movement. Journal of biomedical engineering 12(4):319-327.

    Paneo ND EC, Pacheco MC, Gouvea JP (2010). 3D simulation of orthodontic tooth movement. Dental Press J Orthod 15(5):98-108.

    Qian Y, Fan Y, Liu Z, Zhang M (2008). Numerical simulation of tooth movement in a therapy period. Clinical biomechanics 23 Suppl 1:S48-52.

    Qian YL, Liu Z, Fan YB (2010). Numerical simulation of canine bodily movement. Int J Numer Meth Bio 26(2):157-163.

    Rees JS, Jacobsen PH (1997). Elastic modulus of the periodontal ligament. Biomaterials 18(14):995-999.

    Su MZ CH, Chiang YC, Cheng JH, Fuh LJ, Wang CY, Lin CP (2013). Modeling viscoelastic behavior of periodontal ligament with nonlinear finite element analysis. J Dent Science 8:121-128.

    Tanne K, Sakuda M, Burstone CJ (1987). Three-dimensional finite element analysis for stress in the periodontal tissue by orthodontic forces. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 92(6):499-505.

    Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram NC, Sandler J, O'Brien K (2009). Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 135(4):480-485.

    Toms SR, Eberhardt AW (2003). A nonlinear finite element analysis of the periodontal ligament under orthodontic tooth loading. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics 123(6):657-665.

    Van Leeuwen EJ, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Von den Hoff JW, Wagener FA, Maltha JC (2010). Rate of orthodontic tooth movement after changing the force magnitude: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Orthodontics & craniofacial research 13(4):238-245.

    Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC (2006). Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 9(4):257-270.

    Verna C, Dalstra M, Lee TC, Cattaneo PM, Melsen B (2004). Microcracks in the alveolar bone following orthodontic tooth movement: a morphological and morphometric study. European journal of orthodontics 26(5):459-467.

    Xia Z, Chen J (2013). Biomechanical validation of an artificial tooth-periodontal ligament-bone complex for in vitro orthodontic load measurement. Angle Orthod 83(3):410-417.

    Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Nishikawa H, Nakamura S, Mikami T (1991). Measurements of dental cast profile and three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 38(4):360-365.

    下載圖示 校內:2016-08-29公開
    校外:2016-08-29公開
    QR CODE